How can I change the Full Screen background so that it doesn't start automatically with the beach background. I'm not a fan of that background but when I click on the full screen action it always goes there first.

It doesn't do that for me. It has always started a scene selected at random from whatever scenes that I have enabled.

Also, I noticed in settings that the full screen drop down only has "image 1" as a selection.

I am not sure what you mean. Are you refering to the Full Screen/Screen setting dropdown menu which for me currently offers only "Screen 1", but if I plug in an external monitor it has always offered me a choice of "Screen 1" and "Screen 2".

@z22

@CalgonAre there parts that are never on screen or does it do a full 360? Might be able to cull more if they arent or you modify it so it doesnt do a 360.
Almost everything is in a sprite that rotates continuously, the individual clipsprites rotate in the opposite direction so that they always face the front.

Only the backs of the podiums could be removed but if I chopped them out, I'd have to rotate the podium at the same speed as the whole saucer rotation in the opposite direction like the clipsprites.... I think the difference would be very marginal.

Did the reduced code not make a difference ?

It did make a difference but because you can't specify a resolution in camera 3D (AFIK) it's running in 4k on mine. If i drop the desktop resolution to 1080p it's smooth.

But I can tempt you with an upcoming show - Freya Mayer - The Pink String Number.

Freya totally forgot her underwear. 😊

And don't forget Sasha Meow "Picnic Time"

I may be wrong but I don't think a mask on a single quad would look correct when viewed from different angles and it was a full 3d effect that I wanted to create when I set off to build this.

If I understand you correctly then nest the quad and the masking sprite in a node. Any movements or rotations applied to the node will then move the quad and sprite. By default the quad and sprite will be co-located (though you can change this by specifing pos: and rot: for the nested elements when any values you specify will be relative to the node.

node {
pos: xx, yy. zz ! Position things
rot: rx, ry, rz ! Orientate things
animate: ....

quad (
any other stuff you want for the quad
shader : ...
}

sprite
souce : whatever
any other stuff you want for the sprite
}

} ! End of the node

If the scene is such that the quad can sometimes be seen from behind the sandwich the quad between two identical mask sprites.

@pickle1: I am looking at shows with a dress and no panties right now. Those are the ones that interest me most.
Of course that is a matter of personal taste.

@Starryk - we cannot really list them all here with pictures as the numbers are HUGE.

When I am doing QA, I track shows that are pantyless or bottomless (where the pants are removed first but not from under a dress - e.g. a bikini where the top is kept on) and just in the most recent 470 shows there are

99 pantyless
134 bottomless

I should say though that these are shows where in at least one clip the model is pantyless. If you are looking for shows where the model just does not possess a pair of panties, then those numbers are smaller.

We can sort of do multiple shaders rendered onto a common sprite by calling
framebuffers sequentially however inserting them in a coordinated fashion is another thang
and the memory use of same currently sucks

You can "do multiple shaders rendered onto a common sprite" by slightly re-writing them as functions, passing any necessary inputs and outputs as arguments and then calling them sequentially from a common "main" function.

@EverthangForever

hmm..I haven't had time to look closely at the .scn code, however with a third of a million lines of code in a single .scn it seems like a good place to startSure, i'd expect the model in center gets jerky because 3D camera zoom rescaling up mostly goes there.There's "0;" ending typos btw in every sprite node rot parameter...etc..etc.@Z22 what resolution models are you using to test this ?What happens to overall FPS when you // eliminate each model ?

I just noticed that if I add in an extra model that is not part of the scene but is the first model in the scn file i.e the main model then the frame rate goes up. I assume this means that the software treats the main model differently to the other models ?? Anyway..... I won't be changing my version because I don't want to lose control of which is the main model but anyone with performance issues might want to try that.

Here i want to provide a list of pantyless shows i found.
I checked the photos to determine this so if the model wears panties in the show but they are not visible on the photos i apologize.

Feel free to let us know though. Also feel free to add more shows as this list is be no means complete

iStripper XXX




iStripper

@z22

@CalgonAre there parts that are never on screen or does it do a full 360? Might be able to cull more if they arent or you modify it so it doesnt do a 360.

