Lola in this one.

Marta 7
Lola 8

Lola in this one.

Marta 7
Lola 8

Marta

Marta 7

Lola 7

Thx. the infos @MattBFreq3

Heads or Tails?
Getting either one from either girl would be awesome...lol

Marta has an incredible bod.... but Lolas eyes and smile still give her the edge.

Lola 7
Marta 6

Marta

Marta 6
Lola 6

( joins chorus ) LolololoooollA... so.. Marta 5 Lola 6.

republishing VG cards must be a priority .. IMHO .. good question though , are you gonna republish DB?

I think Angela can be kinda good .. not sure though ... I just hope she comes to me as demo again and i will see ... I got her as demo a week ago but skipped her:( (now starting to regret it) and Billie Star is a MUSTHAVE for me!! I really enjoyed her first card .. probably 5 more to come? tytytyty:)

Lola LolololoLola

Marta 5
Lola 5

Marta

Marta 5
Lola 4

Its Marta for me again :-)

Marta - 4

Lola - 4

okay I have officially run out of hard drive space is there a way to store girls on two different hard drives.

Why aren't Deskbabe cards being republished?

Lola

Marta 3

Lola 4

Lola

Marta 3
Lola 3

Lola

Marta 3

Lola 2

Marta

Marta 3

Lola 1

well .. I have recently got my first Lola card! (still havent watched it yet though, its DB with Laetitia) But Marta stands so high on my own ladder that Lola (nice girl and may be i will like her some day) being as cute as she is has no chance vs Marta. Also i would like to add that Marta looks even better in pictures than in videos. If we voted for pictures only Marta would have been in my top 5 girls (well not sure but close to top 5).. Just take a look at her curves! Well sorry for that little review but i am in a mood to praise Marta today :)Yes I am Marta FAN:)

Marta

Marta

Marta 2
Lola 1

Marta

Marta 1
Lola 1

Marta vs Lola starts now

12:00 P.M. Central European Summer Time (Paris Time Zone)

Lola

Lola 1

Marta 0

all cards from Olga Barz and above will be republished in 1080p!!!

I ain't vote, but IF I'd do so, Eve Angel and Monica Sweet would be the choice };-))

Incredible win there by Marta, wouldn't have thought Vicky to get only 5 votes.

Marta now faces Lola starting 12:00 paris time (about 3.75 hours from now).

updated ladder

1 Anna Tatu
2 Gracy *****
3 Tess Lyndon
4 Viki
5 Melisa
6 Morgane
7 Ariel
8 Kami
9 Eve Angel
10 Victoria Sweet
11 Alyssia
12 Miela
13 Maya Mai
14 Jana Cova
15 Angelica Kitten
16 Trisha
17 Marjana
18 Claire Castel
19 Kathy Moore
20 Zuzana
21 Bijou
22 Aria Giovanni
23 Natali Blond
24 Little Caprice
25 Eufrat
26 Antonia
27 Sandra Shine
28 Dominika C
29 Lorena
30 Sandra H
31 Vani
32 Zara
33 Mandy Dee
34 Viola
35 Isabella Chrystin
36 Sharka Blue
37 Nikky Case
38 Conny
39 Angel Kiss
40 Blue Angel
41 Kari
42 Aleska Diamond
43 Lucky
44 Chelsea French
45 Heaven
46 Linet A
47 Carmen Gemini
48 Lola
49 Marta
50 Vicky S

Knocked out:
1 Jennifer Galbina
2 Mirka
3 Samantha Lee
4 Bella
5 Melissa K
6 Priscilia Jones
7 Silver
8 Davon Kim
9 Ennie
10 Dandelion
11 Marica Hase
12 Chikita
13 Tereza
14 Eliska
15 Alina
16 Natalia
17 Jasmine Andreas
18 Satin Bloom
19 Deny
20 Mia Sollis
21 Britney
22 Angie Line
23 Jenna Sweet
24 Jana H
25 Rebeka
26 Abigaile Johnson

@91hebasu: I agree about opening up too many polls at the same time, next time one poll for each round will do. And you voted for Vicky S & Eufrat right? ;-)

@MrBeeKeeper: thanks for understanding, perhaps I will check out your latest invention sometime :)

Marta 15

Vicky S 5

Marta wins!!

Marta

Marta 14
Vicky S 5

I voted on this duo.

Lynette

It has been one week my last post on one boob out. And I know it is hard to find the right photo to share but there are members out there to share to. any ways I have today is...

