For the current Windows version of iStripper I am showing an installed size of 179 MB. To that you have to add the shown file side of the individual shows... The new Crystal Clear+ shows look to be a bit less than 2GB a show, the previous Crystal Clear shows (about 2015 to 2019) are about half that. It adds up pretty quick.

If you look in .../appData/local and get properties on the vghd folder you will see the total size of the stored data.

and the casino continues

EXACTLY!! I knew it would be the same....

It was this card with Eve Sweet - A Short Sweet Summer - released in February that really got me thinking about this. Surely even just one 3 or 4 minute clip on her feet was an obvious thing to make? She must have walked into the studio? I have the card now yes, but waited until it was further reduced in price in a flash sale.
I noticed a comment on one of todays cards telling us to keep our "*****" to ourselves. This is nothing to do with *****, this is about making shows that would appeal to more viewers in my view and many others seem to agree.

I skip cards because of only bare feet. I've said it before, but my biggest pet peeve is a girl starting out with great high heels but then 20 seconds later, takes them off. Why even start the clip wearing high heels? The only place I can watch and understand high heels is in the table clips.

What are the ratios for the Wheel of Fortune?

Nobody is skipping a card because there might be bare feet

there have been people posting here that claim to do exactly that or because of the lack of a bare feet tag.

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase.
It already does. The tags "anal", "big boobs", "tiny tits", "bare feet", "tatoos", "bushy" or their ***** all disuade some users from purchasing a card, as do the assignment to iStripper or iStripperXXX and the card ratings of full nudity or nudity.

These are obvious bits of information that will help people organize their cards. Nobody is skipping a card because there might be bare feet, and many people like tattoos and bush and look forward to woman with tattoos and bush even though a few whiny people don't like them. Fake boobs or no dancing are clear negatives that aren't going to be shared. Somebody might have a fake boob and ***** fetish but many more people are going to be turned off. A few people might like table only but many more are going to be disappointed with no actual stripping in an iSTRIPPER show. Again, I said I wasn't sure why totem decided on shooting unpopular cards, I suspect it might give the girls a break from being on their feet in the attempt to liven up the other dancing shows or maybe give the girls a better chance at orgasm in at least one show.

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase.

It already does. The tags "anal", "big boobs", "tiny tits", "bare feet", "tatoos", "bushy" or their ***** all disuade some users from purchasing a card, as do the assignment to iStripper or iStripperXXX and the card ratings of full nudity or nudity.

I prefer the on taskbar clips over the standing clips. On a big screen you get a lot more girl.
In a XXX card I need no standing clips, I buy them for the XXX not the stripping.
In a normal card every clip, standing, pole and on taskbar should be represented.

Personally I prefer the Standard shows over the XXX shows...unless it's an outfit I want to see.
Standing Clips?...Hell Yeah...with Shoes on...for ALL clips

Totally understand, Different Strokes for different Folks 👍

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase. Precisely why big boobs is a tag and fake boobs is not a tag. Very few people will only buy all table, but many might skip all table if it was explicitely stated.

At this point I will say a big THANK YOU to all users who write informations like that in their reviews. 👍

I agree with @Alkasyn. Though personally I would prefer it if each card included standing and pole clips I do not not think that should necessarily be enforced for all cards. The important thing is the overall mixture adequately covers everybody's preferences.

Like @wrightsayswow I also do not understand why at least a summary of the clip list is not made available before purchase - it has often been suggested and could be provided automatically by software without requiring any extra human input when a card is published.

Istripper isn't going to provide information that will disuade a purchase. Precisely why big boobs is a tag and fake boobs is not a tag. Very few people will only buy all table, but many might skip all table if it was explicitely stated. Not sure why they film all table when they know sales will be lower but it might be preferred by the performer as many all table shows have been performed by girls who might be less comfortable dancing.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/47177/1#post702571

I have been wondering how much data does Istripper take up? I know on the website that its 98MB but I've got 18 shows and I've noticed that my disk utility space has gotten up not only that but on the website it says that each show its file size is in MB but how many?

Absolutely!

I like standing clips more than taskbar. So I can examine the outfits much better :D. I love, when the girls walking around. 😊

Edit:

I didn't buy Gia Ren / Miss Red Hood because I read in the comments, there is no single standing clip in the whole show. Too sad... such a great outfit and no standing clips. 💔

Seeing all of the previews in the releases today that are table clips, perhaps this site should change its name to iSitter.

