Who ever said geniuses have no sense of humour? Roflmfao! :DDDDDD

Thanks for all 'em u do :-)

Hi JeffreyK

If you right click on the video that you want to download while the video is playing. There should be a pop-up menu which has a Save video as (5th item down). Hope this helps you.

:-))))))

E=mu (if u=c^2)
:-)

I agree as well, several cards have girls with way too much and/or bad makeup (Afrodita, Boroka, Chiara (classic), Dorothy, Henessy, Mona Lee, Susana Melo, etc)..
On the other hand, some makeup can really enhance a girls face (Conny, Coxy, Eve Angel, Holly Anderson, Tracy Gold to name a few).
As for Melisa, her first batch of cards is ok, after that it just gets worse and worse.
It shouldn't be overdone, less is usually more I agree.

going way off topic here...
but I thought this was funny...

top picture is an Emu
bottom Picture is Albert Einstein

remarkable resemblance?

I have repeatedly attempted to download the movies for the last 2 Desk Babes card without success from the website. The cards are: Maya Grand, f0069 and Brynn Tyler, f0068. I have been unable to discover any drop down tabs for unloading or any functional tabs on the movie medallion, with the exception of the functionality of the volume and enlargement of the screen.

No where in the Fax or Customer Service have I seen anything relating to this problem, which I have been experiencing.

Any suggestions?

It's not only that, the language is not exactly ad-modicum...

@TheEmu, Oh thats a relief..sometimes the prospect of changing details/paths in zillions of scene files can be a daunting one. Dankeschön

Edit: In the new Club based Transmats I like the use of the time coordinates shader alternating with various clones of the dancer. Especially the way the tunnels behave & models move. The timing of the way you've made all opacities change is very immersive indeed. The progressive tunnel of flowers Indian Archway and infinite Perlin noise have similar immersive effect, very 3D and adaptable..

@EverthangForever - Yes everything is backwardly compatible.

@TheEmu, wow that was quick with the shares updates..THANKS a lot.
Well that does it..I have to get PaintShopPro now...
I've presume any shaders of same name are backwardly compatible and set extract to replace all
Now peeps have to remember to check updates of shaders (if any) are transferred to their working directories.
Wonderful work @TheEmu..outstanding !!❤️

@EverthangForever

Coincidently I have just uploaded a set of updated Transmat scenes in which the fire tunnel is less overwhelming. The tweak to do this is to reduce its opacity via the scene file, either via the Tunnel A shader's Tanslucency uniform, or via the opacity: or opacity animation when using the framebuffer.

I have just uploaded a number of updated zips tp TheEmusNest.eu and the direct links to the updated files are

• http://www.theemusnest.eu/scenes/Zips/GlslSandbox%20Scenes/GlslSandbox.zip
  
  
• http://www.theemusnest.eu/scenes/Zips/ShaderToy%20Scenes/ShaderToy.zip
  
  
• http://www.theemusnest.eu/scenes/Zips/Experiments/Tunnels.zip
  
  
• http://www.theemusnest.eu/scenes/Zips/TheEmusTunnels.zip
  
  
• http://www.theemusnest.eu/scenes/Zips/TheEmusTransmats.zip
  

The updates to the GlslSandbox and Shadertoy zips comprise

• a few newly adapted scenes
  
  
• several shaders have been modified to have transparent backgrounds
  rather than black, grey or white so that you can put clips behind them
  
  
• the shaders I use for the Transmat scenes have been optimised
  

The optimised shaders have then been used in the Experiments with Tunnels and the Tunnels and Transmats scenes. Previously the Transmat C series were just about as much as my laptop's Intel Integrated Graphics Processor could handle though it was no problem for the NVIIA GPU, but with the optimised versions these scenes are perfectly smooth using either GPU

I have modified the Transmats by tweaking the opacities so that the fire tunnel is less overwhelming and the girls spend a little more time at each destination.

I have also included a new Transmat D set of scenes where an additional effect is seen, this being a set of "echoes in time and space" of the performers which fade in, grow and fade out while the transmat is operating.

