Hello,

On July 7:)
Check out the coming soon section of the Girl store -> choose the show you want info about --> press "details" : you will see the date :)

Big weeb fan here! I can't wait! :O

@SittingDuck

I've been thinking about going premium, but just wondering about the difference in quality between 3k and 4k. Anyone able to show some comparison pictures side by side

To reply to your original question: I can't post images and a screen capture is not the same as a moving model. If you have a 4K display of any size, the 4K cards will look a lot better than the lower resolution cards. If you don't have a 4K display, you probably won't see any advantage to 4K over 3K.

@TheEmu

That, of course, depends on the viewing distance

Yes. My main display is 22" from my nose. My critical use of my computer is to create software architecture diagrams. These involve lots of lines and symbols with associated text. Many of my diagrams are too large to be readable when zoomed to fit my screen, so I use a zoom setting as small as possible to show as much of the diagram as possible while the text is still readable. For me, 100 pixels per inch is about the maximum useful resolution. Although more pixels per inch would allow me to use a smaller zoom, the text size would be almost unreadable.

The effects of having different source and display resolutions can be counter-intuitive. For example if the two resoluions match and then you switch to a higher resolution display the quality of the displayed image can be degraded from that when it was displayed on the lower resolution device.

Degredation due to mismatches between source and display resolutions occurs independently of whether the display resolution is higher or is lower than that of the source. You either have to discard details or interpolate and thereby blur them,

For typical device resolutions you may not notice especially when the display's resolution is high, but consider an extreme case of a 2x2 pixel image displayed on a 2x2 pixel display compared with the same image displayed on a 3x3 pixel display or a 3x3 pixel image on a 2x2 pixel display.

To be able to effectively See subtle difference in the Source resolution,
you need a device that has a resolution of at least 150% greater resolution than that of the Source resolution.

example:
if your Display is 1080p
and you switch from 1080p source files to 1400p files ( 3K )
you will not really notice the significant difference.
you might discern some subtle difference, but you won't see the major difference.

Because your Display is less resolution than the Source file resolution.
you can't see it.

iStripper is by definition a pure luxury good. A pretty wonderful one, but luxury none the less. Displaying it to best effect has to come in a distant second to necessities. 4K is very nice but there is no denying that the equipment costs are substantial.

told me that there is no difference in 720 and 1080 unless the monitor is 50 inches or more,

Human factors researchers feel that anything less than 72 pixels per inch will product noticeable dots.

That, of course, depends on the viewing distance which will typically depend on what you are using the screeen for with the two main usages being as a computer monitor and as a TV screen. It is possible, I think probable, that the salesman was speaking about use as a TV screen (or, maybe through ignorance, had ignored the effect of viewing distance).

@RonaldB,

told me that there is no difference in 720 and 1080 unless the monitor is 50 inches or more.

I think that was a saleman with some motive. The key issue is pixels per inch. I have 3 monitors. My main display is a 42" 4K. It's 37" wide and displays 3840X2160. That comes out to 103 pixels per inch. Number 2 is 30" and that's 25.25" wide with a resolution of 2560X 1600. That comes out to 101 pixels per inch. The smallest is my 27" iMac with a 6K retina display. It's 23" wide and displays 5120X2880. That comes out to 222 pixels per inch. It's crisper, but except with looking a high-quality images it is not noticeably better than the others.

Human factors researchers feel that anything less than 72 pixels per inch will product noticeable dots. Anything more and the pixels will be close enough that you wont notice them individually. The 72 is an average. Some people can resolve the pixels a bit better than others. For me 100 dots/inch produces an excellent image. The 222 dots/inch on my iMac is something I would not have bought as an add-on.

Congratulations @Zantiev and Sandy for your excellent work.

Your perseverance in wanting to improve is a credit to you.

I think you are very good at learning how to make scenes. I would not be able to do it. For me it is really another language.

Good luck, and have fun with your creations and iStripper.

And please stop apologising. 😊


Bravo @Zantiev et Sandy pour votre excellent travail.

Votre persévérence à votre désir à vous améliorer sont tout à votre honneur.

