Autre exemple, attention, il n'y aura bientôt plus personne.
C'est une scène cache-cache. (moi, je trouve amusant)
Ou alors sélectionner uniquement les clips "debout" ? Peut-être. Mais là ce n'est pas mon domaine.

Elle est bien bonne @Philours 😄

Ah, oui , mais non : je la connais : c'est une timide 😆

@titiii

Un exemple di fille que l'on voit mal et qui est acccroupie derrière la table. De là l'idée de les faire danser sur les côtés de la table.

Pas de soucis @ComteDracula, je suis qqu'un de reconnaissant 😉

J'ai testé la scène et je comprend votre problème.

Au début de la scène, effectivement pas de soucis.

Après le zoom, plus que le titre du show, mais pas celui de la fille.

J'ai finalement réussis. Merci @Philours.

Voici deux captures d'écran, avec deux filles différentes, vu qu'elles apparaîssent de façon aléatoire.

Désolé pour vous, c'est vrai que ce n'est pas simple,
C'est ce qui m'arrive parfois, je ne pense pas faire quelque chose de spécial.
Il faut vraiment que les 3 touches soient enfoncées au même moment, cela se joue a pas grand-chose.
D'où le fait d'être assez rapide, même très rapide.
Encore un essai peut-être ?

Merci @Philours, mais pour moi ça ne fonctionne pas, je me retrouve avec l'image de la page plein écran avec les différentes scènes, et la scène disparaît aussitôt que je touche à la touche windows.

J'ai essayé les trois touches ensemble, mais le système ne me donne même pas le choix de choisir la forme de ma capture d'écran.

Il y a probablement quelquechose que je ne fais pas de correct.

Windows, Maj et s en même temps, cher @ComteDracula
Ca fonctionne mais il faut être rapide et bien synchroniser ses 3 doigts 😀😀

@ComteDracula
Thank you for your feedback.
For me, on "titiii_beach2020_isle" the name is already vanished when the zoom is complete...
Doesn't found any delay or duration parameter for the names display in fullscreen parameters
so i don't understand why we don't see the same animation.

Merci pour votre retour.
Pour moi, sur "titiii_beach2020_isle" le nom a déjà disparu quand le zoom est achevé...
Je n'ai trouvé aucun paramètre de délai ou de durée d'affichage du nom dans les paramètres plein écran
donc je ne comprend pas pourquoi nous ne voyons pas la même animation.

@titiii

Je vois le nom de la fille au dessus d'elle au loin. Puis celui-ci disparaît. Comme j'ai mis le nom de la fille pour qu'il apparaîsse toujours dans les configurations du programme, il réapparaît au dessus de la fille, lors du changement de clip, mais en plus gros. Soit que je vois le bas du texte du nom, soit je ne le vois pas du tout. J'imagine que c'est tout dépendant de la longueur du nom.

Ainsi par exemple en petit je vois au loin "Dominno - Punta Cana" au dessus de la fille. Ensuite une fois agrandi, je vois juste "Punta Cana" en plus gros au dessus de la fille. Je crois que le nom devrait être repositionné sur le côté de la fille, et non au dessus. Faites le test avec le même réglage que moi pour l'apparition des noms. Je ne sais pas comment faire une capture d'écran avec une scène, sans qu'elle disparaîssent auparavant, lorsque je pèse sur les touches du clavier.

Quelqu'un peut me dire s'il y a un moyen ?

Merci pour les éclaircissement des dimensions d'écran @stefnev1. 😊

@stefnev1
Merci, je me sens + intelligent grâce à toi 😊
Désolé, j'avais pas vu qu'on était hors sujet, j'ai juste pris ta réponse au bond pour + de détails 👌

@Philours
Les écrans en 4096 sont extrêmement rares, 95% des UHD qu'on trouve dans le commerce sont en 3840 (tous les écrans TV et quasiment tous les moniteurs) pour respecter le 16/9 qui est la norme en TV. Pour utiliser iStripper, le 3840 est très bien. Il faut aussi une carte graphique pas trop minable pour gérer correctement tous ces pixels, bien sûr.
Bon, on arrête le hors-sujet sur les écrans 😉

Are the critics those people who opted for the August pre-buy and are now regretting their decision?

Probably @pickle1. Thanks to the Showroom, I was able to "look ahead" and see that there were a few cards that I wasn't interested in getting. So I didn't get this months pre order.