I agree with @Alkasyn. Though personally I would prefer it if each card included standing and pole clips I do not not think that should necessarily be enforced for all cards. The important thing is the overall mixture adequately covers everybody's preferences.

Like @wrightsayswow I also do not understand why at least a summary of the clip list is not made available before purchase - it has often been suggested and could be provided automatically by software without requiring any extra human input when a card is published.

if it's visible in the description that a show is all on the table.

@Alkasyn Very good point - I knew I'd forgotten something - never understood why we cannot have the info about how many of each type of clip is in each show before purchase.

and the casino continues

Just don't play, we don't have any other recourse :)

FG098
Trivial remix of ''Night road v1 - created by Maurogik'
from Shadertoy.com

https://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ET_FractalGarden98.zip

zip size = 217 Kb . Extract straight to ..scenes/ folder.
Allow merged folders and to overwrite existing files.
Remixed to various 'Alan Parsons Project'.

I don't think each show should have standing clips and I don't mind, if it's visible in the description that a show is all on the table.

and the casino continues

Hi guys, thank you for your feedback. I have just made a correction to avoid any *****.

Yes standing and even pole clips should be required for all cards even xxx.
We get to see another aspect of the model and her outfit.
Granted some models are not very good with movement and are more comfortable sitting down or laying down and I understand that fully.
You can tell when they don't know what to do with their arms or stare at the camera person for direction.
If they are comfortable, willing to do it and practice at it then great.
Camera comfortability, personality, and confidence greatly improve shows more than outfits or a great body.

Just my opinion.

Some related threads I have found.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/35472/1?post=522644
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/41438/1?post=610655
This is another point - if it's a standing clip, why so often does the model not stay standing up!?

Now I will leave you all to it and deal with the flack later.

Katrina Moreno
What An Eyelett
f0754 - iStripper XXX

I'm assuming no standing clips in this show - none previewed - surely the outfit deserved some standing clips!

Wylette
Dark Desires
f0777 - iStripper XXX

I see from a comment there is no standing - same again - all these outfits deserve some standing clips surely?

It's not just here I saw a photo set on MetArt where the model was in a summer dress with high heels, but the all the photos were of her lying around on the floor. Crazy I think.

Is it just me? I'm actually very annoyed about these type shows and need to be careful I know on here what I say. I should probably have search for any similar thread about it, perhaps it's been raised before?

Anyway I was going to put this on the Incoming thread, but decided a poll was in order and no doubt there will be plenty that some will add. It's already gone well off topic for that thread.

I agree the description is misleading. I thought it was worth one credit to test the description. I dislike these games because of the high probability of unwanted cards. The offering of much older cards makes for another reason not to play.

@TallandSlimMan that's my experience with these also in the past - too many cards you don't want and certainly many were not the "most recent + 30 days" either. And no way to win any jokers with these (not clear enough - perhaps you can?) - a gift card is far less worth the time and money. As I've written before - might have played for jokers. All too random for me, but good luck if you play - you will need it.
-----

Getting four cards from 2013 has the same probability than getting four cards from 2021... simply bad luck or programmatical bias ? 😎

The description should therefore be amended to say you could win ANY card not in you collection, not most recent.

Getting four cards from 2013 has the same probability than getting four cards from 2021... simply bad luck or programmatical bias ? 😎

From the announcement :

"The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago."

There are 458 cards I do not own which were released in 2019, 2020. or 2021. These are the ones I would consider "most recent". I tried a test spin. The four cards offered were released in 2013 (!!!) 2015 (!!!) 2017 (!!!) and 2021.

We're here to help!

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/47481

Thank God It's Friday and we're willing to put your next two weeks under the sign of spin :)

Let me first sum up the shows we have released this week:

• Ariana Van X invites you to an highly erotic session with her naughty eyes that seem to say Swat Me
• With Katerina Sol, Fever Is Rising quick and high with her lovely nurse outfit which highlights her little buttocks so well
• Cindy Secret is in Secret Service mission, and the only secret she's willing to share with you is her delicate intimacy...
• Rebecca North finally joins the iStripper team with a "Lace Me Up" supplication that says a lot about her intentions ...
• What An Eyelet Katrina Moreno offers today with this torrid fishnet black dress that simply cannot contain her boobs..
• Kitana Lure is named our Spice Girl of the week with her intense red pepper transparent dress
• Shy sweet Wylette finally accepted to reveal her Dark Desires with an highly exciting bodysuit

And on mobile :

Divine Sasha Meow in flashy pink underwears, Lola Bellucci all dedicated to your desires and one of the most erotic ***** we ever had the chance to welcome in the person of Eve Sweet!




