@jt123 no, comemts.

what guy wouldn't want their girl to take a try in this!!

Wait, what?
She said I was supposed to get ***** up in it!
And then she just laughed and left me hanging there!

Indeed, the variety here is great, and Anna is a great model, too :)

I am also for more variety. Only 15% of all the cards I bought has the Stockings tag, so that is not the selling point for me, rather the opposite.

Anna Tatu Take 1
Like I have written several times: a good outfit is half of the fun.

If iStripper keeps the outfits like they are now (interesting some comments on the outfit of Jade/The Sweet Taste Of Leather) then it's for me no problem. Our Dutch national football hero, the deceased Johan Cruijff - a freetime philosopher commenting football matches -, had an expression: "Ieder nadeel heb z'n voordeel", which means "Every disadvantage has its advantage", about the situation when a team had to play with 10 against 11 players. This is also true for the oversupply of lingerie. Just don't buy it, waiting for the outfit I like.

Some great outfits of the last month's for me were:

• Camille Wallace Breaking Office Rules/e1420
• Irina Gubeva Sexecutive/e1448
• Tina Miniskirt Flirt/e1396
• Elis Escort In Paris/e1342
• Alya Stark Country Bumpkin/f0610

i miss the old VGHD day

When I read this I immediatly thought of two models: the first one is Jana Cova and the second one Anna Tatu. In their Take 1's they both had great outfits. The recommandations of @TheEmu, @pantalone and @Alkasyn one finds back in their outfits.
First the six outfits of Jana Cova and next the one's of Anna Tatu.
I don't know who in @iStripperteam is/are responsible for the outfits, but I would like to have a reaction of him or her for explanation of the choices for the outfit.
iStripper has far drifted away from VGHD and the roots in the choice of the outfits and I'm not happy with that.

Going back to the roots wouldn't be that bad!

Eva Columbus

Fits for me with the lingerie. Too much packaging is bad for the environment 😀!But there could be more bodies and catsuits or tights without panties underneath

👍

Lingerie like @sh42n81 's stockings can, and for me preferably should, be worn with all of those except swimsuits.

Maybe even WITH a swimsuit once or twice for kinky variety! lol

Fits for me with the lingerie. Too much packaging is bad for the environment 😀!
But there could be more bodies and catsuits or tights without panties underneath

Please add katya Cloverhttps://m.istripper.com/model/show/e0221

I agree - that show would look good in the mobile medium - just hope the quality of the original show is good enough to be re-mastered effectively.

Please add katya Clover
https://m.istripper.com/model/show/e0221

Ellie Leen > https://www.istripper.com/model/ellie-leen

I would like more variation to the shows.

And I also think that there are to many shows that begins with the model in lingerie.

Dakota/Denim Fancy

https://www.istripper.com/model/dakota

too much lingerie, i miss the old VGHD day when girls have different dressing covering up their body and strip~I totally agree. You hit the nail on the head! With all that lingerie I buy much less cards. Far too many garterbelts and suspenders. Where is the creativity of the team? Or do they have to follow orders: do as many lingerie shows as possible. If the clientele wants all those lingerie, than there is the problem. In fact like @Everthang wrote several years ago:: "iStripper is a lingerie site". And than you get the selffulling prophecy.
The selection of shows for iStripper mobile confirms this with the choice of many, many lingerie shows. So that's how iStripper sees and presents itself or are the logarithms decisive here?

I also usually skip the lingerie-only shows, and hope that the girl will have a regular costume sometime later. Doesn't always come true, though, which is a shame.

I've skipped many cards from girls I assume I would've liked due to the costume being boring/uninspired/ugly.

@sh42n81

In fact, 95% of my cards are in the Stockings category.

Welcome aboard, my Friend 😊

I almost refuse to buy cards that don't have stockings.

At least for the first Time, but at the End i'm Buying these Shows anyway :)

and support the need for variety.
but there should be plenty of room to suit everyone's tastes.

Variation is always Nice, and from my personal Perception there is a lot of Variation here on iStripper.
But at the End, you can't hit the Taste for everyone ✌

50 lingerie
50 swimsuit
50 business
50 school girl
50 formal dress
50 uniform
60 cos play

My only problem with lingerie is that often it's not enough on its own. Clothes over the top, whether business or casual or formal or even a uniform, give the girl more to do and add variety. More toys would achieve the same thing - towels for the swimsuits, teddies for the schoolgirls, etc.

So I kinda don't agree with the numbers. Just wanna see more variety.

I like the lingerie. But I really wish that those shows started with something worn over the lingerie so that we are treated to a slow reveal of the sexy underwear (or its absense) and only then a slow reveal of everything else.

alright, let's see some numberswe have 360 days in a year (I take a week of in the summer) so we have 360 showsHow many shows do you want for each category?50 lingerie50 swimsuit50 business50 school girl50 formal dress50 uniform60 cos playWhat are your numbers?