Almost everything is in a sprite that rotates continuously, the individual clipsprites rotate in the opposite direction so that they always face the front.

Only the backs of the podiums could be removed but if I chopped them out, I'd have to rotate the podium at the same speed as the whole saucer rotation in the opposite direction like the clipsprites.... I think the difference would be very marginal.

Did the reduced code not make a difference ?

@Zewl
Click on the little monitor's icon at the top right of the GUI to display the list of the scenes, then choose the one you want to see.

@Calgon

Are there parts that are never on screen or does it do a full 360? Might be able to cull more if they arent or you modify it so it doesnt do a 360.

How can I change the Full Screen background so that it doesn't start automatically with the beach background. I'm not a fan of that background but when I click on the full screen action it always goes there first.
Also, I noticed in settings that the full screen drop down only has "image 1" as a selection.

Thanks!

I'll have a look at the loops scenes. My understanding is that you can apply a shader
in a framebuffer node. Call that as source in a sprite node and apply a subsequent shader
to that sprite. Any more buffers, and you would need to chain them as framebuffers. He he..
sounds a bit like somethang you have done already / would do at the.scn level.
However I was really talking about our OpenGL: Fullscreen platform being able to handle that buffering
in a coordinated way within one shader, like they do in da WebGL.

I'm not sure what you are refering to.

@Z22

You could get nearly the same effect for the "window" by using a masking texture on a quad, same goes for the strip at the top and bottom. Arent they most of the sprites?

I may be wrong but I don't think a mask on a single quad would look correct when viewed from different angles and it was a full 3d effect that I wanted to create when I set off to build this.

it looks like your script is generating too many.....
sprite
{
source: Texture
size: 129.585367822521, 1500
pos: 4990.13364214136, 0, 313.95259764657
hotspot: 0, 1
scale: 2, 2
rot: 0, -93.6, 0;
shader: fragment, Shaders/Generators Redux.fsh
}

sprite
{
source: Texture
size: 41.2682932795517, 1500
pos: 4990.13364214136, 0, 313.95259764657
hotspot: 1, 1
scale: 2, 2
rot: 0, -93.6, 0;
shader: fragment, Shaders/calgon_black.fsh
}

That's a great find !! 👍 Some have the same co-ordinates but different rotation and the rotations are 360 apart - I'd gone round each circle twice !

FPS has gone up 40fps 👍👍👍

Try the new code:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10DqzyLNL17jRBibaiK0_9okPdknxTOLl/view?usp=sharing

I'll have a look at the loops scenes. My understanding is that you can apply a shader
in a framebuffer node. Call that as source in a sprite node and apply a subsequent shader
to that sprite. Any more buffers, and you would need to chain them as framebuffers. He he..
sounds a bit like somethang you have done already / would do at the.scn level.
However I was really talking about our OpenGL: Fullscreen platform being able to handle that buffering
in a coordinated way within one shader, like they do in da WebGL.

@EverthangForever

with OpenGL capable of running several common buffers

Well... the loops scenes are an example of 10 x 4k(or 10 x 1080p for the reduced resolution version you can run) screens used as a persistant buffer. how many buffers do you want?

@EverthangForever

@Calgon great stuffI've been hoping (sigh) Totem will one day give us a Deluxe Playerwith OpenGL capable of running several common buffers & cubic textures like WebGL do.We can sort of do multiple shaders rendered onto a common sprite by callingframebuffers sequentially however inserting them in a coordinated fashion is another thangand the memory use of same currently sucks :-/😟

I think that's all above my coding level at the moment. But I'll get there eventually 😕

@Calgon, it looks like your script is generating too many

sprite
{
source: Texture
size: 129.585367822521, 1500
pos: 4990.13364214136, 0, 313.95259764657
hotspot: 0, 1
scale: 2, 2
rot: 0, -93.6, 0;
shader: fragment, Shaders/Generators Redux.fsh
}

sprite
{
source: Texture
size: 41.2682932795517, 1500
pos: 4990.13364214136, 0, 313.95259764657
hotspot: 1, 1
scale: 2, 2
rot: 0, -93.6, 0;
shader: fragment, Shaders/calgon_black.fsh
}

as i can delete a bunch and the scene looks the same. in fact all of this type above these coordinates.

