@TheEMU yeh, i can see the point with making paralax easy to do but for scenes that don't it just seems to ***** more people.

Is it still using the zbuffer when using the 2d camera? I thought it just slapped them down in script order to the back buffer overwriting anything that was there from previous (in the current frame) sprites. So it draws the entire background then overwrites it with a girl or some such?

My Four New Models,

Lesya, Randy Ayn, Belka, Jessika.

Hello,

Thanks for the encouragement.

You are correct, number 2 is in transition.

Bob

I hear that every day when I take a dog for walkies. 😆

LOL @willyweekly

I was running today (allowed even during a shelter in place because I was alone)

A woman called out to me "woo hoo, nice legs!"

I'm not a dancer, but I am a member....

Does that count?

From the "new" girls i really like the two canadian models Isabelle and Jessika. They are really beautiful and sexy with great dancing skills. I was unable to find them anywhere else on the internet, great job from the Totem team to find those two gems. Hopefully they will be back in the future from for some more cards.

Thanks Rex but...I have like 23 models in the last month sitting in the cue do to no preview peek. I'm back to no peek no buy due to the fact I can't win anything for the games. Can we please start getting some nice peek previews?

Thanks, very much, @Rex

I bought a ton of credits on your February 29th promotion. Bad timing on my part, I guess, but at least I'm supporting Totem. It's nice to have some continuity as I'm hunkered down in my home in the U.S.

Thanks, again, for your reassuring note.

@bobby2020

As @gkar45 said a card is released each day (well its 7 per week with one per day from monday to thursday and three on friday). These are then available for you to purchase using any credits that you have in your account.

Most new cards cost 25 credits each, so for 50 credits you can buy two. (It gets cheaper when you have a bigger collection).

If you want more you have to first buy more credits (for real money) and then use those credits to buy any cards that you want.

iStripper does not work on the principle of a single subscription gives you access to everything, you have to buy each card seperately.

I am fed up with your system. Either you fix my acount: 2 cardsin my collection. You are supposed to down load a new card every day, I have nothing. I paid for 50 credits, I don't have any.
If you don't fixe my account then refund me the $59.00 I paid.

Edit by mod : personal infos are not allowed in the forum, I've deleted them. Please log a ticket to the customer service to explain your problem.

Well, sincere apologies for getting carried away with my earlier posts in this thread, for insulting people for their tastes.

It's funny how one (read: me) can get over protective of the girls performing here (or potentially performing here in the future) 😐

To me the sexiest XXX-shows are those where the girl genuinely, honestly enjoys what she's doing, is performing in her comfort zone, and ideally is even getting excited and turned on during that performance. I don't think that the most extreme XXX-content will do that to them... it seems ***** and ***** (based on just my assumption, of course)

That's my opinion, reflecting my wish for what content iStripper should have, and not have, in the future. I should certainly have found a more adult and less ***** influenced way to voice all that...

Glad for this information.

I am also here to support the community. If you need a location to have models in California, I will gladly open my house!!! Send them over anytime!!!

(One at a time please, I am getting old)

@Z22

I use the 3D camera for two reasons

1) It automatically resizes clips (and other scene elements) that I want to appear to be at different distances from the camera making it easier to produce a scene that features girls at different distances. This only works if you have first matched the camera position, distance and view angle to the background and foreground elements, but if you do that then the result is well worth it - especially if you are moving clips about in the scene.

2) If you have scene with separate foreground, background and various middle ground elements then moving the camera (or zooming it by changing it angle of view) will cause these to apparently move relative to each other - i.e. there will be a visible parallax effect - which can greatly enhance the feeling of a there being a 3D scene even though it is just a set of 2D flats at different distances from the camera.

Note, there is little or no difference in efficiency in using a 2D or 3D scenes. In both cases there is a final stage that reduced to a mutlipliction of a matrix by a vector to do the projection onto the 2D surface of the screen. The difference being that in the 2D case the matrixand vector have some zeros in them that are not there in the 3D case. Furthermore, this projection matrix muliplication should, in any reasonable system have been combined with the other matrix multiplications required for scaling and rotations so it is essentlially free.

