If you look up Estonika, she seems to often be in the frame with this weird, zombielike Russian dude who looks really creepy.

@ste1701a Can you please send us an email to [email protected] and we will reset your pwd then ?

Thanks! All sorted now and I'm back in!

Bonsoir,
Achète par 50 € à la fois, c'est le plus avantageux.
Et encore bienvenue parmis nous.
@+

ha ouai mais ca revient cher à 5€ la carte

Casey Calvert

Salut,
Il faut acheter des crédits qui permettent de télécharger les cartes. Dans l'interface du logiciel, il faut cliquer sur Ajouter en haut près du nom d'utilisateur, le nombre de crédits restant étant affiché juste à gauche (voir capture).

I doubt it would work as it is developed for the desktop rather than the phone

Not sure I understand exactly what you're saying.

Welcome to the forum! If you bought credits enough to buy one card as a trial of the software, that will gain you entry to most areas of the forum. 50 Euros will buy 500 credits. At your entry level, each card costs 25 credits. When you have bought more cards, a sliding scale of discount is introduced, starting at Silver level... 10%. At my level, Double Diamond, my cards now cost me 15 credits.

So if you like what you see, just keep buying, eventually, the cards become cheaper to own :)

Salut à tous, je suis nouveau et j'ai quelques questions, pour passer des niveaux il faut des cartes, comment on les obtiens ?

FR : Bonjour, j'ai vu que pour monter en niveau il fallait des cartes, j'aimerais savoir comment on en obtient, c'est celles qu'on achéte 5€ ? car ca fait quand même 50€ pour le niveau argent ?

EN : Hello , I saw that to level up we had card , I wonder how we get is those that bought 5 € ? Because is still € 50 for the silver level ?

A bit of a Drought Season

Nathaly Cherie

Jayden Cole

Emma Brown

Emma Brown sexy legs

@orclover i love your idea, if i could take everything that i know now and start all over my collection would look alot different i honestly ***** the size of my collection it really should be half of what it is. Also your right there are far to many cards/girls that don't get enough plays, no plays, or just end up in delete city. To touch on your point you made about piracy, for me this is the only consistent porn company that makes money off me, i just posted not long ago my woes about what that community was going through.

Now that I have a few, very few, days of full net access here are a few extra, mostly very *****, additions to my list of Observation and Suggestions. Only the first of these causes any real problem.

42) Downloads can block some interactive use of the software.

I am in the middle of downloading many of the iStripper videos as I have got behind with my collection of them. As a result I have often had 6 active downloads with up to anther 8 queued (the peak so far was after adding Belle Claire's 10 solo videos). With 6 active downloads any attempt to switch to looking at the comments or list of videos for another card results in a a "busy spinner" and a "loading..." message which lasts until a few seconds after the number of active downloads drops to 5. This blocking of interactive use by what ought to be the background process of downloading can last for several minutes. This can even block any use of the forum and result in error messages and requests to check your internet connection. Although in my case it did not matter because what I was doing interactively was just going to the next set of videos to download it is generaly not a good idea if the interactive part of any program is blocked by background activities like this. Please prioritise the interactive use even if this means reducing the number of downloads that can be simultaneously active.

43) The meaning of the download manager's "Remove all" is not immediately obvious.

"Remove all" could mean "Remove everything", "Remove all completed downloads" or "Remove all succesfully completed downloads". I thought that it probably meant the third of these but I was wary of using it while any download was active in case it meant the first. The fact that it was a red button, which often means "danger" or "stop", probably added to the slight anxiety that I felt about using it. It would, I feel, be better if the button was labeled differently, e.g. "Clean this list", and if it was not coloured red. I assume that an explanatory tool-tip will be added soon and this should remove any ambiguity.

However, and more important, is the fact that the action of pressing "Remove all" is "Remove all completed downloads" even if they failed. This means that any indication of a failed download may be removed before it is seen as it won't necessarily be visible in the list of downloads if it is not one of the few visible without scrolling. Can you please only remove successfully completed downloads when "Remove all" is pressed.

44) No "close" or "return" button on the license page.

Pressing "Show license" displays the license text, but is no explict "close" or "return" button. Pressing the "Settings" icon has the required effect of return to the settings page but it "doesn't feel quite right" its the difference between returnig to somewhere goingon to somewhere that just happens to be where you came from). I feel that the license should be displayed in a pop-up window with a close button. This isn't at all important, but it still feels wrong to me.

45) No feedback when pressing "Check for updates"

On pressing the "Check for updates" button on the setting panel there is no feedback if there are none available (I assume there would be feedback if an update way available). If there is no update available it would be better to explicitly indicate this rathere than just do nothing. Again, this is not very important but without the feedback you do not know whether the check was made or not or if the button really had been pressed.

46) Current card shown faded in a card's card list.

