"And some of those "blemishes" are actually marks from the Floor "

That is a very Accurate Statement.
the Whole Studio is cleaned and touch up painted blue for each taping.
If the Girl gets a little sweaty, her bare skin will pick up some of the blue.

then in post production, when they mask out the blue color, it causes the bit of blue on the skin to look like a huge ***** as it changes hue / color.

Bump bump bump bump... omg

Its a Floor mark (Trust me it appears part way into a show and isn't there earlier on a couple of the Ladies I have seen it happen)
Turning in place while resting on the floor creates it.

As to the comment about worts and all (think you mean Warts "worts" means "leafed herbal plants" usually) Not seen any Warts.
But people are people so could you not live with one ??

As to missing limbs
Well there are models (including Glamour models) missing limbs.
So clearly its possible in the future.
Im sure there are members here who are missing a limb or are in chairs as well.
A lot of the population (especially ex military) have A disability now.

It would be Very difficult to pole dance with a wheel chair but in the future ?
Who knows.

Birthmarks, freckles and moles are different from: acne, *****, surgical scars, clothing impressions (bra marks, etc.), floor rash and carpet *****, which are temporary conditions.

Some girls always seem to be *****. I have no problem bringing them into the studio in that condition, because that's who they are; they ***** easily or play rough or both, and their windows of clear skin are too brief to schedule.

But surgical scars and pimples heal, become invisible. Personally, I'd wait until then, whether I was model or videographer. Professionally, I'd go ahead and do the shoot because there is an audience for it. There is an audience for everything!

Totem does a great job of presenting all types of girls and conditions (well, no visibly pregnant dancer - yet). It's up to the consumer sort out what they like, and don't. Totem can't very well ***** about the complexion of a model they just paid handsomely. That would be counterproductive to the bottom line.

So it's up to us, the customers, to develop, maintain and publicize a database of faults. Totem provides us with the means and opportunity, and thanks to Zoony we now have a thread to build upon.

I'm not inclined to post pix of blemished bottoms, but will list my personal issues, so that members who LIKE scars and ***** can seek the shows, and others can avoid them. It will be a separate post.


:)

Interesting.
I just seeing what people think.
Everyone to their own, some people like the worts and all idea.
The first image shows an abundance of pimples, the second, is very bad ***** or something else, I don't think it's a mark from the floor, the third is where the Surgeon has inserted the implants.
As I said everyone to their own, as long as it doesn't do *****.
For what it's worth, I think that glamor and fantasy hasn't much to do with reality. it's like listening to the radio, you make your own pictures up, once the program is transfered to TV, it loses something. So yes, in this situation I'd rather the Barbies to the worts and all.
Unfortunately in this circumstance I think it appropriate to judge by appearance. They are selling a product, if we like what we SEE we buy it. It's completely different to actually intending to know someone, in which case looks don't come into it, as for friendship you don't judge a book by it's cover. Think about it, how many cards would be sold if the models had missing limbs, or something terrible like Parkingson's, or really huge birth marks, I don't mean the little ones, were wheelchair users. These people must be treated the same.
In this case, we aren't talking anything other than selfish, one sided indulgence.
But as I said everyone too their own, please don't shot me.
Sorry.

You're right. To be a model - it's not an easy job at all. Very ***** some times.
So can we judge them by their appearance?

Well clearly Cartref is correct about beauty in the eye of the beholder. Of the models presented since September, the 2 that I like least are Ricky's favorites!

...:)

Would you rather not see human girls than barbies?
And some of those "blemishes" are actually marks from the Floor

where can i find the original pics from each girl that vghd puts on the web page i am trying to set up a complete set of pics but some of the i have do not have the 8 originals most bonus galleries i have thank you

Beautiful pictures as always... I look forward to Melissa K's shows!

Ricky,

Please remember that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and not everyone's tastes agree. What you obviously do not like have received great reviews from other members.

Alyssia Loop's "Ready For Fun" has some barefoot taskbar scenes. She has a few shoe removals: she takes them off in standing, pole, and taskbar scenes. Alyssia has a scene in which she appears on the screen with one stocking already off and we get to see her take the remaining one off. Alyssia spends the majority of her time in this card in her stockings and without shoes. Yes, standing, pole, and taskbar scenes in stockings without shoes, "shoeless" as someone on this thread coined it (who started that?). Miss Loop actually has shoes on for only brief periods.

