Check the date when this thread started!
Old rules.
Check the instructions for this weeks redraw - no mention of free redraws for the first 10.

Félicitations aux gagnants!!!!

Well deserved!

Progressive redraw

Today we launch a new formula of one of your favorite promo, the progressive packs.
As usual, the more booster packs you buy, the bigger discount you get!
Ranging from 20% to 56%, on top of your member status discount!

This progressive offer also includes a system of redraw.
You can redraw for free the 10 first times as long as you stay on the 20% step, then each redraw at level 20% & 24% will cost ONE credit, level 28% to 32% : redraw will cost 2 credits, level 36% to 40% : redraw will cost 3 credits, level 44% to 48 % : redraw will cost 4 credits and level 52% to 56% : redraw will cost you 5 credits :-P

We're here to answer your questions !

This didn't work for me. My first redraw still deducted credits :/

Vous pouvez amener Sharon à chaque fois et je l’obtiendrais à coup sûr.

Et bien, même commentaire que :
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/47808/1?post=714130
Ne vous en déplaise 😜

[quote] You can bring Sharon anytime and I would get it for sure. [/ quote]
Well, same comment as:
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/47808/1?post=714130
Do not mind 😜

@KingVCrimson - good attitude 👍

As my old Mum would say "If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all” 😊

And "You Can't Always Get What You Want" (Mick Jagger, Rolling Stones - who looks like my old mum!!!) 😉

Ses pieds sont beaucoup plus beau vernis 😋😋Content de son retour même si j'etait pas un grand fan

Sandra Blonde High society #1231 topless table clip beautiful 2 second kitty flash..Natalia starr Expert Tease #534 topless table behind taskbar very nice tiny thong tease as she's climbing up.

@KingVCrimson

there will always be comments like @Marionlover, but this make no difference.

That is true ... unfortunately,
https://www.istripper.com/de/forum/thread/47808/1?post=714130
but it is what it is i guess ... so whatever :)

She is on of my favorites so I wont mind if there is a Take 3 ;-)

Sharon is indeed another great Discovery from the Team and exactly like i would like to see Ariana again,
i'm jumping with you in the same Boat for Sharon 😎

And i still think that the Team did a Fantastic Job 👍 so far,
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46725/1
regardless the Travel Restrictions with our Nasty Friend SarsCov.

What I most like is that she's always XXX.
there will always be comments like @Marionlover, but this make no difference.
You can bring Sharon every time and I would get her for sure.
There are other girls are not my type but avoid bad comments since I know other users would like them.
She is on of my favorites so I wont mind if there is a Take 3 ;-)

😲

Déception

It's from Futurama.
Look here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f8sjzETQ5o

Sorry - what is snu snu?

Nice big girl 👍
she can give you snu snu 😆

Congratulations to the beauty, every success next month. 😍😘😈💖🔥

Why would it be any different ?
You said before:

Neither of us has anywhere near enough data to justify the claim that the odds strongly favour the house
With a few games "Wheel Of Bargains" you will have enough data to justify the claim that the odds strongly favour the house .... not for a judge but for yourself.

The guy is gonna defend totem no matter what as if he works for them or something while purposely arguing with anybody who has an opposing opinion. Just not worth it. I am just gonna stop. I spent a lot of money in the short time I was here and you and I and him all know how these games work even when it comes to sec's cards.

Why would it be any different ?

You said before:

Neither of us has anywhere near enough data to justify the claim that the odds strongly favour the house

With a few games "Wheel Of Bargains" you will have enough data to justify the claim that the odds strongly favour the house .... not for a judge but for yourself.

this game looks like same chance for every field, but it is not, the lowest discounts have priority,

That is just how I had expected it to behave - i.e. the higher value prizes being rarer than the lower valued ones as they are in other games. Why would it be any different ?

The results for a single user comprise a microscopically small sample for determining if the odds are in your favour ot not. As i have just gone to great lengths to explain even if the odds are such that the game is fair then you are much more likely to lose out unless you play a huge number of games - at least several thousands, a few hundred is not enough.