In my mind I picture a blind man, white cane in hand, wacking away at a dancer...

whack, whack, whack, thump... (there she is...)
whack, whack, thump... ooohh baby....

😂😂😂

👍 😍

Clemence what can I say, so Alluring! The hair, eyes, smile & natural body. She’s so petite & tight Flawless! Clemence is beauty at its finest! 😍

Thanks to all the Gorgeous Models for gracing us with their beauty! 😘

Thanks Totem team! The joy you bring to our community, with all these beautiful models. We all do appreciate the hard work! 👍

👍 😎 Well stated.

@Calgon , yeh i removed the tripple shaders in the sprites and didnt see any performance change. the thing with the textures wont cause any performance problem, more just a problem for you if you want to use the first "Texture" as it will use the second "Texture" and same with 3 calls to the same file. Its more for neatness and less of a headache for you and anyone else reading it. (he says having posted loads of code without comments :/ )

There are some other sprites with 2 shaders active and as with the others removing the extra one made no difference to performance.

I think its just because of the number of things its having to deal with.

You could get nearly the same effect for the "window" by using a masking texture on a quad, same goes for the strip at the top and bottom. Arent they most of the sprites?

@Calgon great stuff
I've been hoping (sigh) Totem will one day give us a Deluxe Player
with OpenGL capable of running several common buffers & cubic textures like WebGL do.
We can sort of do multiple shaders rendered onto a common sprite by calling
framebuffers sequentially however inserting them in a coordinated fashion is another thang
and the memory use of same currently sucks :-/😟

@EverthangForever

There's "0;" ending typos btw in every sprite node rot parameter

Gotcha - thanks

@Z22 re:

shader: fragment, Shaders/Generators Redux.fsh
shader: fragment, Shaders/Disk Intersection.fsh
shader: fragment, Shaders/calgon_black.fsh

Gotcha - changed this as well but it made no performance difference.

I have no idea how the core program works behind the scenes but I would have thought that when the code is compiled the final shader is the one that is calculated but it was worth a try and I "shaved off" about 50k lines of bloat from the code.

Yeah, use Notepad++ Edit >Line Operations to tidy it up a tad first methinks

@EverthangForever - the code is generated from a separate program that calculates the size, rotation and maths of the placement of "stuff". I haven't worried about the tidiness of the final code at this point because I don't edit the scn file directly. It's more about seeing whether it works at all at this stage. I was shocked when I first found that a file of 200k lines would run at all.

@Z22 "multiple textures with the same name" - yarp, I'll fix that, though these are tiny files and unlikley to affect the performance.

Keep those "snags" coming because the program has many things that are set as a single parameter and can easily be changed and the full scn code regenerated.

Should I produce a "lite" version with less detail on the circles ??

@calgon, you have multiple textures with the same name.

texture
{
id: Texture2
source: Images/Black_1010.png
}

texture
{
id: Texture
source: Images/Black_1010.png
}

texture
{
id: Texture
source: Textures/Metal - Rusty - 01.jpg
}

texture
{
id: Texture2
source: Images/Black_1010.png
}

Three calls for the same texture file?

@Calgon , if you use Notepad++ you can do a search/replace for any wonky code. Can also remove
empty lines and justify lines left for ease of reading.
saves a lot of time. Humm, ..not sure why needs such huge decimal places in the size parameters (?)😉

hmm..I haven't had time to look closely at the .scn code, however with a third of a million lines of code in a single .scn it seems like a good place to start
Sure, i'd expect the model in center gets jerky because 3D camera zoom rescaling up mostly goes there.
There's "0;" ending typos btw in every sprite node rot parameter...etc..etc.
@Z22 what resolution models are you using to test this ?
What happens to overall FPS when you // eliminate each model ?

