@TheEmu & all
I think it is more like someone is telling the boss..
'..we cannot get the models to act like they are behind a screen that isn't there'

Ok, well how about ditching the C-K screen and instead stretch a fine piano wire from roof to floor where it was. Models should be able to imagine a screen edge to work with, desktoppers have a fixed side reference and fullscreeners like @JayZ971 & the rest of us can get on with their full body clips back.. n'est-ce pas ?

@EverthangForever

I agree. In my opinion the new style inout clips should have been assigned a new flag bit rather than sharing one with the old style and the clips hotspots should have been defined such that they corresponded with the the edge of screen. This would have allowed us to accurately position these clips in, for example, a doorway. I was very surprised that this was not the case. The information to accurately position these clips is there somewhere (otherwise they would not work in desktop mode) but it is not available to fullscreen scene writers.

Imho, a scene file header needs to be implementable according to clip date. One that then differentiates how 'in/out' is to be treated. Its no good expecting members to deny perfectly good old in/out clips or edit the names of all their pre 2018 clips

For the Older clips that were misLabeld as In/Out

The older clips were not mislabelled as "inout". In my opinion it is the newer clips that are mislabelled and should preferably have been assigned a different clip type such as "edge" (just as the swing clips introduced at the same time are tagged as "top"). In any case the fact is that two very different clip types are classed as "inout" with no way to distinguish between them in a .scn file.

When I did some experimenting I found that the old style "inout" clips could be handled consistently in a scene. This is most easily seen with inout pole clips where the clips' hotspots are consistently, as one would expect, at the base of the pole (just as they are in normal pole clips). However, much to my surprise, I could find was no such consistency in hotspot placement for new style inout clips and it was not possible to accurately position these in a scene. These experiments were made quite some time ago so there may be more consistency now, but I doubt it.

These renamed Clips will no longer be Filtered out as in/Out clips. But you won't be able to Include them specifically, since they are then, no longer a unique clip type.

This whittling down of permissions control is actually a big deal for some scenes where you may want to allow a model to walk in or out of a scene as @Carstrip and I encountered in the Bare Elegance mod exercise.

I'm just curious @Wyldanimal. I did some testing and there is no consistancy with inout in fullscreen mode.
Do the swing clips use a similar calculation / programming to attach to the top of the users screen in desktop mode? Swing clips can be positioned and calculated in Y in fullscreen, cant the inout clips be calculated in x? or is it a filming restraint rather than the programming?

they could have retained the simple placement method without excluding portion of the images in their actual clipsprite capture.

To achieve the desired effect ( the Model peaking in from the side of the Screen ) A real screen on the side of the stage was used.
This then allowed for an Accurate Bounding Box, that the software could then Shift to the Side of a Users Screen.
It then didn't matter the Size of the Performer, or the Outfit, or an Accessory.
The Edge of the Bounding box would always be the same.
Math
Find center of screen
Find edge of users Screen
Width to edge = Edge - Center
Find center of clip
Find edge of Bounding Box
Width of clip = Edge of Bounding box to Center
Clip center = Screen Center
Shift Clip from center = Width to Edge - Width of Clip
That places the Clip right on the side of the screen.


It is the Same type of Shift Used to Have the Clip Seem to be On the top of your Task Bar.

It would have been technically impossible to do the same if the Full body was included.
There would have been no Fixed Bounding Box.

An example is when the Model wraps her fingers around the edge of the screen.
That is only possible to create, because there is an Actual bounding box.

Bit 6 or a Value of 64, is what the Software uses to classify a clip as in/out.
After that Bit is found, then the Header of the clip contains the bounding box metrics to determine the shift amount.

I very often want to work with just the one style of in-out clip but there is no way to do so.

For the Older clips that were misLabeld as In/Out
you can rename the clips, by removing the value of In/out from the clip type.
These are the clips where the Performer was hidden behind the table, and then popups up from behind.
Early on, they were classified as In/Out because the Performer enters from being off the screen.
But the True In/out clips are the Ones the Enter from the Side of the screen.


In/Out has a Value of 64, so from the Clip type number, subtract 64

After you Have renamed them, do a rebuild Collection.

These renamed Clips will no longer be Filtered out as in/Out clips.

But you won't be able to Include them specifically, since they are then, no longer a unique clip type.

La 1.2.266 corrige au moins 1 bug : l'écran noir en mode plein écran.
http://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/45351/1?post=673652

Thanks @pickle1, yes indeed! Lovely addition to the online collection 😍

Two Stacy's cards in online collection, 10 to go...

@TheEmu
I never understood Totem's logic in introducing the physical chroma-key edge screen causing us to deny working permissions on many many older cards perfectly good 'in/out' clips in fullscreen during 2017 onwards. Surely if they wanted to designate a model half hidden at the screen side they could have retained the simple placement method without excluding portion of the images in their actual clipsprite capture.

In late 2017 I cobbled an experiment snow scene for @Sexybrune which showed the consistant placement of the new in/out clipsprite can never occur on a scene because the size of the clip's bounding box will vary for each clip.

