Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

最後の投稿 - ページ#37

  掲示板

ComteDracula
Joined in Aug 2017
2773 投稿

Discussions for Scenes for Version 1.2.X Fullscreen Mode here

iStripperに関する全て
March 16, 5110 アンサー
Thank you @EverthangForever for your lovely scenes (FGA500-FGA507).

They all work well for me.

I discovered that the instability of the NVIDIA performance overlay information window when displayed, came from version 2.0., and occurred just when the user interface is opened at the same time as the scene is played back. This increases the IPS to around 260.

If the program interface is closed, and we randomly play a scene from the iStripper logo in the taskbar, this window remains stable while the scene is playing, and IPS are around 130. I have two duplicate screens.

I didn't see any random short stops in these last scenes when reading them.


Merci @EverthangForever pour vos jolies scènes (FGA500-FGA507).

Elles fonctionnent toutes bien pour moi.

J'ai découvert que l'instabilté de la fenêtre d'information NVIDIA performance overlay lorsque affichée, provenait de la version 2.0., et se produisait juste lorsque l'interface utilisateur est ouverte en même temps que la lecture de la scène. Cela fait augmenter les IPS autour de 260.

Si l'interface du programme est fermé, et que l'on fait jouer au hasard une scène à partir du logo iStripper dans la barre de tâches, cette fenêtre reste stable lorsque la scène joue, et les IPS sont autour de 130. J'ai deux écrans dupliqués.

Je n'ai pas vu dans ces dernières scènes de courts arrêts aléatoires lors de la lecture de celles-ci.
Wuzthis
Joined in Oct 2012
249 投稿

iStripper 2.0 - reveal #1 : General look and feel

iStripperに関する全て
March 15, 137 アンサー
Optional automatic preview download > ***** automatic preview download.

So unless the option is user friendly buried within 50 tiers of settings in a very gentle difficulty curve then there's plenty of "messing with little icons, cause it isn't right there"

Removal of option for automatic preview download is lovely. It's very slick.


I am trying to figure out why some people have such a negative reaction to 2.0. I have been using it since early beta (trust me, it's greatly improved since then) and prefer it quite a bit over 1.0. But there is a learning curve. If you went down that curve you would see a LOT of usability improvements, but you have to work with it. What surprises me is that people are ***** about things that are the greatest improvements over 1.0. Like the detail page for the models. You click on ANY of the model's card and RIGHT THERE you see which cards you own and which ones you could buy. No messing with little icons. It's right there.

I thought this was pretty slick and like it a lot.

From any model picture you right click and have all the menus available to manage the card, play the card, create playlists, it is ALL RIGHT THERE. You can open the clip list on a card and add different clips to different playlists and even create the playlists as you go. I have both imported and newly created playlists (a LOT of new ones, I was testing this) and it is simply VASTLY easier to create them in 2.0.

And people say how much better the old interface was! I don't get it. The old interface was, frankly, clunky. And had an even longer learning curve, NOTHING in 1.0 is obvious! And the new one, once you get used to it, is very pleasant to use.

The new 2.0 is being improved constantly and if there are things you miss (or haven't found, and yes, some of the controls are not obvious- like the preview enable / disable toggle, which IS there) you need to say what they are. Certainly the beta testers weren't shy about that, we were a noisy bunch! And some of the changes we wanted have already gotten into 2.0. And I expect more are on the list to do. But if you don't give feedback on it (based on more than a couple of hours of use) you won't get what YOU want.

And I absolutely agree that documentation is lacking. This, ah, isn't a new issue.

Btw, a number of Totem technical staff have been on vacation, they're not ignoring you. I think they're back next week.
Previous ページ#37