@Wyldanimal Don't mean to pry into your conversation with @Dorsai
I'm on a Mac, Catalina OS version 10.15.7

My Istripper App says Version 1.2.377/ 64 bits / Qt5.9.9

Just updated, so far so good. Don't have to put in a username or password

@Dorsai6

Question for you.
On Windows, the iStripper app is still 32 bit.

What about the App for Mac OS
is it now 64 Bit, or is it still a 32 Bit App?

I don't have access to a Machine running Mac OS
so I have no way to tell.

@aljey pls read my PM

@TheEmu has written a book in the best possible way. As commented shaders in his website
http://www.theemusnest.eu

Thanks @TheEmu

You should write us a book ! The notes on here and those you have left in many of your scenes are always very helpful.

@Dorsai6
No, I don't know how to read the preference file actually.
The article on nethack.ch referred to above does not seem to be about iStripper specifically, is it?
And I didn't really understand it anyway.

Whoops, it looks like it got added to the mobile site by mistake. It's gone now, like yesterday's snows. 💔

Just needed to add this:

#define texture2D texture2D_Fract

(Whatever that is)

That is a pre-processor directive that defines a simple text macro substitution.

It causes any use of the name "texture2D" that is encountered later in the source fle to be replaced by "texture2D_Fract"

texture2D_Fract is a locally defined function that is used as a wrapper around the standard GLSL function "texture" that uses only the fractional parts of the position coordinates, P, passed to it to identify which point is being sampled.

The result of the standard GLSL function texture() is only defined when both coordinates are in the range 0.0 to 1.0 (actually I think the condition might be greater than or equal to 0.0 and less than 1.0 which would exclude 1.0 from the valid range). How the function behaves when fed values outside of this range is implementation dependant, some clamp the values so that any out of range value is treated as either 0,0 or 1.0 while others discard the integer part of the value and just use the fractional part. Using texture2D_Fract either directly or via texture2D macro ensures that the second of these variations is used. This means that "wrap around" semantics are used for out of range values.


Some history. The texture2D() function is an old, deprecated, part of the GLSL language having been superceded by the newer texture() function. By defining a macro near the start of the shader source file we can effectively replace all uses of the deprecated function with the newer function without having to edit the body of the shader. At the same time this macro also eliminates the ambiguity as to what happens if the function is passed an out of range value for the texel position (I can say this with certainty as I was the person who introduced this way of using macros to adapt shadertoy shaders for iStripper - for example on my system the texture() function clamps the position coordinates but quite a few of the shadertoy shaders assumed wrapping semantics)

Nice going 😊

OMG ! It works

Thanks @Everthang - what a slog that was.

Just needed to add this:

#define texture2D texture2D_Fract

(Whatever that is)

in the shader preamble use

vec4 texture2D_Fract(sampler2D sampler,vec2 P) {return texture2D(sampler,fract(P));}
vec4 texture2D_Fract(sampler2D sampler,vec2 P, float Bias) {return texture2D(sampler,fract(P),Bias);}
#define texture2D texture2D_Fract

and in the rest of the code replace all use of 'texture' with 'texture2D'
its an OpenGL thang

@EverthangForever
😕 Could you be a bit more explicit please ?

In the .fsh need to change your use of 'texture' to 'texture2D'

Made some progress at last. I found after too many hours of hacking stuff around that this:

uniform sampler2D texture0; //Random Surfaces
uniform sampler2D texture1; //Random Greys

needs to be "texture" and not "iChannel"

With that, I was able to use texture1 to create a random starting number BUT it has screwed up the texture on texture0 in the scene.

If you load up the attached scene...
http://bit.ly/3XVcSZC

You will find 2 versions adapted from ET431. In the RandomCave version, the "cave" that is shown is different every time i.e the random number is being generated but the textures are all messed up.

There's a second NonRandom version to see what the textures should look like but in this version the shape of the cave is always the same.

If anyone knows if/how I can fix these textures .... 👍

Beautiful model with such lovely hair and a perfect body, but not to my liking because so much tats.

@aljey

That does sound like a preference file problem. It seems you know how to read the preference file since you checked it. It is possible that Apple has added new security features and the "real" preference file is no longer in the Preferences folder. I'm still on Monterey, so I can't be sure. When you checked the preference file did the system.ModelsPath parameter have the correct path name? Was it one value or multiple values? Does Finder show that the preferences file was recently updated?

This is true. Which is why I had to correct mine. 👍 😎

For example, in Account History I have the first card "Niemira / Stress Relief".
But in My Collection is "Niemira / Pleasant Dreams" the first card.

I'm sorry, but after you buy two or more cards in the same time or close enough, you will have the cards arranged by numbers or even by names.
If you choose to display by the Date of purchase, it is not so accurate. Trust me! All the time I bought and looked after it in my collection.

i've been waiting on this show.

She is my new love! 🔥🔞💖

@Dorsai6
I'm on Ventura 13.1
My issue is exactly as described in the original post.
I installed iStripper on a clean system, logged in, changed the settings.
Everything seemed to work, until the app crashed and I was ***** to log in again and all of my settings were gone.
I thought that maybe they were not saved because the app didn't exit cleanly, which didn't turn out to be the case.
I don't mind logging in every time, but it simply ***** me that it starts to automatically download shows to a disk that has almost no available space on it, because it forgot that I have configured it to download to a different one :)

I also enjoy watching her. Beautiful girl
I couldn't agree more with @trov

Eva Elle has a Splendid slim body! Definitely enjoy her first card. I highly recommend 🔥!

@aljey

That was an old problem with the Catalina OS 10.15. I'm currently using Monterey OS 12.6.2. The latest OS is Ventura OS 13. I don't plan to install Ventura for another 2-3 months.