On the cards list panel for a card the current card is shown partialy faded, presumably to indicate that you can't "go to" it because you are already there. However, it think it would be more appropriate to highlight that card as being the current card. Currently it looks as if there is a problem with the card when there is not.

Starryk, as far as I can gather it seems that their main focus was on people with 1000 to 3000 cards. In fact in a online periodical rex makes a point that there are some people who will buy every card to fill out a collection, and this point was used as evidence that VGHD is going to be successful. This can't be what is ultimately best though for totem, or the rest of us. With their new branding, marketing, global access, and anti-piracy measures I think it is time for them to open up access to a group that may not want to spend $5000 on a collection. Think how many thousands only have 100 cards in their collections, when they would have rented 300 or 400 or even a 1000. To me the only risk is an increased chance of piracy, coding challenges and costs. The coding would be more complicated to make sure we could not rip the files and play them on another player. The all or nothing policy with this kind of software is more risky, I would imagine that most people choose nothing, and disappear into a chasm of free porn.

I have the same behaviour but only when playing a single girl in 'full size' mode. The music starts but doesn't stop, just plays and changes songs continuously regardless of whether there is a girl's clip being played or not, including ignoring when the next girl's show starts.
However, when playing a single girl in 'small size' mode the music works as expected, starting and stopping with the clip. If I 'enlarge' the girl during her show, the music just runs continuously and will not stop until the next show appears and I 'reduce' the size of the girl, when the music will end when her clip finishes.
Would be good if the same music behaviour occurred for both the 'full size' and 'small size' modes.

I agree too.
From much time I don't see a real black girl here.
Krystel is always in my dreams...
It seems that Totem has difficult to recruit black girls.
I was thinking that with the new Las Vegas office it was easier engage them but, so far at least, it did not happen.
Best hope for the future ...

Can i copy the program to my iPhone

I'm saving some of my credits for Estonika!

well i think the main risk with renting a show for a day would be for me that i would rent the show and watch it once and unless its simply mindblowing i would not buy it afterwards even if i liked it. why? because there are already new shows i haven't seen yet that i can rent. The way i use iStripper i very rarely watch a show twice anyway because i just don't have the time for that with up to 6 new shows per week. I surely still have a ton of shows i haven't seen yet. so in the end with customers like me Totem would make less profit if they offer a rental system.
it would only work if the number of new shows would go down so it makes more sense and you do have the time to watch older ones again.
I just let some numbers speak for themselves: i currently own 2662 cards. If i would decide to watch them all again and do it by watching one show per day thats enough for 7 years. With 2 shows per day which would mean 1 hour for older and about 90 minutes per day for newer shows its still 3.5 years.
I normally don't use iStripper like its originally intended just letting it play in small mode while doing other stuff on the PC. well what other stuff do i do on the PC? Gaming for one and normally in full screen mode. Browsing the internet to read news or to watch some videos on youtube or series and movies. Thats also something i do in fullscreen mode. During these activities i don't want to have girls dancing on my desktop. So when i use iStripper i do it to watch a show in full mode and do nothing else. So with such little time to enjoy the girls why should i buy a show after i rented it and saw it?

Finally I see a black person in this thread and it's Dave Chappelle.

Totem, bruuuuuuuuuhhhhhh..... when will you hire more dark skinned dames?

A great card is made by much more than looks...such as eye contact, persona, movements, progression of stripping, and then looks. A demo gives almost none of this information. I just know that lots of content sites offer rentable content, and will get double paid if the suitor really likes the product. It would be interesting to see if their new sales approach, without discounts, increased price, and a weak review and rating system has ***** them, or if the advent of the US version has boosted profits enough. Hope the latter to be honest, this is my favorite "software" and wouldn't want it to struggle.

I agree. Especially when you see the contrast of their lighter barefoot soles and very dark skin

Yeah I completely understand...I'm always very picky :D (I have a certain EYE for things lol)

I buy almost all cards here. I will always buy the first of a new girl. Then after i watched her full show completely i decide if she is worth either to buy all her other cards or only if the outfits fits my personal preferences or if i will pass on all of her other cards.
In the last weeks all new girls fell into the first category. Totem is really great with casting.
Only exception was Malena Fendi who got into the pass category for me.
But actually i am not unhappy if i find a girl that i can pass on. There are still plenty i really like.
From the latest new girls Mia Malkova impressed me most with her flexability. Thats damn impressive. Normally you have to go to the Circus to see something like that.
But all latest girls were great in their own way.
I agree with orclover that most girls have strong and weak shows. Often you can guess from the outfit which it will be but of course not always.
Don't decide only by looking at the card images! very often they look much better once you see them perform.
If you like a girls from looks at least a bit give her a chance and get one of her shows. for older cards it makes sense to take the one with the highest rating unless you really dislike that particular outfit.
For freshly released card just take the risk

We buy all of our cards, hoping they will live up to our expectations. Sometimes they don't. Most of the time they do.

