@R2D34ever2

sittingHeight and standingHeight can both be used in the same scene (I have done it in many scenes).

As indicated the standingHeight controls Standing, Pole, Cage, Glass clips etc. The sittingHeight controls table clips only.

Please note that sittingHeight does not control standing clips where the girl may squat or kneel or lie down.

There are limitations in both. Some of the older clips still seem small when the standing height is set. If you increase it to accomodate this then with some of the newer clips the girls head can disappear off the top of the sceen.

Similarly with sittingHeight increasing it for older clips runs the risk of losing the girls head in newer clips if she kneels up.

Neither are perfect and one size doesn't always fit all, but they can work together.

Give it a try. You can't really break anything with it and as long as you save any changes with a new filename then you will not lose your original.

Please note also that if you are using multiple clips then you need to set the standingHeight/sitting Height for each clip when it is called in the scene. This can sometimes help when wanting to reduce the height of some clips to get some sort of perspective effect. If you look in Totem's Whisper Club multi girl scene, the pole clips' standingHeight is set at half of the main clip's standingHeight.

The screencaps have a standing height of 380, 400 and 420 repectively in the Background 2D scene.

Please be aware also that in that scene the camera size is set at 800 x 450 which automatically scales up to a 1920 x 1080 screen so even small changes to the standingHeight (or sittingHeight) in that scene can have quite a dramatic effect.

HTH

Bummer... I've long been hoping to see the unreleased Alexa Nova and Celeste cards. 😪 Perhaps someday, though I shan't hold my breath lest I asphixiate and die...

Does anyone else remember the days when Totem would regularly release old unreleased cards?

I remember dose good old days.😀

Number6 ..
when I change the sitting or standing height in a scenefile can I use what you just explained also or will these two things then collide and I will have something I don't need when playing a fullscreen scene ?

i did not vote.👍 and i will tell u why. what if ms. ginebra like any other model went to totem . and had the legal authority backing her up. and said she wanted ALL her information and photos and shows erased . and totem had to it. bad for us right. 😭 now totem has to refund every one who paid for her shows. OH GOD!!!!!! that a huge loss for the mods and the team players 😲 now this is not suppose happen 🔞 lets just say there was a back ally deal were totem did away with the info and photos but not the shows. 😎 now i said this is not suppose to happen. now think about that . while ur crying 😱 ABOUT A SPECIAL EVent CARD.!!!!!!!!.

I do not understand how anyone could want a special event card. For triple diamond...the special card would merely cost $1-$1.33. To get any of them so far a buyer had to spend more than 13 credits...and only few of the full collectors got anything for free...basically $1 for free. Just adding the cards into the store normally is by far the best option for the community, now for totem it is a different story.

Adding sittingHeight: 380 gives the above approx size on a 1920 x 1080 screen for a table clip.

Forgot to add in the first one

above the standingHeight: 380 line

you can also add a new line

scale: -1.0, 1.0, 1.0

This mirrors the clips so that the text on clothes appears the right way round.

If you want a bit more info on this there a few more posts here.

http://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/38344/2?post=580411

If you want a version that plays Swing clips then copy the code below.

Open Notepad and past the code into it.

Save the file as say Background 2D_Top.scn

Make sure you save it into the Background 2D folder.

text: text.txt

clip {
id: Clip
allow: top
//deny: behindtable
}

texture {
id: Background2D
source: Backgrounds
}

camera {
type: 2D
pos: -10, 0
size: 800, 450

animate: 15, PingPong, InOutQuad, pos, 20, 20

sprite {
pos: 400, 150
hotspot: 0.5, 0.5
size: 820, 615
source: Background2D
blend: false
}

clipSprite {
pos: 400, -35
scale: -1.0, 1.0, 1.0
standingHeight: 380
source: Clip
}

clipNameSprite {
pos: 400, 450
scale: 0.5
hotspot: 0.5, 1
source: Clip
}
}

Hi ladies,
Make a soft punishment to @Wyldanimal, he's not so bad 😀

@desexyvideoclub

In the iStripper GUI click on the Monitor icon in the top Menu bar. This goes to the Fullscreen Page in the GUI. There is a folder Icon next to the number of scenes. Click on this and it will open Windows Explorer at the scenes directory for iStripper.