Play the Wheel Of Bargains next time. 6 fields, 10%, 20%, 35%, 50%, 70%, Free. Statistical the "Free" Field should appear every 6th game. Play just 10 Games then you won´t repeat your statement. You will determine that this game looks like same chance for every field, but it is not, the lowest discounts have priority, and you don´t need hundrets of games for realizing it. It´s the same with a shell player on the bazaar. You don´t need to play 100 games to know he is tricking you. You might have no evidence, thats right, but you know it and you won´t continue playing except you are an ***** or you wanna ***** money for some reason.

D'accord avec cette distinction.😍 😍 😘 😘 ❤️ ❤️ 💋 💋 🔥 🔥 👍 👍 ! ! !

@pacman52766 I know it would be good to upgrade old cards, but it seems they have done all they can.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46093/2?post=706427

The results for a single user comprise a microscopically small sample for determining if the odds are in your favour ot not. As i have just gone to great lengths to explain even if the odds are such that the game is fair then you are much more likely to lose out unless you play a huge number of games - at least several thousands, a few hundred is not enough.

In a fair game (such as betting on single numbers at roulette played with a wheel without zeroes) when the outcomes are averaged over a large number of games the expected value of a player's winnings will be zero but the expected outcome for any player of any particular spin, or short series of spins, will be the loss of the money that was bet.

You are, in my opinion, quite right that the games do not suit you - nor do they suit me. Neither of us has anywhere near enough data to justify the claim that the odds strongly favour the house. It may be true, but equally so it may be false - we simply do not know despite any beliefs we may have.

I dont care whatever I am takeing a break from this place for a while.

The results for a single user comprise a microscopically small sample for determining if the odds are in your favour ot not. As i have just gone to great lengths to explain even if the odds are such that the game is fair then you are much more likely to lose out unless you play a huge number of games - at least several thousands, a few hundred is not enough.

In a fair game (such as betting on single numbers at roulette played with a wheel without zeroes) when the outcomes are averaged over a large number of games the expected value of a player's winnings will be zero but the expected outcome for any player of any particular spin, or short series of spins, will be the loss of the money that was bet.

You are, in my opinion, quite right that the games do not suit you - nor do they suit me. Neither of us has anywhere near enough data to justify the claim that the odds strongly favour the house. It may be true, but equally so it may be false - we simply do not know despite any beliefs we may have.

I added the iStripper Logo to one of my previous Scenes, so you can choose between two Versions from it.

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1u3ERsgjMsTi6p8WlrIMH3gNBDKBQXeiQ

Today, she comes back with a tiny tiny bikini that will drive you crazy!

Indeed @celine indeed 😊 and in these moments i'm really really glad that i found that Image,
https://www.istripper.com/de/forum/thread/29408/62#post703846
for my Scenes. Well deserved! Sharon ❤️ 🔥 💋

She is so damn sexy 😍

@mausy61 Hi yes, it restarts from the beginning.

We are pleased to announce that Sharon White has been named Talent of the Month of July 2021!

Sharon White is a rare beauty from Budapest; she has a natural ease for seduction and the perfection of her body almost drove the stylists team crazy when they had to choose the outfits she would wear!

Beyond her physical perfection, Sharon White is also a lovely person, sweet and smiling and a wonderful performer when it comes to dancing and stripping!




She was sooo perfect during her take 1 that we organized her take 2 even before she left the studio!
And what take 2!! She started by embodying the German soccer team with an amazing sensuality!



Today, she comes back with a tiny tiny bikini that will drive you crazy!



And you are not at the end of your surprises, especially with the stunning show we'll release on July 12!!!

Thank you for the great experience you offer us, Sharon, in our endless thirst of exploring all the beauty & sensuality a woman can express 😍

is it supposed to go back to 20% after you get to higher level

Been a member for 12 years. Have over 3000 shows and some of my favorites were the classics. Waiting for a resolution update for those so you can actually enjoy them again....... Hint Hint ....... get it done!

