@TallandSlimMan

The 7.7 credit price shows up as an adjustment after you have clicked to buy at the higher price, you are then asked if you still want to buy at the lower price.

There seems to be something wrong in the VR-page of my software.I can see the "FLASH SALE -30%" -tag on every VR show that I don't have yet, but if I click on any of them, nothing happens. Doesn't matter if I single-click or double-click, and whether I click on the image or on the flash sale -tag. The page where I could purchase the show doesn't open.I am using iStripper 1.2.246. Does anyone else have this same problem?I did quit the software and restart, and synchronised a couple of times, too.

could you log to the site and test from there directly ?

@Gorfa91For a triple diamond member without the extra premium discount a normal card's price is 13.75 creditsApplying just the normal 20% premium discount reduces this to 11 credits (which is what I paid for three cards today)If, instead, the special 30% discount is used the price is 9.625 credits, which initially gets shown (rounded to 9.63) and then the normal 20% premium discount reduce@ Thes this to 7.7 credits that I paid for the other 4 cards that I bought this morning.

@TheEmu

I'm not seeing any cards priced at 7.7 credits...???

@TheEmu

I do like your way to understand the sentence so I go with it and we will see.

Thank you. 😋

@Gorfa91

I, like you, initially read that as meaning that the normal 20% for premium membership was increased to 30%, but there is an alternative reading in which it means that the 20% of the special offer becomes 30% for premium members. On further thinking it can only be the second, more generous, reading that is correct as the first would not make sense for purchases of cards older than 11 days, i.e. those for which premium members get no extra discount.

@TheEmu

Yes but what I read in first post was:

and Premium members get 30% instead of 20%.

So I guess it should not be cumulative? 😋

Sorry to be the guy who breaks the mood if this is the case but I do like to pay the right price at first rather than being asked to reimburse the delta after.

Yes I am the kind of guy who tells the waiter hey you forgot to bill the dessert... but only in small business like restaurants, never in supermarkets where they do afford a percentage of loss anyway.

There seems to be something wrong in the VR-page of my software.

I can see the "FLASH SALE -30%" -tag on every VR show that I don't have yet, but if I click on any of them, nothing happens. Doesn't matter if I single-click or double-click, and whether I click on the image or on the flash sale -tag. The page where I could purchase the show doesn't open.

I am using iStripper 1.2.246. Does anyone else have this same problem?

I did quit the software and restart, and synchronised a couple of times, too.

@Gorfa91

For a triple diamond member without the extra premium discount a normal card's price is 13.75 credits

Applying just the normal 20% premium discount reduces this to 11 credits (which is what I paid for three cards today)

If, instead, the special 30% discount is used the price is 9.625 credits, which initially gets shown (rounded to 9.63) and then the normal 20% premium discount reduces this to 7.7 credits that I paid for the other 4 cards that I bought this morning.

Nice shows on this week and nice promo! Thanks)

Thank you very Much 😘With this promotion i was able to complete many Sets and 💖 Agatha Vega 💖 was also in this Promotion .... WOW! 👍

This is I think one of the best promotions we have had recently. I have also completed my Veronica Lear set and I may complete my Liya Silver set.

Good work @celine and the team.

😋

@pickle1 always 😋

Thank you very Much 😘
With this promotion i was able to complete many Sets and 💖 Agatha Vega 💖
was also in this Promotion .... WOW! 👍

@Celine sorry me again, could you check something: in the store the cards in promo are displayed at 9.63 in my case and when I try to buy, after the server connexion the app warns me that priced has changed and displays me 7.70 asking me if I want to buy. Before messing the system I said no. There must be some issue somewhere.

@Gorfa91 - you are worried about a lower price?

Seriously though, I think it is the way the system is applying the discount. On those cards on which your Premier discount applies at 20%, the system shows you that price and then discounts "on the fly" by the further 30%. I normally pay 12 credits for a new card using the Premier 20% - today Jia's card cost me just 8.4 credits.

