Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

마지막の글 - 페이지 #1526

  게시판

SanityAbsent
Joined in Jan 2017
14 글

New XXX cards

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
May 12, 2017, 406 답변
Looks like somebody really dislikes porn.

Well if one thing is certain, ppl buying the "old" XXX cards don't think of them as porn at all - for this there are other sites/services available and those cards are and can't be in any competition to that.

Maybe I am spoiled having seen strip shows on stage more explict than those "standard" cards labeled as XXX hotness level, but from what I read and see the new "full XXX" cards exactly go that way. Yes, shows with only table clips could be a bit boring, so some tweaking would be great. But branding a card as "XXX" being too close to to old extended hotness level is kinda cheating and especially with the missing sound and introduction is going 100% what you wanted to avoid - the new shows getting boring.

A XXX card has to be destinct bot in hotness level and performance from standard cards - only offering "mainstream products" will impact the sales for all those customers not interested to buy every single card, no matter what (well and that should be the majority).

I read some great suggestions here, thanks for those guys, especially @Theo.

The best idea I read however is more freedom for the models - this really should be extended to what they want to show - the best cards always have been those where you can clearly see the girls having some fun doing their job and nothing else encourages a better performance and therefore higher sales for their other cards.

With that having said, please take a look at the great suggestions and "improve" the "old" format, let the girls have more freedom and if some girls are interested in doing Duos again, I am sure not only myself will buy more cards, faster, even at a higher price.
pantalone
Joined in Nov 2010
2303 글

Sexual Erotism, Woman Unfriendly?

iStripper에 관한 모든 것
May 12, 2017, 14 답변
"pornography; ...designed to be sexually arousing." (Chambers English dictionary)

"eroticism: ...interest in, or pursuit of, sexual sensations." (Chambers English dictionary)

English is my first language and I can't really tell the difference. I suppose that pornography is an erotic product. You can have erotic art, which is intended by the artist to invoke an emotion beyond pure lust, Dance can include eroticism, while being artistic. What the product consists of (*****, S&M, etc.) is irrelevant.

But iS isn't art, although elements of the dance may be artistic. It is pornographic or, if you prefer, erotic. The xxx discussion relates to degree of explicitness and format. Contributors (not me, because I'm not really a fan of the xxx cards) are getting into knots trying to differentiate the words and attributing meanings to them that don't exist.

As for exploitation, are we being exploited by women who take our money, exploiting our weakness for seeing them with no pants on? Of course we are. As we were by Titian when he painted Venus and sold it, on when we pay to listen to a couple of girls singing the Flower Duet. There's no disrespect associated with exploiting somebody's desires for financial gain, so long as it is a fair trade between adults with nobody being conned or bullied into the transaction. Totem doesn't con or bully the models, so any disrespect is purely in our imagination.

So, @Terbone, I suggest you can ignore the semantic hair-splitting. Tell them to write it in Dutch!
Previous 페이지 #1526 다음