Very interesting card for the reasons listed above and, of course, a fascinating card because of the performance of the lovely, talented, and charming Alyssia Loop.

Enjoy the screen captures!

YouTube: VirtuaGirlGermany
Link: https://www.youtube.com/VirtuaGirlGermany

my view is that it should be up to the individual model concerned as to whether blemishes are covered up or not in pictures or shows. if they want to be made up or airbrushed to hide something they are not happy with which affects their confidence that is up to them.

i personally prefer to see natural blemishes such as birthmarks, moles and the odd pimple etc. as it is more attractive to me than layers of bronzer, fake tan or caked on makeup hiding them.

Another of my favorite performers, Nikita.

Merci @SexyMakeUp for the pictures.

I see a lack of beauties lately on Virtuagirl(I checked these make-up pictures from 14 September)

The casting wasn`t so great as I can saw in the last 2 months.

Except Bailey Rider and Melissa K , the rest of the girls aren`t my type of girls that I want to see on VG(the rest of them are just pretty in my opinion)

Like I said long time ago, a card needs to have 3 important things:

1.The girl must be beautiful(pretty is not enough in case of me)
2.The Outfit is important,too
3.The show must be good.

Now,like I said long time ago I put more accent on the look of the girl than the performance.
If the girl is good looking,the rest doesn`t matter too much in case of me.
Unfortunately,I didn`t see beautiful girls in the last 2 months(starting with 14 September)

I hope Totem will bring more beautiful girls on VG.

Sorry,if this post is a bit off topic.

P.S. I want to add this comment. What I posted, earlier, isn't a reflection of my overall thoughts about VG. I'm very happy with my VG experience - and with the wonderful quality of their service and girls.

I would agree that there is a risk of offending someone, simply because she doesn't meet with our subjective demands about her appearance. However, allowing us to see an overview of pictures would allow us to make up our own minds, without having to post messages about a particular girl. I'm not comfortable doing that, and I won't here.

We choose a card precisely because it meets with our - personal - likings. However, there are cards that I wouldn't have gotten, had I been given a chance to review a general overview of their un-altered photos. For that matter, the fact that VG feels the need to alter photos seems to be an admission that they are attempting to hide something from us, that might affect our purchasing decision.

I'll leave it at that.

Just a suggestion.
It's been mentioned before that there isn't a way to let others know about imperfections. Realizing that these are human beings and of course making issues is not only rude with a risk of being offensive to them, it could also damage the sales for the model and the company.
However if this isn't an issue, how about adding the uploading pictures programing to the comments page, limiting the images to one and filtering some images.
This would enable members to upload an image of moles, and bad skin marks, or odd boob jobs.
So if members are put off by this, they can be forewarned?
See examples

Jenni Gregg/Agent69

BTW clip 4402 with the pole is great with the new music!

Thanks Rex and Sorry for the *****! :-)

Adriana M/Picnic

If the Team are ok, can i prepare several preview like the ancien preview ?

Thanks Rex,
One question though... As an affiliate the old overview was a central part of the design for my promotion pager. Will you create something general to replace the old overview for us? I mean some animated stuff with each girl to be included in the promotion package.

As it is now there's been no animated preview available for the new cards (for affiliates) since you terminated the old overview and I need something "extra" for each girl to replace it.

Nice présentation @Rex.

Rex, thanks for the clarification.

Here is how it should look like.
We'll keep the "Want to se NNNN naked?" whith the computer screen, the model naked but covered, the lock and the buy button.
We'll add a new "Non nude preview" space that will play a short extract of one of the demo file of the model so users can watch the model move.

As I said before, we where unhappy with the previous overview because it was unclear to new users that they were buying nudity (as the overview was non nude). That's why we added the unlock screen and changed the wording.

Plan was to have this new unlock and keep the old overview, but one person left the team here and we don't have the work power to produce them (one new every day) manually. That's why there is nothing for now and we had to work on a system that will display the existing demo files instead of requiring an extra hour of work every day.