I didn't agree too much with this choice, but the last card of Ellie Undisclosed Desire e1325 was great. I wrote this in my comment:
I wasn’t too impressed by Ellie’s dancing in the two cards I had already (e1324 and f0590). When I watched the previews of this card (e1325), I saw a totally new Ellie and I knew I had to buy this show. No artistic gimmicks or nothing-happening-slowness, but real, spontaneous and well paced dancing, a total surprise! Not only real dancing, but also superb playing with the dress like in clip #20.
Indeed: Ellie can play many roles and now I can agree with her being Talent of the Month.

Why do people bother with the 3d camera anyway? You can do all the moving left/ right/ up/ down in the 2d camera. It's just zoming thats more difficult but can still be done in other ways, rotation distorts the girls so is pointless. I have never found an actual use for the 3d camera, it's not like we are using 3d models.

@DrDoom9. I was about to add the following piece of Ascii art that illustrates the point

If we have a scene comprising a row of 9 objects and a camera looking at the centre of that row this looks like

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
........V........ Camera

where I have used a V for the camera because it looks like a field of view

If we increase the camera position (and its target) by +4 units this becomes

1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
............V.... Camera

(If we did not increase the camera's target at the same time as increasing its position then the camera would end up oposite scene object 7 but pointing somewhat backwards towards object 5. How big that camera rotation would be depends on just where the target was placed, if it was exactly at item 5 then the camera would rotate to exactly ponit at it, if it was a long way behind item 5 then the rotation would be much smaller)

If instead we increase the position of everything else by +4, which is what happens if we nest everything in the scene other than the camera into a single node and change its position by 4. we get

....1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
........V........ Camera

(If we move the scene there is no need to compensate using the target position)

I have never tried it, but I suppose you could nest everything including the camera into a node and move it by 4 units in which case you would get

....1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9 Scene
............V........ Camera

but that would not be very useful.

@TheEmu
Quite!
Yes, indeed!

But, to me, it is most unintuitive!
In real life, if I point my camera at a lamp post then move 100 yards left holding the camera in a fixed position relative to my body, the camera will point at the next lam post, to the left of the first, further back along the road.

But rather than move the camera to the left by 100 yards how far, and in which direction, would you have to move the road and its lamp posts to get the same effect.

@TheEmu
Thank you for your quick response.
I understand what you are saying, and it is indeed born out in practice.

But, to me, it is most unintuitive!
In real life, if I point my camera at a lamp post then move 100 yards left holding the camera in a fixed position relative to my body, the camera will point at the next lam post, to the left of the first, further back along the road.

I always think of WildAnimal's original diagrams about the coordinate systems applicable to a scene for 2D and 3D camera schemes. These imply that moving the camera is just that - leaving coordinate system and scene fixed in space and moving the camera along the relevant axes. I need to adjust (invert) my thinking to the fact that the camera is not moving at all - rather it is coordinate system and scene which moves ... and in the opposite direction at that!

By the way, I do understand about moving the target with the camera. This after noting the ***** obtained when the target is not moved! That, at least, is, to me, intuitive.

@VEgas781 Sorry this option is not available
1 account = 1 collection. You will have to switch from one account to the other one
(go to the software' settings , click on 'Register again' login with your other account details.)
Please try to purchase all your new cards with the same account.

@DrDoom9

Moving the camera left is (almost) equivalent to moving everything that the camera is looking at to the right and vice versa, that is why you need to use different signs depending on what position you animate. This just the same in the scenes as it is in real life.