Lynette one boob out.

I too was under the impression there was an agreement for "One at a time". I suppose it could have only pertained to the ladder when the agreement was made though.

I fail to see how an over population of Best This and Best That polls can benefit Totem. It certainly doesn't benefit the forum.

However, I also currently see no reason to consider closing it at this time.


Although, what seems to be a constant barrage of polls being set up in a manner that requires several rounds before you get to a final decision is getting very taxing. I do believe that the Never Ending Ladder is quite sufficient for an on going poll. Really don't need more of them.

So, I guess what I'm getting at is..........Let's get this one over with, get it out of the way and stop opening new Polls for a bit. Think we can do that ???




Now.......Back on topic.

I cast a vote but I ain't tellin'
;-)

I like Marta legs alot too.

I have Ennie sexy legs.

Marta

Marta 13
Vickys 5

Thanks for the reply and great info. I could have worded my part about "Reflections were never an issue before VG started having Full Screen." I knew reflections were never used before Full Screen came along, and that was what I was trying to say. Sorry about any ***** that caused.

I went back and rearranged the reflection and model orders in my .scn files. That pretty much solved the things in the pictures of the pole clips I posted. The funny part is (OK...maybe not so "funny") is that when I first started making my new scenes I tried to use the default scene files as "templates", and they all placed the Reflection entries above the model entries in the .scn files. Things seemed to work fine for the most part. Then a day or so ago I guess I misunderstood a post that said the order of the entries in a .scn file made a difference and you should place the models first, then her reflections. So I went back and "fixed" all my .scn files...moved the Reflection entries AFTER the model entries. Then the "fun" began in earnest, with the results you saw in the pictures I posted. I was going nuts trying to figure out what happened, because it happened all at once to ALL the scenes I was using! ;-)

OK, I'm pretty sure I understand what "Scenemask" is in a scene now. It's anything that is "z-LAYERED" in front of anything else in a manner that will "block out" something behind it, as wherever that happens the front layer will "block out" what is layered behind it. Note I understand the ***** in the semantics between "z-level setting" when using a POS (position) value, vs "z-layering" as it applies to where the object is in the .scn file order list. The semantics of it can get ***** sometimes.

And the .png files can have "transparent" areas on them where that blocking (masking) won't happen (that may not be worded right either, but it explains why you can create a .png file with just the "masking" capability to stop model reflections from going off the front of a stage by using just a graphic of the front of the stage for the whole .png file).

And even a "clipsprite" like the model can "mask" (sort of) another "clipsprite" like a model's reflection, but in that case, how well the reflection might be masked would be determined by the Opacity setting of the Reflection clipsprite.

So...one last question. I'm assuming now that there is technically no limit to the number of "scenemasks" that could be in a .scn file. For instance, I could use a .png file to help mask something "behind" it, then can use another .png file in front of THAT one to mask something on it, as long as it doesn't unintentionally mask out anything I didn't with the first .png file? Just have to be sure they are all z-leveled correctly and everything is in it's "proper order" in the .scn file list? And when I say "z-leveled correctly" that may not be the "right way" to say it, as I'm referring to just making sure the .png files and/or clipsprites are "layered" correctly on top of each other ("placed in the proper order") in the .scn file.

Marta

Marta - 12
Vicky S - 5

Marta

Marta 11
Vicky S 5

Marta

Marta 10
Vicky S 5

I posted this in one of the other music threads, It quite appropriate & goes really well with Heavens Santa Cruz card Explicit Strip pole In/Out a0630_68402 :

Yngwie Malmsteen - Heaven Tonight

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8KHMJU0LaU&list=HL1396475695&feature=mh_lolz

@Member ... who's talking about mud-throwing here ... ? No offense from my side.

Off the topic it goes, therefore my sincere apologies, Member, but just wanted to say that you're always welcome in BI. Perhaps you should take a closer look sometimes, what's happening around us in the larger scale ... if you're interested of course. Perhaps you'll even like it.

Once you've created a topic, take any kind of feedback as a positive motivating factor. I think you like discussions, right? So be ready for criticism as well.
... Think about it first, perhaps there might be a good reason for that.

Marta

Marta 9
Vicky S 5

And the rest.

