Yes @Philours I have the latest version of these scenes. Because with the others there was no name.

Thanks @Stanston

I set the names to "always" and this fixed the name issue for the majority of model changes in scenes. It can happen very rarely that a name does not appear, but like you say it must be due to version .266

Now there are two problems:

There is really no name that appears in the "sh4_Voyeur2b_mod.scn" scene, despite the update.

I'm probably saying anything because of my ignorance on the topic, but could it be because the name would appear outside the screen area?

The code puts it in the same position as sh4_voyeur2_mod, which works for it.

clipNameSprite {
scale: 1, 1
pos: -20, -400, 1
hotspot: 0.5, 1
source: Girl01

And there is a problem to see the names clearly due to the reasons of the shadow of the girl in front of the name, and the fact that he can not see himself on the left side, being in a dark area with the scene "Istripper Backstage - Standing -Carstrip_mod.scn ".

I specify that my problem occurs, while my program is OFF. I watch the scenes by activating them in the full screen page.



Oui @Philours j'ai la dernière version de ces scènes. Car avec les autres il n'y avait aucun nom.

Merci @Stanston

J'ai régler les noms à "toujours" et cela a régler le problème d'apparition des noms pour la majorité des changements de modèle dans les scènes. Cela peut arriver très rarement qu'un nom n'apparaîsse pas, mais comme vous dites, cela doit être dû à la version .266

Maintenant il reste deux problèmes :

Il n'y a vraiment aucun nom qui apparaît dans la scène "sh4_Voyeur2b_mod.scn" , malgré la mise à jour.

Je dis probablement n'importe quoi à cause de mon ignorance sur le sujet, mais se pourrait-il que ce soit parce que le nom apparaîtrait en dehors de la zone d'écran ?

Le code le situe dans la même position que sh4_voyeur2_mod, qui lui fonctionne.

clipNameSprite {
scale: 1, 1
pos: -20, -400, 1
hotspot: 0.5, 1
source: Girl01

Et il y a un problème pour voir clairement les noms pour les raisons de l'ombre de la fille devant le nom, et le fait qu'il se voit mal du côté gauche, étant dans une zone sombre avec la scène "Istripper Backstage - Standing -Carstrip_mod.scn".

Je précise que mon problème se produit, alors que mon programme est à OFF. Je visionne les scène en les activant dans la page plein écran.

collants ?

@ComteDracula
Merci pour toutes ces précisions.
En ce qui concerne le site d'Alarsi, j'ai vu la maison avec les cubes, mais tous ne semblent plus fonctionner et je n'ai pas trouvé de lien de téléchargement. Mais il est tard !!!

Pour la scène "œuf de Pâques", pour les mêmes raisons, je ne m'y risquerai pas maintenant.

Si vous avez d'anciennes scènes, conservez les si elles vous plaisent, car je pense qu'elles ne sont plus disponibles.

Il faudrait qu'Alarsi publie ses créations de façon plus claire sur le fil approprié pour en faire bénéficier le plus grand nombre. (Je ne sais pas si nous sommes vraiment nombreux sur ce site à s'intéresser aux scènes?)

Quoi qu'il en soit / grand merci à vous pour votre temps et votre réponse.

Je vous tiens au courant de mes résultats 😀

Pour ce qui est de la scène oeuf de pâques. (Important: Les guillemets ne sont pas à recopier dans les modifications, ils encadrent dans mon texte les noms des fichiers, pour mieux les mettre en évidence)

Fermer d'abord le programme

Dans "data" /scenes", Quand on ouvre le dossier de "(0) Atripper Virtual Music", il y a un fichier qui se nomme "(0) Atripper Virtual Music.scn"

J'ai créé un double de ce fichier dans ce même dossier que j'ai renommé "(0) Atripper Virtual Music (Animated).scn"

Ce sera la scène (oeuf de Pâques). Dans ce fichier, qui s'ouvre avec le bloc notes .txt de windows, j'ai changé le code écrit par Alarsi :