So

Camera {
pos : 100, 0, 0 // Offset camera to the right
node {
pos : 0, 0, 0
// rest of scene omitted for clarity
}
}

offsets the camera by 100 units to the right relative to the rest of the scene, which is the same offsetting the rest of the scene by 100 units to the left realtive to the camera, i.e. to

Camera {
pos : 0, 0, 0
node {
pos : -100, 0, 0 // Offset scene to the left
// rest of scene omitted for clarity
}
}

I have used pos: rather than animate because its easier to think of the positions rather than motions, but the same logic applies. I have also ignored the camera's target which needs to be taken into account as well (see next paragraph)

I said "almost equivalent" in the first paragraph above because if you only animate the camera's position then the camera will remain pointing at the same point in the 3D space of the screen, as specified by its Target, so moving the camera left will also cause its view direction to rotate to keep the same point central in the view. This rotation will be most noticable if the target position is close to the camera (i.e. difference between the Z components of the camera's pos and target is small) and smaller if the target is a long way away. This is why it is often necessary to animate a camera's pos and target simultaneously.

They have to fly to / be in paris. afik they have a limit on cost of the flight, about 300 euro. A return flight from japan is a lot more.

on a different note can we get a cosplay of a girl/model playing a mother Superior with a large daddle or Ruler pls, pls ya know give these Gents a good spankin...hehehe

Please...as long as she doesn’t look like the nuns I had in elementary school!!! D’oh!😳

OH YES!
I have SUCH fond memories and persistent twisted fantasies of Sister Mary Elephant and her Catechism classes!
(JUST KIDDING!!!!! PLEASE NO!!!!)

I sometimes get ***** with the animate command.
e.g.
A scene has 2 girls, one at, say x=-480, the other at +480. Standard 1920x1080 with initial 3D camera pos and target at 0, -540, +1303.
I do an animate forward so the scene is magnified to double size, and the left girl goes to centre screen (x=0, z=625)
Now, in order to pingpong over to the right girl and back, I use a node{} block in which I reposition the camera.
I find that I need negative x in the animate line when I would have expected to need positive x when moving the camera. (There is, intentionally, no animation of the clipsprites.)

This is something that seems to be 2nd nature to some of you (@TheEmu in "Niches", @WildAnimal).
Can someone please tell me what I am failing to understand?

And thanks to St Patrick's, I can finally complete my 1080p collection. 😆

I now have 3 accounts. How do I combine them into 1 account and not lose any videos that I have already paid for?

Thanks for your words Rex. However I feel that right now the only thing you should look after is the health of your coworkers.
Do not worry about us, should this crisis continue 2 months from now, as long as servers are up, we are not going to throw a fit if there is no new content thrown at us.
I m speaking from a country that has been hit the most by corona, I know what your country will go through in the coming days.
Do not worry about your customers (your thought is appreciated, in any case), worry about the safety of ALL of your employees.
We will make it through this

@stefnev1

The scene description language used in the .scn files for fullscreen scenes allows us to separately adjust the intensity of the Red, Green and Blue colour components and the opacity of each element in a scene. As I said in an earlier reply you can use shaders to perform more complex colour manipulations (though it seems to have disappeared!). This whole thread, all 87 pages of it, is devoted to discussing such things.

EDIT: It seems that my previous reply accidently went to the Share Your Fullscreen Scenes thread instead of this one. That will have happened because I wanted to include a link to that thread in the reply

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/29408/35?post=654920

EDIT2: I have just realised that you could implement a cheap, crude, contrast reduction by using partialy transparent clips over a black or grey background. This can be done entirely within the .scn file without resorting to a shader though it would be only be usable in rather limited circumstances (a shader would, however, be a better way to do it). Or you could overlay a semi-transparent grey layer over the whole or part of of a scene. Both of these crude methods are equivalent to mixing in grey with with the scene. You could of course also mix in any other colour in this way.

@Miwd
You can adjust the color, the brightness and the contrast of your monitor but not from the software.
You cannot make a scene black&white.

Thanks, Rex.

Good health to the whole team!

