In a lot of comments, many users ***** about the lack of explicity in the scenes.

I am actually one of these people who is not that bothered. So I thought it would be intersting to do a poll to see how explicit users want their VGHD.

I would say that i am in camp number 5. I am not bothered by explicit content, but there are a small number of explicit scenes I do like. Although most I am not interested in.

However, I thing the VGHD philosophy is more in camp 4, although I could be wrong.

So what is your attitude to explicity in VGHD?

When I first came here, I griped about it a lot. Then through a number of seductive girls I watched,it became less of a problem and now I could care less about the explicit scenes. I think it should be up to the girls themselves if they want to be explicit or not. You want explicit - watch hardcore porn.

I like the direction VG has taken.

Uh... Well, this is a very controversial topic. But here's my take on this.

This site is a "softcore" site, the owner always make this precision everytime someone ***** on the dull content. "Softcore" is porn, porn have the only objective to sell entertainment that provide sexual arousal in the viewer. Softcore boundaries are very debatable, but fingering briefly and mild masturbation are as far as it should go.

To me it's ok if they don't want to go borderline, but the sexual explicit behaviour most be really explicit, with that i mean full detailed nudity, a perfect view of everything, with enough time of exposure to enjoy it, and presented in a way that is hot, deliberated, lascivious and thrilling. And this features are not beyond softcore standards.

As i said before, they can deliver a softcore product that is hot, with good quality and exciting, or deliver a bad softcore product that is dull, poorly realized, and uninteresting to the viewer. I prefer the first. ;)

By explicit, I assume you mean getting a good view between the girls legs, and perhaps the girl touching herself a bit - which mostly is about as explicit as it gets on VGHD.

I generally like to see a few explicit scenes, which for me make for a good rewarding climax to the show. The viewers reward after being teased and seduced for a while as it were. Simply being explicit, however, in no way makes up for a poor performance or detracts from a good performance in my book.

Some girls are better at explicit scenes than others, and I think there are a few girls who have done them, but perhaps shouldn't have. One of my pet ***** on VGHD is where a girl appears to stop mid-performance in order to pleasure herself. The best explicit girls, on the other hand, make it appear that they are doing it for the viewer.

Yet other girls are such good entertaining performers, that I think showing everything would make them seem a little less classy and actually detract from their performance.

Yes, my view of explicit is basically a girl rubbing her pussy directly. I don't regard as rubbing a pussy through clothing or underwear, or sticking her hand inside her panties.

I don't regard rubbing breasts as explicit, but others may disagree with me on this.

It may be that there are a variety of opinions on what explicit actually is.

I only like a very few explicit scenes where the girl is still wearing her panties, but I am not interested in the rest and am right on the "Switch to next model" button. In saying that they don't offend me either, I just regard it as a waste from my POV.

I prefer the soft core tease and flashing scenes and my personal view is that this is what this site is about.

You can get hard core porn for free on some sites and some even have models from VGHD. But i like the soft core nature of this site.

Variety. The same thing day in and day out loses it's luster after awhile. Variety also means members choose which cards to purchase, which clips to watch 1000 times and which to delete.

Nomatter how we slice it the new site is just the "real" explicit side of virtuagirl. They are hand in hand.
Being seperate will not give them seperate identities nor will it get them seperate audiences (unless the new site takes off and leaves this site in the dust). A product that offers soft and hardcore will outsell and outlast a product that just offers softcore. Even playboy tv went away from just softcore and got harder- it offers both.
Totem is doing that.
Both sites will have members like myself doing both and running both at the same time. I want variety or core and girls. If I like every card of a site there is a problem.
Variety means something for everyone- including things I do not like.
"He who likes everyone has no taste- he who is liked by everyone has no character."

I'm primarily interested in explicit content. If Virtuagirl ever publishes any explicit shows I would purchase those exclusively and stop buying any of the fashion model/foot fetish material released here. I don't want to spend real money on weak shows from porn girls such as Diana Doll, Nikky Case, Tea, Tarra White etc. when I can get much better material from them for free on any of the porn download sites. I also especially ***** the constant fading, which is an insult to me as a paying customer.

The only exception I would make would be the unknown stripper types such as Chems, Kayla, Tess, Krystal, Miss Roxx- women who know what stripping is about and that you can only find here.

Choice 3, I guess, & I think Totem are doing a good job trying to get this mix right. But it is really VGHD's taking-off-of-the-garments technique that needs to be perfected for every single garment worn. If all the models were constrained by having to wear the same outfit, and if they all concluded their act totally naked, then the difference in tease technique would become abundantly clear, regardless of explicit.

In other words, if how we are to get there (tease) becomes secondary to getting there (explicit), then the notion of suprise to the viewer is being disregarded. The "promise of more" portrayed by the actions, expressions and involvement of the performer along with with their involvement with a camera audience surely needs to be valued, cultivated & appreciated further as an art. If VGHD reduces everything to a fashion show (coached from the side) with an explicit option, I expect opportunities to retain ongoing interest by repeat members may not sustain.

I agree with the idea of having a variety of cards that vary in explicitness. Maybe some girls don't want to get that "dirty" and that is fine.

But what has happened this past year in seemingly constraining the performance to a purely softcore (and rather tame softcore for the most part) perspective is disappointing. Hopefully this new site rectifies this inbalance and provides wonderful explicit moments as well as erotic soft-core performances.

There are some non-explicit cards that drive me wild, but for the most part I feel ignored by the current product since the whole Natali Blonde incident (I can't believe the strife that caused). I love to see these women fully revel in both their sensual and sexual natures. Right now, that is just not the case.

I would like to see most explicit in the lesbian shows but is not like an must.I think most of the shows are fine what they are, very gorgeous girls.

Mostly like the tease but once in a while a finger goes in and it gets hot. Would like to see more of that. Don't see why a dildo can't be busted out once in a while - you can always turn that off. Without a little more excitement I think this will get boring. I'd maybe even subscribe if things were a bit more explicit. BTW: what was the whole Natali Blonde incident?