I like my beer like my women....
tall and cold....

wait a minute...
that can't be right....

try 4/20 of nxt yr at 4:20:00 to 4:20:59 what evertime zone, in other words stop waisting your time & money chasing it.

right now it's like an old joke: line up a bunch of ppl up in a line tell them to hold hands above their as if making a telephone call to ypur girl freind that ya went fishin an tell her, all you caught was a bunch of suckers....... hehehhaha

I used to sit at a balcony bar with a friend. we would bet the next round on who has the best guess.
We would guess how many back and forth moves to parallel park a car. (the younger the driver, the more moves it would take....)


Lets all guess on the repair date....
On what day will Totem correct the 4 20 achievement?
You only get one day!!!!

On my Androids the only why I can get the girls to be naked on my Androids is when I go to workshop but it's just a example not full Show like on my laptop. How can I get full show and nude on my Androids?

The Otter Limits!
OMG, I love the show!
All the strange, furry, aquatic alients and munsters!

Do we have any idea when problem will be corrected.

Looking at your Avatar @wuxjnozy, when, let me think... I'd say...

...if Crichton and Aeryn resurrect again unsplintered and return together with the pilot through a new wormhole back to the Leviathan Moya and it's new Crewmember Scorpius. 😆

Thanks so much for the steps, I had such a hard time making the most out of the fullscreen. I really like using it because it looks better.

Right now I can't alt tab to switch music, because it just ends the show. T_T really annoying.

Bought card at correct time according to Totem system. No Achievement yet. By what I have read guess its still bugged. Do we have any idea when problem will be corrected.

I wouldn't call it a problem.....

I like tall women!!!




and short women,
and medium.........

... and beer I think.
Tall woman clearly have their perks. 😆

Henessy, Arteya

I would say not that many models but you could try Avery (as said by @lagotrasimeno) and Blue Angel.

@ParrotEx just to make sure, please go and check the pics in the following thread: https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/25643/1?post=399712Are they the kind your are looking for?

Yeap

@ParrotEx just to make sure, please go and check the pics in the following thread:

https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/25643/1?post=399712

Are they the kind your are looking for?

I wouldn't call it a problem.....

I like tall women!!!




and short women,
and medium.........

Hello, to everybody!
I think this is very nice game.
i'm joined few weeks ago but i'm very happy.

Welcome to you @elgabu78 - glad you are enjoying the show.

Tomorrow a new promotion will be launched - and hopefully you will enjoy that also.

Plus three new girls!

Hello, to everybody!
I think this is very nice game.
i'm joined few weeks ago but i'm very happy.

Look for Elis, Ellie Leen, Merry Pie

The Red Fox, Kiara Lord, Lucy Heart, Dakota.

@ParrotEx that description would describe about 97% of the girls/wimen/models on iStripper & more than that depending on your idea of perky

Ok, maybe I wrote too general.. i mean shows with girls, who have sort of pointy, puffy tits.. example Mischa (Iveta C) . Or something like Retrousse Tits.

I have just had reason to look at my vghd.log file. I see the following error recorded which I believe relates to this card and maybe to the giantess problem

2020-05-21T11:47:34 cards: [CardImageCache::processImageRequest] WARNING[QUrl( "https://www.istripper.com/free/sets/e1411/illustrations/e1411_fullhd.png" ) "Expected CRC was 3925379687 instead of 2546701702"]

The giantess on the releases carousel problem is something that has happened a few times in the past, but this is the first time that I can remember it persisting long after it first being reported. Possibly this is the first time since switching to the cloud based servers and the correction has not properly replicated itself throughout the cloud - I think we have seen this with a few other problem fixes since the switch.

'The Attack of the 50foot (15.24 meter ) Stripper!'

Silvia Luca, Ava, Belle Claire, Heidi Romanova, Stacy Cruz, Agatha Vega, Scyley Jam,

Any show from Avery and Nancy A.

But there are a lot more :)

Whoever recommends a show with nice perky boobs?

Just one? 😱
I don't know... Jenni Gregg or Jana Cova

Little Caprice, Melisa Mendiny.
Btw, does anyone know why popular models who were starting out in the 2000s, like the above two, are not invited back to do more shoots?

I'm sure Melisa was invited back in recent years. I don't know about the others

Talia Mint impressed me as well, @zz. Great performance very fit body.🔥

Talia Mint made a great debut yesterday dancing on the PepperMINT twist: the best Pole specialist since recently Angelika Grays and Anastasia Brokelyn (Talent of the Month May 2020). Great show!

Little Caprice, Melisa Mendiny.
Btw, does anyone know why popular models who were starting out in the 2000s, like the above two, are not invited back to do more shoots?

Thanks for the pro tips Emu, it's working much better for me, and I'm discovering the use of fullscreen mode and the quality is noticable, thank you so much.

Jana Cova, Vicky S,, or Aleska Diamond

The good new is....

the babes get naked!!!

@desexyvideoclub,
If you are sharing iStripper with another person even if that is family, the you are actually in breach of the Licence that you agreed to when you signed up to Totem:

The limited license granted to you in Section I is subject to the additional limitations set forth below in this Section III. Any use of the Software in ***** of the license limitations set forth below is an unauthorised use of the Software outside of the license granted to you in Section I, and will be regarded as an infringement of the copyrights Totem Entertainment holds in and to the Software and the Product. You agree that you will not, under any circumstances:
Sell, lease, rent, loan or otherwise transfer the Software, or grant a security interest in or transfer reproductions of the Software or the Product, to a third party;

While I am aware of similar circumstances in the past, its never wise to flout you "indiscretion", Totem does have the right to disable your account for this.

