Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

마지막の글 - 페이지 #677

  게시판

ComteDracula
Joined in Aug 2017
2666 글

Small reminder concerning the SEC obtained only with games of chance.

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
September 27, 2020, 86 답변
Yes iStripper contributes through their games to exploit some people with addiction problems.
Me personally this aspect comes to me, because I work to help vulnerable people, with mental illnesses.

If you have a problem with gambling or mental illness, then the last place you should be is here.
Turn off your computer and go get some help from a real person.

@GreyWolfNH

I never said I had a mental illness problem.

I said that I help people who have addiction issues and mental illness. I am one of those real people, helping vulnerable people. I am therefore well placed to understand this problem.

In this sense, it is a cause of which I am sensitive.

You should be careful how you interpret other people's words.

Totem has changed the way it acts and attracts people by giving them the illusion that they will acquire SEC cards by playing their games. They make them spend a lot of credits and money and often without being able to get the card they wanted.

Which was not the case before.

I have already said it. I have no problem paying more for an SEC card. On the other hand, I want to know what it will cost me and be sure to get it.

I am not a gambler, nor do I go to casinos, nor play slots, or lottery in real life. I'm not interested in being drawn into this kind of trap, being able to see the damage.

I don't want to gamble, I just want to be able to buy cards and watch pretty women dancing on my screen, without having to play games of chance to try and get them.

As a lawyer, I believe the Devil would get rid of your services fairly quickly.


Je n'ai jamais dit que j'avais un problème de maladie mentale.

J'ai dit que j'aide des gens qui ont des problèmes de dépendance et de maladie mentale. Je suis une de ces personnes réelles, qui aide des gens vulnérables. Je suis donc bien placé pour comprendre cette problématique.

En ce sens, c'est une cause dont je suis sensible.

Vous devriez faire attention dans la façon dont vous interprétez les paroles des gens.

Totem a changé sa façon d'agir et attire des gens en leur donnant l'illusion qu'ils vont acquérir des cartes SEC en jouant à leur jeux. Ils leur font dépenser beaucoup de crédits et d'argent et souvent sans pouvoir obtenir la carte qu'ils désiraient.

Ce qui n'était pas le cas auparavant.

Je l'ai déjà dit. Je n'ai pas de problème à payer plus cher pour une carte SEC. Par contre je veux savoir ce qu'elle va me coûter et être certain de l'obtenir.

Je ne suis pas un gambler, je ne vais pas dans des casinos, ni ne joue à des machines à sous, ni à la lotterie dans la vrai vie. Je ne suis pas intéressé à me faire attirer dans ce genre de piège, étant à même de voir les dégats.

Je ne veux pas jouer, je veux juste pouvoir acheter des cartes et admirer de jolies femmes danser sur mon écran, sans être obliger de jouer à des jeux de hasard pour tenter de les obtenir.

Comme avocat, je crois que le Diable se débarasserait de vos services assez rapidement.
GreyWolfNH
Joined in Jul 2011
96 글

Small reminder concerning the SEC obtained only with games of chance.

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
September 27, 2020, 86 답변
Truth is as a long time member of iStripper every time I see a SEC card it feels like someone tied me to a telephone pole and my nuts to an Indy car and told that driver to hit the redline.

Allow me to play devil's advocate for a moment.

You have 854 cards in your collection. I'm going to assume that you have therefore spent several hundred dollars aquiring those cards. You are now engaging in a line of argument that stipulates several things:

One, that despite spending several hundred dollars to acquire those cards, the thought of spending maybe a hundred more dollars in the slot machine to win a few Joker cards is somehow abhorrent to you.

Two, that despite the fact you don't even come close to being one of the largest collectors of these cards and this product, you now feel that you have some line of argument against those who spend far more money than you, or spend their money in a much more focused way than you to acquire what they want.

I think this line of argument is faulty. You, nor anyone else have no right to ***** foul after you personally subsidized this product.

Compared to most I see on this forum my own collection is quite small. However, I have no compunction about throwing 50 bucks into the slot machine to win a Joker card or two to gain a special event card I really want. Having spent some time in real casinos, playing real gambling games, with real money, and real stakes, I can say the games of chance here have a much higher chance of winning, and have a far greater payout than anything you'll get whether at a casino or your local convenince store scratchoff ticket.

To equate an optional game of chance to ***** only shows me you have deeper problems than your monthly credit card balance.

Yes iStripper contributes through their games to exploit some people with addiction problems.
Me personally this aspect comes to me, because I work to help vulnerable people, with mental illnesses.

If you have a problem with gambling or mental illness, then the last place you should be is here.
Turn off your computer and go get some help from a real person.

Jesus, you folks are throwing thousands of dollars into a hole, only to ***** that that it's not deep enough, and you're not allowed to throw even more money in?