Personally, I can usually judge whether or not a girl can perform well enough from the demos. Or if they have any odd quirks that might make me think, this girl's not quite all there (and there are a few!)

For the cost of a decent hot dog or cup of coffee, I'm not worried if the odd card turns out to be a less than good one :)

I've deleted one of my 763+ cards as I thought the girl was just too way off base for my liking ;)

Another consideration is respect for the customer. The poor rating and no review system is purposeful. It keeps us in the dark, and we buy cards "hoping" the show will be good. This has a negative effect on sustainable buying. Buy enough cards that do not stay in the playlist, waste enough money, and you stop investing. It is just human nature. Giving us a choice to experience the card will keep attention on the software, and increase buyer morale.

I just know from experience that people are going to ignore a ton of great cards because the first couple were a dud for a particular performer, it happens with nearly every girl. Even the best have up and down cards.

Wow !!! Karlee Grey's first card !... I can't wait...

I would love it if Totem did what you suggest, but I don't think it is practical. The big uncertainty is whether this would increase Totem's overall revenue. I don't see how this could be predicted. In my case your idea would probably result in me spending less money than I do at present. Right now I buy every card that looks appealing considering the model's prior performances on other cards I already own. Under you proposal I would rent first and only buy the ones I like. It is unlikely that I would rent more cards than I currently buy. I also see two cost issues that would discourage Totem from doing this:

1. Bandwidth for card downloads must be a major expense to Totem. You suggestion would increase that cost.

2. Implementing this idea would require considerable programming effort. To Totem this is another significant expense and a possible source of defects that could irritate customers.

Ariana Marie has a nice tattoo.

I am a double diamond member but I am finding it difficult to spend on cards these days. I have the money but not the motivation. Of my +1200 cards, only about 300 are in the playlist full time, which means I bought a lot of cards on hope but then deleted them. Buyers remorse keeps me from buying at this point. I imagine this happens to all users to some extent. To the outside observer it seems that the current system works but we no longer have discounts or sales, we have a lack of info for cards, a lack of good demos, and good reviews makes buying bad cards very discomforting, I will not buy if I have any doubts about the quality of the card. Here is a solution:

Offer every card for 33 % of original value to rent for 3 days. So Mine would be 5 credits to rent for three days. If I love it, then I would have to pay 15 tokens to keep it for life...that means I would pay 20 credits for cards I love. If I don't love it, then I have only spent 5 and I am much more likely to continue to spend 5 on every card in the hopes that I find one that I want forever. The reality is every card is different, girls have really great cards,and really poor cards, all shot in a day or two. Abigaile is a perfect example..she has one card that is top 10 all time, but the other 5 are medicore...if she was released today...I would have bought her first and skipped on the other 5...meaning I spent 15 tokens for 6 cards and missed the best card, and with bad reviews, useless rating, and poor demos most people would have missed it as well. With my system...at the very worst I would have spent 30 on 6 cards, just to rent...and I would have bought the yellow swimsuit one so I would have spent 45 tokens for 6 cards.

you are right. My spelling is wrong. Thanks

What the hell happen to bikini beach scenes ,,wet scenes, oil scenes,, are we getting lazy guys,,what about cutting hole in stage with glass floor and doing some up skirt scenes,,

Cool ! More Mia Maklova and Tania R ^^
Estonika's cosplay looks gorgeous too!

I can't wait for Elsa Jean and Karlee Grey *-*

@crasherdnb good job keep it up.

mine will not install either

Karlee Grey is great. Not very elegant though, so we will see.

I am eagerly awaiting Emma's next outing.

Ivana Sugar

Elsa Jean, Karlee Grey, Tania R

Mia Malkova, Emma Brown, Casey Calvert

Thanks to @Manue for answering the question:

Hi,

Our software usually uses port 6881

You can also look for a new port from 6882 to 6899

in the registry : SOFTWARE/Totem/Vghd/p2pTcpPort

Regards
Manue

I don't have that entry in my registry but vghd is still listening to the 6881 port which I haven't seen change between desktop or notebook installs.

By the way, I don't use Norton's either, but the enterprise version Symantec EndPoint Protection and it hasnt blinked with the new web site or programme (even if it is still VGHD.exe

I also added a review.

In all my long years with Totem, I have never "caught"any diseases from there

I just added a review. Norton is collecting information about the safety of this web site iStripper.com, not about the application program iStripper.

Seriously Grabandt........
Norton is giving you a FALSE positive
It doesn't know enough about iStripper and is telling you it's a threat just because of their lack of information

If enough of us do this little review on Norton Safe Net, they will get more information and stop giving FALSE positive results

I'll say it again........
You need to control your anti-virus software and not let it control you

​Also, they're NOT asking us to advertise for them. You really need to actually read Rex's opening comment.