Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

A daily update of the rating of girls.

  Fórum / Tudo sobre iStripper

snake353solid
De em Aug 2009

312 post(s)
November 22, 2009
Hello everyone, now we are going to the new program, but what do you think if you could introduce a ranking updated on a daily rating of the girls?

A daily update of the rating of girls.

56 votos

No, is not a good idea
39%
Yes , but, Im not secure
4%
Yes, , it is a good idea
27%
To see the poll
30%
CIRCERIA
De em Mar 2008

160 post(s)
November 22, 2009
LoL who would bother him/herself to rate up to several hundreds of shows every very day again and again.
That would be an even greater waste of time as to take care about ratings at all.
Better trust your own taste and forget about meaningless ratings.
Apasas
De em Aug 2009

1038 post(s)
November 22, 2009
I have no real opinions on this.

I don't take the ratings seriously anyway.
Severin24
De em Oct 2009

535 post(s)
November 22, 2009
Because the ratings are so deceiving, based on various factors of the viewers (some people vote a girl 10 just because she is attractive and nothing else!), and most importantly, because people who have NOT seen the card they are rating can rate, it is quite unnecessary.

Unless you disable the rating system to people who have yet to buy the card, then it is pointless because the SAME girls will monopolize the top rankings and thus the girls who are not rated as higher will not be equally popular. This is the situation now, but we can only make it worst with this idea. There are a LOT of underrated girls on this site and a lot of overrated girls as well.
Apasas
De em Aug 2009

1038 post(s)
November 22, 2009
In theory, if the rating system was that good, I would immediately want to go out and buy the top three for two tickets. So lets see the top three:

1. Melisa - West Coast
Admitidly, this looks quite interesting. I may get this on a special, but I wouldn't spend two tickets on it. However, there is no way I could take this seriously as a number 1.

2. Morgane - Sun Goddess
Oh my God, this is *****. In general I ***** golden costumes, but this is even worse than the usual fair. I would never buy this card willingly. Totem would have to give me it for free and even then I would never play it. More like second bottom than second top.

3. Morgane - Love cruise
I bought it for one ticket and rate it a generous 6. But there are other card of Morgane and other girls I rate far higher.

So as you can see, the rating system is meaningless from my point of view.
titilate
De em Jan 2009

740 post(s)
November 22, 2009
My suggestion is do away with the damn rating system completely and each member rate their own cards their own way. Everyone has their preferences when it comes to such things as a dancers beauty, body and boob size and shape, performance style, hair colour and yes even skin colour,, lol,,
Severin24
De em Oct 2009

535 post(s)
November 22, 2009
@titilate - Completely agree. It would be better if people could be more objective in their reviews or at least VG give us some better trailers.
Apasas
De em Aug 2009

1038 post(s)
November 22, 2009
I don't have a problem with the current rating system as long as it is regarded as a bit of fun and not used seriously.

I don't think any system would work, because it will always be hijacked by groupies and fanboys. It wouldn't surprise me if the girls and their associates have their own profiles in the site and give themselves perfect tens.

Also, people rate differently. Some people only give tens on the basis that 9 or less is crap. Some people will not vote if they don't like a card. Others, like myself, use a wider range where a 6 or a 7 is a decent score and 9 or ten is rare.

In saying that, people should rate the way they want. But that is why no rating system will work.
WyvernIV
De em Nov 2009

3 post(s)
November 22, 2009
Nothing wrong with the current scoring system as far as I csn see, ***** to have to "re-score" every day (if that's what it meant), I'd probably be more interested to see a bar chart type of thing of how many times the cards were downloaded. Just from an interest point of view.

'Ratings', like 'reputation scoring' type of thing et al deffo not a good idea cos you could end up with 'ratings wars', has happened elsewhere where forums have such things. Getting all their mates to sign up and vote the same way and all that kind of nonsense.
DIDGEDRUM
De em Mar 2008

2336 post(s)
November 22, 2009
No, Don't, Stop Mucking about !!!
WyvernIV
De em Nov 2009

3 post(s)
November 22, 2009
*Exactly* the kind of response I was hoping for. LOL... :D
slayyer
De em Aug 2008

163 post(s)
November 22, 2009
The current rating system is a joke. Totem says it is supposed to be fun yet at the same time the ratings matter for specials and many many new members use the ratings as a guide. How would a new member know the ratings are a sham?
A blind person could rate the cards since you don't have to see the card to vote on it. They can give morgane and melissa cards 10's just by knowing the name. Costume, dancing, performing, etc. are not seen by majority of voters on each card so a blind person is just as good at rating.