(Important : Ne pas changer ce qui est écrit avant ce code dans cette page)


J'ai changé ce code:

text: logo/text.txt


clip {
id: Clip
deny: table
}

texture {
id: Fondo
source: Atripper music base.jpg
}
texture {
id: Instructions
source: Atripper music Instructions
}

camera {
type: 2D
pos: 1920, 1080
size: 3840, 2160

}

//FONDO
sprite {
pos: 1920, 1080
hotspot: 0.5, 0.5
size: 3840, 2160
source: Fondo
blend: true
}

//MODELO

clipSprite {
pos: 1650, 1250
standingHeight: 300
source: Clip
color: 1,1,1
}
//INSTRUCCIONES
sprite {
pos: 1920, 1080
hotspot: 0.5, 0.5
scale: 1, 1
source: Instructions
blend: true

}


par celui- ci:


text: logo/text.txt


clip {
id: Clip
deny: table
}

texture {
id: Background
source: Atripper music base.jpg
}
texture {
id: Instructions
source: Atripper music Instructions
}

camera {
type: 2D
pos: 1920, 1080
size: 3840, 2160

}

//BACKGROUND
Sprite {
pos: 1920, 1080
hotspot: 0.5, 0.5
size: 3840, 2160
source: Background
blend: true
}

//MODEL

clipSprite {
pos: 1650, 1250
standingHeight: 300
source: Clip
color: 1,1,1
}
//INSTRUCTIONS
Sprite {
pos: 1920, 1080
hotspot: 0.5, 0.5
scale: 1, 1
source: Instructions
blend: true
opacity: 0.3

}


Sauvegarder ce fichier une fois le code changé.


Ensuite j'ai changé le nom du fichier "(0) Atripper Virtual Music.scn" par "(0) Atripper Virtual Music (Informative).scn" et je l'ai sauvegarder.

Ainsi dans mon dossier je me retrouve avec deux fichiers:

(0) Atripper Virtual Music (Informative).scn

(0) Atripper Virtual Music (Animated).scn

plutôt que

(0) Atripper Virtual Music.scn

Voir ma capture d'écran 1

Et ce que cela donne sur la page plein écran

Voir ma capture d'écran 2

Le fichier .cache de ce dossier est à effacer avant que le programme soit réouvert. La cache est ce qui nous fait voir l'image de la scène dans la page plein écran.

Deux nouveaux fichiers .cache apparaîtront alors dans ce fichier du nom des deux nouvelles scènes.

La scène "animated" peut être jouée comme les autres scènes dans le programme.

En espérant que cela va vous aider. 😊

Waouh! Ca fait beaucoup! 😲😲😎

To add to @Number6 's post you can also animate their size or equivalently their scale and position.

Or you can apply a shader to obtain any effect that you can think of - in which case this overrides their default behaviour of appearing only intermittantly. A "null" shader therfore makes them permanently visible so you can use them as part of the setting for a scene. The following is a null shader

uniform vec2 u_WindowSize; // Window dimensions in pixels
// The image that is to be manipulated.
uniform sampler2D iChannel0;

vec2 Emu_Normalise_to_Window ( vec2 xy ) { return xy / u_WindowSize.xy; }

void main ( void )
{
// Get the normalised coordinates of the current point.
vec2 uv = Emu_Normalise_to_Window ( gl_FragCoord.xy );
// Update shader outputs.
gl_FragColor = texture2D(iChannel0,uv) * gl_Color;
}

salut

With regard to clipname sprites you don't have to have them stationary. You can play about with them if you want to.