Je vous trouve très bon pour apprendre à faire des scènes. Je n'en serais pas capable. Pour moi c'est vraiment un autre language.

Bonne continuation, et beaucoup de plaisir avec vos créations et iStripper.

Et de grâce, cessez de vous excuser. 😊

@Philours

Considering we are total newbies to scene creation we have learnt a lot from everyone who has commented and suggested on ways to improve each and every one of them. I made a grave mistake when I uploaded them all at once and we spent the last month fixing them and are still in the process of fixing others. We learnt the difference from creating a simple scene to perfecting those simple scenes with what little skills we have acquired so far. We have come a long way in such a short time with whatever free time we have as we both have very busy lives. Since we have a limited amount of cards 83 in total it was really hard to truly test them out thoroughly.

We are very appreciative for those who have assisted us in making our scenes even better. We do deeply apologize for all of the re-installing and inconveniences we have caused and will do our very best to prevent this in all other scenes we create from now on. We are sooo happy that you have enjoyed our basic scenes and we look forward to hearing from you and from others.

@ComteDracula

We are sooo happy that you like them! Thanks for your invaluable contribution as it means a lot to us!

Sending you Both Big Hugs!!

@Philours

Considérant que nous sommes des débutants dans la création de scènes, nous avons beaucoup appris de tous ceux qui ont commenté et suggéré des moyens d'améliorer chacun d'entre eux. J'ai fait une grave erreur lorsque je les ai tous téléchargés en même temps et nous avons passé le mois dernier à les réparer et sommes toujours en train de réparer les autres. Nous avons appris la différence entre la création d'une scène simple et le perfectionnement de ces scènes simples avec le peu de compétences que nous avons acquises jusqu'à présent. Nous avons parcouru un long chemin en si peu de temps avec tout le temps libre dont nous disposons car nous avons tous les deux des vies très occupées. Comme nous avons un nombre limité de cartes 83 au total, il était vraiment difficile de les tester à fond.

Nous sommes très reconnaissants envers ceux qui nous ont aidés à rendre nos scènes encore meilleures. Nous nous excusons profondément pour toutes les réinstallations et les inconvénients que nous avons causés et ferons de notre mieux pour empêcher cela dans toutes les autres scènes que nous créons à partir de maintenant. Nous sommes tellement heureux que vous ayez apprécié nos scènes de base et nous avons hâte d'avoir de vos nouvelles et des autres.

@ComteDracula

Nous sommes si heureux qu'ils vous plaisent ! Merci pour votre contribution inestimable car cela signifie beaucoup pour nous!

On vous envoie tous les deux de gros câlins !! Merci Beaucoup!

👍 😎 Happy Independence Day.

Happy 4th of july to everyone

Ha vous voyez, j'ai l'œil 😉 Mais c'est très bien, qui de mieux qu'un adepte comme vous des scènes iS pour ce job 😄😉

Vous m'avez démasquez @Philours !

En effet le SCQ (et non SEC), c'est moi. 😆

The best thing to do is don't waste your credits on Special Event Cards and to save your credits for other cards. There is nothing special about these cards. I ***** more than 193 credits trying to win a special event card. I should just purchase 14 plus cards.

Totally agree with you @1BlackKnight and happy birthday to you. Have a great day. 😊

Entièrement en accord avec vous @1BlackKnight et joyeux anniversaire à vous. Passez une bonne journée. 😊

I wash my hands of unwashed panties, as they say.

I already have enough of having to wash my wife's, without having to bother with other people's. 😆

But all the better if it suits others.


Moi les petites culottes non lavée, je m'en lave les mains comme on dit.

J'ai déjà assez de devoir laver celles de ma femme, sans devoir m'encombrer de celles des autres. 😆

Mais tant mieux si ça convient à d'autres.