Totem's choice seemed at the time so low tech an approach. Anyway, an effect intended solely for the desktop crowd, to this day ~ it still beats me why they could not have replaced with a flag a tad less important in their clip names codes instead,.. like say using the 'holding a sign' or some other bit set .

En tout cas, ce fil de discussion me sera très utile. Merci d'y avoir pensé.

Petite question comme cela, qu'est-ce que la version 1.2.266 apporte de plus que la version précédente ?

Est-ce juste pour corriger certains bogues, où il y a de nouvelles fonctionnalités ?

Je n'ai rien vu à ce sujet, il me semble.

Valentine

In the settings there is the heading "CLIPS".
The entry "Free Preview Push" can be set to "NEVER", then no new previews will be loaded automatically.
Only the previews that can be seen in the Preview tab are shown.

If you want to deactivate the preview of a show, click on the tick symbol. (Previews tab)
If this show is bought later, this show is still deactivated and will not be played automatically. This show can then be activated again by the tick symbol.

###

There is no way to deactivate all shows of a series (Fxxxx) with a few clicks. Each show must be deactivated individually.

Valentine 💖💖

@JayZ971 @TheEmu

Thank you for the feedback. I do appreciate it. Yeah, I don't love that, but I made the choice to leave the inouts in because I don't like limiting the number of clips that will play more than necessary. To me, it's just something I have to accept, like older cards cutting off at the knees on the fronttable clips or some girls using up way too much lateral space in their shows and walking on air in my scenes.

I have no quarrel with anyone who wants to modify the scenes I post to change things how they would like them better, though. Feel free to deny inouts on your end and even re-share them if you think others would appreciate the improvement. I'm not proud. 😊

Some of the girls used to use Stanz account to chat on the website... I always wondered if we were being punked :)

Some appeared as team members under their names and chatted with the peeps... those were the days... ;)

+1

C'est une bonne idée. Nous verrons combien de personnes viendront sur ce fil de discussion, cela nous donnera une idée du nombre de francophones qui suivent régulièrement iStripper.

Candy Sweet has vagazzle ;)

Alina https://www.istripper.com/model/alina

Thanks for you answer.

But how can i disable cards from XXX Collections on automatic card preview ?
Before i can do it with the checkbox "Hide XXX Collection" under the line "Do not show nudity on screen saver"

@Dfner - it's your favourite girl in your outfit. Enjoy👍👍👍

Hi @kaiju - is anyone going to pop this onto the Discord site in the Announcements section please?

Pretty much what it says. In particlular, looking for girls that have been on iStripper in the last few years.

Here is an another great release on mobile today !

Stacy Cruz in :

@sh42n81

To avoid the problem shown in @JayZ971 's post just add

deny: inout

to the filter controls on the clip, or just add inout to the list if you already have a deny clause. This also helps to prevent, or at least greatly reduce, cases where a performer walks off a platform.

Unfortunately it does not distinguish between "old style" in-out clips where the main performance is centre stage but either walks on from the edge of the stage first or walks of afterwards from the "new style" in-out clips where the whole performance is at the edge of the screen. This is a pity but Totem do not provide us a way to distinguish between these two types of clips in scene description files. I very often want to work with just the one style of in-out clip but there is no way to do so. I hope that someday Totem will provide us with separate inoutEdge and inoutCentre specfiers.

If you are referring to the ability to hide the iStripperXXX cards then this can be done via the Collections filter on the My Collection or Girls Store pages.

If you are referring to the ability to supress playing the XXX (sexualy explicit) clips this is available via the Levels Of Eroticism controls (separate controls for the desktop and fullscreen scenes). However use of this control is disbled when you tick "Progressive Hotness". I have no idea why these two options are mutually exclusive, I wish that they were not.

From the automatic translation of your post I think you may have ticked "Progressive Hotness" as that has always greyed out the Levels Of Eroticism control.

Unfortunately no @avtom
Its the nature of the program in desktop mode and cant be helped.
It makes sense though, its so you have freedom to place them anywhere you want, open windows, task bar etc. Only way to stop it is to catch them before they do.
I actually enjoy the game of catching them before they fall off windows or walk away hahaha.

Cela fait un bon moment déjà, sans doute plusieurs mois, mais maintenant la coche Cacher les modeles XXX est grisée et ne peut donc plus être activée. Bien dommage.
J'ai cherché dans la base des registres si une valeur était à mettre soit à true pour les types booleens, soit à 0x000001 pour les types numériques mais je n'ai pas trouvé.

Un moyen de réactiver cette fonction ?

Sometimes if they are placed at the edge and they walk off, the model gets replaced with a new card. Is there any way to fix this besides readjusting every time they approach the edge of the monitor?

@sh42n81

Just an FYI.......had this end of screen clip in this scene club 3

Happy Wednesday iStrippers 😉

Scene today is goal keepers, 2 standing clips at the front, Swing clips in the middle and pole clips on the sides. One file plays "sport" category clips, the other .scn file plays all the girls.
Kick a goal with all that distraction!

Enjoy 👍

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BQZZao4VUI4rhnwA3pKIT6dc9g5cXZr6/view?usp=sharing

Totally agree @pickle1 I'm old school. After discovering Playboy in the late "70s when ladies were "natural" I prefer that look on a woman. I get that today's women prefer to shave & I don't have a problem with that. So I really like it when @Totem hires a model who is "natural" down there.