Lingerie like @sh42n81 's stockings can, and for me preferably should, be worn with all of those except swimsuits.

alright, let's see some numberswe have 360 days in a year (I take a week of in the summer) so we have 360 showsHow many shows do you want for each category?50 lingerie50 swimsuit50 business50 school girl50 formal dress50 uniform60 cos playWhat are your numbers?

Stockings can go with all of those except swimsuit, so it's all good by me. 👍

alright, let's see some numbers
we have 360 days in a year (I take a week of in the summer) so we have 360 shows

How many shows do you want for each category?

50 lingerie
50 swimsuit
50 business
50 school girl
50 formal dress
50 uniform
60 cos play

What are your numbers?

Sorry not sorry, lingerie opponents, I agree with @Stanston. I love the lingerie. In fact, 95% of my cards are in the Stockings category. I almost refuse to buy cards that don't have stockings. So I'm part of the "problem," from your perspective. But I do understand and support the need for variety. Obviously they're going to make the most of what sells the most, but there should be plenty of room to suit everyone's tastes.

I fell your ***** in a different way: I don't like huge boobs, so there's a lot here that isn't for me. I just ignore those models and focus on the ones that I like.

Lingerie is Sexy 😍 I can't get enough from it 😋

too much lingerie, i miss the old VGHD day when girls have different dressing covering up their body and strip~

I totally agree. You hit the nail on the head! With all that lingerie I buy much less cards. Far too many garterbelts and suspenders. Where is the creativity of the team? Or do they have to follow orders: do as many lingerie shows as possible. If the clientele wants all those lingerie, than there is the problem. In fact like @Everthang wrote several years ago:: "iStripper is a lingerie site". And than you get the selffulling prophecy.
The selection of shows for iStripper mobile confirms this with the choice of many, many lingerie shows. So that's how iStripper sees and presents itself or are the logarithms decisive here?

The Package everyone is talking about is 1100 credits for $99.99
and that is usually offered during the 20% bonus.
so you get 1100 + 20% ( 220 ) for a total of 1320 credits.

The Standard offering is usually 500 credit for $49.99
and during the 20% bonus
you Get 500 + 20% ( 100) for a total of 600 credits.

2x 500 + 20% = 1200 credits for $99.98
so the 1100 for $99.99 gives you an additional 120 credit during the 20% bonus.

iStripper calls it a giga pack
not every giga pack came with the 20% bonus though...

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/42445/1?post=625434

Melody Clark

Ok good to know. Thank for the fast replys. I'll be looking out for the deals.

No problem @E1337 Glad to help out😎 Use your own judgement on the weekly specials. I would also suggest you setup a Wishlist of cards that you want to buy. As these specials come up, you then can buy your cards that are in your wishlist at a better discount 👍

The Wishlist is in the Girls Store, click on the selections tab, then select wishlist. You can also put cards in the wishlist by clicking the heart under the "Get Her Nude" button.

Ok good to know. Thank for the fast replys. I'll be looking out for the deals.

Where can I buy the 1,000 credits package? Or is it like what @JayZ971 says where that package is only offered certain times during the year?

@E1337

You can get the 1000 credits package When Totem offers it. The 1000 credit package is not offered every day, only at certain times during the year. You can get credits thru the GUI (app) or thru the website.

I suggest you check out the News section in the Featured section of the GUI (app) every Friday for the TGIF announcement for the weekly specials. The credit reload & other discount oppotunites will be posted there.

@E1337 Yep, theirs the basic $49.99 for 500credits, the $49.99 for 500 + 100credits, & the all power full $99.99 for 1000credits + 360 in bonuses credits or 320 it's been awhile.

some like myself have enoug credits for about a yr & a half in reserve, which is why I'm going for the 500 in a day achievement award. in a yr & 1/2

Where can I buy the 1,000 credits package? Or is it like what @JayZ971 says where that package is only offered certain times during the year?

Are there any credit packages for more than 500 credits?

A couple of times during the year, Totem does offer a 1000 credits package, usually during the holidays. Also several times during the year, Totem will offer a reload bonus in which you will get a 20% bonus with all credit purchases. So a 500 credit buy would give a 100 credit bonus.

Are there any credit packages for more than 500 credits?

too much lingerie, i miss the old VGHD day when girls have different dressing covering up their body and strip~

sweet 👍

😄😄😄😄 O.K.
Merci à vous, je vous quitte, je dois retourner dans mon donjon... On m'appele ! 😰

1. Look on the settings page of your iStripper client on your old computer. Check the Advanced Settings box at the top. After the Change Folder button, you will see the path to your current storage directory. Unless you have changed it, it should be C:\Users\[yourusername]\AppData\Local\vghd\models .

2. Insert a portable storage device that's large enough to hold your collection.

3a. Click Change Folder and point it to your portable storage device. iStripper will move the model files for you.
3b. Alternatively, you can use Windows File Explorer to copy/move the files manually, but the AppData folder is hidden by default, so you would have to use the File Explorer options to Show Hidden Files first.