Open the Background_2D folder and find the Background 2D.scn file.

Open this file in notepad or other text editor.

Scroll down until you find the folowing

clipSprite {
pos: 400, 450
standingHeight: 380
source: Clip
}

Changing the standingHeight value is what you need to do. Save the file with a slightly different name so you don't overwrite the original but it must have the .scn extension so that iStripper recognises it.

Also directly under the standingHeight: 380 line you can enter a new line

sittingHeight:380

You can play around with this value as well.

standingHeight controls the standing clips.
sittingHeight controls the table clips.

HTH

@goodwolf - 10/50/30/10 would let you know that a significant majority of 80% prefer something in the middle while only relatively few want either extreme. limiting the choices to two by lumping together the two upper bins and the two lower bins reduces this to a 60:40 split, thows away the strong preference for a middle way and replaces it with a weak preference for the upper half of the range.

1000 votes?
Good luck with that

@goodwolf - but if you get a 10/50/30/10 it tells you a whole lot more.

I think not, the biggest number is the 50 = only half of the people voted, agreed to choose that, the other half choose differently... a 30 against 70 is something. 10/10/30/50 is nothing, it only says that everyone wants a different thing, however half could agree on something, but half is not enough. The more options you add, the smaller the numbers get. From 3 options it is almost impossible to show majority agreed in sg.

Okay let's see the results in a week or two, after 1000 votes. I would be surprised if we would see a meaningful outcome. I think we will see, that everybody wants a different thing, no majority at any points.

:)

Beta testers wanted

I've received some suggestions for improving the user interface of my Playlist Generator. This does not add new capabilities with regard to creating playlists, but it does (I hope) make it easier to select the cards and clips to be part of a playlist.

Here is what I've done:

1. Models can now be tagged, sorted and filtered (selected) in the same way as cards.

2. There are now two overview displays. Each looks something like the My Collection display in iStripper. One shows a single card image for each model. (You can determine which image is used). The other shows every card in your collection.

3. On the overview displays, you can either show all models/cards or just those that are currently selected.

4. On the overview displays, you can show one fact about the model/card much as the Girls Store in iStripper does. However, you have many more choices and you can control this display independently of the sort and filter settings.

5. There are now separate filter tabs for models, cards and clips. While these provide many more capabilities than before, I hope they are easier to use and understand. In fact, this is the area where I most want feedback.

6. Tags can now be classified by source which should make importing and managing tags simpler.

7. Although Totem tags default to Totem's structure, that is most are part of "category" I have created an alternate more detailed organization with, for example, all costume tags in one category and all breast size tags in another.

The attached screen shots show some of the primary tabs in the application. The data displayed in the Models tab shows the number and types of cards. The first number is the number of cards currently selected. The second is the total number of cards. The remaining number are by collection letter. The data displayed in the Cards tab shows the hotness level for the card and the number of clips by hotness level. Whether the card is currently selected is also shown.

Anyone willing to beta test this version, please let me know by PM. Include your email if I don't already have it. This version is not as thoroughly tested as previous ones. At this point I'm mainly interested in look-and-feel issues and ease of use.

Can you teach me or make me a version of Background_2D only that has a different size to the model?
I would need 125%, 150% and 200%

Ok, lets fly to Paris and Make a special event card,
WyldAnimals Punishment. 😈

Brilliant idea. 😀

And they can get Aria Giovanni to play the part of Wyldanimal because of....well....you know 😳😳

Ok, lets fly to Paris and Make a special event card,
WyldAnimals Punishment. 😈

My favorite of the list is Miyuki Son. Next Paula Shy and Natalia not mentioned in the list.
A take 2 of one of these: only for Miyuki Son, who had just 6 cards, but very much wished: no.
Of Paula Shy and Natalia there are cards enough imo.

what R2 said ......Paula Shy !!!!

I'm going to have to swat his backside with a rolled up newspaper.

Bad Bad Bad Animal! No treats for you taday!

Sorry for the Derailment. My Bad...
Bad Animal Bad, bad, Bad Animal....