What is your problem? I can probably help. Which OS are you using? If you have a problem with the Totem preferences file, I have a lot of experience. However, Apple has been tightening up security and some of the rules have changed.

@sjaakie
About the NFTs, save your money and invite your friends to the restaurant. It will be the best thing you can do.
😉

Absolutely stunning at first sight! 😍

Simple oversight

Aha ! 👍thanks

@sjaakie

you can even send Offers that are below the Floor.
Can you see my Offer?
Don't accept it.. It is very low..
But wanted to show that the floor is not absolute.

@sjaakie

Je me permet alors de vous conseiller de demander entre 60 et 65€ 😉😊

I would then advise you to ask between 60 and 65€ 😉😊

@virtuasigi have you been able to find a solution to this?
I'm having this problem now (latest macOS).

@sjaakie

you can list for any price you want.
the red warning is just that.
It says you are listing below the floor...

but you can still complete the listing, even though it is less than the current floor.
Which would then set a New Floor.

Current price
700 ETH = $1.086.057,00

It is realy there

It is not a mistake
go look at the other offerings by that same member.
https://opensea.io/Cheyenne13240

They have no idea what the Dolz NFT cards are.

But that it is a NEW coin.
and Hope to cash in in it's Newness...

@Sjaakie - I am not doubting your eyes - I had seen it myself 😊

The error lies with the people posting the prices who need to learn about decimal points.

😆

Other prices are getting a bit more realistic - 35 Matics for one Paola (I still would not pay that for that card)

@picle1 have you watched the link?
https://opensea.io/assets/matic/0x7906fddf30af0d1379ab7ec8feb2fb539e30196b/942

Current price
700 ETH = $1.086.057,00

It is realy there

Simple oversight

shader: Rnd_01.fsh

Should be

shader: Shaders/Rnd_01.fsh

@Philours and @TheEmu are correct - yesterday they did not have the option to select a year, today they can.

I saw that phenomenon myself on their accounts
.

@sjaakie - some people seem to have problems in crypto working out where the decimal point sits - hence 700 ETH instead of 0.07 ETH - at least I hope that is the explanation 😊

I did not know though that there seemed to be a minimum value that COULD be set? I saw some versions of Paola going for 45 Matics and the exchange rate there is nearly 1 Matic to a Dollar.

it defaults to showing the current Year, 2023

This is because for the Year selected there is no History to be seen.
Select a different Year.

Both yesterday and this morning there was no way to select a different year - even after resynchs, restarts and reboots.

After returning home this afternoon I now do have that option.

Select a different Year.

Correct @Wyldanimal, je peux maintenant sélectionner l'*****ée et accéder a mon historique👌 Ce qui n'était pas le cas hier même après synchronisation 😉

Correct @Wyldanimal, I can now select the year and access my history👌 Which was not the case yesterday even after synchronization 😉

Today, we released the first show of Eva Elle, lovely young woman with a thin beautiful body, catching smile and mesmerizing hip waves 😍

Enjoy!

Which istripper fan wants to pay € 65,- for 1 card?

Vous seriez bien étonné 😄 You would be surprised 😄

Notez également qu'il s'agit d'un NFT, ce qui n'est pas exactement la même chose! 😉
Also note that this is an NFT, which is not exactly the same! 😉

Well everything is clear no for me.
But

from the topic "Lana Lane Trading card is yours now":
You can buy or sell Lana Lane's Trading Card here: https://opensea.io/fr/collection/dolz-x-istripper-g0045

Please note that we have also dropped the Trading Card of Paola Hard to those who have participated in the Dolz presales. You can buy or sell Paola Hard Trading Card here: https://opensea.io/collection/dolz-x-istripper-g0032
----

Ok, I want to buy the Paola Hard trading card via the link above:
prices between 0.069 ETH - 700 ETH
This is €110.43 - €97,8474.42 (is this a joke)

Now I want to sell my Lana Lane trading card (I linked my istripper account to dolz for the free card) for let's try €25 = 0.0175 ETH, although that seems a lot compared to an istripper card.
But this is impossible
There is a minimum of 0.047 Eth = € 65

Which istripper fan wants to pay € 65,- for 1 card?

At the moment, I can see my full history and also that for @Bitwrangler and a couple of other random samples - but I see no history at all for @TheEmu or @Philours.

it defaults to showing the current Year, 2023

This is because for the Year selected there is no History to be seen.
Select a different Year.

How the New History works.

Select the Year,
Then for that selected Year you will see the Number of pages available for that year.

This make Ideal sense, only accessing 1 years' worth at a time solves the huge bandwidth issue.

@Evaneself
You can sort by dates of purchase in my collection tab too.

I can see my history from 2008 to today with version 1.2.372.

J'ai eu l'heureuse idée dès le début de mon adhésion avec iStripper de me faire un historique personnel de l'achat de mes cartes, et de tous les renseignements essentiels, dont la somme totale dépensée en argent dans les cartes.

Je suis très fier de l'avoir fait, avec tous les problèmes que je vois à ce sujet.

Du coup ça vous fait une occupation 😆

I still have version 1.2.360

I had the bright idea early on in my membership with iStripper to make a personal history of my card purchases, and all the essential information, including the total amount of money spent on the cards.

I'm very proud to have done this, with all the problems I see with it.


J'ai toujours la version 1.2.360

J'ai eu l'heureuse idée dès le début de mon adhésion avec iStripper de me faire un historique personnel de l'achat de mes cartes, et de tous les renseignements essentiels, dont la somme totale dépensée en argent dans les cartes.

Je suis très fier de l'avoir fait, avec tous les problèmes que je vois à ce sujet.

Thread closed