witch one of her shows is the best

nice choice

Anyway: "plain" cards don't (usually) have any XXX clips, but XXX cards usually have many (in most cases, majority of) "plain" clips. So they may have something to please "plain clips" lovers too.

Personally I am happy with both the "plain" and the XXX side of iStripper.
I like plain cards too, and never would ask them to be quite reduced or eliminated - a thing that, instead, I always have been seeing several plain card fans repeatedly to ask about XXX cards.

@arise77

If you ask a friend what s/he's been up to recently, do you expect her/him to talk about stuff
from 5 years ago or from their childhood? 😀

If i had Friends i would spend my Time now with them for sure, instead of wasting my Time
to Hijack a Thread on the Internet, just saying 😎

Welcome on the forum @Nectarded and have fun with iStripper 😎

Not Exactly new. But first time to post on the forum. I figure if I submit feedback the company will at least teach some of the ladies to dance. 😂 I dunno i guess im just "that guy" that prefers classy and elegant beauty than ***** sexual attraction. Anyways hope everyone is doing well. -StayHumble

@Wyldanimal
Thanks for trying to answer, but you're not addressing my question.
I understand that all other games pick cards randomly from all collections except Vg classic. We also figured out that this game works just like the others.
The issue here is why state a different rule if it's just the same as for the other games?

When you read this rule:
"The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago."
Where do you see the notion of randomness over collections from 2007 up to 30 days ago?

If you ask a friend what s/he's been up to recently, do you expect her/him to talk about stuff from 5 years ago or from their childhood? 😀

Maybe an Image helps better
three hypothetical members
Member A, Member B, Member C
Cards are Random but Only from the Most Recent Available Cards Not already Owned.
( it is all inclusive of all the cards not already owned )

Member A would have Random Cards Stating from Year 2016 all inclusive to 2007

Member B would have Random Cards Starting with Year 2021 including years 2019, 2015, 2014

Member C would have Random Cards Starting with Year 2020 including years 2019, 2018, 2008, 2007

The card selection is different for each Member.

Because the Selection is Random from All Most Recent Cards NOT owned
you could get many, many Spins that do not include any from your Most Recent Year.
Randomness is just that.

Perso, j'ai dépassé le stade du show XXX ou pas XXX. Aujourd'hui j'en suis rendu à acheter une carte uniquement en fonction de l'allure de la miss et de sa tenue vestimentaire. Pour ce qui est du show, je n'y trouve pas/plus de vraies hardeuses et encore moins de vraies danseuses. Je pense qu'il doit y avoir aussi un effet de lassitude, qui sait.

Personally, I've gone beyond the stage of XXX show or not XXX. Today I've come to the point where I buy a card solely on the basis of the miss's looks and her attire. As far as the show is concerned, I don't find any real hardcore girls and even less real dancers. I think there must also be a weariness effect, who knows.

If you still hesitate to invest in a VR headset, this video will convince you in a second!!!

And if you're already in VR, stick yourself on your chair, Paola Hard is just STUNNING !!!

Click here to start your trip: https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/f992e87fa1ea9dec

My Goddess! 😍

Paola Hard is a 20-year-old spanish beauty, she started her career in adult modeling in 2020 and hasn't stopped touring since.

One of the things that most marked the team is her ability to adapt to all situations and all requests ...

Pornstar for other productions, she is at iStripper a goddess of seduction and sensuality ... She poses wonderfully and her youth probalby contributes to her freshness and enthusiasm.

She can just as easily embody an exuberant school girl as a femme fatale, a dominant SM, a fierce bride or a daring pastry chef ... and you are not at the end of your surprises with the 5 shows not released yet...:)

If we had to blame her for something, it would be her impatience :) She can't keep still and is always eager to put on a show :)

We are extremely happy to name Paola Hard our iStripper of the Month of August 2021.

Here is an overview of her shows, just for our eyes' pleasure :

Full show Full show Full show Full show Full show Full show

And don't forget her absolutely STUNNING VR180 performances:

https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/ddce85087c8b8e61
https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/f992e87fa1ea9dec

Congratulations, Paola !! Looking forward to seeing you again 😍

My love!

c'est ce que j'ai demandé dans mon post original :

Tout à fait exact, c'est pourquoi j'ai tenté de te répondre😊Mais tu auras peut-être une réponse officielle😶😉

Haha justement, une clarification 😄 c'est ce que j'ai demandé dans mon post original :

Could you please clarify from which point/date/year cards are considered "the most recent"? And therefore which ones are not recent? Thanks.

Pourquoi ne pas faire une simple correction ?