Gwen , look at her eyes and her smile (yes im a weirdo who looks at the faces first )

Kami , amazingly pretty and the number one choice when I deliberately pick a show

Susan , impressively flexible

@TheEmu
Thanks for that clarification. '..probably the best thing to do is to apply an anti-aliasing step to the final image ' ..sounds like a practical solution to the problem. I will experiment with different sized images & revisit @Lezardo's anti-alias shader to see if that can be worked around & applied somehow in there also, although the 'jaggies' probably requires an anti-alias hard code change somewhere in the shader someday, to properly optimise the result as you say. The Complex functions shader incl. progressive steps is really awesome as a concept.

With respect to the Unknown - e#22678.2 - Modified.fsh ...& recent uniforms, we appear to have been engulfed with the fiery background now (Reds/yellows) swamping the torus. I tried a barrage of tweaks to try to send it back Z-wise in 3D camera however only managed to change overall the colour (line 191) not the background's pervasiveness/distance from the camera, eg (above pic):
191 // was color = hsv(d, 1.0, 1.0)*mind*45.0; // Background
192 color = hsv(d, 0.3, 1.0)*mind*45.0; // Background
193 return color;
Edit: Ooh Ahh..just saw Melena Tara spinning back to dressed mode on fullscreen..I thought a few of these transitions slipped through..don't mind at all .. as long as the hanging ones stay away 😉 lol.

Eileen - She's having fun putting on a show for us and I enjoy every minute of it.

Ok. Let's get this thing clear here. I understand that non-Native English people may get a few words ***** in English. I do it all the time in Spanish :(

Eye BROWS are the hairy bits ABOVE the eyes. Eye LASHES are the hairy bits growing on the very edge of the eye LIDS (top and bottom).

Melisa's eyebrows look fine to me. Her eyelashes are so heavily covered in mascara, they just don't look natural and are completely tangled together. Shabba's eyelashes or just a joke! :(

@Shodan: You're probably right of course. You only really see the details in photos :)

@Shodan084
I agree... talking about crazy eyebrows I though of something like Shabba - Happy Ship. Now that's a makeup disaster!

I've just been watching that card and you'd have to be looking REALLY close to notice that her eyebrows are 'enhanced', this thread is a storm in a teacup.

Just more Melisa please! haha!

It really serious?
Tracy has 5 solo cards ... and 0 duo card?

... and still nothing duo cards ...

Would love to see these being used!

Here the data from the DeskBabes website:
European: 622 cards
Asian: 9 cards
Black: 4 cards
Latina: 14 cards
Middle east: 13 cards

all: 700 cards
difference: 38 cards not counted

###

Here the data from the DeskBabes and DeskBabes interactive in store of the software (version: 1.2.0.84):
European: 613 cards + 65 cards
Asian: 9 cards + 2 cards
Black: 4 cards + 0 cards
Latina: 22 cards + 0 cards
Middle East: 11 cards + 4 cards

all: 631 cards + 69 cards

In DeskBabes are:
2 cards Asian and Latina
3 cards European and Asian
3 cards European and Black
13 cards European and Latina
7 cards European and Middle East

613 + 9 + 4 + 22 +11 = 659
2 + 3 + 3 + 13 + 7 = 28 (double counted)
659 - 28 = 631 cards (only DeskBabes cxxxx)

But on the website of the cards only one of the "Type" are displayed.

Here are the 28 double counted cards:
c0118 c0122 c0248 c0250 c0252 c0255 c0279
c0283 c0284 c0329 c0331 c0333 c0345 c0347
c0349 c0352 c0354 c0355 c0451 c0453 c0454
c0493 c0494 c0495 c0496 c0527 c0529 c0532

Checked with my own batch files, and text files (with various categories).
I can not verify with the VGHD software because I do not have these cards in my collection.

The pictures show an indirect comparison in VirtuaGirl store.

@EverthangForever

In the edit to your previous post you said "I'm wondering if the Complex Functions shader is having difficulty rendering some of the more concentrated iterations."

I assume that you are talking about the result of using the Complex Function shader when using it to distort an image. If so then what you are seeing as "jaggies" are probably due to the finite pixel sizes involved. In principle this could be overcome by using a much higher resolution for the original image - but that is not practical. The problem is exactly that which used to be seen when rescaling any digital image or font, but which is much less often seen nowadays because anti-aliasing techniques are used. It would be a good idea if anti-aliasing were built into the Complex Functions shader, but I do not have it as a high priority on my "to do" list.

