Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

最后发帖 - 页数 716

  论坛

ComteDracula
已加入 在 Aug 2017
2706 发布

Cartes spéciales

关于iStripper的一切
August 24, 2020, 135 回复
@Stanston,

I would like to answer you.

Firstly, personally I am very satisfied with Totem's product, since I would no longer buy their product.

It is not a recognition issue that we are dealing with here.

The problem here is called "Customer Frustration". "Unnecessary provocation by putting certain tempting cards on display, with the aim of getting people to participate in games of chance to obtain them, without certainty of obtaining them, and this, at the risk of having to spend big and end up with products they did not want ".

All the better if you are satisfied.

So much the better if you want to play games of chance. If this is your desire, I have nothing against it.

But someone at Totem is going to have to realize, that there are people who refuse to participate in these games of chance, for various reasons, and that these people are ready to pay more if it is. necessary to obtain these cards.

We are not asking for handouts. Just a possibility to have them and have the full collection of the girls we love and appreciate, without continually getting them in the face to stoke our frustration.

We don't need morals. We are adults and very capable of understanding that Totem is in business and needs to make money to survive and keep paying its costs.



@Stanston,

J'aimerais vous répondre.

Premièrement personnellement je suis très satisfait du produit de Totem, puisque je n'achèterais déjà plus leur produit.

Ce n'est pas un problème de reconnaissance auquel nous avons affaire ici.

Le problème s'appelle ici "Frustration des clients". "Provocation inutile en mettant en vitrine certaines cartes alléchantes, dans le but d'ammener des gens à participer à des jeux de hasard pour les obtenir, sans certitude de les obtenir, et ce, au risque qu'il ait à dépenser gros et à se retrouver avec des produits qu'ils ne désiraient pas".

Tant mieux si vous êtes satisfait.

Tant mieux si vous voulez jouer à des jeux de hasard. Si c'est votre désir, je n'ai rien contre.

Mais il va bien falloir que quelqu'un chez Totem se rende compte, qu'il y a des gens qui refusent de participer à ces jeux de hasard, pour diverses raisons, et que ces gens sont prêt à payer plus cher si c'est nécessaire pour obtenir ces cartes.

Nous ne demandons pas la charité. Juste une possibilité de les avoir et avoir la collection complète des filles que nous aimons et apprécions, sans continuellement se les faire mettre dans le visage pour attiser notre frustration.

Nous n'avons pas besoin de morale. Nous sommes des adultes et très capable de comprendre que Totem est en affaires et a besoin de faire de l'argent pour survivre et continuer à payer ses frais.
TheEmu
已加入 在 Jul 2012
7424 发布

Scratch Game Odds

关于iStripper的一切
August 24, 2020, 21 回复
@nm76

As someone with a complete collection who only plays the scratch games to try to get the SEC cards, I've found that in the past, I would generally break even with credits, thanks to the way they handled the wins for people that had no normal cards to get.

That has been my experience in the past. A few times I was up a few credits, a few times down a few. Once I was up by a lot of credits and once I was down by something approaching 200 credits. Overall I think, but am not sure, that I may be slightly up but in any case not far from breaking even - this over and above having won the SECs.

After purchasing and tracking the results of over 100 cards in this current event (something I've done for the last several scratch-off game events), I can say that the odds for credit wins are significantly lower this time. I'm consistently losing over half of the credits that I spend.

I did not come to this conclusion. In the end I got this SEC after buying 120 scratch cards, and had 10 credits more than I started with. For me there does not seem to have been much of a change. I know others have lost out significantly, but you would expect that even if the odds were perfectly balanced. I was buying in batches of 10 and though on a little more than half the time I won nothing on 5 or more cards out of each batch the occasional win of 50 or 100 credits pretty well balanced that out in the longer term.

Because of the relatively large prizes of 50 and 100 credits compared to the 1 credit cost of a scratch card, with corresponding low odds of winning them, you need to try far more than 100 cards before you can make a reasonable estimate of the long term odds for these games.
Stanston
已加入 在 Aug 2018
3160 发布

Cartes spéciales

关于iStripper的一切
August 24, 2020, 135 回复
Hi @Voyeurpervers
What do you think of these different Totem proposals ???
Proposals and in specific Promises are nothing which can be deal with in an easy way.

In my personal Opinion you never should make any Proposals or Promises,
except to your self. So in that case you can't disappoint any one else/the others.

But, Totem is a Company which has to earn Money to provide us with the Girls on iStripper.
This is what we are here for, to enjoy these Proposals and Promises from Totem.
And believe it or not (i got Yesterday my 2nd Year Achievement by the way)
i'm not disappointed in any kind of way, with iStripper.
And Yes to provide us with very nice Shows, that is for sure a Proposal and Promise,
which Totem made to us since Years.