@sh42n81

One ***** problem with using a single image with transparent portions for both background and foreground is that when using GIMP to do this and then resizing the image before exporting it would lose the colour information from the transparent area - at least with the version of GIMP that was current 18 months ago I have not checked the latest version. This doesn't invalidate the technique but it does mean that you have to be careful when creating the transparent sections - if you do need to resize after creating the "holes" then use the Colors/Curves tool to temporarily make them visible again and and after resizing set them back to transparent (unless, of course, there is no longer a problem with the current version in which case you don't need to bother). Fortunately GIMP has an almost unlimited undo capability which has been of immense use to me with this and other mistakes that I have made editing an image.

@stefnev1
Pour jouer les modèles iStripper en 4k
Alors les 2 sont bons, ou il y en a un à préférer ?

@Philours
Oui, l'UltraHD, aussi appelée 4k par les services marketings, a une résolution de 3840x2160. La "vraie 4k" est en 4096x2160, mais le ratio n'est plus de 16/9 comme les écrans TV dans ce cas.
Et j'arrête là le hors-sujet (charité bien ordonnée commence par soi-même).

Merci pour l'info @stefnev1
Donc si je veux un écran 4k, dans le commerce s'il est noté ; 3840x2160, c'est bon ?

@ComteDracula

Je voulais vous dire que j'ai également un écran 2560x1440.

C'est juste que lorsque je fais jouer les filles sur iStripper, je configure mon écran en 1920x1080, le programme étant optimisé, il me semble pour cette configuration.

La résolution de l'écran doit aller de pair avec la format des shows téléchargés : 1920x1080 pour des shows en 1080p, 2560x1440 pour des shows en 3k et 3840x2160 pour des shows en 4k. Si le format des shows ne correspond pas à la résolution de l'écran, lorsqu'on joue le show en 100% le logiciel va mettre la vidéo à l'échelle, consommant ainsi plus de CPU (ou de GPU si plein écran).

@sh42n81 - there is at least one other oddity with the scene previews. If, as I often do, you use a single image with transparent sections, but with colour information retained for those transpaent sections, for both the background and foreground parts of the scene then those sections are displayed in white in the previews (or at least they are on my machine).

In case you are wondering, I use this so that I only need one image file rather than two and it automatically ensures that the background (which has blend: false) and the foreground (with blend: true) are perfectly aligned. Unfortunately, without resorting to shaders, this technique can not be extended to three or more layers in one image.

@TheEmu

I think I understand what you're saying here. Interesting tip.

@medic01
Congratulations for your first post here. Have fun with iStripper 😎

@Wyldanimal; @TheEmu

Thank you for the lighting discussion. Once we start getting into triangles and vertices, I'm way out of my depth. Apart from a vague awareness that "triangles" are a thing in graphics for gaming, I don't have a foundation of knowledge here.

I have played with many of the "light" properties and have found that they have little apparent effect. Even testing the idea that a light must be placed behind a model and rotated 180 degrees if the model herself is rotated does not seem to hold true. The model in the scene that I'm working on is rotated but she lights up just fine if I place the light closer to the viewer than she is. If I position it deeper, but do not roatate it, she also lights without issue.

I was able to affect the intensity of the light by altering the z value of "pos:" and placing it farther away, and it *seemed* to have a ***** effect if I adjusted the y value. Adjusting the x value did not change the light property in any way that was perctible to me.

In the end, I acheived, to some extent, the effect that I was after by creating a mask of a dark, solid color, and then applying a gradient from transparent to that color.

@Grabandt

At least the numbers seem to add up sensibly for you, mine don't quite do that. However, I made a mistake when I said I had 39 withdrawn cards - I stupidly miscounted - there are only 36 as the program says.

EDIT: The discrepancy, when using the correct value of 36 withdrawn cards, is entirely explained by the 17 SECs that I own, For some reason I thought there were 18.

@ComteDracula
Thank you for your feedback.
For me, on "titiii_beach2020_isle" the name is already vanished when the zoom is complete...
Doesn't found any delay or duration parameter for the names display in fullscreen parameters
so i don't understand why we don't see the same animation.

