Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Derniers messages - Page 1838

  Forum

VirtualPad
Inscrit en Sep 2007
3940 message(s)

Censored Posts

Tout sur iStripper
2 November 2014, 27 réponses
@Huzbub,

Wyldanimal and others bring up some valid points about why your reasoning is a bit flawed. However, everyone is ignoring one huge flaw in your reasoning. The biggest flaw with your viewpoint is that you are ignoring the one element of time. Anyone that knows anything about economics and the very nature of inflation knows that money does not have the same buying power over time. What you make today in income is worth less everyday in an economy of inflation. So if you make $100 today and decide to spend it immediately, it is worth its value. However if you save your money and chose to wait a year from now to buy the very same thing(s), it will cost your more to buy it because prices have gone up.

With a token or ticket system, if you decide to use them immediately, then the value you bought them for is preserved. However if you wait to use the tokens or tickets, then their value will probably be worth less and thus need more to buy the same thing. For example, if you buy some tokens for arcade games, a single game might require one token to play it once. But if you wait to use the token a year later, walking into the same arcade may require 2 tokens to play the same game once. So do you think that's fair?? Of course its fair because inflation caused the prices of the game playing to go up over time. Waiting to use money will almost always make the value of it be worth less over time due to inflation. Of course you can invest the money to collect interest or dividends to help keep up or change the value, but buying tokens or tickets in advance doesn't allow you to do this. They simply devalue over time.
Wyldanimal
MODÉRATEUR
Inscrit en Mar 2008
17207 message(s)
Huzbub
Inscrit en May 2012
10 message(s)

Censored Posts

Tout sur iStripper
2 November 2014, 27 réponses
It is called a monopolized monetary system. Stop defending a poor business move for a lack of understanding. Take a few moments to listen and consider - please.

Given a standardized monetary system you get to vote with your money. Once vested you have pre-invested in a system you are subject to. How is this any different than them saying your current bank account is null and void. Your only option is to purchase new credits?

Stop defending a mistake.

You are wrong. You made a purchase with certain expectations. Those were changed AFTER the fact. New purchase prices are viable but retroactive ones are not a viable business transaction.

I would love for there to be someone else as an advocate for the consumers. I don't care how much you love boobies, I do too but this is simply wrong.

Junger ---- what are you talking about? The price to purchase tokens remains the same and the cost per model has gone up. Am I mistaken? There is not a value gain.

Again - it seems people have lost sight of the fact that it is a pre-purchase credit system on this and not a open market. You may not decide that you are fed up and say, which many of you appear to be brainwashed into thinking otherwise, that you can spend those credits otherwise, go use them in another fashion.

Clearly I am failing to explain some basic economics and that is frustrating for certain.

A new economy is acceptable.

Violating the previously understood ratio is not.


I'm looking to the heavens for just one other person to understand how this is backwards in more than one way.

I'm struggling not to point out the previous posts attempt to use 'big words' incorrectly.

Frankly - there is no point. My effort was not remediation as I suspect that is not viable as we have no power (other than to use our credits, voices and IQ's to illustrate a failure on the attempt to course correct a flawed system).

"There's a sucker born every minute" is a phrase most likely spoken by David Hannum, in criticism of both P. T. Barnum, an American showman of the mid 1800s, and his customers. The phrase is often credited to Barnum himself. It means "Many people are gullible, and we can expect this to continue."

The only defense is to be at least as smart as the person who is parting you with your money. Clearly I'm alone in this endeavor.

Raise the price to $100 per NEW customer - fine. Do not rob current customers of their investment.

For the record, were there a plea from the owners of this establishment and a reputable effort to make course corrections to aim for a profitable while reasonable product I would be entirely onboard. Quite factually I would support this as a kick-starter type of program. Alas retroactively changing the value of my investment on a token based system is unfair.

At what point my friends would you indeed be upset? A small, vast or complete devaluation of your invest?

Only valid credits going forward must be pink ones. Those are only available next month. Oh wait -the following month we will only accept purple ones. So all pink ones shall be null and void. Also those tokens are only valid on Tuesdays.

A new rate is subject to a decision per the consumer. A change of the previous understanding is not.

Hitler versus the USA. I'm running out of ways to express the error here. But I do suppose a toddler will not understand something like relativity - regardless of being sucked into a black hole. :)
Huzbub
Inscrit en May 2012
10 message(s)
Huzbub
Inscrit en May 2012
10 message(s)

Devalued and fractional credits = Lost money!

Tout sur iStripper
1 November 2014, 8 réponses
I've written to support but want to get community awareness.

With the recent increase in cost to no less than 1.6 credits you have all lost 60% of the value of any credits you had in your bank at the time of this so-called upgrade. Meaning you need to spend 60% more per model. Sorry but to me this is flat out wrong.

Retrocredit existing balances *1.6 to keep all things even value wise from before and after. If people then decide to move forward with the new system it's at the new rate and that's their choice. Should not penalize current customers.

Instead of this messed up fractional credit system, adjust the purchase price of credits. It's too bad nobody here has an IQ greater than my dog. Discount the credit purchases then for your elevated customers. See how that works? Same net effect without leaving people with screwy partial credits that can't be used. Common measure to rob people of their value invest. Uncool.

Any crap about costing more to buy new tech or higher resolution feels like bullshit to me - I'm still seeing mostly 720, occasional 1080 and RARE 3k.

The messed up new client has some up sides but we just all paid for it in a huge way - I'm not a fan.

Dual monitor support appears to be hosed (I think I've seen this posted elsewhere).

The little trick with "Get it Now!" triggering a "the new price is 2 credits Y/N" probably got a few people like it did me.

Speak with your wallets, forums and support - bottom line they've reduced the value of your bank balance and that is completely *****.

Do the math over however many customers they have and it is outrageous.

Also a side note ---- these exponential requirements for additional discounts is insane. 1500 credits to get 45% off?! No bump at 500 credits?

I for one want my lost balance fixed and as is have no intent to continue patronage.