And more important, we as a User/Customer of iStripper are not be able to Look behind the Curtain in any Way.
So we can't see which decisions are made yesterday, and which decisions are made today or tomorrow.

Because behind that Curtain you will meet Humans just like you and me.
No Robots, No AI, just friendly and smart Humans :)
And Humans can make mistakes, but as a Company it is not Totems obligation,
to keep us informed about every smaller or bigger Situation, behind that Curtain.
There is no Point, except they decide to do that, because it is not our Company/Business.

And from my own experience, in a specific Company as an employee for almost 7 Years.
My boss was making always and anytime different Proposals and Promises,
but he was never be able to solve these things, for different Reasons.
Market changes, Customer changes, or simply not enough Time and Manpower
to deal with every single Situation.
Or just simply he has overestimated himself, which can happen to everyone of us,
please think about that 😉

Let us stay short on the Topic Manpower, Employees are costing Money, but it is impossible to pay those Employees when Customers asking continuously for more Discounts or better/cheaper Deals.

And just to Remember, we didn't pay any Cent/Penny for the iStripper Client Software.
Some Members from this Community are providing us with different Skins and Fullscreenscenes.
That is not a matter, of course.

So Totem, the Creators from the Community, and the Participants of the Forum
are in my Opinion the best Proposal and Promise, which can be made to every Single User/Customer.

The Problem is when things becoming redundant, people forget about that.

Be Grateful and Appreciative for what you have now and not for, what you could get eventually.
And Live every Moment, as if it were your Last.
arise77
已加入 在 Mar 2008
431 发布

Cartes spéciales

关于iStripper的一切
August 24, 2020, 135 回复
Je voudrais revenir au post de @Sexy3DBoy (désolé si c'est un peu tardif) :

Ceci dit, si iStripper se fait plus d'argent avec les SEC, on peut se dire que c'est pour mieux rétribuer nos très chères danseuses. Qui pourrait être contre cela?

On peut se dire aussi que c'est pour étoffer la garde-robe des danseuses. Qui pourrait être contre cela?

On peut se dire aussi que c'est pour toujours plus de développement techniques et informatiques. Qui pourrait être contre cela?

Quant à douter de la légalité de tout cela, perso, je préfère voir iStripper comme une compagnie qui nous offre du très bon divertissement...

Je suis évidemment pour le financement de ces 3 choses, comme vous dites "qui pourrait être contre ?" ; et je suis d'accord qu'il n'y a pas vraiment à discuter de la légalité de ces jeux.

Mais pour ma part, je pense que ce n'est pas le sujet. Ce qui est dérangeant ici n'est pas le fait que Totem fasse du profit avec ces jeux ni comment il est réinvesti, mais plutôt la manière de l'obtenir. Les jeux sont présentés comme une forme d'innovation à Istripper, alors que cela n'offre rien. Au contraire, on reçoit du vieux contenu plus cher, sans obtenir ce pourquoi on joue : les cartes spéciales.

ComteDracula l'a suggéré comme d'autres, s'il s'agit de payer plus cher certaines cartes, pourquoi pas ?

Il y a 6 ans, Totem a décidé d'arrêter les abonnements mensuels, puis a fixé un prix pour les cartes, que l'on ne pouvait alors qu'acheter à l'unité. Je pense que la plupart des membres a compris pourquoi et en a accepté les conditions.
Si on ne nous dit pas directement que la vente des cartes n'est pas rentable et qu'il faudrait que chaque membre paie tel montant pour une carte, nous ne pouvons que faire des suppositions.

Dépenser plus ici, d'accord, mais pour du contenu que l'on veut. Il y a de nombreux moyens de satisfaire ceux qui sont mécontents en raison des jeux de hasard. Par ex :
    - proposer d'acheter un peu plus cher un lot de cartes que l'on choisit, et y inclure une carte spéciale
    • permettre l'achat de cartes Joker, ou directement des cartes spéciales après un certain temps à un prix plus élevé
    • instaurer un système de points, plus on achète de cartes, plus on accumule des points, points que l'on pourrait échanger contre une carte spéciale

Cela n'empêche pas de continuer à proposer les jeux de hasard pour ceux qui préfèrent ce moyen.
Carstrip
已加入 在 Apr 2020
291 发布

Discussions for Scenes for Version 1.2.X Fullscreen Mode here

关于iStripper的一切
August 24, 2020, 5063 回复
Interesting observations @sh42n81

Last night I cleaned all the scenes in my collection and took all of them out of iStripper, then put them back in one at a time.
Funny result was that even just starting iStripper it had the RGB error codes. Those arent anything major and wont effect the performance but is interesting just starting the program it has these errors.