Note For anyone who had a problem compiling the earlier parent scene
FG108P please note I have made some ***** code adjustment since,
that should fix any compile problems. (req. re-download)

Pour tous ceux qui ont eu un problème pour compiler la scène parentale précédente
FG108P s'il vous plaît noter que j'ai fait quelques ajustements de code mineurs depuis
cela devrait résoudre tous les problèmes de compilation.

https://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ET_FractalGarden108.zip

Lol, we see a new list and order as SE card not yet able to arrange for full collectors besides using joker card.As well some people who know what to do when in lockdowns :-) quite a lot new full collectors

However, as you reintroduced the topic of gambling, what is your evidence for your apparent view that games the here have "the odds are set for mostly against you"?

I would say my evidence is 1261 cards left + 25 sec cards in my collection I will never own. hundreds of dollers in slots and not a single fucking 1. many lottto tickits and not 1 single win. Get real!

@PSEUDO6ISME

The text you quote, and the whole post it came from, had nothing to do with the gambling games. It was a reply to an implicit suggestion that a particular kind of special offer, one that would correspond to a permanent price reduction if repeated often enough, be made far more frequently than it is.

However, as you reintroduced the topic of gambling, what is your evidence for your apparent view that games the here have "the odds are set for mostly against you"? As far as I can tell the overall odds for the games neither favour Totem nor the players (or at least are not greatly biased either way). But the data available to me do not allow me to be at all certain of this. Of course most players lose out, but some make large gains.

Let me illustrate this point with a very simple type of game. Consider a game in which the organisers sell 1000 lottery tickets for 1 euro each, draws one at random and gives the winner a prize of 1000 euros. This is an absolutely fair game in which each participant has the same chance of winning and the organisers gain no monetary reward - nevertheless there will be 999 losers for every winner.

As far as the individual players are concerned the game would be exactly the same if the organisers bought one of the tickets for themselves, the only difference is that the organisers themselves are taking the same risk of losing as the ordinary players and have the same chance of winning the 1000 euro prize. So still an absolutely fair game.

When such a game is repeated very many times then on average the gains and losses even out both for the organisers and for the players, but because the organisers participate in all the games while an individual player participates in far fewer the organisers can be more sure of their result than any individual player. This is still an absolutely fair game though now there is an asymmetry between the organisers and the players because the organisers can be more sure of breaking even than an individual player, but the organisers also now have a small risk of making a much bigger loss than any player (and an equally small chance of making a much bigger gain).

When there are several different prizes, a few of high value and many of low value the analysis is more difficult - but there can still be an absolutely fair game, one that does not favour the organisers, in which almost everybody will lose out but this is compensated for by the high value prizes. All of this for games that would be absolutely fair in all respects.

Because we mainly see posts from the those that have lost out on the games we get a distorted view of them.

This is not to say that the games are fair in the way I have described, only that from the results that we see we can not tell if they are or not.

@Rhea

Progressive Redraw the last months is kind of stupid for me, like, this time I got 9 out of 10 cards that I don’t like, seriously, why should I even consider a redraw, especially only for the 20% discount?
And I am sorry to repeat myself. In any business the purpose of such offers is to get us to increase our spending not to reduce it. This is done in part by persuading us to buy things that we would otherwise not buy. In general special offers are not there to make it cheaper for us to get what we want or even to increase the number of things sold. These may be used as the means to the end desired by the seller but they are not the primary purpose of the offers.

What you seem to be asking for comes close to being a simple reduction in price which, if the base price is close to optimum (for the seller), would reduce income not increase it. Totem do, in fact, occasionally make offers of that general kind, but it would be against their interest to do so continuously.

It's good to increase money in business and the problem with how companies do it to what the customers want. All this gambling why not just add a poker game and give us the option to buy chips when we run out or wait for more to be delivivered for free ounce a day. Lots of money in that. instead new players who join will have a ever growing amount of sec cards in there collection which you can argue its for the best of the company but in all honesty not really a good look or a good way of doing buesness. You can compare it to the pay to win games etc. Just not right. There are better ways to make money then you have to gamble hundreds of dollers were the odds are set for mostly against you which compared to a online a poker game in the actual market it would be illegal.

