Using the numbers posted by @Rex the average is 9.7766 which would be a 4.888 star rating, which is hardly a typical rating. In my collection, which is a full one, there are only three cards with a rating of 4.87 or above and they all feature the same model, Belka, who has a three cards rated as 4.87, 4.88 and 4.89.

From this I conclude that the numbers are incomplete, or are not typical, or that Totem already use something other than a simple average in order to compensate for the highly skewed distribution of votes.

The third interpretation seems to agree with a post made quite some time ago (I think when the change was made from VGHD to iStripper) from one of the team, probably from Rex himself, saying that among the changes was one to the rating system that was intended to improve the resolution at the high end of the scale but I could never see that it made much difference.

EDIT: There were 412 numbers in the list posted by @Rex - this is far too many for two of the three highest rated cards but to few for the other, for which the card's details page gives the total number of votes as 581 - perhaps the post was truncated because of size. I also note that 581 votes, or even just 412, is a remarkably high total especially for a quite recently released card. Checking cards at random there are a few with more than two hundred votes, but I have yet to find another with more than 250.

Eva Ginger Sexy upskirt.

Eva Ginger Sexy panties

Avery Sexy legs

Avery one boob out

It was told to me Years ago by the developers.

They Never intended for their product to be a Sequential Product..

meaning the Clips have no Specific Order in which they can be played.

They wanted it to be More like an Individual Act on a Stage, where the 1st act doesn't control what is seen in the next act.
Each act in of itself is it's own show, not part of a Bigger sequence.

And that is, for the Most part what we still have to day.

yes, wit the different levels, we can have a level progression
but we don't have a sequence that we can string together to go from Stat ( Fully Clothed ) to Finish, Completely nude
in a cohesive progression from one clip to the next..

It's not how the product was envisiond back in the day, and I don't think that is the direction they are looking to go today..

They Don't Film a continuous 45 minute Session, and then break up that single session into Clips, that could be Put back together in order..

There might be Sessions of 3 to 6 minutes, and some clips broke out of these Sessions, but there is then a Next Session, a 3rd, 4th, or 5th, or 6th Session, and then from each sessions Some clips are made and others might go to the cutting room floor.
So there is no set Pattern to put the clips back together to have a start and finish.
The Interactive Clips, are Filmed, so to have the required set of clips...
Examples...
Ok, Stand Here, jump and fall to the ground...
Ok Stand Here, then Walk to the Left and Look like you are bored or Waiting...
Now do the same but walk to the right.
Hang on this Bar and wiggle...
Sit Here, then get up to a Standing position.
These are done both Nude, and Dressed.

It's random clips, with no real sequence to put back together.

Ratings?

Each of us has in our own Mind what the Rating means.

Your Own Idea might be totally different from that of another member.

You Might for example, Watch the card, and Rate her on how Nice her Body Appeals to You.
She has nice boobs and a nice ass, and a pretty face, yo u that is waht you Believe the rating means.

but then another member, Rates her simply on how well she Use the Pole.
and Another rates the Card based on the Difficulty of getting it to download.
And still yet another on just how big her boobs are.

All of the ratings are valid ratings, to the member who rated the card, But none of them are based on the same criteria..

So the Question is,
What does the rating, averaged out after 100 members gave it a rating, mean?
Can it be used by another member to get an Idea of how good the Card will be,
based on their own Idea of what the Rating criteria is?

And the Answer is: it basically is Meaningless, because it is NOT criteria based..

It is based on, what ever that member decided, it should be based on.
Which is never the same as what you think it should be based on..

A single written out review that shares specific criteria ,
is worth more than any numerical based system could provide.

Wow. Is there anything simple with this program? lol

Anyway thank you all for the info and as it sounds like a lot of work by default I will find that Playlist Generator and see what I can do with it.

Thank you again for the replies.

@Rex, LOL

No, it didn't work (I got no free spin on this week).
I suppose that anyone who already used the 10 free spins on last week (as I also did) didn't be meant to get them again now on 2nd SlotMachine promo week. But, if it's the case, it really should have been clarified by Team at beginning of new TGIF.