The best thing to do is don't waste your credits on Special Event Cards and to save your credits for other cards. There is nothing special about these cards. I ***** more than 193 credits trying to win a special event card. I should just purchase 14 plus cards.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/29408/74?post=744620

Et voila @Zantiev, le service Contrôle & Qualité a donné le feu vert 😊 Pouvons nous considérer que vos scènes sont arrivées dans leurs versions finale ? 😄
Merci et félicitations pour le choix de votre avatar si personnel. Et ne dites pas le contraire, j'y reconnais très bien Sandi même en ombre 😆😆😆
And voila @Zantiev, the Control & Quality department has given the green light 😊 Can we consider that your scenes have arrived in their final versions? 😄
Thank you and congratulations on choosing your personal avatar. And don't say otherwise, I recognize Sandi very well even in shadow 😆😆😆

👍 😆 😎

Not bad. 😎

Everything is perfect for me. Thank you. 😊

Tout est parfait pour moi. merci. 😊

Just got home for lunch and fixed the positioning of the names of those 2 scenes back to what we originally had them. Sorry about that!

Most of what is posted here belongs here : https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/27449/128#:~:text=R2D34ever2-,Discussions%20for%20Scenes%20for%20Version%201.2.X%20Fullscreen%20Mode%20here,-FORUM%20/%20EVERYTHING

maybe it's better to make one page since most of the discussions are here...

Winning bid: EUR 404.00 👍

Yes those unwashed panties seem to have sold well in that auction. 😆

Non seulement cela se vend bien mais il n'y a même pas de frais de nettoyage 😆
Not only does it sell well but there's not even a fee cleaning 😆

I have a 1080 monitor and when I first joined here 5 years ago I downloaded cards in 1080 if they were available that way. However, there was an update that had some detection of my monitor and it set the suggested download to 720. I remember that a salesman at Best Buy told me that there is no difference in 720 and 1080 unless the monitor is 50 inches or more. Anything to that?

With the way inflation is now and my having prospects of major car repair if not replacement and having major dental work, I doubt I'm going to sink big money into a 3k or let alone 4k monitor.

Totem is also wise trying to find new streams of revenue

Yes those unwashed panties seem to have sold well in that auction. 😆

Interesting read, and I agree on the monopoly thing - there's no reason for Totem to try and increase the goodwill/public outlook for the company if they're a monopoly (which they are).

I've long ago stopped caring for having even all the cards of models I like, but I'm looking forward to the NFT thing (maybe I'll be able to buy cards cheaper than my 13,75 credits if it fails? :D - you never know!)

There's so much content out there that it doesn't really matter if I get all of Sia's cards or not - she's all over the web (paid and free).

I think Totem is also wise trying to find new streams of revenue (like auctioning off polaroids from shoots) - customers are looking for that personal touch nowadays in the oversaturated market of online porn.

She's a really lovely model, so it's well deserved, but it's a shame when nice outfits (Kawaii Kutie) are ***** on a fully table card. I don't buy those anymore on principle.

She's got a lovely voice we should hear more often in the clips, too.

There is no TotM bage on her shows at "Store" (again). Or you just dropped that feature for good?

@TheLionKing83 Hello and Welcome : ) Our new forum is on

iStripper Discord --> https://discord.gg/hPQgggkzsb

If you have any questions please contact [email protected]

Have a lovely week with iStripper ! : )

Let's see @Philours. A little uploading effort is nothing compared to the work it takes @Zantiev and Sandy. 😊

Voyons @Philours. Un petit effort de téléchargement ce n'est rien à comparer au travail que cela demande à @Zantiev et Sandy. 😊

@Zantiev, votre directeur artistique est très exigeant comme vous vous en apercevez 😊 Et oui @ComteDracula aime la perfection 😆😆 Il faudra néanmoins finaliser ces scènes une fois pour toute et aller de l'avant 😊 Dites-nous quand la version définitive sera publiée car cela m'épuise d'installer ces scènes encore et encore 😀 Je plaisante, bien sûr 😄 Merci à vous et Sandy pour votre gentille participation à notre divertissement😊
@Zantiev, your artistic director is very demanding as you can see 😊 And yes @ComteDracula likes perfection 😆😆 We will nevertheless have to finalize these scenes once and for all and move forward 😊 Let us know when the final version will be published because it exhausts me to install these scenes again and again 😀 Just kidding of course 😄 Thanks to you and Sandy for your kind participation in our entertainment 😊

@Bitwrangler,
I only download the cards in 720p (except the low resolution classics); never any higher resolution, even though I do have a 1080p screen.
(I guess to save space, though I am slowly running out of that)

I checked which cards can be downloaded in 4k. I found 882 cards in my collection. 415 in collection e; 467 in collection f. At 2 gb each, that is 1764 gb.
Wow! That is a lot of space just for the 4k cards.

