Part 3. This is another experiment to see the determining factors people use in order to rate a girl. Vote and/or comment.

Thank you for voting and/or commenting.

Wow, that was a complex pole. Number 1 for me as the costume is most important. But 4 also has some sort of impact.

Dude, you really love polls. I answered 1,2,3, although looks are the least important factor for me. There are only a handful of woman here that I find so ugly that I can't watch their shows. The outfit isn't very important either. I also don't exactly know what you mean by "personality".

What counts for me are performance skills, interesting routines and overt eroticism/explicit content. The girls (and director) need to have a very developed sense of how to exploit their erotic potential- unfortunately, some are just clueless.

Nudity is a given minimum for all shows according to Totem. I believe the job of these girls is not to look or act cute, or just remove their clothes, but rather to aggressively flaunt their assets in a way that gets me turned on enough to throw virtual dollars at the screen, just like in a real strip club.

Not really, Ambler. It seems easier for people to vote than actually writing in their opinions on threads. I find the ratio of views to posts/votes significantly lop-sided with most of the threads. Maybe the threads are not interesting enough. Who knows.

Polls are fun for sure. This one is a bit complex though.

Interesting to see what happens @Severin24, if early trend is any indication.

titilate - See poll 4 :)

I am indifferent to explicitness

At the moment, this poll contradicts all the debate about the need for explicitness, given the option 1,2,4 is in the lead. And no one has yet to vote for explicit only.

well for the rating explicitness is not important. It just spices things up. I got no problem with a girl that doesn't want to show her pussy like Laura. I only got a problem if the girl wants to show her pussy and some editor decides that she is not allowed. Then i get angry. But as its not the girls fault i try not to implement this anger into my rating.

I voted 1,2 and 4 as well.

The one thing not mentioned that I at times factor in is role play. Props and outfits can thwart a shows potential for greatness if the dancer doesn't incorporate the flavor of activity the outfit is trying to dictate. For instance, I gave Karina and her gun routine a "10" being the only model excelling to the degree she does in that particular prop's usage.

Raymondo64 - Excellent points.

In fact nakedness in a negative factor for me. I a girl happened to spend a lot of clips naked, I would mark her down.

Raymondo64 hit it on the button and is what I was hinting at, in that the poll is still indicating that current VGHD members are less interested in explicitness than the other factors. I also voted 1,2&4. My only prob with Karina's gun prop was my concentration kept deviating from her show and asking myself "now is this firearm being handled in a safe and secure manner at all times":)

Lol . . . very funny titalate. I thought I was alone in that line of thinking when viewing her show. ;)

Thanks @Severin24 for that nice warm round of applause. ;)

...

Conclusively, the votes reveal that explicitness is not the most thing when rating a girl, despite the demand for more explicitness. I think most people realize that if they want straight-porn, then they should watch a porno video. The uniqueness of VGHD is that it is softcore and allows itself to be a nice, light and playful distraction from time to time. Nothing too serious. With the standards VGHD has, the girls are ***** to be creative with their work and not simply get in different position and be banged. Of course, some girls do tend to cross their porn moves over to VGHD, but that's a plus for some. Anyway, it seems like people actually do like VGHD the way it is.

Thanks to those who participated. All votes after this are welcome but not necessary.

I think if you are going to to sum up an incredibly ***** poll after a few hours with a ***** resume steered to whatever biases you may currently be harboring you may as well ditch the poll and just use the boards to publish a personal manifesto entitled "the truth as I see it".

Meanwhile, publish all the cute "I"m closed" pictures you want, but this poll is currently meaningless and is actually insulting to any true sampling of the tens of thousands of active members who spend money on this site.

Well, my conclusion was not based on my own biasness or my need to preach some truth or have some ulterior motive or something. I honestly wanted to know people's opinions. There are issues discussed here, pointless as they are since Totem will steer VGHD however it wants, but nevertheless they are discussed ad nauseam. Waiting for the poll to fill up to 100 or so would be a pointless endeavor since some people view threads and do nothing. I am sorry if this poll ever merited any importance to you, but for me, it is MEANINGLESS because we don't decide what is what nor do opinions really matter to Totem but rather what sells, so your entire comment is equally meaningless.