Disons une clarification, alors 👌😉 Si tu veux, pourquoi pas. Proposition est donc faite à totem 😊
Let's say a clarification, then 👌😉 If you want, why not. Proposition is therefore made to totem 😊

@Philours
On est d'accord, on peut tous constater que cette règle ne s'applique pas et que finalement toutes les collections sauf Vg classic sont incluses. Pourquoi ne pas faire une simple correction ?

Welcome on the forum @Azalin it's better late than never 😀
Have fun with iStripper 😎

I get it. The rule says "most recent", the cards drawn are not "among the most recent", so in fact it's just like all the other games, cards are just randomly selected from all collections.
Then why add this rule if it doesn't apply?

@arise77
Je comprend bien votre interrogation. Si vous vous souvenez de mon post précédent : cartes plus récentes = toutes sauf cartes classiques (considérées comme anciennes) Alors la description du jeu peut être considérée comme correcte.
Il ne faut peut-être pas chercher plus loin que cela 😉😊
@arise77
I understand your question. If you remember my previous post: newer cards = all except classic cards (considered old) then the game description can be considered correct.
Maybe we shouldn't look any further than that 😉😊

I had over 300 cards available in the store from 2019 and 2020 even excluding the previous 30 days ones. Why aren't any of these selected then?
Like all of the Events, not all of the win options will be to your liking,
in that case your option is to spin again, or to not play.

Randomness is just that, it's random...
5 spins, 40 spins, 100 spins is not enough to draw precise evaluation of the random odds.

the results of the spin are based on the NOT owned cards for that particular Member.
but it doesn't mean that ALL of the results will be as expected.

So if the spin results do not meet with your likings, then you can Spin again, or not.

You said it in an earlier post: For a member who doesn't have cards from 2020. Most recent will be cards starting from 2020.
At least you tried to give an explanation for "most recent".

The rule doesn't say "cards are randomly selected from all collections except ...", it says "selected among the most recent cards not in your collection and more than 30 days old". I'm not the one making the rules.

Where does it say anything about member's liking? Where did I say anything about my liking?
I replied to your post saying I had many more recent cards available in the store; in fact between 400 & 500 were more recent than cards from 2016.

I get it. The rule says "most recent", the cards drawn are not "among the most recent", so in fact it's just like all the other games, cards are just randomly selected from all collections.
Then why add this rule if it doesn't apply?

I just noticed the time - if you are going for this good luck - I will not get in the way - ready - steady - go! 😄

Maybe the XXX customers are more profitable now, so iStripper is moving towards more xxx content. Totem's business model has changed over the last couple of years, as they introduce the SECs, games and costume sales. These seem to increase margins and profitability, probably because studio time is less for each $ earned. We don't know that xxx customers play games and spend more, but Totem does. It wouldn't be a surprise if the mix changes to accommodate this.

@Wyld this is so true about randomness. 😎 I remember the early ages of microcomputers some people were creating massive database with all results of the national loterie for the past decades in the hope to play highly probable combinations... 😂

But one point to be strictly accurate. Totem is using pseudo-random generators in their algorithms. That is the bias brought by computing to randomness. 😋

But your explanations and conclusions remain valid anyway. 👍

far from a Hard site

Absolutely, nothing made by iStripper in my view gets anywhere near the hardcore range.

Felicitaciones para Paola¡¡¡¡¡ Lo tiene muy merecido.

@TheEmu,
Plus de variété n'est pas forcément dans chaque carte, mais dans l'ensemble des cartes. Et je devient plus sélectif également depuis l'arrêt de mon abonnement Premium. Mais pour des raisons inverses aux vôtres. 😉
Et franchement, je ne trouve rien de répugnant sur iStripper. Nous sommes encore loin d'un site Hard 😆
@TheEmu,
More variety is not necessarily in each map, but in all maps. And I have also become more selective since the end of my Premium subscription. But for reasons opposite to yours. 😉
And frankly, I can't find anything disgusting about iStripper. We are still far from a Hard site 😆

XXX is here to stay...

@HansSachs - I was not disputing that. It is not what I would prefer but I am quite happy to acknowledge that the present mix is probably about right for Totem.

I was, however, disputing the text that I quoted, namely

The more features, the better - and more people pleased.

It was this, and only this, that I was making a brief comment on.

The casualy accepted statement that more variety, no matter what, within a card will automatically satisfy more people is not true.

If it was true then it would imply that Totem should include all sorts of activities, beyond simple XXX action, in many or most cards even if many or most of their customers would find them repulsive. There are almost certainly a significant number of members that do not buy any card that is tagged "anal" and including that in all cards would, in my opinion, reduce overall sales. The same is also likely to be the case with XXX rated clips - hence the existance of cards that do not have any and the likelyhood that such cards will continue to be made

The recent apparent trend to more XXX, and slightly more extreme forms of it (I am thinking of the "squirting" cards) is beginning to affect my purchasing habits. I will not be automatically purchasing every card from now on, though I will probably still buy almost all at least for the next month or so but eventually I will reduce to the point where my Premium membership will not be cost effective and I will cancel it. I had rather arbitrarily put off making this change until I had reached the 5000 card mark but had been considering it since the start of the year.