There are only two options, for me:

• totally eliminate ratings;
• keep them. But if you keep them, each and every vote must still have same value. Yes, the silly and ridiculous ones too.

If not, it would become a rigged voting system. A vote by some ones - chosen with arbitrary methods and reasons - should count more than other ones' one? No, thanks. Better no vote at all, then.

There are over 200 votes in there, and only two zeros, the rest are mostly 10 with some 9, 8, two 7 and one 3. Seems like a perfectly normal score, no need to make a big fuss out of a non-issue.

Here is a typical vote on a model.
10
10
10
3
10
10
8
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
8
10
10
10
10
9
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
7
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
7
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
9
9
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
10
0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
9
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
8
10
10
10
9
10
8
10
10
10
10
10
9
10
10
9
10
10
10

@Gorfa91 That was funny - YES, that would be the ideal solution :)

Otherwise, I agree with @HombreSinSombra. People have right to give score to cards, but they really should do it honestly and understanding what the vote is for.

Giving one or zero stars to a card/performer just because it is part of advent calendar and the user didn't want that particular model to appear in that pre-paid set of cards, is not ok. Same thing for 5 stars simply to counter attack low scores given to cards of your favourite model, even if you really dislike the contents of the card. These kinds of issues should be handled with general feedback to Totem, not as feedback on specific card.

There is no way of evaluating with adequate certainty the motivations of any voter, but some adjustments can and should be done in case the points/star-system remains. I think the idea of trimming the distribution of votes by 10% or 20% from top and bottom is a good idea, but I think there should also be a mechanism that checks your voting history and/or voting pattern for specific cards: if your voting pattern heavily concentrate on 1 star or 5 stars (compared to voting in general), the significance of your vote should be down-weighted so that it doesn't affect the overall average as much as votes by "more trustworthy" voters.

Hahaha! Good one. You reading this Team???

Ok then I may have the solution, this is a sophisticated device that will detect alpha waves of the users voting and commenting... if and only if their intentions are pure, then the votes will be validated otherwise they will be sanctionned. 😋

Scene is taken from an old french movie that is not the most glorious one... but this is what we call french cultural exception...

You may be missing the point, my friend. I welcome people's opinions if they are in line with what they are REALLY thinking.

Too many people down-vote cards BECAUSE they were SEC cards, or Advent calendar cards PURELY because of those reasons, NOT because of the card or model's own merit. I hope you and others can see the difference in that. It's not fair to the model or Totem.

Do you confirm that it is only possible to vote for and comment the cards that you own, correct? If this is the case the vote is VALID for me because you are then entitled to express an opinion. But I do agree it may be UNFAIR... but fair/unfair implies the notion of subjectivity.

I also do agree that the current system is far from perfection, but to be honest I do not see how to improve it either. 😕

for the platinum only list, is that strictly for forums or is there a list of cards that are only available at this level?

You get access to the 480p classic cards. In the store - click on the collections tab and you should be able to see Virtuagirl Classic added to the list.

Please note that these are low quality and are filmed on old equipment. The quality cannot be improved on these and are really intended for collectors. Some of the girls are great though.

1 star is as valid as 5 stars whatever the reason

I sincerely disagree!

We've all seen and read the ridiculous votes of members over the SEC cards, the Advent calendar cards etc. Also, any one of us can go and read the comments of any recent card... Such as one member pretty much copies and pastes a line of stars on EVERY card with no comment. Always 5 stars.

If you think that is a VALID and FAIR estimation in general of a given card's value ... Well... I'm not going to say it... 😎

Edit: Nothing to do with the topic at hand but talking about elections... I was with Brewster. None of the above. EVER! 😖

for the platinum only list, is that strictly for forums or is there a list of cards that are only available at this level?