Yes, it works for me now as well. FG 110 is fine now. Thank you very much @EverthangForever .

And thank you for your explaination as well, @TheEmu . Your Scenes all work pretty good, personally I do not care about the white backgrounds in the preview. But if you want me to test something feel free to ask. I´ll try then.


Cheers

Thank you! This is an instant buy for me! Sasha is a sexual goddess! 🔥💖💕😍

Congratz to all on the awards!

The scene FG110 before correction, had a white background both in the preview and in the real scene.

I know - but I was replying to @JuppKowalski and explaining why the scenes of mine he mentioned were OK when run but showed white areas in their previews, which had nothing to do with FG110's problem - which is why I addressed him and did not refer to FG110's problem at all.

In fact the two problems may be due to the same sort of coding error - a mismatch in the number of components between a value and what it is being assigned to with the compiler "helpfully" accepting the bad code - but if so they are in very different places. Or they may be due to very different types of error, I have no way of knowing.

This is the june 2021 iStripper’s Hall of Fame !

• Collection award Rewards the 3 members who have purchased the biggest number of shows during the month.
• Full Sets award Rewards the 3 members who have completed the biggest number of full sets of models' shows during the month.

These members get a decoration on their profile picture for one month! (Make sure you have a nice avatar picture on yours!)
You will also find here a ranking of the top 250 active members with the largest collections of shows. If there is equality between members, they are sorted from the oldest to the most recently registered.
Congratulations to all!

However, when generating the scene previews the program gets it wrong and instead of just setting the alpha component to 1.0 it seems to also set the red, green and blue components to 1.0 as well - so we see white pixels in the previews but properly coloured ones in the full sized versions.

The scene FG110 before correction, had a white background both in the preview and in the real scene.

@JuppKowalski

OK, and in addition to that I can say that i donwnloaded some scenes from @TheEmu as well and in my scene library of the Istripper Software they appear the same ( with white background) but when i play this scenes they work just fine. (For example: Bana Split and Ergometer Scenes).

I often use a technique where the same image is used for both the foreground and the background of a scene. When I do this I have edited the image such that the pixels in the part that only appears in the backgound have an alpha channel value of 0.0 (i.e. transparent) whereas those that are part of the foreground are assigned an alpha channel value of 1.0 (opaque) while, for all pixels, the red, green and blue channels are left unchanged from their original values. When used for a background the sprites for such images use the "blend: false" option which tells the system to ignore the alpha channel values encoded in the image and treat them as having an alpha value of 1.0.

However, when generating the scene previews the program gets it wrong and instead of just setting the alpha component to 1.0 it seems to also set the red, green and blue components to 1.0 as well - so we see white pixels in the previews but properly coloured ones in the full sized versions.

Problème corrigé. Merci beaucoup @EverthangForever 😊

Hourra tu as fait ma journée 😉

Ha,ha Bravo, c'est gagné 👍👍 Ha, ha Bravo, it's won 👍👍

one final last try for FG110 with thanks to
@DAN070 @JupKowalski @Philours @ComteDracula
and all others who might benefit..

FG110
Example of layering two shaders
via alpha length coding on a
transparent rendered quad

https://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ET_FractalGarden110.zip

fingers crossed

FG 110 Possible error and location.

J'ai le même problème également sur version 1.2.242 . Quoi qu'il en soit nous patienterons en vous remerciant @EverthangForever 😉
I have the same problem also on version 1.2.242. Anyway we will wait and thank you @EverthangForever 😉

OK, and in addition to that I can say that i donwnloaded some scenes from @TheEmu as well and in my scene library of the Istripper Software they appear the same ( with white background) but when i play this scenes they work just fine. (For example: Bana Split and Ergometer Scenes).

THX so far @EverthangForever and @TheEmu and all the other creative people here for the great scenes you already created.


Cheers