Not completely fallen for, but some extra attention for Agatha Vega. On the photo's the "Scars" on her breasts, but also the tattoo on her back with our solar system with clearly the South-American continent on planet Earth. Agatha is from Venezuela.

What appear on my credit card bill if I use epoch/credit card payment ?

Until now, i used paypal/epoch and my credit card bill indicate "PAYPAL *X. TOTEMCASH" and this is not what i call "anonymous".

I have no problems with scars, but I don´t like tatoos, don´t like them at all.

I think info about 4:20 should be updated:

• buy a card
• ***** on forum you didn't get the achievement. :P

So yeah, didn't work for me either, despite multiple attempts with PST and PDT, one-click enabled and disabled.

I bougth my card at 1:20:16 AM CET+2, this is 4:20:16 PM PDT. I also didn't get an achievement.

"Groundhog Day" 😆

This is not the first time you have asked about "Special Event Cards"......did you read this thread ???

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/43676/1?post=644841

its the truth

This is quite a can a worms you are opening.

I am going to get a beer,
sit back,
and watch the comments come in.

supply and demand

This is true of most labor.

when unemployment is low....
restaurants have to hire bad waiters becuase all the good waiter have jobs.

when umemployment is high
restuarants have a choice of people to hire and service is much better.

To a certain level, this applies to many careers.

hi
i wanted to purchase a special event card but it wont let me....im guessing you have to buy it in a certain amount of days or it expires...bummer

Just bought 3 cards at 6:20 PM CDT for the 4:20 PM PDT award.
1=Agatha Vega, account history shows 01:20:58
2=Jill, account history shows 01:20:33
3=Carolina Abril, account history shows 01:20:08

No 4:20 award yet, maybe next week ?

So bought these cards, spared them for the 4.20 achievement. But unfortunately it's bugged.
You can check in the sales log.

@pantalone

I also think that sites such as iStripper might be the ones to benefit from current situation.

The way I see current porn industry, I find it horribly tasteless and becoming more and more disgustingly extreme. The women in the industry are encouraged to do more and more extreme acts (anal, hardcore, *****, etc.). I absolutely ***** that trend, and loath people who get their kicks off from watching women *****, violated, *****, tormented... (real or simulated).

I really hope this crisis will either put Brazzers, Lethal and similar sites out of business or at least make them change drastically the content they produce.

The women in the industry should somehow get together, form a union if needed... to formulate some commonly accepted rules of what they agree to do and what they don't accept. This could be a right moment to do that - maybe even put up their own website or production outlet.

MetArt, MetArtX, SexArt, EternalDesire... and sites like that (concentrating heavily on solo performances) should be the winners of the current crisis.

I couldn't agree more.

@pantalone

I also think that sites such as iStripper might be the ones to benefit from current situation.

The way I see current porn industry, I find it horribly tasteless and becoming more and more disgustingly extreme. The women in the industry are encouraged to do more and more extreme acts (anal, hardcore, *****, etc.). I absolutely ***** that trend, and loath people who get their kicks off from watching women *****, violated, *****, tormented... (real or simulated).

I really hope this crisis will either put Brazzers, Lethal and similar sites out of business or at least make them change drastically the content they produce.

The women in the industry should somehow get together, form a union if needed... to formulate some commonly accepted rules of what they agree to do and what they don't accept. This could be a right moment to do that - maybe even put up their own website or production outlet.

MetArt, MetArtX, SexArt, EternalDesire... and sites like that (concentrating heavily on solo performances) should be the winners of the current crisis.

Why does every society put a taboo around It? I'll tell you why. It is the one thing we'd all like to do.
Quote From the Movie "Priest".

I can imagine how different the experience at iStripper is, compared to more structured and directed sets. It seems clear that the performers here have to do the choreaography themselves, instructions being "okay, there's your stage, dance and perform for 35 minutes and try and look sexy" :)

Based on recent shows, i don't think girls get much instructions or direction from the production team, which is a shame I guess, but rather they are given free range to do what they feel comfortable doing... Maybe this affected Agatha's performance, too?

And for the record, I loved Agatha's show! The shyness and not-100%-professionalism is exactly what I want to see. Spontaneous decisions, choices made in the spur of the moment, little clumsiness and ***** mishaps... all of that makes the show even more precious to me.

The istripper setting is so artificial. An industrial studio, with a hard stage, and a green screen. It is the most unsexy setting imaginable. In contrast, Agatha shot for W4B on the cliffs on the coast overlooking the blue sea. Her show was 8 minutes long and she was done.