Then, I found that when iStripper goes to the "fullscreen preview" page it actually reads everything in your collection and will pick up any error it can find in any of your scenes in your collection!

I had "Rotation" and "Ambient" errors individually in 3 scenes (took a lot of looking to find lol) So repaired them and now I have no rotation or ambient errors at all.

I dont think its worth trying to find all the errors if the scenes work, but if it effects performance its worth investigating each file individually, one bad scene has impacts on the others.

Another interesting find was if the sprite has a definition ie: allow: pole - and then has a long list of "deny" under it, the system takes longer to find the correct / appropriate show.
I modified all my 127 scenes so that if it is allowing pole for example, I deleted all the denies under it (table, behindtable, top etc). All my scenes now go faster!
It makes sense though, it means the system is just finding pole clips only, and not trying to further clarify beyond pole what other elements it needs to deny. Noticably much faster 😉
sh42n81
已加入 在 Apr 2008
507 发布

Discussions for Scenes for Version 1.2.X Fullscreen Mode here

关于iStripper的一切
August 24, 2020, 5063 回复
I spent some time digging into the error log with my IBTC scene today.

    decode overflow

There are tons of these, but they are just warnings. I don't notice any peformance problems in spite of a high RAM load. Most of them are very small: from 0 - 3 ms and, interestingly, mostly at frame -1, 0, or 1. So, right at the start of a clip, perhaps?

Curiously, I am experiencing performance problems on this PC right now and text that I type is being delayed appearing on screen. But it isn't my 6-clip and 3-shadow IBTC scene that is playing--it is the standard "Paint" scene that comes with iStripper and only has a single clip. My GPU really doesn't like motion backgrounds, it would seem. CPU usage (by vghd.exe) is only 9% and RAM is a paltry 300MB.

I just told iStripper to find a different scene. It chose The Penthouse Club and now I can type in real time again. 😊 I am banning Paint now.

    incorrect sRGB profile

Also just a warning. I had 7 of these each time the scene ran. This matches the 7 .png files that make up the scene: the background and 6 masks, each made from duplicates of the background image.

I opened each of them in GIMP and converted the sRGB profiles to GIMP's built-in profile. That did eliminate the warnings from the log. I will make sure to take this step with scenes that I create in the future, just as a best practice, but i don't see the need to revise my current scenes to replace the color profile. It doesn't seem to be causing any trouble. The Internet and @TheEmu agree that it can be ignored.

    Unknown node property "ambient"
    Unknown node property "rotation"

These are just weird. The only place in this scene where the "ambient" property appears is the "light" node, and I know that's valid. "Rotation" spelled as the whole word, doesn't appear at all. I have used "rot" in clipSprites and I know that's valid, too.

i did a search to verify that "rot" isn't being used out of place anywhere, and it isn't. Also verifired that I didn't accidentally type "rotation" anywhere. That word does not exist in the file.
ComteDracula
已加入 在 Aug 2017
2706 发布

Cartes spéciales

关于iStripper的一切
August 23, 2020, 135 回复
Je le répète la promesse n'a pas été tenue.

Si elle l'avait été, nous ne serions pas ici encore et encore à parler de ce sujet.

Totem à ouvert une boite de pandore avec ces SEC, et seul eux peuvent régler ce problème.

Ils doivent tenir compte aussi des membres qui se refusent à jouer à des jeux de hasard.

Il y a eu plein de suggestions intéressantes de membre, dont par exemple permettre l'achat de ces cartes un an plus tard à un coût plus élevé, pour les personnes ne voulant pas participer aux jeux de hasard. Pourquoi ces suggestions sont elles ignorées ? Juste pour une question de faire de l'argent sur le dos des membres ? Pour ma part, je ne le sais pas.

S'ils ne le font pas, il va continuer à y avoir encore et encore des messages de gens frustré de ne pas être capable d'acquérir ces cartes, et d'avoir perdu beaucoup d'argent et crédits.

La détente dont vous parlez est entre leur mains.

En ne faisant ou ne disant rien, ils ne font que faire perdurer cette tension chez plusieurs membres.


I repeat the promise was not kept.

If it had been, we wouldn't be here over and over again talking about this topic.

Totem opened a Pandora's Box with these SECs, and only them can fix this problem.

They must also take into account members who refuse to play games of chance.

There were plenty of interesting member suggestions, including allowing the purchase of these cards a year later at a higher cost, for people not wanting to participate in games of chance. Why are these suggestions ignored? Just for the sake of making money off the backs of the members? Personally, I don't know.

If they don't, there will continue to be messages over and over again from people frustrated at not being able to acquire these cards, and having lost a lot of money and credits.

The relaxation you speak of is in their hands.

By not doing or saying anything, they only perpetuate this tension among several members.