The lowest card number in my collection in each collection available at 4k are as follows:
Li Moon, A Step above, Lesya, Cure for it all

Thanks @Zantiev for the shadow corrections on the "Zantiev - 4/4b-Friend's Join In!" scenes. Everything is OK, as well as for the centering of the boat.

I notice that with the scene "Zantiev - 4-Friend's Join In!" the names of the two couples of girls in the foreground do not appear.

For the scene "Zantiev - 4b-Friend's Join In!" The names of the girls are partially hidden being behind the girls in the foreground.


Merci @Zantiev pour les corrections des ombres sur les scènes "Zantiev - 4/4b-Friend's Join In!'". Tout est OK, ainsi que pour le centrage du bateau.

Je remarque qu'avec la scène "Zantiev - 4-Friend's Join In!' Les noms des deux couples de filles en avant plan n'apparaîssent pas.

Pour la scène "Zantiev - 4b-Friend's Join In!'" Les nom des filles sont cachés partiellement étant derrière les filles en avant plan.

Hello!

I fixed the 'Zantiev - 4/4b-Friend's Join In!' scenes with shadows and centered the boat and updated them in the 'Friend's Camping' link above. We also re-adjusted all name sprites in those scenes mentioned and in the 'The Boys Camping' scene.

We just discovered a little trick with the iStripper interface. If you press the 'down arrow' key it changes all of the girls in the scene with no disruption to the music chosen nor does it change the scene. It gives you the option of selecting the girls you want as some girls are larger then others. Also if you hit the 'right arrow' key it will change the clip01 card in the scenes in which we put the clip01 cards to the front of the 'Friend's Camping' (and in most scenes we have created) to give you a choice of changing the girl closest to you in the tent to give you a better choice. Most of you probably already know this but to any newbies like us they are cool little tricks to help make the scenes more enjoyable.

Thanks!

I pretty much recommend it for everyone that has (1) enough storage space (2Gig per card in 4K, twice that of 3K) and (2) a 4K monitor. Even with a QVGA monitor it is a bit better but it really shines on a 4K. I wish I could post a comparison but of course we can't here, and anyway the video still shots never look very good, but basically the 4K cards make 3K look sort of fuzzy. On average, anyway- there are some very sharp 3K and a few not so sharp 4K but most of the 4K cards are noticeably sharper.

For example, Joy Lamore in Beachside View is absolutely WRITHING on the screen in 4K right now, and looks amazing. And, and she seems to be oiled... Still more evidence that playing CARDS rather than clips can be a superior choice as I am sure I've never seen a lot of this.

I've been thinking about going premium, but just wondering about the difference in quality between 3k and 4k. Anyone able to show some comparison pictures side by side?

Anyone still have the Red_Window scene? All current links are broken.

I made a decent remix of it, and I want to try to do it again, but I need the original picture.

@millertime
Strap-on shows till now:

Solo shows (with "Teddy the Fuckerbear"):
Elisa (Card Nr.0144)
Jordan (Card Nr.0195)

Duo shows:
Silvie Deluxe & Rachel Evans (Card Nr.0035)
Kitty Jane & Christina Jolie (Card Nr.0100)
Bella & Promesita (Card Nr.0313)
Jenna Lovely & Nikita Bellucci (Card Nr.0378)

Promised show, but is only in bonus video amd bonus pictures, in display isn't:
Darla Demonia & Pussycat (Card Nr.0313)


I hope will be new shows in the near future

Nikita Bellucci and Julie Valmont have a strap-on show card 0474

NO. No estoy de Acuerdo👎.
¿Cándo Aparecerá Lana Lane como Talento de algún mes?