# andrà tutto bene
(all will be well)

Hi guys. So iStripper is full of beautiful, wonderful ladies. We all have our favorites. I’m sure that you knew most of the models earlier from the internet. But today I want to ask about your favorites girls, which you know from iStripper and you saw them for the first time right here, not on other websites. But remember – only best of the best – so give me only few names. Girls you know thanks to Totem. Girls you love to watch on your desktops (photos appreciated). Here is my list of top “debutantes”:

1) Gloria (what a shame I didn’t know this goddess before iStripper…)
2) Linda Elisson (so cute and sweet)
3) Dakota (most beautiful labia I’ve ever seen. See for yourself 😈)
4) Mila I (she is very elegant and seductive)
5) Estonika (so naughty and turn-on. I love to watch, when she rubs herself).

Well said and thanks, Rex!
Safety and people first and all will be well.

Thanks for the reassurance, Rex. Looking forward to weathering through these bad times with some entertaining shows!👍

Great news, happy to hear you hae planned ahead and are not worried.

Thank you for the update.

I hope you all stay healthy, and secure.

@Rex thank for your words disspelling the Na sayers & worry warts

on a different note can we get a cosp;ay of a girl/model playing a mother Superior with a large daddle or Ruler pls, pls ya know give these Gents a good spankin...hehehe

Please...as long as she doesn’t look like the nuns I had in elementary school!!! D’oh!😳

Dear Customer,

In light of the COVID-19 outbreak, we wanted to let you know that we at iStripper are committed and well-prepared to keeping iStripper running smoothly – the way you’re used to.

A new card every day as usual. We’ve taken steps to ensure the operational resilience and the continuity of our production and releases.
Production at the studio will slow down because of border closing and country lockdown in Europe but ou won’t see any difference to our releases anytime soon as we’re sitting on over two months of unreleased production.

With the health of our employees as our first priority, most our staff will be working remotely until further notice.
Our Customer Service team remains dedicated to supporting you.

We got exciting new models and promotions to be released and I wanted to let you know we are going to keep you entertained for the months and years to come.

Best regards,
The iStripper team

God dammit! I thought it was some new promo.
A tu zonk.

Nie zonk, tylko nekroposting, żeby na pewno utrzymać się na pierwszym miejscu nagrody dla spamerów przez koleżankę powyżej :D

God dammit! I thought it was some new promo.
A tu zonk.

There is a reason these threads are usually locked...

Wow, what a necro.

We're not going back to the old format. It was a one time thing because of production issues.

Thanks Rex! Had a feeling it was an anomoly!

@Miwd

Yes it is possible to adjust the contrast or make a scene black and white or do any sort of colour ***** that you can think of. You have to use fragment shaders to do do all of these things.

My EmuLib library provides several of these - in particular the Adjust_RGBA, Remix_RGBA, Quantize_RGBA, Blur and Sharpen shaders. You can find others among the Shadertoy Scenes

http://www.theemusnest.eu/scenes/Zips/TheEmuLib/
http://www.theemusnest.eu/scenes/Zips/ShaderToy%20Scenes/

Note, the scenes in these Zip files are there to demonstrate what the shaders can do - it is up to you to use them in something interresting.

Hello everyone!

As you know, it is possible to change the colour of the girls in a scene. But I was wondering, is it possible to adjust the contrast too?

Another question, somewhat related, is it possible to make a scene black & white?

Hoping you can help :)

Thanks for the clarification!

i just looked on Live Jasmin at their options screen. Pricing appears to go up to 9.99 per minute.. see screen grab. The iStripper Live Girls options are slightly different.

Hello everyone!
Who do you think is the best girl with the body/babydoll ?
For me, Kristina is awesome.

I totally agree, Kristina is gorgeous

Hello everyone!
Who do you think is the best girl with the body/babydoll ?
For me, Kristina is awesome.

Kristina certainly is awesome!
I'm really enjoying her new cards :)

Gracy-***** Onyx a1108