Update: What happens when you use a "texture" is that when the shader is determining the colour to use for a particular pixel in the image being generated it determines what point in the texture image corresponds to the pixel in the final image and uses its colour. In general this will not correspond exactly to a pixel in the texture and the actual colour used will be some sort of average over the nearest pixels in the texture. This is done by the GLSL function texture2D.

This works quite well if the texture image is smaller than the image being generated (though a simple minded averaging can lead to a blocky final image) but has problems when the texture image is much larger than the image being generated. In this case two neighbouring pixels in the image being generated may correspond to widely separated pixels in the texture. Because they are widely separated any averaging over neighbouring texture pixels does not help because the two points in the texture are too far away from each other to be neighours.

Strange as it may seem you might actualy get a more smoothly coloured result by using a smaller texture, but of course you then ***** from the lower resolution in those parts of the final image that are not affected by the relative scaling of the generated image and the texture. As I mentioned above probably the best thing to do is to apply an anti-aliasing step to the final image.

Things are, of course, rather more complicated than what I have described, but it gives the gist of the problem.

I absolutely agree with Corax77

Melisa's faked eyelashes are terrible.

It's the reason why I only bought one of her new cards and I won't buy more. Too much Makeup at all for her. I was very disappointed.

Playful ***** and Tea :)

@Corax77
100% sign

Hmm... I can post images...

Vinna Reed looks beautiful :)

I wish Anna Tatu, Playful ***** and Deny came back!

Tracy Smile

@Jununger. This one of Melisa appears to be a Totem image. The other is most definitely NOT! Don't go there... Scary people ;)

Oops. I just tried posting both a .jpg and a .png file. of Melisa. Seems the website bugs are still around :(

Click on the OP's link. It's safe :)

Not to be a nag... but why don't you attach the images to the post? If it's Totem content then there won't be any problems. I for one don't like clicking on links to sites I don't know or trust...

Can somene post the images in the topic... please..? 😐

I have to agree that your second link shows some damned ugly people who have no clue :´-(

Melisa however doesn't look so bad in that extreme close-up. Her eyebrows are plucked and painted a little but that looks pretty normal to me for a well-groomed lady.

The eye LASHES however... ARRRRGGGHHHH!!! They look like something growing under my bed in the corner right now! Not sure if it's a spider's nest or something worse... I'll scrape some of it into a test-tube and get it tested ;)

does anyone know whether new cards by Cameron Dee come?

New numbers after almost a year. I get on a regular basis to check to see if there there is anything new for guys like me, who desire something more exotic. Haven't had much luck. Sucks to love a software and would like to spend money on it but can't. Kinda wish they would be honest and say that they aren't interested.

VirtuaGirl

1808 Cards
Euro 92.03%
Asian 1.85%
Black 0.99%
Latina 2.15%
Middle East 1.54%Desk Babes

700 Cards
Euro 88.85%
Asian 1.28%
Black 0.57%
Latina 2%
Middle East 1.85%

Claims to have 700 cards but adds up to 662 when adding up “Type”, which explains why Euro went down.

Brynn Tyler sexy legs

Für mich liegt es ganz klar an den zu krass überschminkten Mädels. Ich habe auch gerade einen Thread dazu aufgemacht, da ich meinen Unmut über einen neuen Makup Trend äußern mußte, der für mich jedes noch so hübsche Mädchen entstellt.

Komisch, daß PapaJango ausgerechnet Melisa anspricht, denn gerade sie ist ein Paradebeispiel dafür (geworden). Sie hätte all die Schminke gar nicht nötig ...auch mit 29 nicht! Und als i-Tüpfelchen dann noch widerlich angemalten Augenbrauen. Das sieht so abartig schlimm aus, ich kanns echt nicht mehr sehen.

WARUM NUR? Warum muß man Brauen noch anmalen? Ich habe noch nie einem Mädel ins Gesicht geblickt und dabei gedacht: "Hey, die hat aber ausdruckslose Augenbrauen. Da müßte sie aber echt mal was dagegen unternehmen!".