Merci pour votre retour.
Pour moi, sur "titiii_beach2020_isle" le nom a déjà disparu quand le zoom est achevé...
Je n'ai trouvé aucun paramètre de délai ou de durée d'affichage du nom dans les paramètres plein écran
donc je ne comprend pas pourquoi nous ne voyons pas la même animation.

@gkar45 - I thought it was about 2M, but what's a factor of 10 between friends.

@Grabandt

If you click on my name it will tell you that I have 4605 cards (or at least that is what I see when I do it). However when I look at My Collection it tells me that I have 4658 cards.

Withdrawn cards are not included in the first figure - I have 39 of those though when I display only those it says that I only have 36. I do not know what the explanation is for the rest of the discrepancy - though it is close to the number of Special Event cards.

@Grabandt

If you combine the 16,201 number for those who have made at least one post to the forum with the 3.22% who have the achievement for doing this you end up with a total membership of 503137. This is rather less than the numbers I have seen quoted for installations but is inline with the half millon claim for membership that I seem to remember being quoted somewhere recently.

@Grabandt

What the actual proportion is will depend on how you define "Full Collection". If you take it literally to mean "owning all cards possible" then you will end up with a low proportion. If you relax that a bit then the proportion will go up, however I think that there may be a peak at the very high end (albeit a small one) due to people who are deliberately trying to have full collections purely for the sake of having one and people like me who have got into the habit of buying each card when it is released (though I do tend to make sure that I have got everything at the end of the month just for the sake of it rather than as a deliberate aim - but that make no real difference to the end result).

If, however, you consider only those who have full collections of the sort of cards that they like, or have only excluded certain types of cards that they particularly do not like - whether this be based on the type of performance (e.g. XXX or not, or anal content), some ***** aspect (e.g. bare feet) or the video quality, then the proportion of this sort of "full collection" will be much higher and may well exceed your 20% estimate.

Assuming that the numbers are accurate we can make some firmly based assessments from the data on out achievements page. According to mine

1.45% have the "Nice Shot" achievement for buying 100 cards in a day
3.88% have the "Nice shot" achievement for buying 50 cards in a day
0.58% have the "Patron" achievement for owning 3000 or more cards
3.22% have the "Well done" achievement for making a first post to the forum

but these figures almost certainly count all members, not active members.

Merci @titiii

Très belles scènes.

Je voulais vous dire que j'ai également un écran 2560x1440.

C'est juste que lorsque je fais jouer les filles sur iStripper, je configure mon écran en 1920x1080, le programme étant optimisé, il me semble pour cette configuration.

D'abord j'ai revérifié en 2560x1440, pour vérifier si le problème de nom avec la scène "sh4_Voyeur2b_mod" venait du fait qu'il se serait affiché en dehors de l'écran et ce n'était pas le cas. Il n'y en avait tout simplement pas. Avec votre dernière correction de vos scènes, les noms s'affichent à tous les coups. Je n'ai plus d'***** de noms par intermittence sur aucune des scènes. Il faut dire aussi que j'ai réglé l'affichage des noms à "toujours".

Il y a deux choses que j'ai remarqué. En changeant le nom de la scène "Istripper Backstage - Carstrip_mod" par "Carstrip_Backstage_Standing_mod", la scène ne se retrouve plus à côté des scènes originales de @Carstrip, comme c'était le cas précédemment. Le nom de la fille est très bien situé et visible maintenant sur cette scène. Merci.

J'ai remarqué qu'avec la scène "titiii_beach2020_isle", peut importe la configuration de l'écran, on voit le nom au dessus de la fille au loin, mais lorsque l'image se rapproche, le nom soit n'apparaît plus, soit apparaît à moitié, car il est très agrandi en même temps que la fille.

Je me demandais s'il y avait un moyen de le faire apparaître à une grosseur normale à côté d'elle, seulement lorsque la fille est rapprochée.

Enfin je me demandais s'il n'aurait pas été préférable de faire danser une fille à gauche et deux filles à droite sur le sable à côté de la table pour vos scènes "titiii_beach2020_table" and "titiii_beach2020_table2".

On perd beaucoup de la vision des filles, comme c'était le cas avec la table "Club Penthouse", dont beaucoup ont demandés une modification sans table, car elle cachait trop la fille qui dansait derrière. De plus je remarque que lorsqu'il y a un fille assise derrière la table, on ne lui voit que le dessus de la tête.

En espérant que mes remarques puissent être aidante pour vous, afin d'améliorer les scènes.