@Celine sorry me again, could you check something: in the store the cards in promo are displayed at 9.63 in my case and when I try to buy, after the server connexion the app warns me that priced has changed and displays me 7.70 asking me if I want to buy. Before messing the system I said no. There must be some issue somewhere.

@gkar45 @TheEmu thank you for your answers I should have read the manual first. 😉

@Celine merci beaucoup, "je crois que c'est mes yeux" 😋

I've been using a 4k monitor for 4 years now (not that expensive - $300-400 for a 28 inch from Samsung) and just recently got a laptop with a 4k HDR screen. The big difference is not the increased resolution (I usually set it to 2560x1440 as it's less taxing on my computer and not noticeably different at that size). The big difference is that 4k has 10 bit color, as opposed to the 8 bit color that is standard for HDTV. That means about 60 times more shades of colors. Seriously, it's like night and day and I can always tell the difference between 8 bit and 10 bit.

Some screens also have 12 bit color now, which means about 4000 more shades than 8 bit. HDR is becoming standard, which basically means an increased brightness and contrast (I can already notice it on my laptop, but it's on the low end of the HDR standard so not much). And the new standard for color, Rec. 2020, calls for more than twice the range of colors than the last standard, Rec. 709 (HDR also has increased color range, but nowhere near Rec. 2020). This last one is what's giving companies the most trouble, but they're getting there, especially with the new QLED tech.

Something isn't right? Promo ends on Friday January 24th?

corrected ! on line in a minute

@Celine I see part of my recent shows are at -30% and part of them are still -20%. In only have the last 7 recent shows to buy. Is there a reason?

As a Premium you have 20% on the recent releases, those who did not switch to 30% are the ones who did not do a VR180 video :)

.So the discount on a normal card depends on whether the model involved has made a VR show.

All the shows of the girls who did a VR180 are discounted by 20% (30% instead if you are Premium)

Something isn't right? Promo ends on Friday January 24th?

@Gorfa91 - from the first post in this thread

For the next coming 7 days : you have 20% on all our VR180 shows PLUS 20% on all the desktop shows made by the same girls !
and Premium members get 30% instead of 20%.

So the discount on a normal card depends on whether the model involved has made a VR show.

Merci @Celine pour la super promo de la semaine 😊
J'avais acheté 500 crédits il y a une huitaine de jours et il va falloir que je repasse à la caisse pour terminer le mois 😕 Mais c'est le but, vous faire gagner de l'argent 😎
Cela n'empêche pas que je suis toujours en colère contre vous comme d'autres membres d'ailleurs.
Le système pour obtenir des spéciales Event Cards n'est pas équitable pour tous le monde en l'état actuel des choses.
Les chances de les obtenir sont de 1 sur 1 million, si ce n'est pas plus... 😭

@Celine I see part of my recent shows are at -30% and part of them are still -20%. In only have the last 7 recent shows to buy. Is there a reason?

Flat promotions like this are always welcome. Especially when we can pick and choose what we want to buy. Thanks!

For the next coming 7 days : you have 20% on all our VR180 shows PLUS 20% on all the desktop shows made by the same girls !
and Premium members get 30% instead of 20%.

We're here to answer your questions !

Thank God It's Friday and after a week of luck, we want to make sure you enjoy the most effective promotion on our most recent content, for once :-P

New releases

A sum up of this week releases first, to keep the good habits :-P

Today, we welcome the sweet Eva Colombus, shy and secrete brunette, she comes today with Nici in a sexy sports legging and with Jia Lissa, divine in her red dress that makes her hair even redder!

Talia Mint and her big blue eyes are back in a "call-for-caress" dress, Agatha Vega crazier than ever in a tiny tiny asian dress, Anastasiia is determined to do the housework in your heart to leave the place ***** for Stefania Beatty :-P




Discount,

Today we want to highlight the models who delighted us with a VR180° show:

All VR180° shows are discounted by 20% PLUS all their desktop shows!
-- And Premium members get 30% OFF instead--

Yes you hear me well: it means a discount on our most recent models!