As per the attached screencaps you can make it rotate and change colour.

clipNameSprite {
scale: 1.5
pos: -350, 0, 1
rot: 0, 0, -45
hotspot: 0.5, 0.5
source: MyClip
color: 0, 0, 0
animate: 0.12, PingPong, inoutbounce, color, 1, 1, 1
animate: 0.24, PingPong, inoutbounce, color, 1, 1, 0
animate: 0.36, PingPong, inoutbounce, color, 1, 0, 0
animate: 0.48, PingPong, inoutbounce, color, 1, 0, 1
animate: 0.60, PingPong, inoutbounce, color, 0, 0, 1
animate: 0.72, PingPong, inoutbounce, color, 0, 1, 1
animate: 0.84, PingPong, inoutbounce, color, 0, 1, 0
animate: 2.5, PingPong, linear, rot, 0, 0, 360
}

@Philours, concernant ses scènes commençant par (0) , j'en ait 22 incluant la scène oeuf de Pâque dont on doit modifier un code. Il en a plus que cela, mais son ancien site où j'avais téléchargé plus de sènes gratuites de lui, ne semble plus en fonction.

Il faudrait lui demander , car j'avais aussi des scènes de lui qui commençaient par (1) et d'autres avec son surnom soit Alarsi. Je ne sais plus combien j'en ai au total.

Alarsi fait un excellent travail. Dont sa maison interractive ou l'on peut visiter plusieurs pièces. Un peu le mème principe. On fait danser nos filles devant des pièces de la maison devant des pages interractives sur le net.

Voici le lien: https://www.alarsi.com/virtual-backgrounds-interactive

Pour entrer dans les pièces cliquer sur les symboles en cube devant les fenêtres et faites y danser les filles à partir du programme.

Pour sortir d'une pièce et revenir devant la maison cliquez sur le logo House Enter Active en haut à gauche. Ensuite vous pouvez changer de pièce.

À l'époque il y avait des zones d'objets cachés dans ces pièces, qui nous ammenaient vers d'autre pièces, mais je n'ai pas vu, il faudrait explorer plus en profondeur les pièces, pour voir si elles sont encore là ou le demander à Alarsi.

@ComteDracula

The name of the girl sometimes and rarely does not appear, when changing the girl.

Check your Settings under Desktop and Fullscreenmode for:
Show the Name of the Girl
If you are using the Setting > Only for the first Time
the Name will Not appear in Fullscreenmode, if you started the Show in Desktopmode before.

If you are put the Setting to Always, the Name will appear everytime when a new Clip is Starting
from a Show in Fullscreenmode, which is not what you want i think.

Do it like myself:

Search for the Show in your Collection which you want to start in Fullscreenmode.
Put the Show via ***** & Drop in your next Playing Area (see my Screenshot).
Don't start that Show in Desktop Mode before.
Switch to your Fullscreen Tab.
Start your Fullscreen Scene.

But since Version .266 sometimes the Name will also not appear, even with this Method.
It was not the case in Version .264.
Maybe it's a new Bug, but nothing really to worry about i guess.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/27449/99?post=677571

Ou peut-être ce lien @ComteDracula

Scène de titiii modifiées par Carstrip pour ajouter le nom des filles.

@ComteDracula
Pas de quoi.
Pour les scènes de titiii, avez-vous utilisé sa mise à jour d'il y a 11heures sur ce fil ?

@Wyldanimal ... Nice! ... It is very difficult to find one of those screens I have looked for and nobody wants to sell them 😭.

@coolcrew1: As for the chromecast and your router are 2.4 or 5.0 ghz ?.
If PC + Chromecast + Router are 5.0 Ghz it is quite fluid.

@ComteDracula
Beaucoup de modifications de scènes pour le moment. Si j'ai bien compris.
La scène de sh42n81 est en "réparation" pour l'instant et il a supprimé l'accès pendant ce temps (comme annoncé + haut)
Patience, ... pour un mieux 😉

Ok merci @Philours, je n'avait pas vu.