The paradox is the istripper performances can be the most real because there is little cutting and ***** of footage. We get to see the whole female form, which is unusual in movie formats, and we get to see it in multiple positions in one clip. And of course girls will attempt to truly dance which is also unusual on other sites. I really hope Agatha contrasts this performance with a much more confident one later, that would make a complete set.

I can imagine how different the experience at iStripper is, compared to more structured and directed sets. It seems clear that the performers here have to do the choreaography themselves, instructions being "okay, there's your stage, dance and perform for 35 minutes and try and look sexy" :)

Based on recent shows, i don't think girls get much instructions or direction from the production team, which is a shame I guess, but rather they are given free range to do what they feel comfortable doing... Maybe this affected Agatha's performance, too?

And for the record, I loved Agatha's show! The shyness and not-100%-professionalism is exactly what I want to see. Spontaneous decisions, choices made in the spur of the moment, little clumsiness and ***** mishaps... all of that makes the show even more precious to me.

@orclover Reacting on your comment on her show: Agatha Vega has done 8 movies for W4B and 4 for Nubiles. So she's used to the camera and not shy or inexperienced. I don't known anything about the chemistry between her and the director.
The show with this dress is taken on her first day in the studio. The inviting for the fansign is on the first day.
More info here: https://www.thenude.eu/Agatha%20Vega_41079.htm#videos

All I can say is she blushes continually from embarrassment, and is always looking off the to the side for direction. This is not unusual recently though so I think something is going on with direction. None of the recent girls including the starlets look like they are freely performing. Even a girl like Carolina who has sex in front of hundreds of people on stage seemed uncomfortable at times. It does appear as if the later cards get better just from the demos so maybe just nerves...the istripper experience is very different from those other sites.

Imagine being asked to perform but there are no cuts and there is no post-production to fix mistakes. Everything that is filmed will be public. W4B and Nubiles do set pieces, so if a girl does a squat or a shake, or splits it can be set up separately from the rest of the performance. And there is no pole which causes some stress on the girls if they aren't pros. ALso performing in on a set with a couch or normal setting has got be more relaxing than a stripper stage with industrial lighting.

Maybe totem should bring in a few hundred people to be a crowd for the performances...in my public speaking experiences...many was always easier to navigate than just a few.

If I remember correctly there was a card that was marked/scored quite low and had nothing to do with the woman.
It was a Christmas card, but was more of a new years eve card.
all the negative comments were about it not being christmas.

That was the SEC f0428 Olivia Sin / Happy New Year

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

If I remember correctly there was a card that was marked/scored quite low and had nothing to do with the woman.
It was a Christmas card, but was more of a new years eve card.
all the negative comments were about it not being christmas.

@pantalone

I also think that sites such as iStripper might be the ones to benefit from current situation.

The way I see current porn industry, I find it horribly tasteless and becoming more and more disgustingly extreme. The women in the industry are encouraged to do more and more extreme acts (anal, hardcore, *****, etc.). I absolutely ***** that trend, and loath people who get their kicks off from watching women *****, violated, *****, tormented... (real or simulated).

I really hope this crisis will either put Brazzers, Lethal and similar sites out of business or at least make them change drastically the content they produce.

The women in the industry should somehow get together, form a union if needed... to formulate some commonly accepted rules of what they agree to do and what they don't accept. This could be a right moment to do that - maybe even put up their own website or production outlet.

MetArt, MetArtX, SexArt, EternalDesire... and sites like that (concentrating heavily on solo performances) should be the winners of the current crisis.

Yep! She sure got me!!
You Evil Woman
You Tease!
You Lying Manipulator!
Yeaaahhh Baby!
I’m Yours!

I still think that economics will drive the quality of the shows here.
Performers will compete for modelling work with surviving businesses and the Totem team, who have been prudent enough to keep their business going through the pandemic, will have the pick of the best performers around.

It may look a quite cynical way of thinking about the future situation, but it's probable things will really go like so.

Who's the girl in the Oktoberfest badge?

a

I think that lovely lady is Kate Shoo.

Ok that must be her jam 😊

I wonder if it was played in the studio 😶

We could debate the pre-Covid quality of the performers till we're blue in the face.

I still think that economics will drive the quality of the shows here. Pretty much all national economies are taking a battering right now, with massive unemployment, over-loaded social security safety-nets and people's net disposable income crashing. Plus, right now, people can't travel.

So nobody can get to the strip clubs or escort agencies in Eastern Europe. They'll go bust without tourism and the performers will have no work and probably no social security, since they were not full-time employees working in their home towns. Even when lockdown eases, punters can't afford to take expensive holidays in Kiev and even the normally affluent will be reluctant to fly the girls around and pay them $500 an hour or whatever.