I would have preferred to see 1 or 2 XXX cards in Nici's third set...
Anyway, this doesn't matter now. If a good job has been done, her new card with that outfit will be absolutly unbelievable 😍

I know some are disappointed by no xxx cards, but not me. Nici is the most beautiful woman on earth. I can't wait for this card😍

Live Jasmin used years ago. Untilll my bank account was protesting. Great shows but can be expensive. Just an advice, only charge what you can afford and remove creditcard after you charged credits. It was easy to buy credits after credits. Still great time.

I love this....

Maybe it could be a new setting.

Every time a wishlist appears... it is giant!!!!

I don't think she's dangerous though 😆

Totem offers approximately 4520 cards....There are 14 SE cards. 9/14 cards are from girls who have 12 or more shows. So we are ***** about 0.3% of cards, where 70% of these 0.3% are from girls with huge collections available. And none of them are considered truly special...one has roller skates, another has a shopping bag, a few are seasonal. The real "problem" is the fact that people aren't willing to go without 0.3% of a collection without paying exhorbinant prices...is it ego or just an addiction.

Even weirder...a person with 4520 cards...lets say they watch 8 hours of cards a day, every day, it would take 420 days to watch their collection. So we have people collecting who might never watch a card, or only watch it once, who are spending massive amounts of money. Something isn't right.

@Vortim, the problem there is that there are some users that have bought every card so they have a huge sunk cost fallacy/***** of missing out. So they will pay ridiculous amounts to keep their full collection (though some have said f it and said they won't buy any more credits).

Proveing my point as to why they will never go away and never be for sale.... Is it really a "problem" in Totems eyes? Nope....

@Opie235

The the cards produced before Crystal Clear used a lower resolution camera than those produced since so the original image quality Totem are working with will be lower for the earlier cards. This will be particularly noticeable if you allow the cards to be scaled beyond their native resolution (controlled by the "Do not zoom of 100% of the clips original size" tick box on the settings page). However, if you do restrict the scalling to not exceed 100% then the height of the affected cards will be limited so they won't fit your screen as well as you might like.

The photo's are made with a much higher resolution still camera so their image quality is not related to that of the clips.

Unfortunately until now the scaling algorithm used for the desktop mode is a relatively poor, but quick, one.

In fullscreen scene mode things are somewhat better as in that mode a better scaling algorithm seems to be used (one that takes advantage of your GPU). It is to be hoped that Totem will, perhaps optionally, use a better scalling algorithm for the dektop mode in some futre release.

I'm looking at 1312 Little Caprice, from 2013. I'm a fan.

The demo quality on my screen that's 3440x1440, is extremely blurry, not enjoyable, and barely viewable.
I see the quality of the photos for this card look much better.

For anyone who owns this card or any card from or before 2013, is the demo quality of these cards the same quality as the full show?

For now I'm just avoiding all the old cards where the demo appears blurry to me, which are cards made before Crystal Clear. Please let me know if the full shows are any different.

Do we need to create a different account for "IStripper Live" or does IStripper automatically log us in?

You need to make a new one. But if you have an account with livejasmin you will most likely be able to use that one.

@Vortim, the problem there is that there are some users that have bought every card so they have a huge sunk cost fallacy/***** of missing out. So they will pay ridiculous amounts to keep their full collection (though some have said f it and said they won't buy any more credits).

It's upsetting that SECs are not even available for purchase when it comes out. It's straight to gambling upon release.

And here we go! Just start y with >0 and nothing is stuck, that's what I meant.. 😊

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vJzsnCVvwpf_GOn2YtzL_Qs8y-boOHLW
if you're interested this is what i messing about with.

ahh. think i see it now. thanks.

it now looks like

float lum = GetLuma(1.0-FB.rgb);

float yd = 5.0 + (5.0 * lum) ;

for ( float y=(1.0); y<=yd; y+=1.0 )
{
float xd = (0.5*y);
for ( float x=(-xd); x<=xd; x+=xd )
{
float x1 = x*2.0;
vec2 p1 = vTexCoord.xy + Offset * vec2(x1, y);

Yes, that is correct. But in your first example, the x-loop cannot work on the first y pass, because

for (float y=(0.0); y<25.01; y+=1.0)
{
float xd = (0.25*y);
float xdm = xd+0.1
for (float x=(-xd); x<xdm; x+=(xd))
{

for (float x=(-0.0); x<0.1; x+=0.0)

The first X-loop with Y=0.0 runs dead because of the step size 0.0.

maybe it should be

for (x=(-1.0), x<=1.0; x+=1.0)

edit... yep, that works as intended and x reached xd.

It behaves like

if (x+1.0 < 1.0 )
{
x =+1.0
}
else
{
break;
}

so..

if (x+1.0 < 1.01 )
{
x =+1.0
}
else
{
break;
}

is needed.

i have to add 0.1 or some value to xd otherwise it drops out early and never actually reaches xd.
if i have

for (x=(-1.0), x<1.0; x+=1.0)

it doesnt reach 1.0 and drops out at 0.0;
whereas

for (x=(-1.0); x<1.01; x+=1.0)

then it works as intended and x reaches 1.0

It's to get the giggles. 😆