Es sieht einfach nur fake aus und total billig. Für mich einer der größten turn offs überhaupt, obwohl es für manch einen sicherlch trivial erscheint. Möglicherweise denkt ihr aber genau so und habt es nur noch nicht damit in Verbindung gebracht.

Das in meinem Thread gepostete Bild von Melisa spricht jedenfalls für sich selbst (und ich war eigentlich immer sehr angetan von ihr!):

fs2.directupload.net/images/user/150704/tmsu69vk.jpg

Total verklumpte Wimpern, dann diese übermalten Brauen und insgesamt sowieso viel zu viel Makeup. Und dann nennen sich die Leute, die sowas verbrechen auch noch "Makeup Artists". *kopfschüttel*

Natürliche Schönheit ist heutzutage offenbar nur noch einen Sch... wert. Traurige Gesellschaft. Wie man wohl merkt, macht mich das sogar richtig wütend, da das einfach nur unnötig und kontraproduktiv ist, aber viele scheinen das einfach nur toll zu finden. Unfassbar.

just my two cents...

Hey there,

It's awful to see how makeup can ruin a girls facial expression. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against makup, but as the saying is: less is more! Think about it!

Lipsticks, eyeliners, a bit makeup here and there and slightly trimmed brows ...that's OK. BUT: These ***** trend to brush the eyebrows is absolutely sickening! This looks so fake, I can't bear to look. Why in hell are girls or "makeup artists" doing this? I always thought that girls are using makup to beautify herself and not to look like a damn alien! I see beautiful girls in my clique, in town, at facebook and now here on VG, following these disgusting makeup trend.

If you intend in future to deface the beautiful girls here on VG, there will be no cards for me to purchase anymore. I guessed these ugly trend would disappear from the scene real soon but apparently it's the new ideal of beauty. It's a pity!

I was so happy, when I read about Melisas comeback and then I saw this (click to enlarge):

fs2.directupload.net/images/user/150704/tmsu69vk.jpg
http://www.directupload.net/file/u/38518/tmsu69vk_jpg.htm

So that's sexy, huh? I don't think so! The M.I.B. would shoot at her with good reason (no offence!).

And NO, this is not a matter of taste. This is pure self-***** and a hard blow against natural beauty!

Sorry, my english is not the best but I had to talk about it. I hope I don't have so see some of these excellent creations, when I come back to check the next updates on VG.:

fs1.directupload.net/images/user/150704/d9rs4juu.jpg
http://www.directupload.net/file/u/38518/d9rs4juu_jpg.htm

I don't want to make trouble or provoke somebody, but this ugliness has to come to an end!

Oh good, I had to rush out the door earlier, so I wasn't worried about getting the logo organised. I''ll add it later ...Yes using your complex set made the changes so progressive. Love that..and the transitions without masking are quite blendy the way you set them up. I'm not so worried about needing random functions anymore, its so easy to chop and choose combinations of textures with right-click in name trees now. Peeps can change the start func settings in as many copies of the scenes as they want to make. Some of the funcs are my favorites like with the escher type textures and @Lunarpups together. (above:-) Glad you like em.

Edit: updated 5th July ~ amended Complex Functions
by adding uniform: ContourDensity, int, 10,
~included SCNs for all group function starting positions.
~Added missing splash file. Zip http://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ComplexDomainTransmatGarden.zip is 66.7MB

VGHD Tracy 3K @2560x1440 WQHD Display

There should be 12 CPU Threads but ill didnt re-installed Win 7 yet....

@EverthangForever. I really liked your ComplexDomainTransmatGarden http://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ComplexDomainTransmatGarden.zip scene, nice mix of the transmat and older scenes. At first I had some trouble downloading it as the first two attempts resulted in inavlid zips, but the third attempt worked. I do get an error message

Root node: Couldn't load splash Info/large_logoELECTRICAveNewTheEmuTMCF.png

because the file is missing, but its not a problem because that doesn't stop it running.

Forgive me this chaos @TheEmu, I've revisited back where fractal garden series started ( before shaders) to use it as a sliding animation with selective opacity. The firewall tunnel of Transmats became a framebuffered set for the models to deep inspect close-up the effects on their journey inwards. Its intended to be run in its own name-tree multi, because by right-clicking you can avoid all the texture combinations that might be unaesthetic and move on to the next. So its manual change or it just gets more complex by @Emu's design. Nevertheless, nice with Blues Radio http://185.33.22.13:8030 as an experiment in motion & wonder that is virtually unlimited given that you've kept some earlier textures in ETImages/plaftexrot01/ and the Textures/ surfaces 215x215 folders.