Superb!!
She well deserves this...her assets are just awesome and anyone would love to see all those with eyes wide open...
She is now in my wishlist..🙂

Sup'! @Azalin! You're a very selective buyer! Your buying restraint is legendary! I hope all is well your way! ✌💚😎

Definitely Mila Azul, she's just gorgeous.

@Azalin

Welcome to the Forums !

13 years and I'm still here too...
I think It's an addiction.
it's too good to let go...

I had over 300 cards available in the store from 2019 and 2020 even excluding the previous 30 days ones. Why aren't any of these selected then?

Like all of the Events, not all of the win options will be to your liking,
in that case your option is to spin again, or to not play.

Randomness is just that, it's random...
5 spins, 40 spins, 100 spins is not enough to draw precise evaluation of the random odds.

the results of the spin are based on the NOT owned cards for that particular Member.
but it doesn't mean that ALL of the results will be as expected.

So if the spin results do not meet with your likings, then you can Spin again, or not.

I used to play roulette, quite a lot.
I spend a hours tracking the spin results to make my own Hot and Cold number list.
when I had Cold numbers than had not come up in 200 spins
I'd start to bet heavier on them, and double up every 5 spins
Because I thought,
It's been 300 spins and they have to come up..

Well 1000 spins later, and $100 lost,
the COLD numbers still had not come up.

but some of the HOT numbers must have came up 10 times.

randomness is random, and you can't predict it, or pattern it.

There are those of us that liked VGHD precisely because there was an almost total absense of sexualy explict content.

I'm one of them. :)

@Philours
Dans la trentaine de fois où j'ai essayé ce jeu l'*****ée dernière, les cartes "récentes" justement (de 2019 ou 2020 par ex) sont très rarement apparues - d'où ma question. Comme tu dis, j'ai peut-être simplement été malchanceux.

Effectivement, j'ai déjà posé cette question plusieurs fois, et merci d'avoir tenté de m'apporter une réponse. 😊
Pour l'instant nous n'avons que des suppositions, mais aucune réponse claire. Ce n'est pas si évident, puisque même les membres qui ont répondu ont une interprétation différente de cette phrase. Peut-être que cette fois-ci nous aurons une réponse, qui sait... 😉

J'imagine que la personne qui a écrit cette phrase dans le règlement sait à quoi correspondent ces cartes dites "récentes".


Out of 30 or so spins last year, "recent" cards (from 2019 or 2020 for example) showed up very rarely - hence my question. As you said, maybe I was just unlucky.

You're right, I have already asked this question several times, and thank you for trying to answer. 😊
So far we only had guesses, but no clear answer. It isn't so obvious after all, since even the members who answered have a different interpretation of this sentence. Maybe this time we will have an answer, who knows... 😉

I imagine that the person who wrote this sentence in the rules knows which ones are the so-called "recent" cards.

@TallandSlimMan thanks for confirming. 👍

I will remind to all that Totem did publish the list of best selling cards of 2020: out of 20 best sellers, vaste majority has been XXX - and moreover, almost all first placed ones have been XXX.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46902/1?post=698311

XXX is here to stay...

Very well deserved!
She's so beautiful and skilled like a succubus that sucks you dry while she ***** you with her gorgeous eyes!

Almost five years now! I am still new here.

The more features, the better - and more people pleased.

That may be true, and quite probably is, but it is not necessarily so. There are those of us that liked VGHD precisely because there was an almost total absense of sexualy explict content.

Yes...well. I haven't played this particular game, but I have played past games with this exact same language.

My post from April of this year:

"The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago."

There are 458 cards I do not own which were released in 2019, 2020. or 2021. These are the ones I would consider "most recent". I tried a test spin. The four cards offered were released in 2013 (!!!) 2015 (!!!) 2017 (!!!) and 2021.

iStripper is great just because it has all.
Here we can see sexy dance, nude dance, tease, stripping and yes, masturbation too. Why not?
The more features, the better - and more people pleased.

By the way, most XXX cards contain 2/3 up to 4/5 of softcore clips...

So well deserved and couldn't be happier to see this! For much of the time the last few weeks, my istripper has become a Paola-Hard-machine, she has something 100% enticing for me and glad to see it recognized in that. Looking forward to many more shows, Paola!

If you want to see girls masturbating you have tons of options. If you want to see most of the XXX girls on this app masturbating, you can find them on many other sites. This kind of soft-core content is unique and is what made the brand what it is. Is that what Istripper is doing now? Catering to people like you who don't even like the product?

