Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Últimos mensajes - Página 849

  Foro

TheEmu
Desde en Jul 2012
7424 posts
pickle1
MODERADOR
Desde en Mar 2019
6471 posts

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Todo sobre iStripper
February 25, 2020, 205 respuestas
@nm76
And they need to reconsider their strategyu, because judging by the feedbck I am seeing, they are ***** off long-standing customers with their recent shenanigans... driving away their most loyal customer base. In the long run, it will backfire for them.
This is also true. I don't expect Totem to want to do anything that will cut into their profits, but there is a fine line to be walked between maximizing profits, and drastically ticking off your most loyal and longstanding customers. At some point, trying to maximize profits is going to meet with very diminishing returns, if you push things so far that you start to lose the very people that spend the most money on your product.

People like me are what the gambling and gaming industry refer to as "whales". We're the ones who spend STUPID amounts of money on stuff that most people wouldn't, and the ones that managers in those other industries tend to cater to.

Totem did throw us a nice bone by at least making the game playable for basically no cost (by pricing the scratch-offs at 5 credits -- basically break even with the win rate), but it is still costing us a lot of TIME. It would have been win-win for both Totem and the "whales" (at least in this case) to just give us the OPTION to buy the SECs directly.

Something to bear in mind is that in this case the "whales" are not likely to be the most profitable customers in the future. Because you already own most / all of the cards, your expenditure is going to be on just new releases (at high levels of discount) and potentially the SECs - Totem already have most of your money. Their profits are more likely to lie in new customers who will be building collections and hence will be buying more cards at lower discount rates.

Look at the current game. Let's say (hypothetically) it took you a net 20 plays to win the SEC at 5 credits a play - that's 100 credits used. For a new customer, if they had to buy the same number of plays for the SEC they would have had to spend 20 times 60+ credits - i.e. 1200 credits to win the same card. Granted, they would have acquired 80+ cards but not necessarily cards that they want.

So - Totem's future profits are likely to rely more on the new customers than the old and that will be where they focus.
nm76
Desde en Feb 2008
8 posts

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Todo sobre iStripper
February 24, 2020, 205 respuestas
Just to clarify my comment from before, my suggestion was that Totem make SECs purchasable "for people like me," meaning people that have complete collections with all the other cards. I realize that Totem is a business, and they are only going to do what makes them the most money. I totally get that. My point was that, in cases like mine, they are NOT making any money from me, when they could be.

And yes, I'd pay 200 credits for an SEC, to avoid spending FOUR HOURS OF MY LIFE (literally, that's how long it took me to get ONE of the two SECs that I was missing) scratching those stupid cards. I have literally nothing else to spend my credits on (outside of new releases), which is the same case for all the other people that have full collections.

I am not suggesting that they make them purchasable for everyone, and I'm not suggesting that they get rid of the gambling options for people that would rather spend the time than the money. As TheEmu said, suggestions that take away profits will be (justifiably) ignored, so I'm only trying to suggest how they could have made more money from ME (or people like me). Leave the gambling games in for everyone, just give those of us with all the cards an additional option.

Heck, they don't even have to make the SECs directly purchasable. Just give me an option to spend 50 to 100 credits on a guaranteed SEC scratch-off, where it randomly gives me one of the SECs that I don't have. For people with complete collections, they'll spend the credits to get all of them anyway.
TheEmu
Desde en Jul 2012
7424 posts

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Todo sobre iStripper
February 24, 2020, 205 respuestas
@nm76 says in favour of making SEC and/or Joker cards purchasable

So Totem could be making WAY MORE MONEY from me

but the point is that Totem would then be making WAY LESS MONEY from others which would more than offset the gains that you envisage.

and @boan000 says

Hell NO!!! 200 credits for a single card?!:? Don't give Totem any ideas, please. 50 credits would be more than enough

Again this would almost certainly reduce Totem's profits. As I have repeatedly said suggestions to any business that amounts to "please reduce your profits" are not likely to be followed. 50 credits is far too low a price - as is essentially proved by the apparent fact that many people do pay far more than that, via the gambling games, with the aim of getting these cards. One measure of how much something is worth is how much others will pay for it.

@garyaw20

In this latest version of the scratch game it also took me a similar, though somewhat lower, number of attempts as yourself - but the overall cost was low. Others in the same position as us (i.e. having full or almost full collections) in this thread have reported similar results or event have ended up with the SEC and more credits than they started with. I have had a similar experience with all of the iStripper scratch card games that I have played - I always got the SEC, once with a small increase in credits, two at very low cost (30 or 40 credits) and once with a slightly higher cost (90 credits if I rember correctly). Overall I find this quite reasonable.

orclover
Desde en Jun 2012
1404 posts

Mystery Envelopes, Q&A

Todo sobre iStripper
February 23, 2020, 205 respuestas
I won't be playing this game because I don't like the odds (especially as as per usual the odds are not published).

I have around 600 cards in my collection and the vast majority are of girls that I personally find attractive. If I don't find a girl attractive or I don't like the outfit, I don't buy the card.

But in this game - for just a 20% discount - I have no visibility of what card from the remaining 3,000+ could be included (and it could so easily be a girl I don't like). Then I have to gamble that the scratch card is a winner (which it easily could not be) and even if it allocated an SEC card I have no control over which card I would be given (and it would only be Eva that I want).

At least with the Goose game you could see the cards that were available and, once you won the Tanya card, the free card became one from your wishlist.

I'll just have to wait for a game with better odds to try to get the Eva card.

Should be illegal to have online games of chance w/o providing odds....in fact I am pretty sure it is. I like the fact that totem is getting some nice income and they have been improving the product a bit over time and aren't in danger of shuttering up but it also makes me uncomfortable that they are taking advantage of vulnerable people, as this is precisely how gambling works. I really dislike the new meta of making money off of people without providing a measurable service...it is a really slippery slope for the future. In the past there was generally a fair trade of product for currency, then companies began the move to a little product as possible for as much currency as possible, and now it is merely no product for as much currency as possible...not good.