This will be good for iStripper! Performers will compete for modelling work with surviving businesses and the Totem team, who have been prudent enough to keep their business going through the pandemic, will have the pick of the best performers around.

So maybe strippers will go down to $20-a-barrel. Or is that just too Brent Crude? Always look on the bright side of life, da dum, da dum.....

Someone should have asked...

mentirosa manipuladora

***** liar

lying manipulator

Also the name of an Alblum / song
https://play.google.com/music/preview/Tqblehzm4u5267qb6flkfxkf2ie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfqLjGAT4HI

No thanks for me @Missy?😳

@orclover Reacting on your comment on her show: Agatha Vega has done 8 movies for W4B and 4 for Nubiles. So she's used to the camera and not shy or inexperienced. I don't known anything about the chemistry between her and the director.
The show with this dress is taken on her first day in the studio. The inviting for the fansign is on the first day.
More info here: https://www.thenude.eu/Agatha%20Vega_41079.htm#videos

I love tattoos so I see this as an win

Hey guys relax! I’ll take the blame for the ***** comment!
Downloaded, Played the show, didn’t Bother to look😵 closely, Jumped to a Bad conclusion.
I commented Favorably about Agatha’s show , regardless was corrected-thankfully by another member.
Agatha did the trick for me!! Yeah! She’s a Keeper!

Please don’t get your Panties in a Bunch over this
Sheesh✌

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

Imagine being a new user though...you literally have thousands of cards to choose from..each costs $2.50, which is a lot for 45 minutes of non-b/g porn. Ratings are key to getting somebody "hooked", in fact I went from 10 cards to hundreds based off of a now-defunct site that clearly rated every single card. Of course it is just one card but inevitably people are going to ignore the rest of hers thinking she has red scars.

Within a set of cards the ratings are surprisengly trustworthy. Most scores below 4.6 are cards that are either boring, have physical, or technical flaws...scores above this tend to maximize what the girl has to offer...so you may not like the girl but a high rating means she is physically and technically well represented.

Take Belka's 1st xxx card. To many, the most highly anticipated card in a long time. It barely has a rating of 4.6...that is much lower than her entire first set that were all above 4.7. I could immediately look at that rating an know the card must be a let down because Belka doing xxx should be an automatic 5...except it doesn't maximize Belka, and people rated it lower.

At Agatha's back a tattoo with our solar system: above the Sun, then Mercurius, Venus and Earth with the South-American continent showing! Her home continent!👍

All tattoos are scars in my view.

I knew from pics on Lukaszr's fine site that the breast tats were not scars. In my opinion, they are also not attractive.

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

There was a thread about this a while ago but in reality the rating system is too basic and too open to being used to express people's personal agendas. If they don't like XXX, rate a nudity-only card low - and vice versa.

Until a more scientific objective approach is implemented,it will always not be worth the paper it's not printed on 😄

In the meantime, when I first saw the tattoos I thought "huh!" but it took me all of around 5 seconds to realise they couldn't be scars. Agatha has a fabulous figure and high potential - my only regret about her card was that she wore a dress like that and didn't do a single pantyless upskirt - now that is a hanging offence!

😉😉😉

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

In first couple of months of 2020, though, new models did tend to be slightly worse, anyway it maybe would have been just a short moment (I remember it has been said, many times, that winter and Xmas times are not so good for shootings)

I don't agree. The month's April, May and June 2019 were the worst of all for me. There were weeks I didn't buy any card, which hadden't happened since December 2013. The general level has gone upward. Less models who don't go further than a shake to the left and a shake to the right and look sweetly/mysterious at the camera(man). It all depends of what kind of show you like: the top for me so far is Elis (for others Belka, who had all the skills and is the highest rated model ever and when were her shows...). And therefore I again ask for a TAKE 2 of ELIS!

@orclover Thanks for starting this thread. It's so unright what has happened to Agatha.

People who took that tattoo as a ***** need to have their eyes examined.

@orclover I have to say that - while not to all - I agree with some of your statings. We could discuss together about such important quality matters; but it looks unluckily quite unuseful, since only thing the average user looks to be interested in, now, is getting the 4:20 achievement...

Anyway, I recently started a thread on Ideas & Suggestion our discussion's matters could have some relevance to; feel free to add your considerations there, if you like to.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44668/1?post=661671

In this case it is not the system's fault. It's the fault of a bunch of mor... - ekhm, "users" - who mistook tattoos for scars.

