Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Durars mensajes - Página 1553

  Fórum

TheEmu
De em Jul 2012
7424 post(s)

Discussions for Scenes for Version 1.2.X Fullscreen Mode here

Tudo sobre iStripper
April 5, 2017, 5111 respostas
Re: @Wyldanimal's useful explanation of how clip categories are encoded into the clip file names.

I have long been of the opinion that Totem made a bit of a mistake when they decided to do this as it means that if this is the only source of the clip characteristics then if a clip needs to be recategorised then the clip's file needs to be renamed and any references to it by name (e.g. in playlists) also need to be tracked down and changed if they are to remain valid.

A better scheme, in my opinion, would have been to have a database of some kind which provided a way to look up the actual categories for each clip. At its simplest this could be one extra file per card containing one record per clip. With such a scheme translating from file names to clip characteristics would be done by via the database. This would allow categories to be changed or added without having to rename any files and this would allow the various meanings of "in out" to be disambiguated.

The space overhead should be small, one file per card, one record per clip comprising a file name and a 32 bit or 64 bit integer with the decoded clip categories. There would be a small time overhead, but this would be minimal if the file for a card was read just once when the card is first accessed.

I could envisage such a sceme being introduced incrementaly with the software decoding the file names directly if there was no clip categorisation file for a card. To avoid impacting existing scenes you would probably want to keep the current meaning for "inout" but add something "inoutentry" "inoutedge" just as we currently have "table", "fronttable" and "behindtable".
InsaneGenius
De em May 2011
106 post(s)