Be forewarned: This update may not be ok for those prone to 'motion-sickness'.. so if you ***** from that be warned. Its really a celebration of complex domains so kudos Bardo et @TheEmu. cheers ;-) zip is 66.6MB

scenes.virtuastripper.net/ComplexDomainTransmatGarden.zip

I have Adriana M very sexy legs and let me tell you she has legs. Have a good weekend.

Very nice photos everyone.
Here is Adriana M one boob out.

Ms Lynne again

Well that has cleared up a lot of the ***** regarding only passing integer or floating point values from a scn file to a shader. In spite of this, it appears a lot can be predisposed in these switch tables which will allow SCN level ***** of the result via uniforms. Its exactly the outcome I was hoping for, and although its a lot of work to setup in shader, it makes scene construction (tinkering) a pleasure for many for years to come. Great these efforts. They predisposed artistic endeavour..without peeps dissecting shader files into too many tailored versions. I'm combining your work with complex domains in this also and omg thats exciting ..hope I don't fry my GPU lol. Bless you and have good rest @TheEmu... we need time to catch up.😉

Edit: I'm wondering if the Complex Function shader is having difficulty rendering some of the more concentrated iterations. I thought it was just my lousey graphics quality on GetPaint however even @Lunarpup's impecable 1920 x 1200 textures are showing a little saw-toothed where iterations become tightly packed in the rendered shapes. @Number6 mentioned the importance of maintaining pixel size when converting png to jpg some time back. I wonder if textures being png has something to do with the shader's small scale rendering behavior ie: lines tending to become serrated or a series of dots/dashes.?
Edit: think I've fixed it by adding uniform: ContourDensity, int, 10 so I'll update and upload again shortly.
Edit: ok, done !

@EverthangForever

You are correct - thery should be switch ( funcB*signB ). and switch ( funcC*signC ).

My excuse is that I was very tired when I produced the modified shader this morning. I have corrected the version at TheEmusNest but it you might as well make the changes yourself.

In you post your description is almost correct. When you say

switch table of funcA as function of signA in 8 cases

this should be

switch table of function of funcA*signA in 8 cases

Really all that multiplying the functionId by its sign is doing is evaluating abs(funcA), i.e. discarding the sign. But if coded like that then the result of abs(funcA) is a floating point value and a switch needs an integer. I could also have used switch ( int(abs(signA)) ).

In essence there are a set of functions, each of these is identified by a a number (used as part of its name, but this does not have to be the case), the mapping from a function id to its function is done by the switch statements. It has to be done this sort of way because you can only pass integer or floating point values from a scn file to a shader. It would be nice to be able to pass arbitrarary code snippets, but the system just doesn't work that way.

@TheEmu please rest ~ this work is amazing..I've just tried in Transmats in lieu of firewall tunnel..the merging and masking & colors are phenomenal..absolutley never a dull moment..brilliant work. THANK YOU !!!❤️😄

@EverthangForever

You are correct - thery should be switch ( funcB*signB ). and switch ( funcC*signC ).

My excuse is that I was very tired when I produced the modified shader this morning. I have corrected the version at TheEmusNest but it you might as well make the changes yourself.

@TheEmu, thanks so much. Works like a charm. It will take a
while to get my head around the syntax, however looks like..

define table of hard coded functions

declaration of funcA uniform as an integer,
same for funcB and funcC

declaration of float choices A, B and C as decimal values 0.0

declaring signA as an integer related to funcA,
similar for signB and signC

switch table of funcA as function of signA in 8 cases.
similar tables for funcB and funcC.

'A' defined as a function of signA
similar for 'B' and 'C'

Its gradually making sense the more I read it, however not sure why
switch tables for funcB and funcC have different headers ie: why not
switch ( funcB*signB ).

I was struggling with this, as we've never been shown exactly how it
works...its great to have a solution and outcome. Kudos & very grateful.
Guys were right about the integers..Now I'm off to get the new cards and give it a whirl 😄