Wylette
Want Some Candy??
f0776 - iStripper XXX

Lola Bellucci
Deep Entwine
f0760 - iStripper XXX

Veronica Leal
Chain Fe-Mail Armour
e1620 - iStripper

Kitana Lure
Cocktail Hour
f0756 - iStripper XXX

Katrina Moreno
The Sex Cruise
f0753 - iStripper XXX

Katerina Sol
Summer Sol-stice
e1583 - iStripper

@wrightsayswow

https://www.7-zip.org/

It is similar to a zip file but 7zip usually compresses better than zip.

I've been using it for years both for business and home use.

Its free and has no ads or malware.

theres been a few that ive missed posting but heres one i just found that droped
Wylette - Dark desires
clip 7 fishnet footjob

@Carstrip I tried downloading your scene file. I don't recognise the file extension .7z - I thought it was going to be .zip
I don't download much from this thread, but your scene caught my eye, playing only standing and pole clips and from the pictures without too much clutter around the lady.
Anyway I'd like to get it to work here - what do I do with a .7z file? Something really simple I bet!

Normally I would never buy a card that features strictly all table clips especially if none of those clips were behind the taskbar (which at least is somewhat "standing" ). However in the case of the recent Wylette card I picked it up as soon as I saw it. I have to say that it is a superb card despite there being no standing clips. This is because it was designed from the get go to be an all table card. The length of the clips, all being explicit, the nature of the performance, even the outfit to some extent all suited table clips. SO in this instance I had no real isue with it. The wylette card is a very rare example where all table clips was a good thematic and creative choice.

Happy Saturday iStrippers 😎

Scene today is in a Lingerie shop door, reflections in the doors etc.

Plays standing and pole clips only.

Enjoy 👍

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x16_imuytFZ7PApekWXnBQCoB4NhauN8/view?usp=sharing

Have fun with the glass

I think we can do that @stefnev1 ! What a good idea for a thread @Bitwrangler 👍. Never shown in photos - not sure why not - perhaps time does not allow? Never mind we can have fun catching screen shots of our favourites behind the glass. Mine being Gloria. Here she is in her Sweet Flirt show. 😈😍❤️

Have fun with the glass @Bitwrangler 😎

Fair enough. I now notice the tag is "glass" as well. They are awesome whatever you call them. 😍

Welcome on iStripper @Toydo and have fun with the girls 😎

hello 👍💋

I agree - if there are standing photos, it means that it was possible to shoot even two short standing clips. Katrina has a lot of standing pictures there. I once said in the post about long dresses that there are cards in the dress only when seated - which I considered a waste of the potential of a long dress

@Bitwrangler
I've modified the title of your thread, because this is a "glass" which is used by Totem for these clips, not a "window". Just put your mouse pointer over the icon of the clip 10 in Avery's Siren Song and you will read "glass".

What are the ratios for the Wheel of Fortune?

They've repeatedly ignored such questions, so I don't think you'll get an answer.

Anyone had any doubts? Business is business....

The size will depend on which resolution you choose to download the clips.

For comparison with @Wyldanimal I have a full collection, excluding the gay cards, but at a maximum resolution of 1080p (as yet my system can't drive a 3k or 4k display). The total size of the Models directory is 3.00 TB for 4896 cards.

I also have 513 GB of disk space used by the bonus pictures and videos (I have an almost complete set of pics, missing just this last two weeks, but still lack rather more of the videos).

with over 5100 shows
and All the Crystal Clear + shows in 4K
My Models Folder is currently
4.23 TB (4,653,489,324,032 bytes)

For the current Windows version of iStripper I am showing an installed size of 179 MB. To that you have to add the shown file side of the individual shows... The new Crystal Clear+ shows look to be a bit less than 2GB a show, the previous Crystal Clear shows (about 2015 to 2019) are about half that. It adds up pretty quick.

If you look in .../appData/local and get properties on the vghd folder you will see the total size of the stored data.

and the casino continues

EXACTLY!! I knew it would be the same....

It was this card with Eve Sweet - A Short Sweet Summer - released in February that really got me thinking about this. Surely even just one 3 or 4 minute clip on her feet was an obvious thing to make? She must have walked into the studio? I have the card now yes, but waited until it was further reduced in price in a flash sale.
I noticed a comment on one of todays cards telling us to keep our "*****" to ourselves. This is nothing to do with *****, this is about making shows that would appeal to more viewers in my view and many others seem to agree.

I skip cards because of only bare feet. I've said it before, but my biggest pet peeve is a girl starting out with great high heels but then 20 seconds later, takes them off. Why even start the clip wearing high heels? The only place I can watch and understand high heels is in the table clips.

What are the ratios for the Wheel of Fortune?

Nobody is skipping a card because there might be bare feet

there have been people posting here that claim to do exactly that or because of the lack of a bare feet tag.

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase.
It already does. The tags "anal", "big boobs", "tiny tits", "bare feet", "tatoos", "bushy" or their ***** all disuade some users from purchasing a card, as do the assignment to iStripper or iStripperXXX and the card ratings of full nudity or nudity.

These are obvious bits of information that will help people organize their cards. Nobody is skipping a card because there might be bare feet, and many people like tattoos and bush and look forward to woman with tattoos and bush even though a few whiny people don't like them. Fake boobs or no dancing are clear negatives that aren't going to be shared. Somebody might have a fake boob and ***** fetish but many more people are going to be turned off. A few people might like table only but many more are going to be disappointed with no actual stripping in an iSTRIPPER show. Again, I said I wasn't sure why totem decided on shooting unpopular cards, I suspect it might give the girls a break from being on their feet in the attempt to liven up the other dancing shows or maybe give the girls a better chance at orgasm in at least one show.

