Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

最后发帖 - 页数 684

  论坛

orclover
已加入 在 Jun 2012
1403 发布

guns in istripper

关于iStripper的一切
September 26, 2020, 47 回复
Was skeptical about doing so, but If I may chime in-
Owned, (legally) enjoyed shooting handguns, long guns since my late teens
At one point in my life it became required to carry a handgun due to my chosen occupation - to STOP a threat.
To protect life- Never property, from the bad people of society when he/she/they are using equal deadly *****/intent
Can using a gun on a human being result in their demise? Absolutely
Was I ever trained/instructed to ***** someone? Never- I was trained to stop a threat to protect Life, my own and or other human beings.
I totally understand this is a emotional issue and rightfully so- discharging a firearm at a human being can cause death
It may sound cliche' but to me a firearm is a tool, just like a wrench, saw, hammer. It serves it's purpose- and should be respected
Am I pro gun? Yes-Legally owned, responsibly posessed

Now as far as Beautiful, Sexy girls firing a gun at a range in the Tightest short-shorts...What a turn on
Plenty of videos on Ytube

America is just a different place from the rest of the industrialized world. It has always had very high crime rates, and its people are a weird combination of individualistic, materialistic, simple minded, and resistant to oversight. The nation is so much younger than the rest of the industrialized world, with nearly the entiretly of its population coming from recent immigrant families. Statistically a gun is most likely used to ***** its owner...rather than protect..the incidents of a gun stopping an intruder are extremely small, but gun suicides are astronomical...and annually into the 10s of thousands. Rural people are the most likely to own a gun, and are the least likely to have to use it, except to ***** themselves or endure their children accidently shooting themselves. Guns are deadly, ***** thousands of people a year but they are fun...and deadly fun things that ***** thousands fit right in my america.
Vortim
已加入 在 Apr 2019
264 发布
willyweekly
已加入 在 Jul 2015
1035 发布

guns in istripper

关于iStripper的一切
September 26, 2020, 47 回复
Considering the amount of guns in America alone, I believe 99.9999% of civilians who posses a gun here, aren't planning to ***** people with them either.

As far as vehicles are concerned most people who buy a car aren't initially planning to planning to ***** people either but ***** and reckless driving along with inattention (all of which are conscious decisions) ***** a great many people worldwide. More than illegal gun shootings, I believe, by a considerable margin.

As far as animals are concerned I wasn't addressing that but I see animals ***** by cars on the road virtually every day in the area where I live. Darn, I'm so sorry Mr. Deer/Cat/Dog/Raccoon/Squirrel but I just couldn't be bothered to swerve around you since I was texting on my phone or at 30mph over the speed limit and couldn't miss you in time... Whether on purpose or not, the animal (or person) is just as dead.

How many defendants at sentencing time after ***** someone with a gun or a car stand up and with crocodile tears flowing, say something along the lines of: "I didn't mean to shoot/hit him or her and I'd take it back if I could, Please forgive me...." Whether on purpose or not that person is just as dead.

Whether you personally like it or not, using a gun to hunt/***** animals in the wild as a sport, is legal in most countries in the world.

Both guns and cars are tools and when used legally for their intended purpose, they serve that purpose and are justified.

However when either are misused, no matter why, each is just as unlawfully deadly as the other.

The point being that until the human variable enters the scene, neither tool ***** anyone and just sits collecting dust.

But when that human makes a conscious decision to misbehave while using said tools, people (or animals) start getting ***** or worse.

Stop blaming the tools and focus the attention at the place (the human variable) where it can actually do some good. And unfortunately I don't have the solution for that either but I know what we have been doing so far isn't working. A new approach is needed.

And I apologize for doing my part in helping this thread slide off track but this is a subject on which I have spent much time contemplating and I lost focus on the o/p's original complaint. Mea culpa.

I am happy to have a civil conversation and I think most of us here are going with that.
Thanks to all. (off topic or otherwise)

I will add two/three parts here.