👍

Without XXX cards i would probably stop buying their product because not interested on dancing shows.
There are multiple sites for non XXX shows for people interested in that kind of soft-core.

Are you kidding me? If you want to see girls masturbating you have tons of options. If you want to see most of the XXX girls on this app masturbating, you can find them on many other sites. This kind of soft-core content is unique and is what made the brand what it is. Is that what Istripper is doing now? Catering to people like you who don't even like the product?

I'm not against them releasing 1 or 2 XXX cards a week, but for them to release more XXX than stripping shows or even a 50/50 split is kind of ridiculous to me. There are some models who only have XXX shows now. I really like Sasha Meow and was excited to see that she shaved her bush. But every single one of her new cards are XXX? WTF is that?

#05 and climbing. Old timers are slacking on the SEC's it seems :D

So true ...😆

Most Deserving, She is Great in VR.😜😍

Well deserved I'm totally convinced about that ! - Most of all I guess Paola is basically that kind of Model that really loves to share her Erotics with good Peoples ( Men and Women) and Fans - Peoples and Fans who love her Erotics in a Heartful good and kind way and it is an Art as well. When an Erotic Model does a Show etc. she should think only at all good Peoples with Love in their Heart in the Ordiance and not "at the other" Peoples. Love, Life, Freedom, Art and Fantasy and Understanding must win in the End and that's all ! 💙👍👍💖👍

Congratulations Paola !!! and eagerly awaiting your next show.😘❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

@arise
Salut, peut-être , juste pas de chance dans le tirage des cartes qui te sont proposées😉
Ce n'est pas la première fois que tu t'étonnes à ce sujet 😊Je comprend bien ton exemple des personnes de + de 50 ans.
Les réponses que tu as reçues sont valables , bien sûr.
Je ne suis ni Celine, ni Manue, mais si tu comprends, comme moi, que les cartes les plus récentes sont toutes les cartes sauf la collection classique, alors la solution est trouvée 😀😀😀
@arise
Hi, maybe, just bad luck in the draw of the cards that are offered to you😉
This is not the first time that you are surprised about this 😊I understand your example of people over 50 years old.
The answers you received are valid, of course.
I'm neither Celine nor Manue, but if you understand, like me, that the most recent cards are all cards except the classic collection, then the solution is found 😀😀😀

Not Sonya, Freya or Tatiana ?

@wesley077 - their time will come.

If you look at the following link you will see, in the first post from @celine, the criteria on which the winner is selected.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46541/1?post=693470

Number of sales is a primary factor and hence Paola with more shows in her catalogue released or available last month and selling strongly will probably be ahead of the others.

@arise77
"among" veut dire "parmi" et pas "seulement" (mais ça tu le sais déjà). Donc quand @celine écrit "parmi les plus récentes" cela ne signifie pas "seulement parmi les plus récentes". La nuance est bien là, on peut recevoir des cartes récentes (sorties il y a 30 jours ou plus), mais pas que.
Bonne journée quand même 😎

@stefnev1
Justement, "parmi" est suivi d'un groupe défini, indiquant une limite. Par exemple, si je dis "parmi les personnes de plus de 50 ans" cela n'inclut que les personnes de 50 ans et +, mais cela exclut aussi les personnes de moins de 50 ans, logiquement. Donc ce qui ne fait pas partie du groupe énoncé après "parmi" est exclu.
Je pense que ce que tu voulais dire était : "cartes récentes incluses parmi toutes les collections"
Bonne journée également 😉

@Members
You have to read the Entire rule, not just half of it.

The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago.
Most recent not in your Collection and more than 30 days old

Then why say "among the most recent ones"?
For every Member, Most Recent NOT in your collection will be different.

A member who has every Card from 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and none from 2017
Most recent will be cards starting from 2017

For a member who doesn't have cards from 2020
Most recent will be cards starting from 2020

So it depends on a members collection and which cards will be most recent to them.

@Wyldanimal
Thanks for your reply, for me the part "more than 30 days ago" is very clear. My question was about the meaning of "most recent".

So you're saying that if cards from 2020 onwards are available for me to buy, they should be drawn. At the time of my screenshot I had over 300 cards available in the store from 2019 and 2020 even excluding the previous 30 days ones. Why aren't any of these selected then?

💋💋💋🔥🔥❤️❤️

@Members
You have to read the Entire rule, not just half of it.

The cards are selected among the most recent ones not in your collection and released more than 30 days ago.

Most recent not in your Collection and more than 30 days old

Then why say "among the most recent ones"?

For every Member, Most Recent NOT in your collection will be different.

A member who has every Card from 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and none from 2017
Most recent will be cards starting from 2017

For a member who doesn't have cards from 2020
Most recent will be cards starting from 2020

So it depends on a members collection and which cards will be most recent to them.