I also totally agree. I discovered playboy a little earlier than that, back when even pubic hair was air-brushed out to leave at most a featureless pink triangle visible. The current predominance of shaving all too often reminds me of those bad old days.

Agreed... always perfered a little bush or trim to fully shaved... Fully shaved is okay, but a neat trim is always favored in my book....

She will be the next behind SEC

nice! @sh42n81
Yes much better with pole clips, I do like pole clips tho, they dont run off the tables hahaha, thanks for sharing!
I appreciate how much effort goes into the scene masks, great job 👍
The yacht scene was a hard choice of scene but you got it to work, also nicely done.

Keep sharing your progress 👍

i tryed that just waiting to hear back now thanks

I know there are some people who ***** hairy pussies but I like both hirsute and shaven.

So I thank @Totem for the recent additions to the "coming soon" list of girls with some fur, including Cara Mell (of course), Melody Clark, Clara Rene, Valentine, Jade and Sasha Meow.

👍👍👍

Totally agree @pickle1 I'm old school. After discovering Playboy in the late "70s when ladies were "natural" I prefer that look on a woman. I get that today's women prefer to shave & I don't have a problem with that. So I really like it when @Totem hires a model who is "natural" down there.

Variety is key.

Yes it is 😍👍

Closing this topic as it is / already headed in the wrong direction.

Moi, je la trouve bien jolie, notre petite Sasha !

Me, I find her very pretty, our little Sasha!

Hi!
Where we can find the link with the update description?
Where I can read about the new version?
Why to make the effort to reinstall the software, if I don't know why?
Thank you!

@Evaneself4

The update descriptions are in the Bugs & Fixes Forum

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/45351/1?post=673652

You clearly haven't looked at the blonde hair picture I posted earlier. She looks like a skeleton in it. She looked fantastic and great with nice tits an a luscious booty before her last 2 cards with the new fluffy hair.. I'd rather not see the ribs and hip bones of ANY dancer sticking out when they do poses... and her next card coming out makes her look like a skeleton. Something wrong with people that think someones ribs and bones showing looks "better"

You should stop insulting the girl here.

Hi!
Where we can find the link with the update description?
Where I can read about the new version?
Why to make the effort to reinstall the software, if I don't know why?
Thank you!

'Am I the only one who thinks Sasha Meow has lost way too much weight?'

Yes, you are.Sasha Meow looks even better with less kilo's.

You clearly haven't looked at the blonde hair picture I posted earlier. She looks like a skeleton in it. She looked fantastic and great with nice tits an a luscious booty before her last 2 cards with the new fluffy hair.. I'd rather not see the ribs and hip bones of ANY dancer sticking out when they do poses... and her next card coming out makes her look like a skeleton. Something wrong with people that think someones ribs and bones showing looks "better"

Well that all sounds good.I will have to have a look at it.However it would be great if we can access our computer vision account via the mobile app version.

@BlackPanther2011 - the intention of the mobile beta is to complement the computer app and the existing website, not to attempt to replace any of the functions. It is likely that a bridge will be provided in the beta to allow you to jump across to the existing website where of course you can access the Forum, your profile etc.

[quote]J'ai essayé sur iphone 8.Ca fonctionne bien, c'est assez clair, j'ai juste des problemes de commandes : quand je zoome avec 2 doigts pour aggrandir le model, lorsque je relache ça déclenche le changement de show ou de model.peut être qu'utiliser des zones plus cironcrites de l'écran pour les changements de models et d'avance ou de recul dans le show en cours permettrait d'éviter ca.Je ne sais pas si ca a déjà été dit je n'ai pas osé relire les 7 pages.[/quote

@AlexOneKennobi - je peux vous faire gagner du temps de recherche - il n’a pas été mentionné précédemment. L’application mobile lit la position des doigts et le type de toucher pour décider s’il faut avancer à travers les clips dans un spectacle ou passer à la prochaine émission. Il est possible que lorsque vous utilisez vos deux doigts pour zoomer, l’un de vos doigts reste trop long en position et l’application agit en conséquence. J’ai eu ce qui se passe de temps en temps sur mon téléphone Android. Si cela se produit souvent, vous devrez peut-être ajuster vos téléphones "sensibilité » ou modifier légèrement votre technique de zoom pour vous avoir les doigts dans une position plus centralisée.

Merci d’avoir porté cela à notre attention.

@AlexOneKennobi - I can save you the time searching - it has not been mentioned previously. The mobile app does read the position of the fingers and the type of touch to decide whether to advance through the clips in one show or advance to the next show. It is possible that when you use your two fingers to zoom, one of your fingers remains too long in position and the app acts accordingly. I have had that happen occasionally on my Android phone. If it is happening often you may need to adjust your phones "sensitivity" or slightly modify your zoom technique to have you fingers in more of a centralised position.

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

Thanks @gkar45

'Am I the only one who thinks Sasha Meow has lost way too much weight?'

Yes, you are.

Sasha Meow looks even better with less kilo's.