It is okay, I did find the digression pretty interesting! 😆

Je suis d'accord avec vous, moi j'achète les cartes qui m'interressent et donc je ne suis pas prêt à acheter un lot de cartes inutiles juste pour en avoir une qui me plait,(je ne participe pas au calendrier de l'avent par exemple) mais c'est sûr que la carte de Niemira par exemple je l'aurai acheter si elle avait été à la vente seule même après un mois, visiblement je ne suis pas le seul dans ce cas (vu le forum ) . Multiplié par le nombre cela fait une perte sèche pour totem de ne pas mettre en vente cette carte événement......

Totem could make a new "VIP" member level (above triple diamond) for members with 3,000+ cards and allow them to purchase special event cards. I'm pretty sure that anyone who has purchased that many cards has shown their fair share of support to Totem.

Another possibility, if Totem wants to keep doing exclusive cards, would be to make these cards available to buy for triple diamond members, or members who already have over 3000 cards for example. These cards could be part of exclusive offers like the ones we've seen, and these offers would still be attractive to members building their collections.

From what I read in different threads on this topic, some members (like myself) will simply choose not to take part in exclusive events. But I'm guessing the hundreds or thousands spent by other members during these events largely compensates for the ones who don't.

As other members suggested before, the best way to show you disagree with something is to boycott it. Totem has already changed some of its special offers: for instance booster packs don't come up so often anymore, and redraw option has been added. 1st exclusive card wasn't originally meant to be aquired outside of advent calendar and this has also evolved. All this shows Totem does pay attention to members' feedback.

Sur ce sujet , je pense que tous les membres 3diamands doivent avoir acces à tous les cartes et rubriques du site, mais depuis peu certaines cartes sont inaccessibles; Alors pour contenter tous le monde faire des cartes vip mais les rendre accessibles au bout d'un moment à tous seraient une bonne solution.

La plus jolie c'est Maya Mai je voudrais bien un take 2 de 6 shows .........SVP

Sorry for the Derailment. My Bad...
Bad Animal Bad, bad, Bad Animal....

My favorite is Paula Shy ...
I wish she came back for another take...

Cristina Miller

@boan000 not a any help there. I do`t know.

Avery

I have one of it a0102, but never knew, that it was a special series.
You have some nice tray icons :)

Not a Special Series,

there were some cards not released when they were produced, Due to Flaws or encoding errors....

After the years, a New Encoder, allowed them to be re-Encoded and released to fill in the Missing gaps.

I think these were from 2009, and then gaps filled in in 2012

Tray Icons.
One day Maybe I'll complete them...
I did about 500 of the "A" series
the Cards last Digit ends in 0 through 9, So I assigned a color to every digit as the Back ground..
So All 0's will have the same back ground color, and all 3's etc.....

I've got Photoshop 7.0
Maybe it has a scripting language, that I can automate the process..

I've not looked into scripting with Photoshop.
Anyone have experience with PS 7.0 scripting?

@goodwolf - but if you get a 10/50/30/10 it tells you a whole lot more.

As I understand JayZ's options...
1: As we have now. Offered later in other promos.
2: As originally intended but now changed by vociferous demands...
3: What the majority so far seem to want but goes against Totem's original idea of being exclusive forever. Might upset some members who bought into the original events...
4: Obvious.

I personally think that JayZ should have put MORE options in this poll. I agree completely with TheEmu.

What about an option for, 'Don't really care. All is good with me 😊' ? (Which I would have voted if it was there as I have no intention of buying every card available … )

Or how about, ' YES if I can do something so spectacular as a benefit for the forum and all members that I deserve to be given all of these exclusive cards for free!' 😆

You are absolutely not right at this point. Let's say you get a 30/30/20/20 as result, which tells absolutely nothing besides, that we customers/users can not agree on anything, some wants this, some wants that, nobody wants the same. AND we already know that :) But I leave it up to you, that is your opinion and this in mine.

@GhostRider22,
Bonjour, on obtient une carte gratuite quand on s'inscrit sur iStripper (la première donc). C'est cette carte que tu n'as pas reçu ?
Si oui, ouvre un ticket vers le service client en expliquant ton problème et l'équipe de Totem y répondra.