4. Install iStripper on your new computer and sign into it.

5. At this point, you have two choices:
a: use the Change Folder button to point iStripper to your external storage device, as I have done in the attached screenshot, and just leave it connected. (IMPORTANT: make sure you select the *models* folder)
b: Manually move your models files into C:\Users\[yourusername]\AppData\Local\vghd\models on the new computer. Again, you'll have to Show Hidden Files in File Explorer options.

6: Quit and restart iStripper.

7: Click the Rebuild Collection button on the iStripper settings page.

At this point, your model cards should be successfully playing.

Hi @Philours
Glad you enjoy that scene and thanks for the compliment. I'm no proffessional, I just enjoy the hobby of making iStripper scenes and have learnt heaps over the last couple of months about how the program works.
I'm more than happy to share scenes with everyone, especially if it enhances the iStripper experience for all the fullscreen users.
Enjoy the endless hours of whips and leather shows in your new dungeon lol.

Andreina Deluxe / Pull On My Reins #10, #7
Aislin / Shy Girl #17
Alyssia Kent / By The Fire #13, #19
Alyssia Kent / Picturesque #20 (2x), #8 (a must have card in this context... or maybe in every context 😊)

And two older (low-res) cards:



Marie / Seaside Day #28
Marie / Pink Palace #6, #21

Added on August 5th, 2020 !

Super cute Avery :)



Enjoy ^^

My scene created based on a classroom. Enjoy your dream teachers!

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ouIAl3RXRwZcw0Cp2Zy0-ykY7bGV9dIn/view?usp=sharing

Gettin' down and dirty with another simple ruin porn background. I took a stab at a shadow, but I got rid of it when I couldn't make it point in the right direction without separating from the Girl.

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1zpKNZCKtS5Ljtkm7xUnCAWPmgol5g9-C

That is a common problem. Unfortunately just using the functions provided by the .scn files for shadows (rotation and scaling) are not enough to get the shadows pointing in the correct direction to match those of the setting.

Oh, I thought it was just me. I have been playing with shadows a little and have been thinking that, for most of my scenes, they don't add enough to be worth the effort. Shaders are definitely beyond my abilities at this point.

Thank you Stanston
I will definately check out the Babydoll outfit, Agatha looks really cute in it.
and will make suggestions in that location.

Firstly, it would be helpful if the names of the .scn files (and the ,zip or ,7z files) each began with the creator's iStripper name or an abbreviation of it - for example @Everthangforever always prefixes his scenes with "ET - ". Doing this affects the order in which the scenes are listed on the fullscreen selection page of the app such that they are grouped by their creator. I always rename them myself before copying to the scenes directory but if they are created this way it might help newcomers

It would be handy if all submissions used the same naming convention, although people's preferences vary. I like to use a # prefix to put all the user scenes before official scenes. Some might like having all their say bedrooms grouped together, independent of creator, and so they wouldn't want a user prefix.

@carstrip
Je viens d'installer votre scène Dungeon Delight. Avec Takha (Ready To Slap), c'est le top !
Plus l'effet du miroir, cela est vraiment bien.
Merci pour ce beau travail.
Cela devient de plus en plus professionnel.👌

Regardez dans votre PM pour un indice concernant la victoire que first one badge

Jade

Dommage parcque pour moi, je dois synchroniser chaque fois pour voir la sortie de la carte. Donc pas facile de réagir rapidement.😪😪

En achetant le Pre-Order d'Août, je pensais obtenir le badge "First One" mais apparemment il n'en est rien !😢😢😢😢😢😢

Malheureusement, @Philours ni la précommande ni l’auto-achat ne vous inclura dans la chance de gagner le badge First One.

En achetant le Pre-Order d'Août, je pensais obtenir le badge "First One" mais apparemment il n'en est rien !
😢😢😢😢😢😢

One constructive criticism about the island scene, though: the Girl's shadow seems to be pointing the wrong way relative to the cabana.

That is a common problem. Unfortunately just using the functions provided by the .scn files for shadows (rotation and scaling) are not enough to get the shadows pointing in the correct direction to match those of the setting.

It is possible to do much better using a shader - as a minimum you need to apply a shear transformation to ofset the shadow of the head sideways relative to that of the feet. You may also want to apply some tapering so that the shadow gets narrower or wider the further away it gets from the feet and also to blur it and maybe to introduce a gradient in its colour and transparency.

I have written a shader to do these things, but even I find it a bit ***** to use as it is a lot of work to get the shadows properly aligned with the clip it is supposed to be shadowing. The problem is that although each parameter is simple to understand the way they interact means that when I change one parameter I then may need to fiddle with two or three others to get the shadow back where it should be which then means adjusting the first one again - and then repeat the cycle several times to gradually find the correct values. At some point I really should look at it again to make it more user friendly.

A better approach would be to use a ray-casting approach in a shader, but that would be more complex and use a lot more GPU power than faking it out as I currently do.