Encore merci de nous les partager.


Thank you @titiii

Very beautiful scenes.

I wanted to tell you that I also have a 2560x1440 screen.

It's just that when I play the girls on iStripper, I configure my screen to 1920x1080, the program being optimized, it seems to me for this configuration.

First I rechecked at 2560x1440, to check if the name problem with the "sh4_Voyeur2b_mod" scene was that it would have been displayed outside the screen and it was not. There simply weren't any. With your last correction of your scenes, the names show up every time. I no longer have intermittent missing names on any of the scenes. It must also be said that I set the display of names to "always".

There are two things that I noticed. By changing the name of the scene from "Istripper Backstage - Carstrip_mod" to "Carstrip_Backstage_Standing_mod", the scene no longer ends up next to the original scenes from @Carstrip, as it was previously. The girl's name is very conveniently located and now visible on this stage Thank you.

I noticed that with the "titiii_beach2020_isle" scene, regardless of the screen configuration, we see the name above the girl in the distance, but when the image gets closer, the name either no longer appears, or appears halfway, because it is very enlarged at the same time as the girl.

I was wondering if there was a way to make him appear at a normal size next to her, only when the girl is close.

Finally I was wondering if it would not have been better to have a girl on the left and two girls on the right dance on the sand next to the table for your scenes "titiii_beach2020_table" and "titiii_beach2020_table2".

We lose a lot of the vision of the girls, as was the case with the "Club Penthouse" table, many of which requested a modification without a table, because it hid too much the girl dancing behind. In addition I notice that when there is a girl sitting behind the table, you can only see the top of her head.

Hoping that my remarks can be helpful for you, in order to improve the scenes.

Thank you again for sharing them with us.

I don't know what percentage of all iStripper users have a complete card collection, I guess 20 percent.

It is going to be far far less than 20%

The most recent Hall Of Fame shows that there were just 89 of us at the end of July, rising to 249 when you include those are mising up to 20 cards. The Forum Members list pages shows that there have been 16,201 members who have contributed to the forum but we know that a large proportion of members have never posted anything - this can be seen whenever a list of big prize winners is given for any of the games, many of the names in those lists do not appear in the Forum Members list and can not be found if you search for them (you can find them by creating a post containing an @reference to them, previewing that and clicking on those references, you can then cancel the post before you send it). On top of those will be people who have only won ***** prizes and those that do not play the games at all.

Of course of the 16,201 in the Forum Members list there will be a lot that are inactive, but I think you should lower that 20% estimate to something closer to 2 percent, maybe more or maybe less.

Incidently I bid more than 133 EUR, Way More !

@Grabandt Not sold for EUR133.
White & black bikini auction Winning bid:EUR 1,100.00
https://www.ebay.com/itm/254668218478

I was refering to auction @5marta55 started talking about in middle of this thread.
He posted jpg of bid from the middle auction for 133 EUR, not final bid ? ?
Copy of same image above. Think @5marta55 did not say final bid 133 EUR.
Note his image does not have SOLD banner.
Just look at:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/254668218478

Talia Mint -- Also above average

I second this.

Also, I just watched Hali Sanders' Sexual Urges card closely to review it. She belongs on this list.

Gut gemacht. danke

New Releases on Desktop

Sometimes the simple can be the most profound. Case in point That sweet sexy simple dress that adorns the woman we know that you will come to love as much as we do. Ladies, gentlemen, feast your eyes on Audalove.

This week's second card is sure to lure you away from your troubles. The Femme Fatale, the Russian Goddess, none other than Kitana Lure in a tiny pink outfit complete with heels that will make you high.

What can we say about Veronica Sky that has not already been said? Just look at her. Those devious eyes. That riding crop. All any of us shoud say is Hit me Verona One More Time.

Imagine you are relaxing in a hammock being softly kissed by a cool Island Breeze. You don't have to imagine. Just pick up the latest card featuring Jade. Island Breeze.

Have you ever had a crush on the girl next door? Of course. We all have. But now you can live out the fantasy in 4K ultra HD. This is what Premium was made for. Takha is just waiting for you to knock on her front door.

Purple Rain, Purple Rain. Stella won't you be my Purple Rain. With a wink and a smile she replies, "Yes. All you have to do is pick up my latest Card!"