Au vu de ton historique :

• 25 crédits donnés le 22 juin 2016
• 25 crédits donnés il y a 19 jours
• 2 fois 10 crédits donnés il y a 11 jours

Bonjour, j'ai crée ce compte-ci en 2015 et j'y ai acheté quelques shows récemment...
Lorsque que je vais sur votre site pour avoir les show données gratuit, je ne les reçois pas. Ce problème persiste depuis 2015 et pourtant, je ne les ai jamais eu.

Quelqu'un pourrait m'expliquer pourquoi je ne les reçoit pas alors que sur un autre compte lambda que j'ai créée, je les reçois ?

20th March
FG056 ~ bmp animations conversion to a fullscreen scene.
Extracted some sample frames from Lunarpup's recent multi
screensaver scr at
http://www.lunarpup.com/animations/ss/FSa.exe
to include within the FG series to illustrate FS anim codings.

https://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ET_FractalGarden56.zip

Zip size = 25.9 MB extract ( via merging folders & overwrite-all ) to ..scenes/

On the contrary, a simple yes/no vote would be far too simplistic.

The ones with answer: don't care - why vote then ???

Because it provides some extra feedback to Totem over and above simply not voting.

This is another irrelevant poll. Can you still change for just yes or no ?
... and I don't understand the question and some options either :(
Maybe can you specify it to be more clear at every answer- what that means ?
This way it is quite focused to get an irrelevant outcome ... 3 yes against 1 no.
The two yes, but... typed of options should be taken out. You can't work with 100 % splitten into 4 parts. You can undertand a 50/50 or a 70/30 vote, but not this.

The ones with answer: don't care - why vote then ???

You did it wrong by the 3rd option. There should be just yes or no. This will make the poll irrelevant, so not voting this time.

Yes, every day there were random cards discounted from 2 to 1 credit as far as I can remember...

I have one of it a0102, but never knew, that it was a special series.
You have some nice tray icons :)

@spiderman1804
👍
thanks for the detailed information.

Old price system until October 2014.
All shows of the series Axxxx (VirtuaGirl), Cxxxx (DeskBabes) and Bxxxx (VirtuaGuy) were offered for the price of 2 credits (new 20 credits).
All shows of the Dxxxx series (VirtuaGirl Classic) were priced 1 credit (new 10 credits).

Since the end of October 2014, there is a new pricing system in which a discount is granted depending on the user status.
New were the shows with quality "Crystal Clear".
The basic prices depend on the quality level:
"low" (480p) for 1 credit
"medium" (720p) for 1.6 credits
"standard" (1080p) for 2 credits
"crystal clear" (3K) for 3 credits (later reduced to 2.5 credits)

With the iStripper version, the payment has changed. This change was not a price increase.
The basic prices depend on the quality level:
"low" (480p) for 10 credits
"medium" (720p) for 16 credits
"standard" (1080p) for 20 credits
"crystal clear" (3K) for 25 credits

The purchased credits were also converted accordingly.

###

There were different possibilities in the old price system not to pay the full price.
# Subscription for 1, 3 or 6 months
# Bosster packs with 10 shows on a theme (for example blonde or bikini)
# single random shows for the price of 1 credit (new 10 credits)

I'm not sure, but in the old VirtuaGirl software it could have been the possibility that a kind of calendar added a random show every day to be displayed there. If no subscription was active, then from the last 14 shows the show could be bought for a reduced price.

You are forgetting about the discounts. The 10 you paid already included a membership ranking discount. 10 credits then compares to a medium quality card today, As a triple diamond member they cost you 8.80 today, so acctually they are cheaper today.

Those cards are now many years older and lower quality than currently available so it seems reasonable they cost less now.

My earlier point was cards (the newest and best quality available at the time) went from $2 to $2.50 and they ended the ability to buy the new cards as they were released for a $1. That's an effective 250% increase as far as I am concerned.

I never ***** about the increase I simply wondered if I would have become a member at all had the cards cost that much when I joined. Too fully clarify my original point, I wondered if a discount based on the number of cards you are currently buying would be more palatable than a discount based on the number of cards you have already bought.

I have almost 2500 cards and imagine I payed about $2300 for those cards over the last 11 or 12 years so either way is fine by me but I think a lower cost of entry will help grow the membership and thats good for everyone.