Am just using the default resolution

@calgon, you have a bunch of errors in the .scn for ***** things like "Sprite" should be "sprite" to sprites with multiple shders active in them, redundant things like allow and block (you only need one or the other). Am having a go at cleaning up the code so we can see whats going on. though i'm not sure whats meant to be goin on in some eg:-

sprite
{
source: Texture
size: 41.2682932795517, 1500
pos: 5000, 0, 0
hotspot: 1, 1
scale: 2, 2
rot: 0, 270, 0;
shader: fragment, Shaders/Generators Redux.fsh
shader: fragment, Shaders/Disk Intersection.fsh
shader: fragment, Shaders/calgon_black.fsh
}

That is calculating all three shhaders but only displayin the last one AFIK.

hmm..I haven't had time to look closely at the .scn code, however with a third of a million lines of code in a single .scn it seems like a good place to start
Sure, i'd expect the model in center gets jerky because 3D camera zoom rescaling up mostly goes there.
There's "0;" ending typos btw in every sprite node rot parameter...etc..etc.
@Z22 what resolution models are you using to test this ?
What happens to overall FPS when you // eliminate each model ?

@Z22 I'm using an RTX 3080, I get about 28fps.

@EverthangForever - I put reflections behind an opaque mask and leave the clips normal when I can so that if one reflection passes in front of another you cannot see through it. The mask is at line 8145 of the published version. Changing this one line will change the appearance of all of the reflections. I've changed this to 0.5 at my end, looks better like that, they were a bit bright.

Judguing by gpu activity its not the gpu. I have a 3950x CPU. none of the cores are getting pegged full but there is a lot of spikes on 4 cores, which are on the same ccd so it's not a cross core latency problem. It's not the number of girls, i have made scenes in the past with 5 and used to be able to run 20 girls on the desktop (till they nerfed it).

As ET says, if it's only displaying the last shader in a node but is still calculating the others it could be the cause (worth investigating).

Il manque juste une paire de seins ! 😄😛
It's just missing a pair of breasts! 😄😛

@Z22 I'm using an RTX 3080, I get about 28fps.

@EverthangForever - I put reflections behind an opaque mask and leave the clips normal when I can so that if one reflection passes in front of another you cannot see through it. The mask is at line 8145 of the published version. Changing this one line will change the appearance of all of the reflections. I've changed this to 0.5 at my end, looks better like that, they were a bit bright.

Yes!
Clemence is very beautiful (with a perfect body).
I got this card with auto-buy more than an hour ago.

By ***** those 2 shaders i can get it to run at 30fps. It's only using ~30% of my GPU so i'm guessing the bottleneck is in the .scn. Have fun figuring out where ...

If i ***** all the shaders (delete) i get 33fps. Most of the girls seem ok except the girl in the centre, she is jerky (like 7fps jerky). Might be a place to start looking.

Fake Azimuthal EquidistantMod01.fsh cost 8fps

Disk Intersection.fsh appears to be costing 6fps. (am sequentially removing shaders to see where the bottleeneck is)

@Calgon

It's running at 15fps on a rtx 3090.

Clemence what can I say, so Alluring! The hair, eyes, smile & natural body. She’s so petite & tight Flawless! Clemence is beauty at its finest! 😍

Thanks to all the Gorgeous Models for gracing us with their beauty! 😘

Thanks Totem team! The joy you bring to our community, with all these beautiful models. We all do appreciate the hard work! 👍

After an unbearable wait, Clémence finally arrives on your computer, in a show of a rarely equaled sweetness and erotic intensity!!! an absolute MUST for your collection!



Enjoy

Marie Berger VR 😵 this is a must buy for me! I wonder how well she uses that duster 😈 Crotchless panties! MMMM that Dirty Marie 🔥

Marie Berger is waiting for you in your headset!
Come and discover what she does with her feather duster 🔥🔞😜😍

https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/817ff61244d3d820

The idea was that being a Premium member should have some kind of recurring benefit (to go with the recurring charges).

Premium membership already bestows two recurring benefis (not counting the little crown and the premium skin or the priority for support).

While I would welcome receiving a free SEC or joker every now and then I don't think that Totem will go for this scheme (especialy not at the rate of one a month) as it could well reduce their income rather than increase it.

Yeah, that's understood @Vortim.

2 or 3 Jokers a year wouldn't be enough for me to bother. The idea was that being a Premium member should have some kind of recurring benefit (to go with the recurring charges).