Colors and tastes... I don't see the point to ***** the votes. 1 star is as valid as 5 stars whatever the reason. Because the average does not represent our own taste... very often after what we call elections, the elected candidate is not the one we have voted for... shall we suppress votes for other candidates?

Ahhh the call of Silicon... who may resist to that... just in time in her thirties to become a MILF. Second carrier starting... Let's go for a Take3.

That's not what I said. I also believe Rex was just giving extreme examples.

Half 5 stars and half 0 stars would give a rating of 2.5, regardless of how many percent you took off the top and bottom. Eliminating 20% or 40% of the data from top and bottom combined can only give a more accurate view of the membership in general who voted.

My above example was of course simplified so that people could easily see the maths involved. In reality, there would normally be many more votes of 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 in the middle. The end result would still be a fair measure of the general membership's view WHEN they take the time to vote, of course :/

@HombreSinSombra

Unfortunately, according to @Rex, discarding the extreme ratings would eliminate something like 90% or more of the data.

You do not even have to do that, just ***** a picture to the area that you typing opur post into.

Thanks @TheEmu👍

Sorry I'm still living in the Stone Age and don't know how to post pics...yet

When you type in a post, look at the line under the text-box. You can see here a line of icons. The last one at the right is the one to add pictures (max. 8) in a post.

You do not even have to do that, just ***** a picture to the area that you typing opur post into.

Great, she was cute now she's cute with bigger boobs :)

Its not that hard to understand why a girl would at least be curious about what it would be like to have large boobs.

Um... I think theres more invoved than curiosity...to most girls going through with this it is a lifetime investment. Every girl is in charge of their bodies and and can do what they wish... it is their body. I as a man am just expressing my disdain for these girls having to make their breasts bigger in the thinking that they will be more appealing to men. So be it. God bless you Sabrisse.. if that makes you happy and content. I still love and cherish her for bringing me many hours of enjoyment

The 4K shows only become available if you buy the premium membership.

In general, the XXX shows are the same price as regular shows but as a premium member, you get an extra 20% off your regular price for the first 10 days after release of a card. :)))

Are the 4k XXX shows 30 credits?

For me none of these spin games are paying off. Compared to Black Friday they were just giving me free credits. Someone jacked the payouts wayyyyy up.

@orclover There's always crumbled paper and socks to use for padding and bulges for anyone feeling the need. 😜

Seriously though, while I don't respect her decision I do respect her as a person and I do respect her freedom to make her own choices. She owes us nothing nor does she need to explain anyone why she decided to get the surgery.

For purely selfish reasons I wish she had remained au-naturel, because this change in my eyes was to the worse. In my eyes it lessens her appeal. I wish her all the best and I hope she's happy with her choice in the future.

For me, the only fair way to make the changes to the rating system, without making it too complex and, hopefully more accurate goes like this:

Remove the top 10% and bottom 10% of star ratings from the calculation. Possibly revise that to 20% after say 100 votes.

This would (probably) eliminate the majority of negative votes out of spite or whatever other silly reason and also the habitual 5 star voters just because they love ALL the girls.

How does that sound?

Edit:

Keeping the maths simple, let's say a card has exactly 100 votes and they went like this:

20 people voted 5 stars
60 people voted 4.5 stars
20 people voted 1 star

20 x 5 = 100
60 x 4.5 = 270
20 x 1 = 20
Total = 390, divided by 100 = 3.9 average vote.Doesn't read fair right?

Remove the top and bottom 20 leaves 60 x 4.5 = 270. Divided by 60 = 4.5 average vote. That to me looks much more fair and accurate.

@stefnev1 Did we anywhere not respect their choices? We are free to give our opinions.