And now my Lords and ladies. We present our final card of the week. A card and a girl well worth waiting for. Valentine, in an outfit that would make Tarzan blush. Are you ready to take a walk on the wild side?

Is there any way to refresh or change the 3 cards able to be purchased? I have a group of 3 where I only really want 1 of the 3 and not that I wouldn''t mind the other 2, but don't want the other 2 at all, I'd like to keep going getting the better and better deals but don't want to waste credits either for cards I don't want

@7171al71 Thank you, that's kind of you. The P-in-P demo looks great!

There is something going on with recent votes, even more glaringly than before... Two of the cards released today, Friday August 28th 2020 (Takha: Sunshine Of Our Lives and Stella: Purple Rain) have rating of 3.36 and 3.72 respectively while every written review for both of them as of now is full 5 stars.There seems to be quite a few people there giving 1 or 2 stars for both of these shows, which is very hard for me to understand since the score deviates very much from the scores of their earlier cards and to me, they don't seem at all worse... actually, I think both of them are better than their previous cards.What is the issue here? It would be easier to understand if all those 1 and 2 star voters would give some reason for their votes... now it just seems that they're abusing the system for some reason. It's not fair for the girls, and I don't think the votes have been given "honestly".

@Dfner - I am as baffled as you. Stella has 6 actual reviews, all with a 5 star score - but after 33 "ratings" she is at 3.67. It begs the question whether the people voting have even bothered to watch the show. Are the critics those people who opted for the August pre-buy and are now regretting their decision?

Stella is not to my taste - but instead of punishing her with a low score, I just don't buy the card.

@sh42n81: I've been watching your scenes, they are very good.

As for the PIP, I discovered how to do it, I was looking to do something else and I discovered it by accident. It looks great. !!!

Picture in Picture scene demo
https://youtu.be/RSxQv4k7JgA

This happens with every calendar. The ratings crater on pretty much every card.

My guess is members resent buying something they didn't want and instead of taking blame for their own actions they instead take it out on the card or model.

I don't care how someone else rates but it keeps the demos from showing up in the carousel which I do watch.

There is something going on with recent votes, even more glaringly than before... Two of the cards released today, Friday August 28th 2020 (Takha: Sunshine Of Our Lives and Stella: Purple Rain) have rating of 3.36 and 3.72 respectively while every written review for both of them as of now is full 5 stars.

There seems to be quite a few people there giving 1 or 2 stars for both of these shows, which is very hard for me to understand since the score deviates very much from the scores of their earlier cards and to me, they don't seem at all worse... actually, I think both of them are better than their previous cards.

What is the issue here? It would be easier to understand if all those 1 and 2 star voters would give some reason for their votes... now it just seems that they're abusing the system for some reason. It's not fair for the girls, and I don't think the votes have been given "honestly".

I totally agree.
I wished the anonymous voters would give their reasons.

Hi @Dfner
Check your PM 😉

There is something going on with recent votes, even more glaringly than before... Two of the cards released today, Friday August 28th 2020 (Takha: Sunshine Of Our Lives and Stella: Purple Rain) have rating of 3.36 and 3.72 respectively while every written review for both of them as of now is full 5 stars.

There seems to be quite a few people there giving 1 or 2 stars for both of these shows, which is very hard for me to understand since the score deviates very much from the scores of their earlier cards and to me, they don't seem at all worse... actually, I think both of them are better than their previous cards.

What is the issue here? It would be easier to understand if all those 1 and 2 star voters would give some reason for their votes... now it just seems that they're abusing the system for some reason. It's not fair for the girls, and I don't think the votes have been given "honestly".

Valentine & Petra

Talia Mint -- Also above average

Kristina -- She shows much better than average skill on the pole. I'm watching One Hot Summer right now.

Hilary C

Viki (veronika fasterova)

Probably the best dancer of all the girls on here. Also the hottest.

The iStripper pole dancers that always come to mind are

Susie Q
Shabba
Goldie
Foxxy

Normal, elles prennent leur temps pour se faire belles, pour notre plus grand plaisir 😊

👍

Ah! ces Françaises, jamais pressées. 😄😄😄 😉

Normal, elles prennent leur temps pour se faire belles, pour notre plus grand plaisir 😊

Someone who could make a native picture in picture in a scene?

@7171al71 That should be farily easy to do. It gives me an idea about how to represent something that I have been struggling with.