Voter accountability would be great. When you view a member profile and see their collection it will show you how they rated each girl (ones they own and ones they don't own).

but seriously. Either disallow members from voting on cards they do not own or have 2 ratings for each card. Overall and owner ratings.
WyvernIV
De em Nov 2009

3 post(s)
November 22, 2009
Actually I noticed that, only allowed if actually owned rating does make more sense.
Severin24
De em Oct 2009

535 post(s)
November 22, 2009
@slayyer - I think you put it perfectly, but the ratings, though pointless, won't sway most newcomers as I think many people will buy cards based on their physical attraction to the girl. My first card was Sandra H.

When I first joined up, Morgane had five or six cards on the front page. Highly rated and if it wasn't her, then it was Melisa. Both are great, but still the ratings create a monopoly by a one to three girls, even just one. If you go by rank, then Morgane would be considered the best. I initially avoided her because I assumed she must be overrated since fanboys will inevitably push a girl up in the rankings by fiddling with the ratings or something.

The reviews suck too because most do not have any objectivity in them. Go to any Nikky Case card and see exaggerating praises, despite Nikky having reservations about what she wants to do.

Do away with the rating system altogether or disable to people who have not bought the card!
snake353solid
De em Aug 2009

312 post(s)
November 22, 2009
You're right, Slayyer, soo agree with your reasoning, in fact I opened this post also to know your views. Even I find wrong with the current ratings system, and that's why I would that change for the better.
alerte
De em May 2008

6537 post(s)
November 22, 2009 (edited)
hello all, i think the best is have to us disposition sevaral ratings system. i hope Totem think to made this for the new site.
titilate
De em Jan 2009

740 post(s)
November 22, 2009
When Totem produces a new card for a girl it comes out with sometimes a very high rating or a low rating,presumably based on past cards that model has. To me this is unfair to start off with as a new card should not be prejudged and it takes a lot of votes to ***** a rating up or down a little. All new cards should start with the same rating of "0" or whatever and let people judge that card on how the girl performs and looks etc. in that show and not on her past ratings.
snake353solid
De em Aug 2009

312 post(s)
November 22, 2009
Hi Alerte, yes, I hope this too !!!
Peterboy1975
De em Jul 2009

213 post(s)
November 23, 2009
I agree with snake353solid for an edit to Special Offers
snake353solid
De em Aug 2009

312 post(s)
November 23, 2009
Tanks Peterboy1975
deszu
De em Jun 2008

21 post(s)
November 23, 2009
I use my own personal rating. My personal site rating is counted in this, but only partly. I'm a statistic freak and love playing around with spreadsheets. (auto colouring cell's, automatic graphs based on loading a spreadsheet, pivot-tables, etc)

The site rating is crap as:
  • It doesn't show how many downloaded it,
  • You can vote without downloading.

That last thing can be handy if you don't always buy tickets. Rate the girls 10 and they show up as your most favourite in your profile. Handy to have a list ready of girls you want to buy. And thus fully feck up the ratings ;-)

I can't think of a system of avoiding fanboys.
Just use it as something fun, you just can't take it serious. Even TotemRex is mis-using it. Just take a look at one of is favourite girls, he's got to be kidding... Jennifer Galbina?? Seriously? Nah...
Use it for own personal preference but never believe that everybody else does as well.
snake353solid
De em Aug 2009

312 post(s)
November 25, 2009
@deszu
You are right in wath you sayed, thats wy I prponed a change in the system of the rating. I love statistics too, and should be nice if they gonna be more things in the new version.
deszu
De em Jun 2008

21 post(s)
November 30, 2009
Just came across an interesting rating system.
It's a star system 1-5 but next to it was a breakdown on how many rated 1,2,3,4 or 5 stars. This way you can see a better interpretation. If 9 people rate 5 and 1 just 1 star that gives an average of 4.6. This way you can pick out the trolls a lot easier.
Apasas
De em Aug 2009

1038 post(s)
November 30, 2009
@Deszu

Thats the same system Amazon use. Yes, its quite good.

Trolls aren't the problem with the rating system really, otherwise all the girls would have too low scores.