Where to find the VR180° shows ?
Click on the VR tab on iStripper software or visit : https://www.istripper.com/vr180

Where to find the discounted shows ?

• Open the Girl Store tab of iStripper
• Click "selection" in the filters
• Select "Discounts"

You have till Friday, June 19, 9.00 am Paris time to enjoy this promo!

Have a great week-end!

4K is great on TV's but a 4K PC monitor...yikes (expensive)...and nvm an 8K TV lol

I don't even record at 4K on my phone... 1080p@60hz is good enough for me! 😋

Axelle Parker & Anna Tatu
Blanche Bradburry & Eileen

Tess & Lena Love
Cayenne Klein & Paula Shy

Kristina vs Minori

Cara Mel vs Zoe Doll

Marina Visconti vs Lucy Li

All absolute winners here!!

Alyssia Kent vs Victoria Daniels

Belka vs Vivia

Really hard to pick a winner here

We lechers are the winners. 😜

editing as it seems I forgot to add Anastasisa


Emilya Argan
Guilia G
Paulina
Sophie Sparks
Anastasia

Really hard to pick a winner here

you have to BUY your credits here, just like in a casino when you BUY your chips

Of course, but on casino you can then convert your chips back into money, so your chips have a monetary value. Here, instead, neither you, neither Totem can ever do such a thing with credits - so, credits have no monetary value. And this is not a fiction but a substantial difference.
Because of this, indeed, only monetary transaction here is the credit purchase. All we do then with credits (acquire cards, win on gamble, lose on gamble) has no real value and Totem couldn't care less (economically speaking) about it.
Only thing that really matters for Totem and for the company's sustainability is how many times during our membership we'll click on that red button "Buy Credits".

In short:
1. (quoting a sentence by @Stanston in another thread)

Totem earns Money when we Buy Credits and not when we spend them in the Store.

2. Totem sells to us something (called "Credits") which are way more similar to Monopoly notes than to Casino chips.

3. All this is explicitly stated by Istripper license itself - which each of us had to accept and agree to, in order to use this software - on section 3. It says:

YOU FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THE CREDIT SYSTEM HAVE NO MONETARY VALUE AND CANNOT BE REDEEMED FOR CASH. NO REFUNDS WILL BE MADE FOR THE PURCHASE OF CREDITS.

This old argument again; I'm still saying it; you have to BUY your credits here, just like in a casino when you BUY your chips when you walk in the door.

Credits on iStripper do not magically appear out of thin air... it is not a closed loop system. ;)

@mehdi2
Bonjour, il faut que tu ailles dans les réglages du logiciel (la petite roue dentée en haut à droite de l'interface) et que tu cliques sur "Se réenregistrer". Là, tu entres ton login&MdP de ton autre compte, puis toujours dans les réglages, clique sur "Synchroniser avec les serveurs".

Yes well said wisc4fun, if Totem's going to put in a game of chance, at least show us the odds of winning. It's fair for the customers and will lead to increased sales.

I am very much in favour of Totem always publishing the odds of winning for these games. However the unconditional claim that this "will lead to increased sales" is by no means a certainty. Knowledge of the odds could disuade some (possibly many) from playing, especialy those that are currently trying for the SEC and/or joker cards, resulting in reduced sales. At best we can say that publishing the odds may lead to increased sales.

Thank you Dfner, I've been searching for that list for a while.

Yes well said wisc4fun, if Totem's going to put in a game of chance, at least show us the odds of winning. It's fair for the customers and will lead to increased sales.

Chelsea French - London Club

@celine or team member in charge of VR production, please.
Question regarding choices for VR shows: Is VR Show for Jill or Martina Smeraldi in production or just not chosen?
Both had xxx scenes on couch. Can you give any insights to production process for VR ?
Would love to see more VR shows released. I have all 36 released sofar, about 3/month over last year.

istripper.com

I appreciate all of the advice from you all. I have no problem doing the watermark route, As I would love other people to check out this software.
I did do a livestream last night, And several people asked me about it.
I just directed them here. I wasn't flagged, So that is a relief.

