Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Durars mensajes - Página 2190

  Fórum

plasonic
De em Dec 2007
4653 post(s)

Model Ratings

Tudo sobre iStripper
March 14, 2013, 29 respostas
I'm not surprised at the proliferation of high ratings for cards on VG. To me, being a guy who came here to see sexy Babes so that I can "get off" when desired,that is what I believe is the prime focus of this site for many (most?) members.The girls performance is, as it should be, in support of this overall effect & goal.That we get this with a nice dose of esthetic grace & beauty is an overall bonus thanks to the qualitative viewpoint of Totem in general.
I've always campaigned for COMPLETENESS i.e. all of it in EACH card.Beauty,good sexy,performance,explicit & X intensity, all presented in the Totem way that sets it apart from "just porn"! That has come in varying amounts of COMPLETENESS,Totem having to portray it's own vision AND satisfy all aspects of the viewing membership.
I don't think many people are committed to highly focused ratings here.I think it's mainly..."Is she hot? Does she move sexy? Is she Erotic? (Different than just Sexy...includes more aggressive "***** desire" attitude & action)and, to a lesser extent "does she have tattoos, work the pole/cage well,take off her stockings, etc.

For me the most direct representation would be a 3 tier system...
One rating for "Beauty"
One for Performance
One for Erotic/Xplicit action.
(One for "Get me off ability" too? lol)
....but I'm not gonna be doin' the math to average them out...
I'm aware of the problems that setting up a more expanded system could contain.
So for me it's ...
If the Babe is hot & she dances sexy enough to create the effect 10
Less explicit/Erotic 9 or 8
Less Xplicit & not so good performance-maybe 7
Less explicit but she turns me on 10
A sexy babe who turns me on (gets my FantaSex brain to jump)will always get a higher rating than just a good performance.
I think, it's a lot more important to write good descriptive comments on each card so members can see each person's responses to various aspects of the card.
I tend to view a lot of "just watching the girls" as something that comes inevitably with age....and that will be either adjusted to or prescribed for!
:)
So for me a clear set up for ratings is to be able to rate separately for Beauty,Performance, & Erotic effect.


BigSteve
De em Dec 2007
525 post(s)

Model Ratings

Tudo sobre iStripper
March 14, 2013, 29 respostas
I appreciate the interest in the direction this thread is now taking. I share the original poster's interest in the fine numerical distinctions around the value of 9.7.

My point was simply that to give any card a 9 or below would pull the average down in more than half the cases, while the only way a card can find its rightful place within the vast territory between 9.00 and 9.99 (where more than half of them lie) is determined solely by the number of raters who awarded the perfect score of 10. So as a rater, I have only two choices -- either pull the average down or award a perfect score. Even if only for the sake of ranking our own personal collections, a bit more precision would be very much appreciated. To those members who don't care for the extra precision, you would still be free to select the nearest whole number.

In response to those who lament that some card-holders might be rating a hot girl with a lukewarm performance high, or vice versa, what would you have us do? Are we not being encouraged to rate the entire overall enjoyment experience of the card, whether it be from the beauty of the girl or the beauty of the performance or in combination as we see fit? Here once again I see the wisdom of the crowd at play. A card's overall rating reflects a thorough melting-pot combination of the thoughts of everyone who cared to vote. Two raters who happened to give the same rating for completely different reasons are each the same drop in the bucket toward the final overall average.

When I first joined this community, I placed a lot of reliance on the ratings to make my purchasing decisions, and the ratings served me amazingly well. I wonder if we could be giving the newer members the same kind of benefit but with greater precision if we had the chance. (Now that I am aiming to become a maxed-out VGHD collector, I don't need the ratings for that same original purpose, but it's still important to me for my DeskBabes purchases. Also, my inner thirteen-year-old still enjoys this game for the sheer joy of playing with numbers -- pinch of salt and all.)