New promo duo:

A new round of promo games is waiting for you! All under the sign of spin this time with the famous Slot Machine and the Wheel of Bargains!

Reminder of the rules:

SLOT MACHINE :

Spin for 1 credit and get 5% to 50% discount on the cards drawn
Spin for 2 credits and get 10% to 70% discount on the cards drawn
Spin for 5 credits and get 20% to 100% discount on the cards drawn

PLUS: Win FREE credits when you see a symbol on the line drawn:
If you spin 1 credit:
1 symbol makes you win 1 credit
2 symbols makes you win 5 credits
3 symbols makes you win 50 credits
4 symbols makes you win 1 000 credits
And you multiply the number of credits you win if you spin for 2 or 5 credits!

WHEEL OF BARGAINS:

Spin for 1 credit and get one of the following discounts on the 4 cards drawn:

10%, 20%, 35%, 50%, 70% or 100% (FREE)

The cards are selected among the ones released more than 30+ days ago.

Press "add to collection" to buy these shows with the drawn discount or press Spin for a new draw.

These promo games are online till April 30, 9.00 am Paris time :)

Enjoy!

thank you for new VR.. keep them coming....

In case no one has mentioned it lately, the glass clips are well worth the effort to get this to work. Well. Worth. It.

Avery's Siren Song, clip 10. Dang.

Thank you iStripper.

Just posted twice I know Kaleesy on the strip to nude in eight photos thread and then found these perfect for this thread. That's her Playful Date show. Very relaxing spending time with her.

EPOCH is unprepared for the job, not even asking the codes just rejecting straight.
NETBilling worked.

The show is there. I close this one.

I'll have a Stella...

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/29408/62?post=706932
Update to FG097 at 326Kb ( Same download link as above )
Improved light & background via a new dedicated sampler2D.
Included antiAlias shader in da sprite pretreatment..
an attempt to reduce jaggies, however if they worry you
just increase the speed in the Winding Menger Tunnel.fsh

As always..Download/Extract again straight to ..scenes/ folder.
Allow merged folders and to overwrite existing files.

Yay!!!

Today's new model Rebecca North reminds me of 1990s model/actress Suzanne Lanza. Athough she never was at Supermodel status, I found her quite attractive.

Back then I had a small website, limited in size due to it being the free space from my ISP, where I posted wallpapers made from pics of different models. I had some of the Supermodels of the day like Laetitia Casta and Cindy Crawford, but always had some by lower profile lovelies like Suzanne. LOL, back then standard wallpaper size was 800 x 600 and a few got big time at 1024 x 768.

I have a pic of Rebecca, then a collage of headshots that I did of Suzanne for the web site. Pardon that many if not most of the pics are not high resolution by present standards. The last pic is of Suzanne recently. According to Wiki, she presently runs a social media company.

Niemira and Medusa 😲

You have discovered a cute & innocent Wylette in her mauve maid outfit on your desktop:



But it's a totally new person you will discover here in VR!

https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/9f6474593e7a18b6

Here, Wylette feels very naughty, she loves playing with the camera and with our nerves !

An absolute must or your VR collection !

Little Caprice might be a surprise to put on this thread - I fancied a challenge. She does not smile all the time, looks quite serious at times. An exception for me at least to wanting a model that smiles a fair bit. Always liked her look though and when she does smile it is lovely to see. These pictures all from her 2021 shows.

It's for tomorrow ;)

Free beer tomorrow!

It's for tomorrow ;)

It's probably just tied up in Q&A. Some shows need more work than others... :)

just a little bit longer.......😘

The show for Rebecca North titled Lace Me Up has been in the Coming Very soon list on the Workshop site for weeks now. Other shows have been released in front of it that were added to the coming soon page after that one. What's the hold up?

Great choice :)