Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Scorsos mensajes - Pagina 849

  Forum

Plopsaland
Da In Sep 2008
426 post(s)

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Tutto su iStripper
February 26, 2020, 205 risposte
I was looking here in the forum as I wanted to report the envelope broken. I found this suggestion and think that's the guy we can partner ship together. I played a lot. (Sure you can check) The slot machine where you could win a joker card, but after few hunderd tickets not even a letter in the slot. Now I have the same with mystery envelopes. 200 credits further and not even a card symbol or special event card. Legally the win rate is fine as you win 5 credits , sometimes even 25. I know Totem does not like comments like this but I'm a member since 12 years and this makes me so frustrated, feeling sad and awefull. I'm a premium member, dedicated customer. Please let me just buy them.I think after trying out all the games it's gone to far. A goose game can be fun, played the last one as well. But this is way to customer unfriendly. Seriously guys - this SEC stuff has gone too far. I'm a PREMIUM member with a FULL set, and I have NO way to obtain an SEC? Did you even consider that scenario?Here's a remedy: Make gambling OPTIONAL. Let those of us with credits to ***** BUY the SECs (or buy Joker packs) so we can skip this crap.I'd happily pay 250 credits for a pack of 10 JOKER cards any day of the week. Make that option only available to PREMIUM members.Problem solved.VERY disappointed in your poor behaviour.

With credits spent BTW is minus the credits won in between. So netto credits.
Sorry couldn't edit post.
Stanston
Da In Aug 2018
3160 post(s)

Customization

Tutto su iStripper
February 26, 2020, 177 risposte
Hi there,

inspired by the Posts from @pumpdude48 i started to Create individual Pictures for the Main Model Site, here are some Examples.

And here is my overall Workflow. I created 2 PNG Files in Gimp (430 width x900 height and 1000 width x 900 height) for the different Formats from the original Pictures.

I Choose my favourite Pics from the Camera Tab, Copy the Files in to the correct Folder for each Model, Load it in Gimp and Scale it to the proper Size.

Here you have to individually Look for the Scale and the right Picture, to not loose too much Quality, in this case it is all based from your personal Choice.

Then i put the Picture (Copy and Paste) in my self created PNG Files and Cut out the white Background.

Sometimes, because i use the Choose from Colour Tool in Gimp to delete the white Background, other white Details (Underwear, Stockings, Shoes etc.) will also deleted.

But the Istripper Software Recover this Information, I think from the original File, and at the end all is fine,
regardless which Colourinformation from the Picture was Lost.

At the end i save the new created Picture with the New Name extension _custom.png without deleting the Original File, of Course ;-)

And that is it, relatively easy because it is only a Copy and Paste Action with a little bit of Knowledge in Gimp.

This is so enjoyable and relaxing Work, i Love all these Woman and with the possibility to Modify some Parts
of the Istripper Software Wow, absolutely Amazing. Thank you so much Totem to give us more or less easy Acces for this Possibility.
orclover
Da In Jun 2012
1404 post(s)

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Tutto su iStripper
February 25, 2020, 205 risposte
@iPseudo

It matters not one little bit whether we like the practices in question - as I have stated previously I do not like them at all. What matters is what Totem think - if they think, rightly or wrongly, that SECs and gambling are good ideas then they will use them. If they think that offering SEC at a fixed price of 50 credits is of negative value to them (because of its impact on other revenue streams) then they will not make such an offer. They may be wrong in their estimates, but it is only their estimates that that will matter in making decisions, not ours - our estimates of cards values will only affect the result of those decisions. Totem have data on which to base their decisions, we do not have access to that data, hence they are more likely to be right than we are.

Totem has made the "moral choice" to ignore mountains of research that point to the fact that humans are vulnerable to games of chance. The act itself releases dopamine and becomes addictive to a substantial cross-section of society. Totem is not providing any service other than trapping some customers in an addictive cycle that inevitably results in totem gaining and the customer losing. One must reflect on the fact that istripper is pornography, which in itself is addictive, and then must reflect that the company itself nor its customers are moral or bound by any promises of morality. And therefore the customer should not expect to be treated with any sort of respect or morality. We take pleasure in girls being paid to strip naked, and totem reaps the benefit as do the girls. The long discussions about what is right or wrong or good or bad are non-sequitur.
TheEmu
Da In Jul 2012
7424 post(s)
pickle1
MODERATORE
Da In Mar 2019
6471 post(s)

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Tutto su iStripper
February 25, 2020, 205 risposte
@nm76
And they need to reconsider their strategyu, because judging by the feedbck I am seeing, they are ***** off long-standing customers with their recent shenanigans... driving away their most loyal customer base. In the long run, it will backfire for them.
This is also true. I don't expect Totem to want to do anything that will cut into their profits, but there is a fine line to be walked between maximizing profits, and drastically ticking off your most loyal and longstanding customers. At some point, trying to maximize profits is going to meet with very diminishing returns, if you push things so far that you start to lose the very people that spend the most money on your product.

People like me are what the gambling and gaming industry refer to as "whales". We're the ones who spend STUPID amounts of money on stuff that most people wouldn't, and the ones that managers in those other industries tend to cater to.

Totem did throw us a nice bone by at least making the game playable for basically no cost (by pricing the scratch-offs at 5 credits -- basically break even with the win rate), but it is still costing us a lot of TIME. It would have been win-win for both Totem and the "whales" (at least in this case) to just give us the OPTION to buy the SECs directly.

Something to bear in mind is that in this case the "whales" are not likely to be the most profitable customers in the future. Because you already own most / all of the cards, your expenditure is going to be on just new releases (at high levels of discount) and potentially the SECs - Totem already have most of your money. Their profits are more likely to lie in new customers who will be building collections and hence will be buying more cards at lower discount rates.

Look at the current game. Let's say (hypothetically) it took you a net 20 plays to win the SEC at 5 credits a play - that's 100 credits used. For a new customer, if they had to buy the same number of plays for the SEC they would have had to spend 20 times 60+ credits - i.e. 1200 credits to win the same card. Granted, they would have acquired 80+ cards but not necessarily cards that they want.

So - Totem's future profits are likely to rely more on the new customers than the old and that will be where they focus.
nm76
Da In Feb 2008
8 post(s)

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Tutto su iStripper
February 24, 2020, 205 risposte
Just to clarify my comment from before, my suggestion was that Totem make SECs purchasable "for people like me," meaning people that have complete collections with all the other cards. I realize that Totem is a business, and they are only going to do what makes them the most money. I totally get that. My point was that, in cases like mine, they are NOT making any money from me, when they could be.

And yes, I'd pay 200 credits for an SEC, to avoid spending FOUR HOURS OF MY LIFE (literally, that's how long it took me to get ONE of the two SECs that I was missing) scratching those stupid cards. I have literally nothing else to spend my credits on (outside of new releases), which is the same case for all the other people that have full collections.

I am not suggesting that they make them purchasable for everyone, and I'm not suggesting that they get rid of the gambling options for people that would rather spend the time than the money. As TheEmu said, suggestions that take away profits will be (justifiably) ignored, so I'm only trying to suggest how they could have made more money from ME (or people like me). Leave the gambling games in for everyone, just give those of us with all the cards an additional option.

Heck, they don't even have to make the SECs directly purchasable. Just give me an option to spend 50 to 100 credits on a guaranteed SEC scratch-off, where it randomly gives me one of the SECs that I don't have. For people with complete collections, they'll spend the credits to get all of them anyway.