@ComteDracula
Beaucoup de modifications de scènes pour le moment. Si j'ai bien compris.
La scène de sh42n81 est en "réparation" pour l'instant et il a supprimé l'accès pendant ce temps (comme annoncé + haut)
Patience, ... pour un mieux 😉

Thanks @titiii

For your link

https://mega.nz/folder/8doXEBza#Q9mC0oU0r6Net2ZTjIm1Jg

I see that some scenes have a problem with the names. I don't know if this intermittent naming problem also occurs with other scenes created by other people, but I wanted to let you know.

sh4_Voyeur2b_mod.scn (I never see the name) but sh4_Voyeur2_mod is ok.

Istripper Backstage - Standing -Carstrip_mod.scn (The name of the girl sometimes and rarely does not appear, when changing the girl.
Not the best place, it's hidden by the black silhouette of the girl, and the left part of the name is very dark).

titiii_glass_office_A.scn (no name of one or two girls intermittently).

titiii_glass_office_b.scn (no name of the girl by intermittently).

titiii_glass_office_C.scn (no name of one or two girls intermittently).

Could you tell me the changes with the original scenes? I don't always see them. Especially for the "sh4_Voyeur2_mod.scn", "sh4_Voyeur3.scn" and "sh4_Voyeur3-1.scn" scenes.

Thank you.

@sh42n81

https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/29408/50?post=677671

I have this message with your link drive.google

403. That’s an error.

We're sorry, but you do not have access to this page. That’s all we know.

@ComteDracula, bonjour
Comme je vous l'avais dis, j'ai trouvé le temps d'installer la scène D'Alarsi, grâce à vos explications. Il s'agit en fait de faire jouer les filles devant une page web de You tube pour résumer.
Alarsi à publié de nouvelles scènes que j'ai installées, non sans mal, car son système de téléchargement et d'installation n'est pas si simple que d'autres.
J'ai maintenant 20 scènes de lui. Est-ce bien cela? Même si SC02_180°, SC02_360°, et peut-être encore un autre ont quelques problèmes de "décrochage" lors de leurs exécution. Mais bon cela n'est pas trop grave. De votre coté : rien remarqué ?
Ces 20 scènes ne comprennent pas le fameux "œuf" dont vous m'avez parlé et pour lequel je suis prêt à lire vos commentaires et votre "notice" d'installation.

Tout ceci, bien évidemment, lorsque vous aurez un moment, car j'ai remarqué que vous étiez assez occupé sur le forum ces derniers temps 😊

Au plaisir de lire votre réponse, cher Comte

@7171al71

Yes, it's a Passive 3D screen, no shutter glasses.
it uses the same glasses as in the Movie theaters Real D 3D.

I only wish they still made them.
I'd buy a larger screen size.
when I got this one I got a 48"

I can say I share the same experience. No degradation on my experience.

I only cast from a source of the same or higher resolution than that of the TV screen.
Also My PC is hard wired to the network.
So Only the Chrome Cast device is using the Wifi.
If both are connected by Wifi, then the Signal can be reduced.

what resolution is your PC, and what resolution is the TV.

@sh42n81
J'ai eu une fille vitre au centre du bateau, peut-être désactiver ce tag ?
Sinon, très bien.
Pour les ombres, je n'ai rien remarqué. Mais je n'ai pas votre expérience ! 😉

@sh42n81
I had a glass girl in the center of the boat, maybe disable this tag?
Otherwise, fine.
For the shadows, I didn't notice anything. But I don't have your experience! 😉

@Grabandt Thank you for the feedback!

@titiii Thank you, as well. Hmmm....you're right. I'm disabling any more downloads until I have a chance to fix it this evening.

The problem when I cast my full desktop is that the picture quality gets drastically worse. If iStripper had an option to cast directly, maybe I could actually make use of the good video quality.

Ive had this for a while, but Im only just getting into it now.

@sh42n81 : another good job, thx for this !

if i may... it seems the girls goes behind their shadows ;)

Merci @stefnev1 pour la réponse.