Where has this program been all my life? It took me 10 min to write this lmao.

I don't mean to insult anyone here. Based on what I have read on this forum I am doubtful there are many gamers in the community. This discussion has been going on for years.

- that on Istripper we don't gamble with real money

This is an example of an incorrect statment. In casino when you go to a slot machine in many locations as soon as you enter your money in the machine its turned in to a "credit". The difference is you can choose to turn that credit in to another currency option (ie a Dollar or Euro). There are some locations that require casinos use real cash values instead of credits as well.

I was very clear that currently Totem is bypassing gambling regulation because you are never going to win currency you can turn in to Dollars or Euros and thus most legal requirements do not apply that does not mean its not gambling just that its not a legal definition to require a gaming commission oversight. Instead you are simply winning a currency that can be redeemed for digital goods (this is the loophole that people are pushing to be closed). In certain circumstances those digital goods can even be turned back in to standard currency (CounterStrike knives go for $$$) but since you are not directly winning something that has a specific cash value it still does not qualify for legal enforcement most places.

Gambling is the act of spending a small amount of currency and either getting a larger or smaller return by a system of chance. This is why Fantasy Football is not viewed as gambilng because it is based on a game of skill instead of game of chance (its also an argument used for making Texas Holdem legal as some people view it as skill instead of chance). The only difference is today the regulations are written based on a time before digital or other currencies it also has been overlooked since the governments are not getting a cut of your winnings like they do with casinos.

If Totem wants to do that, then that is fine they choose to take action and others can choose what to do. I am expressing a viewpoint that has been shaped over years of interaction of these types of systems. Some might not know but systems like this are actually becoming illegal in Belgium. So there will be a time in the future where this is not allowed with actual oversight. https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/25/17280440/belgium-video-game-loot-boxes-illegal-gambling

That is my only ask is that Totem be upfront about odds. People do not view this as a video game but I have to assume any new legal president would apply to all software not just those strictly viewed as traditional video games (since I would suspect Pokemon would be on their radar which in certain realms could be viewed as a collection software simliar to this with cards).

Individual credit purchases by individuals is of little concern to Totem. It's the aggregate of all customer purchases that matter.

Which is at the end, indeed, an aggregate of credits purchases.

Credits have value to the purchaser

But they have not any value for Totem.

I think that like most companies Totem cares about annual revenue and whether it is increasing or decreasing. The fact that we buy credits to get cards and play games is irrelevant. If there were no cards and games there would be no annual revenue. If the quality or quantity of cards were to decrease there would be less annual revenue. If Totem changes it's pricing structure annual revenue will change. Individual credit purchases by individuals is of little concern to Totem. It's the aggregate of all customer purchases that matter.

The notion that credits have no monitary value is a legal fiction. Credits have value to the purchaser in term of what they paid for them and what they can get with them. To me 10 credits is as valuable as a Hershey Bar.

You forgot the Uranium Q-36 explosive space modulator to set it all in motion.

@HansSachs,
Thanks for the reply, we all have our on view on things and at this point I
think we both can agree to agree.
Have a great day and stay safe.

Now what I am saying is if I win 1,500 credits then
I save a $150.00, right ?

From your point of view yes, but the company sells credits, not cards - so they have not any economical loss by your win. You are instead more likely to become an happy customer, and so be going to buy even more credits from them in the future rather than the opposite... let's say they take the risk.

@HansSachs,
I know credits have no monetary value. So if I want to get a card I have to
have credits, right? and to get credits I have to buy them, right ? so I want
to get 136 cards at 11 credits each I would have to spend $150.00 to get
1,500 credits, right ? Now what I am saying is if I win 1,500 credits then
I save a $150.00, right ? Does my math make sense or am I missing something.