@ComteDracula

Certainly the analogies are not perfect, they were intended to show that the practice is widespread.

iStripper is a monopoly and has no equivalent.

Bingo, you have identified a very important aspect - something you have known but have been ignoring important consequences thereof.

It means that there is less of a reason for them to indulge in the practices that you keep asking for. Such "philanthropy" by businesses directed towards customers it is usually associated with competition by being used to encourage users to stay with the company making the "gifts", Conversely "gifts" are also used to encourage customers of the competition to switch as well as attracting completely new customers.

Monopolies only really need to offer such "gifts" in order to retain customers - but very loyal customers are precisely those that are less likely to leave anyway so are less receptive to them.

We are essentially in agreement about what is happening, but not about the likelihood of it changing. In my opinion we are only likely to see it if it becomes favourable to Totem. Arguing that other companies provide "gifts" to loyal customers is irrelevant if those companies have direct competitors while Totem do not.

A very very relevant example here is myself. Until recently I had been buying every normal card that Totem had released and only shortly before ceasing to do that had also participated in the games to the extent that I had all the SECs. If, while exhibiting my "maximum loyalty" I had been offered a free SEC it would have reduced the income that Totem's received from me.

They would not have been giving me a SEC (which would have cost them very little) but would have been giving up the amount that I would have paid in order to get that SEC (which would have been a much larger amount). so it is not surprising that during this period I was offered no such "gifts". However, since I ceased to be a "loyal customer" I have received a few offers of this kind - again this is not surprising as such offers could have nudged me back into buying again.

I am surely not alone in this. Certainly there will have been other "loyal customers" for which the offer would have been effective, but the question is would they, in Totem's estimation, made up for the risk of losses from those like me,

I too in this case would like to have the generic version of the same card as the SEC, which would be sold to us at a price of a "Normal" card.

What you are talking about is related to a merchant who wants to sell a product under his name, but who will deal with a manufacturer of a similar product that is sold at a higher price with the brand of this manufacturer.

Basically the two products are almost similar except for the presentation (packaging) and the brand.

Except that in this case there is a way to make a choice for the cheaper product, which in essence is almost similar. People have the choice to pay for the brand or not.

Except that here there is no competition, nor any other choice to have the similar product at a lower price. of the same card with say a different presentation in the display.

iStripper is a monopoly and has no equivalent.


Moi aussi dans ce cas j'aimerais avoir la version générique de la même carte que la SEC, qui nous serait vendu à un prix d'un carte "Normale".

Ce dont vous parlez est en lien à un marchant qui veut vendre un produit à son nom, mais qui va faire affaire avec un fabricant, d'un produit similaire qui est vendu plus cher avec la marque de ce fabriquant.

Dans le fond les deux produits sont quasi similaire sauf la présentation (emballage) et la marque.

Sauf que dans ce cas il y a moyen de faire un choix pour le produit le moins cher, qui dans l'essence est pratiquement semblable. Les gens ont le choix de payer pour la marque ou non.

Sauf qu'ici il n'y a pas de compétition, ni de choix autre pour avoir le produit similaire à moins cher. d'une même carte avec disons une présentation différente dans l'affichage.

iStripper est un monopole et n'a pas d'équivalent.

Where is this generic version of totem, please?

The analogy was between generic ***** and iStripper's normal cards as opposed to non-generic ***** and SECs. It is my understanding that some companies make and sell both the generic ***** and their brand-named version.

I think it is just a comma and a space.

Example:

category: student, casual

Rolling Stones .. epic song 👍

Solid tune. 😎

Winning bid: EUR 828.00 👍

I think that's the highest price I've seen paid for an outfit in a long, long time!💰😱😵

Gonna have to keep my eye on the current auction! The Mina Von D outfit should fetch a high price!

😲 👍 😎

@TheLionKing83

Welcome. <(^_^)>

Où est cette version générique de totem, svp ?😄
Where is this generic version of totem, please?😄