Other than 4K (which I genuinely don't care for) there isn't much benefit to those of us on 3D level - it's essentially break even.

SECs have always made me unhappy as a long term and 3D customer. I got ***** a lot by the gambling games, so I decided not to invest at all in SECs any more (even though I have quite a few in my library from earlier).

Perhaps the Joker frequency could be tied to your general tier?

• 3D customers: Monthly
• 2D customers: 3 months
• 1D customers: 6 months
• Other customers: 1 per year

That way, there is an incentive to be a Premium member - especially as you level up. And SECs become a privilege for those who buy more shows. Seems like a fair deal to me - both for Totem and for customers.

Of course, this would still allow people to play the games if they want to ... it would just be nice to be rewarded for loyalty and being a larger customer.

Running the numbers on Premium, it's pretty much a break-even deal if you're in the habit of buying every show and every VR. It's not really an incentive as far as I'm concerned.

I think adding a monthly Joker card to this would make this a BRILLIANT offer. That way, customers who stay longer can get Special Event cards by subscription rather than just via the games ... and it would take more than 12 months to get them all, which would help to drive loyalty and retention.

As it stands, Premium is a bit "meh" for me. But add that monthly Joker card, and I will NEVER unsubscribe.

Not that i am argueing with your idea.. but i really dont think they will add a monthly joker to the mix ever.... It would be more realistic to say maybe 2 or 3 a year... like quaterly or every 6 months... but no way every month. I dont know what the release rate is on SEC, but i thought it was usually one per month almost.... by giving a joker away monthly, they would basically be giving you the SEC every month, no way that will happen. And for someone like me who has all SEC (most by winning them in the games) I am sitting on two jokers as it is and just waiting on SEC cards to possibly use them on oneday.... i would be collecting a ton of joker cards if they gave them out monthly. Now 2 or 3 a year... i would probably sign up for Premium right now if that was the case.... again, not argueing, but trying to look at things logically from a sales/consumer point of view.....

Running the numbers on Premium, it's pretty much a break-even deal if you're in the habit of buying every show and every VR. It's not really an incentive as far as I'm concerned.

I think adding a monthly Joker card to this would make this a BRILLIANT offer. That way, customers who stay longer can get Special Event cards by subscription rather than just via the games ... and it would take more than 12 months to get them all, which would help to drive loyalty and retention.

As it stands, Premium is a bit "meh" for me. But add that monthly Joker card, and I will NEVER unsubscribe.

re: Flying Saucers
@Calgon this last of yours is magnificent. It compiles just fine for me.!
The colors and the camera zooming in on the center model
periodically, goes particularly well with music like P.Floyd. For a
scene deploying five 3Kclipsprites the stuttering was negligible 👍

The main thangs I changed at my end were to halve opacity of
da reflections and comment out the unused shaders & some
other stuff that might have been slowing it down some.
I believe within a node like a sprite node, only the last thus
listed (declared) shader in that node is used.

Not very practical
It's like a blind man imagining a naked woman. 😊
.

In my mind I picture a blind man, white cane in hand, wacking away at a dancer...

whack, whack, whack, thump... (there she is...)
whack, whack, thump... ooohh baby....

Wow very nice scene @Calgon. 😊

The only problem comes from my graphics card, which shows slight jerks in the girls' movements. Yet it is not used at 100%.

Damn graphics card, nothing to understand.


Wow ! Très belle scène @Calgon. 😊

Le seul problème vient de ma carte graphique, qui démontre de légères saccades dans les mouvements des filles. Pourtant elle n'est pas utilisée à 100%

Maudite carte graphique, Rien à y comprendre.

I've had a lot of help from the people on this forum so I wanted to share a little scene I've been working on. I write lots of scenes but most of them only reach 90% completion before I start something different 😕. I've been experimenting with circular shapes built up from many rectangular shapes.

The file is a bit large so I'd be interested to find out if it runs ok for people.

Special thanks to @Wyldanimal and @TheEmu

Flying Saucers

https://drive.google.com/file/d/109vY73MnGWOZmLnMFFpahn_JuvV9kDoo/view?usp=sharing