This will be in the software only at first as the non nude preview is in our proprietary format and can't be played by regular browsers. We'll see if it's worth it to reformat all demos videos for the website looking at buyers stats (most users buy from the software now).

For DB the previews will include nudity and explicit stuff, it will be named Quick Preview and we'll add a warning at the entrance on the website.

I think it's better because new users won't be ***** about what they buy and everyone will have a preview of the girl moving.

Nice ;)

Merci @SexyMakeUp, passe une bonne semaine.

Today, 19 november 2012, Robin is in our studio for Virtuagirl.
Here is a picture after her make-up.

Does anyone know if Star made any pornos? If so, what was her name?

in 2 poi sono bellissime

ha me piace sempre di più

Here is more of Amber Michaels

Wonder about DBs, since not all the cards there feature a no-nudity demo. Guess that upcoming preview is only for VG purposes, or new DBs demos gonna be released to achieve this?

Thanks for news,@Rex.

I don`t have nothing against if the new animated overview will be non-nude.

"New overview will appear in a new space called non nude preview and will show one of the demo clips of the girl.."

If this thing will going to happen and it will appear in a new space it`s fine for me.If I will see one demo clip or more just like in demo carousel it will be fine for me.
I hope that(those) demo clips(clips) will not be too short(3-4 seconds)like that crap that we see.


" I have no idea how it ended up published, but it should not have. "
LOL,it`s strange what you said.I thought nothing is published without your approuval.After all,you are the boss of "The Team" and everything what will be published it should be asking your approuval before to be published.

@Rex

Thanks for letting us know what's up with this preview clip. On a Sunday at that.


However, I'm a little ***** about this comment. Not too long ago, you were saying that newcomers were having trouble understanding that the payed for content included nudity and you wanted to make sure newcomers understood that the full shows were nude shows. Here lately, it seems like the free teaser pics have been going pretty much non-nude and now you're saying that this new preview that replaces the old overviews will be non-nude. Are all the demo clips going to become non-nude too ??

If a long time member such as myself can be a little ***** about what's really going on, don't you think a newcomer could be ***** ?? I mean, I kinda get the impression that VirtuaGirl may be in the beginning stages of going non-nude. I've had that impression for quite some time now. Here I could swear you guys said you were looking into creating a new site for non-nude shows a while back. Did you change your mind and decide to make VirtuaGirl non-nude ??



I'm still wondering why an adult site that requires age verification or membership for entry would even be concerned about nudity on the home page and store pages. I guess I'll never agree with or understand that one. Just doesn't make any sense to me.

Thanks for the clarification Rex, any guess as to when this is going to happen?

It's a glitch. This was a test we did but it was net approved, we didn't like it. I have no idea how it ended up published, but it should not have.
New overview will appear in a new space called non nude preview and will show one of the demo clips of the girl..

some more,

Crissy Moran, Los Angeles
Danielle Trixie, Dallas (VGHD)
Edita, Washington DC
Elody, Houston
Erica Rose Campbell, New Hampshire
Erika, Orlando
Jade Hsu, Los Angeles
Janet, Miami
Jennifer, Austin
Justine, Missouri
Karen, New Jersey
Kinga, Oregon
Lady Shade, New York
Laureen, Seattle
Linda Tran, Los Angeles
Lola, Philadelphia
Lux Kassidy, Los Angeles
Mallory, New York
Maya, Boston
Natacha, Tampa Bay
Pamela, Walnut Grove
Puma Swede, Los Angeles
Regina, Las Vegas
Ryley, Boston
Sally, San Francisco
Stacy
Sunny Leone, Los Angeles
Tabatha, Little Rock
Tall Goddess, Los Angeles
Tracy, Las Vegas
Wendy, Hollywood
Whitney, Atlanta

that's it.

Ah yes........American girls.

You could browse through the Classic Collection and find that there are quite a few American girls to choose from. The Classic cards are not in Hi Def though.

A short list through the D's......

Girls name and where Totem has them listed as their Origin...

