Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

마지막の글 - 페이지 #794

  게시판

pantalone
Joined in Nov 2010
2303 글

American Models in Europe

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
May 9, 2020, 38 답변
The way I see current porn industry, I find it horribly tasteless and becoming more and more disgustingly extreme. The women in the industry are encouraged to do more and more extreme acts (anal, hardcore, *****, etc.). I absolutely ***** that trend, and loath people who get their kicks off from watching women *****, violated, *****, tormented... (real or simulated).

I'm with you on that one, but I think that the current crisis will only exacerbate the trend. The businesses that push the boundaries of good taste and taboos will have a wider pool of willing models to choose from. Some businesses won't survive for economic reasons, but new ones will take their place, if there's a market for it. The virus and its economic impact won't affect people's desire to see women *****. Many people would regard our taste for vids of striptease and masturbation as *****.

One thing that would affect it is widespread state intervention, primarily in the area of universal basic income. Performers would then have the freedom to choose not to work for the most extreme sites.

Another possibility is state censorship for the moral wellbeing of the populus (i.e. everybody except the patriarchs), or for the avoidance of exploitation of vulnerable women. Proponents of this sort of stuff (nannies) forget that the vulnerability is caused by iniquitous state policies and religion as a tool of repression, all to preserve the hierarchy.

Or maybe fashion will swing against extreme porn and the women will rebel as you suggest.

But I don't see any evidence of any of these ideas becoming mainstream, even during pandemic times. Vested interests like the media and banks will resist it, public opinion will follow and politicians, including the populists, will ***** the voters.

The important thing is to resist the extreme becoming the new normal. Avoid women becoming victims of exploitation, rather than being performers revered and celebrated by those of use who pay them to entertain. Avoid businesses that exploit male powerlessness and frustration. We may not be able to resist some widening of the envelope of what's available in times of economic trouble, but at least we can avoid supporting businesses that ***** and degrade people, physically or mentally.
orclover
Joined in Jun 2012
1404 글

Not a Scar

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
May 9, 2020, 42 답변
I can imagine how different the experience at iStripper is, compared to more structured and directed sets. It seems clear that the performers here have to do the choreaography themselves, instructions being "okay, there's your stage, dance and perform for 35 minutes and try and look sexy" :)

Based on recent shows, i don't think girls get much instructions or direction from the production team, which is a shame I guess, but rather they are given free range to do what they feel comfortable doing... Maybe this affected Agatha's performance, too?

And for the record, I loved Agatha's show! The shyness and not-100%-professionalism is exactly what I want to see. Spontaneous decisions, choices made in the spur of the moment, little clumsiness and ***** mishaps... all of that makes the show even more precious to me.

The istripper setting is so artificial. An industrial studio, with a hard stage, and a green screen. It is the most unsexy setting imaginable. In contrast, Agatha shot for W4B on the cliffs on the coast overlooking the blue sea. Her show was 8 minutes long and she was done.

The paradox is the istripper performances can be the most real because there is little cutting and ***** of footage. We get to see the whole female form, which is unusual in movie formats, and we get to see it in multiple positions in one clip. And of course girls will attempt to truly dance which is also unusual on other sites. I really hope Agatha contrasts this performance with a much more confident one later, that would make a complete set.
orclover
Joined in Jun 2012
1404 글

Not a Scar

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
May 8, 2020, 42 답변
@orclover Reacting on your comment on her show: Agatha Vega has done 8 movies for W4B and 4 for Nubiles. So she's used to the camera and not shy or inexperienced. I don't known anything about the chemistry between her and the director.
The show with this dress is taken on her first day in the studio. The inviting for the fansign is on the first day.
More info here: https://www.thenude.eu/Agatha%20Vega_41079.htm#videos

All I can say is she blushes continually from embarrassment, and is always looking off the to the side for direction. This is not unusual recently though so I think something is going on with direction. None of the recent girls including the starlets look like they are freely performing. Even a girl like Carolina who has sex in front of hundreds of people on stage seemed uncomfortable at times. It does appear as if the later cards get better just from the demos so maybe just nerves...the istripper experience is very different from those other sites.

Imagine being asked to perform but there are no cuts and there is no post-production to fix mistakes. Everything that is filmed will be public. W4B and Nubiles do set pieces, so if a girl does a squat or a shake, or splits it can be set up separately from the rest of the performance. And there is no pole which causes some stress on the girls if they aren't pros. ALso performing in on a set with a couch or normal setting has got be more relaxing than a stripper stage with industrial lighting.

Maybe totem should bring in a few hundred people to be a crowd for the performances...in my public speaking experiences...many was always easier to navigate than just a few.
orclover
Joined in Jun 2012
1404 글

Not a Scar

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
May 8, 2020, 42 답변
I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

Imagine being a new user though...you literally have thousands of cards to choose from..each costs $2.50, which is a lot for 45 minutes of non-b/g porn. Ratings are key to getting somebody "hooked", in fact I went from 10 cards to hundreds based off of a now-defunct site that clearly rated every single card. Of course it is just one card but inevitably people are going to ignore the rest of hers thinking she has red scars.

Within a set of cards the ratings are surprisengly trustworthy. Most scores below 4.6 are cards that are either boring, have physical, or technical flaws...scores above this tend to maximize what the girl has to offer...so you may not like the girl but a high rating means she is physically and technically well represented.

Take Belka's 1st xxx card. To many, the most highly anticipated card in a long time. It barely has a rating of 4.6...that is much lower than her entire first set that were all above 4.7. I could immediately look at that rating an know the card must be a let down because Belka doing xxx should be an automatic 5...except it doesn't maximize Belka, and people rated it lower.
orclover
Joined in Jun 2012
1404 글

American Models in Europe

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
May 8, 2020, 38 답변
They need to reinvest these easy earnings from the gambling and SE back into the productDuring 2019, that has be done indeed (VR shows, 4K cam, new codec and better video quality - and there have been better beauties and better performances also). In first couple of months of 2020, though, models have been got slightly worse, but maybe it would have been just a moment (I remember it has been said, many times, that winter and Xmas times are not so good for shootings) and probably things were about to change again - but then COVID-19 arrived...

The issue with the "new content" is it requires additional expense so you can't call that reinvestment. Charging such an exhorbinant price for VR is like charging for pictures...10 minutes for the price of multiple cards, 4k is another slap in the face because it requires the triple diamond consumer to sacrifice 40-50 cards worth of money to get it. And they refuse to optimize the software to 64 bit so it can actually handle the extra memory. What they have learned from the gambling is they can get away with a lot more than they initially could back in 2015...cards are still broken, all new content requries extra cost, and the new shows...not necessarily girls, are poorly scripted, I mean Jia Lissa, Belka, and the new group of girls all look like they are being micromanaged and not actually allowed to perform. I actually believe the girls are being managed to not put on the best show but to sell more cards later in the series...being told to hold back..to only do this move this many times,...and so on. That has to be very distracting for a dancer, who isn't actually a professional dancer.

I am wrong a lot so it might just be a little dip and a good week can turn me immediately into a fanboy because I have the maturity of a 12 year old. The gambling perturbs me...always has because it doesn't serve my ilk and I can only imagine getting free easy money is going to encourage them to continue to pursue free and easy money while letting the product fall apart at the seams.
Previous 페이지 #794 다음