New stuff.

v1.2.0.0
table, top, cage, pole, inout, behindtable, fronttable, others

allow
deny
filter

I have completed my tests.
the word filter is no long used.
if you have that word no error is made, but it is just ignored.

allow and deny can be used together.
the order allow first deny 2nd or deny first allow 2nd does not matter

as long as the type does not contradict each other..

deny: table
allow: fronttable

will result in No clips.

allow: fronttable
deny: table

also results in no clips.

use of the word Others has No effect.

allow: others
results in No clips

deny: others
results in all clips

so Others is Not working..

I could find no filter to prevent accessories
I could find no filter to allow Just type 0 or Standing clips.

allow: pole
deny: inout
this works just like it states.

so that seem to be the only combinations..
Allow: xxxx
deny: inout

Yes, even the leg cutoffs vary from card to card for the earlier cards' usual 4-5 taskbars high @full sizie ( 2 @small size). It ranges to even half that in some cases. I suspect upgrade of film equipments over time and vaguearies of legions of film techs has meant its hard to provide zero point for taskbar SCNs especially with regards to making taskbar reflections.(see above). As a remedy, I was thinking of putting an area of mask at the upper of this leg cuttoff range as a second last sprite to the pool reflection, and maybe go from there.

Another curious thing I've noticed is that the Camera animate: target and pos: values need their x values to be head on ie: 0, y, z not to either side , or the zooming tends to make the model look like she is sliding about on the surface she is laying on.

couldn't that be ...
Put the Floor in First.
Add reflections and Shadows
Add front of Stage - to act as the Mask.
Add Normal Models

...so that when model does taskbar on that particular SCN, her legs will drape ok.


yes it could be if you are mixing clip type...

All part of your Own Scene design..
But as you have said..
I'm not sure there is One Perfect scene for all types of clips.
So that is why the use of allow or deny is important to your scene design.

example..

You have the perfect small stage for a single pole clip..
then you get a clip that has pole with in/out and the model walks on to the stage floating in Mid air..

there are things that you won't be able to make perfect..

View from another MOD.
Unless we get numerous complaints from the Member base.
( it's flooding the top 50... all I see is thread xxxxxxx )

I would let it take it's course..
Part of the forum is to have fun, and if members enjoy this sort of thing, without it getting out of hand.

I am okay with letting it run it's course.

Also, just because this is a porn related site, there can be Off topic threads that interest members too.

I look at all of the forum in the same perspective.
Does it ***** Totems T&C?
is it just Spam?
is it Flooding the forum?
do members have an interest in it?
how many complaints have I got, and, are they valid complaints?

threads in question I would normally discuss with the team and MODs

depending on why we question it..
maybe a PM to the OP to try and fix it..
or if it is just a complete ***** - BAN it without discussion.

I would Normally have this type of discussion in private, but thought the community should know how I look at things.

It's not always a case of black and white..

Marta

Marta 8
Vicky S 5

Marta is a great edition to the ladder, but I've vote Vicky. - so - Marta 7 Vicky S. 5

allow and deny values
table, top, cage, pole, inout, behindtable, fronttable, others

What each means:
clip type - word
0 others
1 fronttable or table
2 behindtable or table
4 Pole
16 ??? others
32 ??? others
64 inout
512 cage
1024 top

Use of the word table would include both fronttable and behindtable

Compare to the GUI language:
clip type GUI word
0 - no GUI word, but it is standing on the taskbar
1 over task bar - in front of the task bar
2 task bar over - behind the task bar
4 Strip Pole
16 - no GUI word, but it is holds a sign
32 accessories included
64 in / out
512 cage
1024 Top of Screen

The Clip type Value is additive.
Pole is value 4, so any clip that contains the value 4 would be included by the use of the word Pole.
so Pole included 4, 36, 68 type clips.


I have not yet tested if we can combine the Allow and Deny together.
Also, with v1.2.0.0
you should only use Allow and Deny in the scene file
Not use filter any more. ( might have been left in for backward compatibility)
filter word is same function as deny..

regards to type 16 - with a sign.
there was only one card I know of. a0002 that has this clip type.
a0002_82113 ... type 82 = add 16 and 64 together
a0002_82114
so I don't think a filter will be made for it.
The GUI does not use a special word for it either.

also, back in the early days, the value 64 In/out was mistakenly added to
all clips that the Model Entered or Exited the Screen.
Even if it was from behind or in front of the task bar.

The Correct use of type 64 is for leaving or entering from the SIDE of the screen.
So use of InOut might have varied results on older clips??

Marta

Marta 7
Vicky S 4