Aimee Sweet, Rhode Island
Alexis Amore, Los Angeles
Anabella, Las Vegas
Angel Cassidy, San Diego
Angie, Iowa
Anita Dark, Miami
Betty Love, San Fransisco
Bunny Love, Venusia(no idea, don't ask)
Cameron, San Diego
Carol, Santa Monica
Channone, Houston
***** Laine, Green Bay
Chelsea, Arizona
Devin Devasquez, Baton Rouge
Dana, New Orleans
Dana V, Santa Monica
Deborah, North Carolina
Donna, Alabama
Dorina, Austin
Douchka, New York


Again.....Just a short list. There are more to choose from in the Classic collection.

If it's what I'm getting the overview isn't an overview it's a couple of frames. I knew they'd SCREW it up! I've totally stopped buying cause without the overview's I feel I've been taken or "RIPPED OFF" right and left!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Have to say it I told all of them in these forums that they were going backwards and "I was Right"!!!!!!!!!!! Extremely, just plain STUPID if you ask me!!!!!!! Oh, but they don't care!!!!!!! It is of absolutely NO USE!!!!!!!! Very, Very BAD!!!!!

Since this is currently only on ONE card, it's hard to Say that THIS is how it's going to be.
We will have to wait and see how it evolves.
I'd like to see More Samples, not just that short single sample.

Personally, I too like the old Larger Banner style Overviews.
But Totem is Integrating the GUI and the Web, so the new Animated Lock overview will be used on both.

Just checked it out, and I hope it improves a lot! It's tiny and not really much use at the moment.

This may or may not be a wrap on this thread ,. Or at least the me being a boob,. segment.,. But ,.


my sillly pixilated brain does wonder about this "Clap Board" conundrum :p

Is that just a feature that came along with new updates? Or do you need to have a certain level? ,.

I can`t believe after so many months where The Team worked to bring us this new animated overview, the final result is a crap(my opinion)

I checked too that animated overview and like other members said, it is a bullshit(and when you think they worked so many months - they even delay the term of releasing-they said end of september first time)

I don`t want to believe that all cards from VG and DB sites will be like that DB card (Anna and baby Cindy).
This thing will be a total disaster.

I appreciate all the time Totem tries to bring new improuvements on the site and software and actually I like many improuvements they`ve done (the demo carousel especially,the pictures,the videos,the reviews and other useful features integrated in the software and examples can continue)

The only thing that I disliked from the beginning in the new look of the site was that big monitor with that big padlock(I mentioned this thing long time ago on the this forum).That monitor occupies too much space from one card.
I said it that time and I say now again.

I don`t know who from The Team had this "brilliant" idea of removing the old "overview of her ...min show" and to replace it with this animated overview,but I can tell him(her) only this:

That idea was A BAD ,BAD idea.The result you can see it now(the new animated overview is a crap).I didn`t realise it will look like this.

So please Totem remove that crap with that monitor and padlock and put it back the old "overview of her ....min show.

All those words written above are just my opinions regarding of this new animated overview and if someone will feel offended somehow,he(she) is free to say it.

Please remember Totem if you`ll replace all cards(VG and DB) with this crap will be a big mess and a total disaster.
I don`t see how you`ll increase your sales with that bullshit.

I would like someone from The Team to open one poll for voting the members IF they like the actual animated overview and if they want to keep it OR to bring back the old "overview of her ...min show" and remove that monitor and the padlocks from all cards.

Totem only shoots in Europe....
A few USA Babes have made it over...
Saraliz ...Aria Giovani

Years ago they tried to shoot in USA
Something messed up & they were only able to get
usable Shay Lauren & Rachel Roxx material...
CAUTION:Rachel & Shay's cards are "the best that could be salvaged" due to the screw up & thus are not quite up to the quality of regular VG animations...but at least we got 'em wigglin' & jigglin' here!

There are some American Babes in the VG Classics too(Erica Campbell)but I'm not well informed there....maybe other members will come on & give you a list of those.

Sorry i find on the virtualgirl page payment for SMS, but when i try from my computer this possibility not exist.
I understand - price is changed... 2 Euro in polish zloty (PLN) today is almost 3 Euro... Early was less...

For me its all about Sandra H, Heaven, Anna Tatu, Zafira, Ashley Bulgari, Morgane..... wait for it..... SHAZAM!!!!!

LOL that's it?

I'll keep buying with demos only...no more 2 credit purchases.
Thanks Totem!