Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Last posts - Page 1569

  Forum

Birger52
Joined in Apr 2008
415 post(s)

A new version is out!

Everything about iStripper
February 10, 2017, 205 answers
I look throgh the featured cards - and the ones that look interesting, goes on the wishlist.
Some looks so interesting, that I preview the card. If it then is one that peaks the interest more than the others, I keep the preview.
In that way, my wishlist contains previews of the cards that I am most likely to buy, when funding is for that sort of things...

Limiting previews to 7, kind of also limits the number of cards I have to choose from - and the pushing of previews kind of feels like interference in which cards somebody that is not me, think I should invest in. It can be turned off, OK. Should be OFF by default, then....

I will need some other way of setting my own mark on cards that I find more interesting than others.
Alterantively, change my ways, and limit the number of cards I find interesting to 7 or less, at any given time.
A loose - loose situation.

When buying, I usually buy credits, and spend them immediately.
This preview thing is then also a limitation.
Where i live, there is no fast net. So once 2 cards are bought, I will have to wait with further previews (that are not already downloaded), until the new cards are done downloading.
And that kind of limits the enthusiasm...
Again a loose - loose situation.

Keeping 1.2.148 for now.
Think Totem shot themself in the foot, with this limit of previews.
Fully understand the problem with people watching free shows, rather than buying cards.
But there must be a solution, that does not limit the usefullness of the program, for customers that don't.
SanityAbsent
Joined in Jan 2017
14 post(s)

A new version is out!

Everything about iStripper
February 10, 2017, 205 answers
Well this form of customer care deserves an award - the golden pile of cat poo...

***** the update as soon I read about the new "Preview Pusher" feature in the forum - with no effect. So you can assume how happy I was to see the new Preview Tab in my GUI.
Luckily I had the old installer file still on my PC so reverting the version was no big deal.
However I still spent about an hour to manuallly check the numbers of the "trial" files in my vghd folder and reanble the corresponding cards via the Girls Store (!!!)

For me, I used the wishlist as my reminder of shows I definitely want to purchase later and Previews not ( yet) in my wishlist need a bit more consideration until I either delete them, put them in my wishlist or even buy them right away.

I do realize some might just use lots of previews without intention of ever buying them or some but focusing on impulsive buyers cuts out many (most certainly the majority). Limiting the offer is a business concept never working in the past - as any failed socialist state proves.

In just a bit over one month I, f.e., bought 52 cards, thats BECAUSE I had the freedom of choice !

Furthermore the feature to push random new Previews of cards to someones PC and automatically downloading them is really awesome if your internet connection is not the fastest and you still rely on it for work. So this new feature would ***** not only me to permanently delete unwanted Previews of cards I have zero interest in just to get some other with a high chance of having no fun at all again of the newly downloaded ones.

A random Preview pusher might work out as OPTIONAL feature but certainly not as way of *****.

Seems like I am not the only one considering if buying new cards is an option with this kind of policy.
pumpdude48
Joined in May 2016
2259 post(s)

The vanishment of anal scenes

Everything about iStripper
February 10, 2017, 13 answers
As for girls liking Sodomy, that may very well be true for a few girls. Apolonia comes to mind. I can't remember if she did it here but she sure seems into it elsewhere.

But in this case, I think the point trying to be made is, it's not IF they "LIKE it" personally but how much has to be paid, to see them do it on camera. My understanding of the porn business (very limited though it may be) is that it is a "pay to play" type of business. In this case I what I mean by "Pay to Play" is that, the more explicit the acts that are asked of the model, the more she (or He) gets paid. Teasing is less than nudity, nudity is less expensive than finger play and toys/vaginal insertion is more than finger play etc. I would guess that Anal is probably somewhat more expensive than toys etc. which I think was part of @EverthangForever 's point.

The other part of his point seems to be that it is not sanitary/medically healthy in any way shape or form, no matter how well she cleans herself out beforehand. I agree wholeheartedly with that opinion but that opinion is probably jaded by some of the things I have had to do during the course of my employment. Ugghh.

For me, along with not being exciting, anal just feels "Nasty" to me, knowing what normally comes out of that hole. That may be part of what excites others about it, I wouldn't know but it also seems a little on the degrading side to me to ask a girl to do that to herself, but that is only my personal opinion.

If others want to see anal, they can request it I suppose, it won't be me and like @EverthangForever I don't care to personally subsidise it either. I have enough trouble supporting my own porn habit... 😉