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase.

It already does. The tags "anal", "big boobs", "tiny tits", "bare feet", "tatoos", "bushy" or their ***** all disuade some users from purchasing a card, as do the assignment to iStripper or iStripperXXX and the card ratings of full nudity or nudity.

I prefer the on taskbar clips over the standing clips. On a big screen you get a lot more girl.
In a XXX card I need no standing clips, I buy them for the XXX not the stripping.
In a normal card every clip, standing, pole and on taskbar should be represented.

Personally I prefer the Standard shows over the XXX shows...unless it's an outfit I want to see.
Standing Clips?...Hell Yeah...with Shoes on...for ALL clips

Totally understand, Different Strokes for different Folks 👍

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase. Precisely why big boobs is a tag and fake boobs is not a tag. Very few people will only buy all table, but many might skip all table if it was explicitely stated.

At this point I will say a big THANK YOU to all users who write informations like that in their reviews. 👍

I agree with @Alkasyn. Though personally I would prefer it if each card included standing and pole clips I do not not think that should necessarily be enforced for all cards. The important thing is the overall mixture adequately covers everybody's preferences.

Like @wrightsayswow I also do not understand why at least a summary of the clip list is not made available before purchase - it has often been suggested and could be provided automatically by software without requiring any extra human input when a card is published.

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase. Precisely why big boobs is a tag and fake boobs is not a tag. Very few people will only buy all table, but many might skip all table if it was explicitely stated. Not sure why they film all table when they know sales will be lower but it might be preferred by the performer as many all table shows have been performed by girls who might be less comfortable dancing.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/47177/1#post702571

I have been wondering how much data does Istripper take up? I know on the website that its 98MB but I've got 18 shows and I've noticed that my disk utility space has gotten up not only that but on the website it says that each show its file size is in MB but how many?

Absolutely!

I like standing clips more than taskbar. So I can examine the outfits much better :D. I love, when the girls walking around. 😊

Edit:

I didn't buy Gia Ren / Miss Red Hood because I read in the comments, there is no single standing clip in the whole show. Too sad... such a great outfit and no standing clips. 💔

Seeing all of the previews in the releases today that are table clips, perhaps this site should change its name to iSitter.

I agree with @Alkasyn. Though personally I would prefer it if each card included standing and pole clips I do not not think that should necessarily be enforced for all cards. The important thing is the overall mixture adequately covers everybody's preferences.

Like @wrightsayswow I also do not understand why at least a summary of the clip list is not made available before purchase - it has often been suggested and could be provided automatically by software without requiring any extra human input when a card is published.

if it's visible in the description that a show is all on the table.

@Alkasyn Very good point - I knew I'd forgotten something - never understood why we cannot have the info about how many of each type of clip is in each show before purchase.

and the casino continues

Just don't play, we don't have any other recourse :)

FG098
Trivial remix of ''Night road v1 - created by Maurogik'
from Shadertoy.com

https://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ET_FractalGarden98.zip

zip size = 217 Kb . Extract straight to ..scenes/ folder.
Allow merged folders and to overwrite existing files.
Remixed to various 'Alan Parsons Project'.

I don't think each show should have standing clips and I don't mind, if it's visible in the description that a show is all on the table.

and the casino continues

Hi guys, thank you for your feedback. I have just made a correction to avoid any *****.

Yes standing and even pole clips should be required for all cards even xxx.
We get to see another aspect of the model and her outfit.
Granted some models are not very good with movement and are more comfortable sitting down or laying down and I understand that fully.
You can tell when they don't know what to do with their arms or stare at the camera person for direction.
If they are comfortable, willing to do it and practice at it then great.
Camera comfortability, personality, and confidence greatly improve shows more than outfits or a great body.

Just my opinion.

Some related threads I have found.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/35472/1?post=522644
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/41438/1?post=610655
This is another point - if it's a standing clip, why so often does the model not stay standing up!?

Now I will leave you all to it and deal with the flack later.

Katrina Moreno
What An Eyelett
f0754 - iStripper XXX

I'm assuming no standing clips in this show - none previewed - surely the outfit deserved some standing clips!

Wylette
Dark Desires
f0777 - iStripper XXX

I see from a comment there is no standing - same again - all these outfits deserve some standing clips surely?

It's not just here I saw a photo set on MetArt where the model was in a summer dress with high heels, but the all the photos were of her lying around on the floor. Crazy I think.

Is it just me? I'm actually very annoyed about these type shows and need to be careful I know on here what I say. I should probably have search for any similar thread about it, perhaps it's been raised before?

Anyway I was going to put this on the Incoming thread, but decided a poll was in order and no doubt there will be plenty that some will add. It's already gone well off topic for that thread.

I agree the description is misleading. I thought it was worth one credit to test the description. I dislike these games because of the high probability of unwanted cards. The offering of much older cards makes for another reason not to play.

@TallandSlimMan that's my experience with these also in the past - too many cards you don't want and certainly many were not the "most recent + 30 days" either. And no way to win any jokers with these (not clear enough - perhaps you can?) - a gift card is far less worth the time and money. As I've written before - might have played for jokers. All too random for me, but good luck if you play - you will need it.
-----

Getting four cards from 2013 has the same probability than getting four cards from 2021... simply bad luck or programmatical bias ? 😎

The description should therefore be amended to say you could win ANY card not in you collection, not most recent.