How could she do this to herself, why did she ***** the way she was, while all her fans liked her that way. I cannot understand. Agree totally bro! For the life of me, I can't understand what drives these Natural babes to do this. Low self-esteem? She had great pure natural titties😖 P.S. I don't have twitter account either, but if you google Sabrisse twitter, you will see. Apparently she had them done this past October 😖

Imagine if every guy had a huge bulge poking and this represent the size of his package. And woman and society as a whole went nuts for the largest bulge...you got more attention, bigger tips, better jobs if you had a larger bulge. And imagine that you were born with no bulge. You had to go to school...work...with people with bigger bulges who got a ton of positive treatement cuz of their bulge. And imagine going into pant modeling...and being pretty successful but seeing comment after comment about how your bulge wasn't large enough...agent after agent telling you "only if your bulge was more visible". Its not that hard to understand why a girl would at least be curious about what it would be like to have large boobs.

33% of small ones available.

In 2019 (2019-12-28) small breasts (tag Tiny Tits) were 68/365 * 100% = 18,6%.

Worked out for anyone?

I just used my last credits 4 hours ago.

You can think what you want, but respect their choices.

Sigh..... It's a sad day in Nebal Land😢

And I think, it's here where the Totem ***** is. We have models for every tastes,Yes, it is exactly what I too wanted to say: if 31% of models has big boobs, it means it's likely to have also approx. 33% of normal sized ones and approx. 33% of small ones available. Perfect ratios.

perfectly balanced as all things should be 😉

@zzmaskers and @Nebal
You should respect the decison of the young ladies. They do what they want to do, it's a freedom for everyone. You can think what you want, but respect their choices.

How could she do this to herself, why did she ***** the way she was, while all her fans liked her that way. I cannot understand.

Agree totally bro! For the life of me, I can't understand what drives these Natural babes to do this. Low self-esteem? She had great pure natural titties😖 P.S. I don't have twitter account either, but if you google Sabrisse twitter, you will see. Apparently she had them done this past October 😖

@Nebal I don't use Twitter, but everybody can see it here:
https://www.thenude.eu/Sabrisse%20A_27906.htm#bio
Go to the tweets and you see the photo's.
How could she do this to herself, why did she ***** the way she was, while all her fans liked her that way. I cannot understand.
She shoud have talked with her fans, like before Isizzu and Sapphira A.

@stefnev1 thanks, I have to work on it, appreciate the info 👍

@zzmaskers Found out via her twitter page bro. A ***** disappointment, she's still sexy as hell though. Like I said I do not know how to post pics , sorry man. Chec her out on her twitter page. Wish she would come back here nonetheless 👍

@NotyaBusiness
To make a playlist, open the tab Playlists at the right of the GUI. Open the card you want to play, then go to the clips list. Now, you can ***** and drop the clips in the playlist area in the order you want to watch them. You can add clips from other cards if you want. When you have your playlist completed, you can save it (you give it the name you want), or play it immediatly. Save it makes the ability to replay it when you want. All the playlists you make are saved in the Data/playlists directory of the software.

Just to add to that...the playlist plays from the bottom clip to the top, so load fully dressed clips at the bottom, nude at the top.

You can't rely on clip numbering to get a sequenced striptease - iStripper often puts starts-nude clips half way through the numbering and the knickers-off clips at the end. So check them as you load the playlist.

And there's a bug in the editor (at least I think it's still there). If you try to move a clip using *****'n-drop within the playlist, the program leaves an invisible copy behind when you save it. If the clips play in an order you don't like, you'll have to delete some and reload them somewhere else.

Playlists work well, but it's a matter of trial and error. @Dorsai has done a Playlist Generator that does what you want (there's a link somewhere on this forum), but he's going to release a new version and you might want to wait for that.

Sabrisse.. one of my all time favorites , so beautiful, sexy and fun here on Istripper has unfortunately mutilated her beautiful titties and "enhanced" them

@Nebal Sabrisse is also an all-time favorite of me and will be that forever. If it is that way, then she did the same as Michaela Isizzu, who had her heydays in the same period (2013-2016). How could she do so? And how do you know @Nebal?

also, Playlist play from the Bottom, up to the top of the list.

Ellie Leen makes me melt like an ice cube under the sun 🔥

Test italic doesn't work

I agree with @HansSachs it's time to fix the italic format in the GUI.😟