J'avais pensé à quelquechose de ce genre, mais je croyais que d'autres clips des filles en questions prendraient la place, étant donné qu'il y avait 5 cartes, quitte à rejouer les mêmes clips d'une même carte à deux endroits différents de la scène.

D'après ce que je comprend, et corrigez-moi si je me trompe, disons que j'ai 5 cartes en fonction, et que la scène a 5 filles, ce sera toujours la même carte d'une fille qui va jouer dans un emplacement x de la scène. Car d'après ce que je comprend une même carte ne peut pas jouer à deux endroit en même temps dans la scène.

Si la carte en question à l'emplacement x a des catégories de clip interdit dans le "Deny", ce clip va être remplacé par un rectangle blanc.

Est-ce bien celà ?

Autre chose, mais je n'ai pas remarqué. Si la scène a deux filles, et que j'ai 5 cartes sélectionnés, est-ce que la carte de la fille dans le second emplacement de la scène, disons, et qui n'a pas la catégorie de clip autorisé, sera remplacée par une autre carte que j'ai sélectionné qui a ce genre de clip ? (Bon je présume que oui n'ayant pas remarqué cela lorsque toutes mes filles sont sélectionnées, mais je pose la question tout de même)

Freestyle dancing? Taking a spin on the pole? Lounging by the pool? Whatever floats your boat!

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=10WzSjnICIL3MGSLKKbGmejUxKg6NyrKL

Eighties flower *****! ;)

Now this;

Is more like it!

Smiling girl, enjoying herself... that there is is my girl! :) It's a shame... I dislike the whips and leathers, but I like the tape!

Hips, thighs & babydoll... and it zips in half! :)

Celia Clay...

She is putty in my hands! :)

Another french girl for the collection!

I modify some of your scenes (Carstrip, sh42n81...) for my personal use.
The boat is a good one ;)

Nice job moving the sitting clips to the bed in Voyeur 2. I don't know why I didn't think of that.

Thanks @celine 😎👍 2 of my favorites 🔥🔥😍

Added on August 24:



Added on August 26:

@sh42n81

It would be nice if I'm wrong, but the PC market is shrinking. Even though that is still the best way to watch iStripper shows in my opinion, fewer people are using PCs all the time.

Colud be, but i would say, let's see what the Future brings to us, nothing is carved in stone yet, fingers crossed.
Because i'm trying to Help as much as i can with Linux (until to an specific Point of course),
even i'm the only one native Linux User here. Maybe this is a Sign 😇 Who knows :)

Anyway, i have updated both of my scenes packs (bedroom_neon + glass_office) and add girls names in them.
I'll add names in my future scenes :)

https://mega.nz/folder/8doXEBza#Q9mC0oU0r6Net2ZTjIm1Jg

Thanks 😎👍

@gkar45

Thank you for helping out. This is an old thread. I solved this problem by finding a way to get the legacy WMVDECOD.DLL codec into my installation.

@Stanston

Further Red Hat is a BIG Player in the Linux World. They are contributing a lot of Code to the Linux Kernel,
and in my Opinion without them, Linux wouldn't be on this Point where it is today.

I agree.

Those are clever ideas. But I doubt that Totem has much interesting in spending time on a Linux port of any kind, with so much of their attention focused on VR and mobile development. It would be nice if I'm wrong, but the PC market is shrinking. Even though that is still the best way to watch iStripper shows in my opinion, fewer people are using PCs all the time.

I modify some of your scenes (Carstrip, sh42n81...) for my personal use.
The boat is a good one ;)

https://mega.nz/folder/Id4R0LRA#GrruwlB7_8U80MMozI6QQw

@titiii
This thread : https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/27449/100?post=677577

Peut-être que le type de clip ne correspond pas à ceux autorisés dans le script du plein écran ?
Par exemple, dans le script ballroom.scn on trouve cette ligne :

clip {
id: Girl01
deny: table, behindtable, fronttable, cage, top, accessories, pole, inout
}

Tout ce qui vient dans le "deny :" est interdit dans cette scène.

