Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

BELICIA'S TATTOOS AND OTHERS

  게시판 / iStripper에 관한 모든 것

mjn304
Joined in Jun 2008

84 글
July 23, 2009
Would it not be interesting if Totem find a way not to use Belicia's interesting tattoos into card/show ?


For that matter tattoos others be used in the theme of the show/card.

BELICIA\'S TATTOOS AND OTHERS

30 투표

Use all the physcial feaures a model has or a theme of card/show--
73%
Does not matter
27%
tiobruno57
Joined in Aug 2008

159 글
July 23, 2009
Where's the "no" vote? "Does not matter" is not the same as "no." Personal preference, I don't vote in polls without that choice.
Starryk
Joined in Nov 2008

1849 글
July 23, 2009
i don't really understand what this poll is about so... i just leave :-)
titilate
Joined in Jan 2009

740 글
July 23, 2009
Decline. I don't think this is even a poll, lol, or perhaps just "does not matter"
plasonic
Joined in Dec 2007

1325 글
July 23, 2009
The question/poll is worded awkwardly. It seems, to me, to ask if a model's tats or "physical features' should be considered & included when coming up with a theme for a show.
In Belicia's case..."The female soccer player, before her shower, looking for her pet kitty that has just wandered in (& up her back) from tracking through the mud outside!"
Eh?
I'm all for slender, small breasted babes being schoolgirls...and tall, big breasted babes being Amazons..(cliche's)...but the problem would be that the presentation, the dance, would have to go along with the theme, & we have that to varying degrees of success. (pointing guns, cat scratch,swordplay,firewoman, etc.)
Is that what you mean mjn304 ?
eevilkayneevil
Joined in May 2008

128 글
July 23, 2009
Well said plasonic,

@mjn304, your idea/poll may have a lot of horsepower, but for clarification sake, would you mind re-posting a fresh thread/poll with more detail? I'll bet many will vote then...

Great day to you,
eevil
tiobruno57
Joined in Aug 2008

159 글
July 23, 2009
Be sure to include an option for those that disagree with you. That's the purpose of a poll. Choices, choices, choices.

I'm not saying I agree or disagree with the idea, just that there needs to be that option of no, thanks.
wildone
Joined in Dec 2007

389 글
July 23, 2009
I say that if they have tattoos, just leave them just as with any natural feature. Just like natural body parts, if it's something that's already attached when they show up for their filming, I say leave it. I know tattoos aren't a natural thing you're born with, but if it came with the girls when they show up, leave it. I just don't like fake boob jobs. I think that that would be the only exception for saying "no way."
yosho1967
Joined in Apr 2009

438 글
July 25, 2009
I don't know...
Some tatoos are soo strange, ugly and disgusting... or not exciting...
It's my opinion.
LuckyRene
Joined in Sep 2008

1629 글
July 25, 2009
do also not vote because this Poll isn't asking the right question.

@yosho; and some tattoo's are okay... like this from Marie ;)
plasonic
Joined in Dec 2007

1325 글
July 25, 2009
I'd like to vote against people starting threads/polls & not returning to discuss them. (real world needs permitting, of course)
And I think Marie's tat & most others are really sexy kiss targets...and therefore good body art!
This Marie pic has me imagining passionately kissing her there while reaching around and finger twirling & plunging her pussy! All the while feeling the heat rise from her ass on my chest!
Darn imagination! (heh, heh, heh)
LuckyRene
Joined in Sep 2008

1629 글
July 25, 2009
and she is one of the rare girls who do not wiggle and waggle but like Suzie etc. really do a great perform plasonic ;-)
plasonic
Joined in Dec 2007

1325 글
July 25, 2009
Tats & Lasses are a unique combo to me.Mostly I don't mind tats on babes.I like all kinds of "accent" tats. I especially like "across the hips" & over the cunt ones. I guess I am less inclined to like dark hard "biker type" tats & like the fem-arty type.I've never seen any here on VGHD that I really disliked. I view them as beauty marks, body art,design, & erotic stimulation. Until coming here I never knew there was so much objection to them on women!
I think tats these days are an attempt to reach back into more primitive times when they were used as identifying marks of a rite of passage or achievement, and thus most tats today may be a bit more superficial. But to each their own,who's to judge why, body art alone is a good enough reason. Erotic design and kiss targets, thong band tease illustrations are a good use too!
A beautiful thing to see on summer streets is low jeans,untanned skin, blue-green thong "whale-tail", tanned skin, unique,artistic, branching colors,hip line tat!
yosho1967
Joined in Apr 2009

438 글
July 26, 2009
That's fine.
My suggestion, Monica Mattos is very tatooed too.

아직 참여할 수 없습니다.

iStripper の無料ユーザーはフォーラム内の주제に参加したり新しい주제を作ることはできません。
でもベーシック카테고리には参加できコミュニティーと接することはできます!