The real problem are the fanboys who always scatter 10s ike confetti and of course the noobs.

There are two issues with noobs.

The first problem with the noobs is ignorance. They buy and play their first shows. They may be so excited by what they see that they automatically give a ten even though they haven't compared it to anything else. I know I did this as a noob

The second problem with the noobs is partly caused by Totem. The default setting in the "Browse Models" page lists the cards in order of rating. So naturally, noobs are likely to buy the higher rated cards because 1) These are the first cards the see and 2) They trust the rating system through ignorance.

The result is off course is that you end up with noobs giving tens to already higher rated cards boosting their rating even more.

deszu
De em Jun 2008

21 post(s)
November 30, 2009
So basically we need:
  • Expert rating
  • N00b rating
  • ratings after taking a full psychology test.

I don't know. My rating system is based on a lot of things:
  • Personal rating (5 star system)
  • My site rating (first impression)
  • Clip rating (takes a long time)
All clips rated below 6 I delete. So I make another distinction between
deszu
De em Jun 2008

21 post(s)
November 30, 2009
Maybe a "comment rating" and a "non-comment" rating?
but that would be difficult as there are two languages on the system. English don't see the french comments and visa-versa.
Apasas
De em Aug 2009

1038 post(s)
November 30, 2009
I can see the french comments. I think it depends what options you select in your profile.

I personnally have changed ratings quite a lot since I started. I have lowered some and raised others and still make the odd adjustment.

The problem is that Totem put rating as their default setting on the "Brouse Girls" page. But that is understandable. They have to put the cards in some order rsting is probably better than any other. Alphabetical would certainly not be fairer.

To be fair, in the home page, the most recent shows are listed first, so it is not all based on ratings.

Overhalling the rating system may help, but it may also be worse. Its a very difficult thing to get right.
slayyer
De em Aug 2008

163 post(s)
November 30, 2009
I agree with Apasas. Noobs and regular members who do not frequent the forum (the 99% of the 8 million users here)click on "brows models" and they see the models rated top to bottom. I am a regular and I can't help but be swayed at times. I bought melissa cards because I kept seeing her in top 5. I wanted to see what the hype was about. When I first joined morgane was the flavor of the year. I got a taste because of the hype.

The current rating system makes as much sense as walking across broken glass barefoot.
Imagine if every member listed their top 20 cards and ranked them 1-20. Are all 20 cards a 10 rating? If so why is one ranked 1 and another ranked 20? too many 10s. And too many 0 and 1 for girls that someone doesnt like. Stop the confetti.
Apasas
De em Aug 2009

1038 post(s)
November 30, 2009
That's a good point Slayyer about the regular users. I was only thinking of Noobs, but the barabrian hordes who only raid the site occasionally may also be heavily influenced by the ratings more than us more...ahem... sophistcated regular users.

There is also another factor. ***** by Totem. Remember, this is a commercial site directly selling the products being rated. It is not like a story sirte, or You tube, or even like Amazon.

The rating is used as marketing tool. When someone visits the site, they see all these cards rated as 8 and 9s. Obviously this is in Totem's interest as they would want to show the users that the cards are rated highly by exisitng customers.

So Totem don't want their customers to see ratings of only 6 and 7 or lower. No they want to show spectacular ratings of 8s and 9s as the typical rating of their product. So it is not impossible that Totem boost the ratings of all cards to make them appear high.

Apasas
De em Aug 2009

1038 post(s)
November 30, 2009 (edited)
Continued from previous post.

Obviously there are some low ratings. But even these just help to justify the extraordinarlily high ratings of the majority of the cards. But even then, the ratings of the lowest rated cards are not that low. Hell, the lowest rated girl is 4.75 which immediately jumps to 5.8. But the 18th lowest card is rated 7, which is actually a good rating if you look at it objectively.

So it is unlikely that Totem will change the rating system because it serves a commercial purpose, and may be manipulating it anyway. However, they risk potential loss of sales on good cards which are lost in the rating system. But that is really their problem (and possibly that of the girls depending on how they are paid) and not ours.

In conclusions, I am not saying that Totem are manipulating the ratings. But there are commercial reasons why they might.

Você ainda não está autorizado a participar

Como usuário gratuito iStripper, você não tem permissão para responder a um tópico no fórum ou criar um novo tópico
Mas você poderá acessar as categorias e conceitos básicos e entrar em contato com nossa comunidade.!