@ale221 Hi, please send an email with all the details to [email protected]

@sh42n81

Is is that those could be distrubtion methods if Totem ever makes and official Linux version of iStripper?

Exactly, because you can't install a .deb Package from Debian or Ubuntu in Fedora.
Or for example an Arch Package in Ubuntu or Debian or Fedora.
But a Container as an pre Build Linux Application can Run on every Linux Distribution.
Because all dependencies are included in this Container, you only need to install the Snap or Flatpak Service.
So as i mentioned Snap and Flatpak is available in Ubuntu.

Also in Arch Linux:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Snap
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Flatpak

Also in Debian
https://packages.debian.org/buster/snap
https://packages.debian.org/buster/flatpak

So i'm not that familiar with Container based Installations because i didn't use them before.
And i always ditched the Snap Service after an fresh Install of Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04.
But the Wiki-Article on Ubuntuusers > https://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/snap/
is for myself 100% understandable and it are only a couple of Commands in the Terminal to use it.
So nothing crazy :)

But don't get me wrong, it's not about pushing something, but it was hitting me yesterday like a Lightning Strike.
And yes maybe this could be an possibility for an official Linux Version for iStripper.

As for the future of containters, I think it's pretty solid. Much of the Cloud runs in containers now,
and I don't see that changing until something even more efficient is invented.

That they are solid, that is no Question of course there i'm with you, but i remember on an
Message from an German IT-News Portal Heise Online, which was this one.

https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Docker-verkauft-Enterprise-Geschaeft-und-bekommt-neuen-CEO-4585658.html

and her in an Article in your native Language :)

https://containerjournal.com/topics/container-ecosystems/restructured-docker-inc-sells-platform-business-to-mirantis/

And also about the Future of Containers, you should know Red Hat Linux Enterprise.
The only one Commercial Linux Distribution (and CentOS as the Free and Open Source Variant from it),
and they are using also the Container Technology.

https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/containers/what-is-docker

Further Red Hat is a BIG Player in the Linux World. They are contributing a lot of Code to the Linux Kernel,
and in my Opinion without them, Linux wouldn't be on this Point where it is today.

Even Microsoft loves Linux > https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/windowsserver/2015/05/06/microsoft-loves-linux/

But i don't trust Microsoft and this Message, but it's my personal Opinion.

So yes a Container based Solution for iStripper on Linux could be indeed an opportunity 😊

Ah, thanks for the heads up. I didn't know that before.

@JayZ971 which discussion thread ?

Anyway, i have updated both of my scenes packs (bedroom_neon + glass_office) and add girls names in them.
I'll add names in my future scenes :)

https://mega.nz/folder/8doXEBza#Q9mC0oU0r6Net2ZTjIm1Jg

when i get most to all my cards i want i might get this if i have a good VR system

@willyweekly

If we temporarily ignore all but the possibility of winning 10 credits - i.e. getting you money vack for a card then on average for each 100 cards bought you would expect to win 50 times - but with a standard deviation on that number being equal to its square root which is just over 7. This in turn means that you should not be at all surprised to get a result that is anything up to 2 standard deviations away (i.e. anything in the range 36 to 64, in fact about 50% of the results should be outside of this range) nor should you be too surprised by results that are 3 deviations away from the average (though at that level you can legitimately begin to wonder).

Your results are quite consistant with the true probabilty of winning being 50%. Including the other prizes would significantly complicate the calculations but not in a way to invalidate the hypothesis that the odds are 50-50. If the larger prizes are considered then the odds of winning the most common prize of just 10 credits will go down so that in the short term you will tend to lose but the rare wins of 50 and even rarer wins of 100 would compensate this.

Now I do not say that the game is definately fair in this technical sense with regard to the long term outcome, but as yet I have seen no proof that it is not. Indeed I would expect that there would be a small bias in favour of the house - like that given by any zeroes on a roulette wheel.