If I buy a gun, then I am going to shoot to *****. no other options. We can talk about protection, but if you are planning on protecting someone or something, then you are planning on shooting someone... to *****. guns have no other use. If this isn't in the plan then you don't know what a gun will do. (I don't have a problem with hunting, but again, we understand that this is *****. my brother in law and other friends who hunt, trained, registered, etc. )

I went to get my camping gear and speak to the guy behind the counter for a fishing license. We chat and he tells me how scared he is about selling guns. He mentions the one question that lets him know if the person should have a gun. He asks "how many rounds do you want?" If the person doesn't even know the term rounds, then they shouldn't be buying a gun (according to me and the salesman). What makes him scared is the majority don't know what a round is....


We are all in the middle of gun control.
We aren't thinking we hand guns to people leaving prison. (no control)
We aren't thinking we ban all guns. (no guns)
We are all in the middle. Civil discussion can discuss the middle. (Sadly, civility is rare.)

pickle1
主持人
已加入 在 Mar 2019
6471 发布

Pickle's favourite shows

关于iStripper的一切
September 25, 2020, 69 回复
Miluniel -Maid Day

Miluniel’s second card and this time she has been given some clothes to work with – and it’s a good looking costume. I have high hopes for this.

As in the first card, there seems to be an issue lighting Miluniel – her legs have very heavy shadows on them. And she has got good legs, beautifully highlighted by the short skirt. Nice round bottom too.

Again, this is nudity only. The clip breakdown is (exc. previews) 7 standing, 5 pole, remainder table – no swing this time). There are 6 no-nudity, 3 topless and remainder nudity.

Again, her movements are fundamentally wiggling and posing. No acrobatics on the pole. Shoes and socks come off so we have bare feet.

But – we are only in pole clip 5, fully dressed (no nudity), when the panties are slipped off. Things are – literally – looking up! That adds a nice element of tease to the subsequent pole clips. Fabulous when the dress slips off in pole clip 13 and she is naked underneath.

The dress unzips sexily at the back and slides off the shoulders. Nice natural small/medium breasts

And standing clip 21 is a fantastic example of how to do a panty-less upskirt – lots of flicking upwards of the skirt so that you can enjoy both front and rear views.

Nudity only, so you can see her beautifully trimmed pussy but there are no explicit views and no touching – but the does not hide it behind her hands, she just keeps her knees close together. On mobile using zoom you would see more.

I think this is a gentle and great show. It helps demonstrate that a girl who could do a good show with 2 pieces of clothing can do a superb show if given a bit more to work with.
ComteDracula
已加入 在 Aug 2017
2694 发布

Small reminder concerning the SEC obtained only with games of chance.

关于iStripper的一切
September 25, 2020, 86 回复
Thank you @Krell and the others for your testimonials.

It gives me another clarification and helps us all see it more clearly.

For my part, I hardly expect a response from Totem.

I know that I am disturbing to them and that I raise questions that irritate them.

For my part, I have always been transparent in my intentions.

But I never have the answers from them, which many here also need to have.

Yes iStripper contributes through their games to exploit some people with addiction problems.

Me personally this aspect comes to me, because I work to help vulnerable people, with mental illnesses.

I believe that the lack of response does not help their cause.

I believe that several here have already given ample explanations and means, on why Totem should change their policies of the SEC, obtained only by the games of chance.



Merci @Krell et aux autres pour vos témoignages.

Cela me donne un autre éclaicissement et nous aident tous à y voir plus clair.

Pour ma part, je ne m'attend guère à une réponse de Totem.

Je sais que je suis dérangeant pour eux et que je soulève des questionnements qui les irritent.

Pour ma part, j'ai toujours été transparent dans mes intentions.

Mais je n'ai jamais les réponses de leur part, dont plusieurs ici ont également besoin d'avoir.

Oui iStripper contribue par leurs jeux à exploiter certaines personnes ayant des problèmes de dépendance.

Moi personnellement cet aspect vient me chercher, car je travaille à aider des gens vulnérables, avec des maladies mentales.

Je crois que l'***** de réponse, n'aident aucunement leur cause.

Je crois que plusieurs ici ont déjà donné amplement d'explications et de moyens, sur le pourquoi Totem devraient changer leur politiques des SEC, ne s'obtenant que par les jeux de hasard.