If you've got a problem with the way the company sells their goods, maybe you should find a new company. Or maybe you should go outside once in a while, get some perspective on life. Maybe go visit your relatives, or take up a hobby that's not quite so expensive. Like making changes to the grafitti on office equipment, or driving around until you find somewhere your SatNav tells you you can go, but you can't.
orclover
Joined in Jun 2012
1402 글

guns in istripper

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
September 26, 2020, 47 답변
Was skeptical about doing so, but If I may chime in-
Owned, (legally) enjoyed shooting handguns, long guns since my late teens
At one point in my life it became required to carry a handgun due to my chosen occupation - to STOP a threat.
To protect life- Never property, from the bad people of society when he/she/they are using equal deadly *****/intent
Can using a gun on a human being result in their demise? Absolutely
Was I ever trained/instructed to ***** someone? Never- I was trained to stop a threat to protect Life, my own and or other human beings.
I totally understand this is a emotional issue and rightfully so- discharging a firearm at a human being can cause death
It may sound cliche' but to me a firearm is a tool, just like a wrench, saw, hammer. It serves it's purpose- and should be respected
Am I pro gun? Yes-Legally owned, responsibly posessed

Now as far as Beautiful, Sexy girls firing a gun at a range in the Tightest short-shorts...What a turn on
Plenty of videos on Ytube

America is just a different place from the rest of the industrialized world. It has always had very high crime rates, and its people are a weird combination of individualistic, materialistic, simple minded, and resistant to oversight. The nation is so much younger than the rest of the industrialized world, with nearly the entiretly of its population coming from recent immigrant families. Statistically a gun is most likely used to ***** its owner...rather than protect..the incidents of a gun stopping an intruder are extremely small, but gun suicides are astronomical...and annually into the 10s of thousands. Rural people are the most likely to own a gun, and are the least likely to have to use it, except to ***** themselves or endure their children accidently shooting themselves. Guns are deadly, ***** thousands of people a year but they are fun...and deadly fun things that ***** thousands fit right in my america.
Vortim
Joined in Apr 2019
264 글
willyweekly
Joined in Jul 2015
1030 글

guns in istripper

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
September 26, 2020, 47 답변
Considering the amount of guns in America alone, I believe 99.9999% of civilians who posses a gun here, aren't planning to ***** people with them either.

As far as vehicles are concerned most people who buy a car aren't initially planning to planning to ***** people either but ***** and reckless driving along with inattention (all of which are conscious decisions) ***** a great many people worldwide. More than illegal gun shootings, I believe, by a considerable margin.

As far as animals are concerned I wasn't addressing that but I see animals ***** by cars on the road virtually every day in the area where I live. Darn, I'm so sorry Mr. Deer/Cat/Dog/Raccoon/Squirrel but I just couldn't be bothered to swerve around you since I was texting on my phone or at 30mph over the speed limit and couldn't miss you in time... Whether on purpose or not, the animal (or person) is just as dead.

How many defendants at sentencing time after ***** someone with a gun or a car stand up and with crocodile tears flowing, say something along the lines of: "I didn't mean to shoot/hit him or her and I'd take it back if I could, Please forgive me...." Whether on purpose or not that person is just as dead.

Whether you personally like it or not, using a gun to hunt/***** animals in the wild as a sport, is legal in most countries in the world.

Both guns and cars are tools and when used legally for their intended purpose, they serve that purpose and are justified.

However when either are misused, no matter why, each is just as unlawfully deadly as the other.

The point being that until the human variable enters the scene, neither tool ***** anyone and just sits collecting dust.

But when that human makes a conscious decision to misbehave while using said tools, people (or animals) start getting ***** or worse.

Stop blaming the tools and focus the attention at the place (the human variable) where it can actually do some good. And unfortunately I don't have the solution for that either but I know what we have been doing so far isn't working. A new approach is needed.

And I apologize for doing my part in helping this thread slide off track but this is a subject on which I have spent much time contemplating and I lost focus on the o/p's original complaint. Mea culpa.

I am happy to have a civil conversation and I think most of us here are going with that.
Thanks to all. (off topic or otherwise)

I will add two/three parts here.

If I buy a gun, then I am going to shoot to *****. no other options. We can talk about protection, but if you are planning on protecting someone or something, then you are planning on shooting someone... to *****. guns have no other use. If this isn't in the plan then you don't know what a gun will do. (I don't have a problem with hunting, but again, we understand that this is *****. my brother in law and other friends who hunt, trained, registered, etc. )

I went to get my camping gear and speak to the guy behind the counter for a fishing license. We chat and he tells me how scared he is about selling guns. He mentions the one question that lets him know if the person should have a gun. He asks "how many rounds do you want?" If the person doesn't even know the term rounds, then they shouldn't be buying a gun (according to me and the salesman). What makes him scared is the majority don't know what a round is....


We are all in the middle of gun control.
We aren't thinking we hand guns to people leaving prison. (no control)
We aren't thinking we ban all guns. (no guns)
We are all in the middle. Civil discussion can discuss the middle. (Sadly, civility is rare.)

Previous 페이지 #677 다음