Note, a casino can make a profit on an absolutely fair game like this (e.g. a roulette wheel with no zeroes) because given a run of small losses a customer may stop playing whereas the casino, having deeper pockets, can typically afford to wait longer and also gets the benefit of the averaging effect of having many customers which damps out the random variations,

I am also curious if the odd are different because you can't win cards. If you can't win one of the prizes, then that must change the probability.

In at least some of the previous scratch games if your collection rules out winning free cards then this possibility has been invisibly replaced by getting your money back, which for this game would be a 10 credit prize. I do not know if that is the case for the current game.

I'm not sure what you're suggesting. Is is that those could be distrubtion methods if Totem ever makes and official Linux version of iStripper?

As for the future of containters, I think it's pretty solid. Much of the Cloud runs in containers now, and I don't see that changing until something even more efficient is invented.

@TheEmo

I did not come to this conclusion. In the end I got this SEC after buying 120 scratch cards, and had 10 credits more than I started with. For me there does not seem to have been much of a change.
OK, so based on your claim that you were getting about the same "break even" odds as in previous events, I decided to buy another 100 cards "for science" and then post my exact results from both sets of 100 cards.

First 100 cards, which I bought back on Friday (prior to my earlier post) yielded the following:
66 -- no win
30 -- 10 credits
4 -- 50 credits
0 -- 100 credits
0 -- SEC
(net loss of 500 credits)

Second set of 100 cards, purchased today:
27 -- no win
67 -- 10 credits
6 -- 50 credits
0 -- 100 credits
0 -- SEC
(net loss of 30 credits)

Combined, over the 200 cards, that makes:
93 -- no win
97 -- 10 credits
10 -- 50 credits
0 -- 100 credits
0 -- SEC

As you can see, there's a HUGE difference in the "no-win" versus "10-credit" outcomes between the two sets.

Because of the relatively large prizes of 50 and 100 credits compared to the 10 credit cost of a scratch card, with corresponding low odds of winning them, you need to try far more than 100 cards before you can make a reasonable estimate of the long term odds for these games.
While I totally agree that 100 (or even 200) cards is not a statistically significant number for determining the odds of things like the 100-credit wins, it should be a realtively decent number of trials for determining the "10-credit" and "no win" chances. And while it's true that the differences between my results on Friday and my results today could be due to just very odd luck, I personally think (especially given Totem's track record for screwed-up coding) that it's probably more likely that something was very broken with the game before, and they fixed it sometime between Friday and today. When did you buy your 120 cards?

My hunch (just a guess) was that for people like me with all the cards that couldn't get normal card wins, perhaps the game was previously giving them a "no win" in place of a normal-card win, and is now giving them a "10-credit" win in place of the normal-card win. Indeed, my results today look much, much closer to what I've seen in past scratch-off events.

[Edit: Just for reference... In both cases (both days), I purchased all the scratch cards in 20-card batches, though I wouldn't suspect that it makes any difference.]

I am also curious if the odd are different because you can't win cards. If you can't win one of the prizes, then that must change the probability.

Petite question.

Hier soir j'ai décidé de faire jouer 5 cartes. J'ai déselectionner toutes les autres, car je ne voulais voir que les filles de ces cartes en les faisant danser dans différentes scènes.

Je ne suis rendu compte que parfois dans les scènes avec plusieurs filles qui dansent, il y avait des rectangles blancs, qui apparaîssaient à la place des filles.

Est-ce que cela s'est déjà produit pour vous, et est-ce que quelqu'un sait pourquoi cela se produit ?

Je n'ai jamais remarqué cela, lorsque toutes mes cartes sont sélectionnées.

J'ai fait une recherche sur le forum, mais je ne trouve rien à ce sujet.

Il faut dire que ma mauvaise compréhension de l'anglais n'aide pas.

Je ne suis pas capable de faire de capture d'écran, car la scène disparaît, lorsque je veux le faire.

Merci.