Ratings are made by users... so it's precisely what I too did try to point 😉

They need to reinvest these easy earnings from the gambling and SE back into the productDuring 2019, that has be done indeed (VR shows, 4K cam, new codec and better video quality - and there have been better beauties and better performances also). In first couple of months of 2020, though, models have been got slightly worse, but maybe it would have been just a moment (I remember it has been said, many times, that winter and Xmas times are not so good for shootings) and probably things were about to change again - but then COVID-19 arrived...

The issue with the "new content" is it requires additional expense so you can't call that reinvestment. Charging such an exhorbinant price for VR is like charging for pictures...10 minutes for the price of multiple cards, 4k is another slap in the face because it requires the triple diamond consumer to sacrifice 40-50 cards worth of money to get it. And they refuse to optimize the software to 64 bit so it can actually handle the extra memory. What they have learned from the gambling is they can get away with a lot more than they initially could back in 2015...cards are still broken, all new content requries extra cost, and the new shows...not necessarily girls, are poorly scripted, I mean Jia Lissa, Belka, and the new group of girls all look like they are being micromanaged and not actually allowed to perform. I actually believe the girls are being managed to not put on the best show but to sell more cards later in the series...being told to hold back..to only do this move this many times,...and so on. That has to be very distracting for a dancer, who isn't actually a professional dancer.

I am wrong a lot so it might just be a little dip and a good week can turn me immediately into a fanboy because I have the maturity of a 12 year old. The gambling perturbs me...always has because it doesn't serve my ilk and I can only imagine getting free easy money is going to encourage them to continue to pursue free and easy money while letting the product fall apart at the seams.

In this case it is not the system's fault. It's the fault of a bunch of mor... - ekhm, "users" - who mistook tattoos for scars.

Hey! You! Yes, you @user, If you're reading this, if you're one of those "users" and you've taken it personally, well, that's your problem.

And yes! I was one of those "users" too 😆

They need to reinvest these easy earnings from the gambling and SE back into the product

During 2019, that has be done indeed (VR shows, 4K cam, new codec and better video quality - and there have been better beauties and better performances also). In first couple of months of 2020, though, new models did tend to be slightly worse, anyway it maybe would have been just a short moment (I remember it has been said, many times, that winter and Xmas times are not so good for shootings) and, so, probably things were about to change again - but then COVID-19 did arrive...

a stunning girl, who can dance a bit, who has some of the lowest ratings on the site, based on a script.

This could summarize the rating system 😖

I’ve completely fallen for Veronica Leal and Belka just wish I had the money to finished my Belka collection minus her event card. Two amazing models I could never get enough of .

My comment on her show a few minutes ago:

My advise at any commenter: look careful, there are NO scars; the red inkt is a tattoo. The breasts of Agatha are total natural. Agatha makes a very good debut!!!

Total 18 clips divided in Standing 6, Pole 6 and On TB 6. Some touching/rubbing in TB clips. No Bare feet. Starting Nude (just heels) one Standing, one Pole and one TB clip.

I knew Agatha from partnersite W4B, were she made her debut three years ago without any tattoo. A year later she had her first tattoo (our solar system on her back) and
the nipple piercings. Again a year later the breast tattoos were put on in red ink with the words “montirosa” and “manipuladora”. Superficially seen one can think it are scars,
but they are not. Her breasts are natural!!! The socalled sleeve on her underarm is the most recent one. Agatha has a soft, friendly face and her shapes are curvaceous, what
declares the title of this show. Her figure has the right proportions. No skinnyness here. The dress was beautiful, just as the high heels and the lace panties. At certain moments
a breast peeped out above the dress.

Agatha does a show mostly in the slower striptease style. So you have all the time to watch her curved body with her wide pelvis and her well developped butt. Her contact with
the camera is good and she smiles more then enough. At times her movements are squiggly. In the TB clips Agatha laughs slyly and is not shy. Perfect views on that ass/butt/bum.

The rating: Standing 4,5 (slower striptease style, squiggly), Pole 4,5 (learning fase, does her very best), Taskbar 5 (laughs slyly, not shy), Beauty 5 (friendly face, curved body) and
Outfit 5 (very nice dress and heels). Total 24/5 = 4,8-->5 stars. A good debut show of Agatha, but underrated by commenters/raters, who took a tattoo for a *****. NATURAL BREASTS!
------------------
As Music of the Show not a specific song, but all the music of the famous Venezuelan musician Oscar D’Leon. Before my retirement as teacher I once asked my female students
from the Dutch Antilles: “What is good Latin music?” One of the musicians they advised me, was Oscar D’Leon and so I learned from my students! “Mulate Coquete” is a good one.

Liar and *****.

Possibly best in a while with a nice phat ass. Juicy. I gave 5 stars.

merci pickle1