I would like to know more about this studio.

How the idea of creating this studio came about. Who were the people responsible for it.

Its history, when it opened and what led to its closure.

Were the shooting conditions the same as in the European studio at that time?

Was the enthusiasm of the clients the same for the American women, as for the European women for example?

Is a return of a studio in America possible or not? If not, why not?


J'aimerais en savoir plus sur ce studio.

Comment est venu l'idée de créer ce studio. Qui en était les personnes responsables.

Son historique, la date de son ouverture et ce qui a ammené sa fermeture.

Les conditions de tournage étaient-elles les même qu'au studio européen à cette époque ?

L'enthousiasme des clients était-il le même pour les femmes américaines, que les femmes européennes par exemple.

Un retour d'un studio en Amérique est-il envisageable ou non. Si non pourquoi ?

No estoy de acuerdo, Lana Lane Debió ser el talento del año. Alissa Foxy tuvo muchísimo descalzo, arruinó muchos shows con eso, y además su belleza es Ordinaria.

Maravilloso!!!! Mi Reina Refinada preferida: Mujer con Esquisita Belleza, Porte, Dsitinción y Una Extraordinaria Elegancia Sensual. Muy bien merecido. Espero que también sea el talento del año 2023, porque no. Si la vulagridad silvestre de Alissa Foxy le dió la distición de ser talento del año 2022. Lana lo merece a un MÁS por su Empatía y Generosidad.❤️❤️❤️❤️👍👍👍

Rika Fane/Skintight Latex - f1215

The Cards are Not meant to be a string of a Progression of clips cut from one Long Video.
They are Just a Bunch of Clips, some of various Levels of Eroticism.
Not meant to be Strung together to make a comprehensive chronological video.

Some cards do have clips that can form a Progression.

Thanks @Wyldanimal I know it's complicated how the shows are put together
Just wishing for a click play and having the show go from start to finish in a somewhat natural order of things

Still Love the Chicks man........
I bounce around anyways, a strip here, a pole clip there, a different girl here, a different girl diddling herself there.....
The End resuls is Always the same....Box of tissues handy
All good!

Straight hair suited her better somehow (2nd visit). Those were some of the best shows of all time!

@Dorsai6 - it was this kind of activity we tried to do a couple of years ago with a re-tagging exercise and we did discover how difficult it is.

The first thing to be done is to establish a very clear definition of what is "pantyless" so that any volunteers are working to the same definition because, believe me, a few dozen people can have a few dozen different views.

You then need a few dozen people with full collections to volunteer and commit 100% to the task in hand and the timescale - because one weak link, one person who backs out will totally piss-off the others and the exercise will collapse.

And finally you need the facilitator who will also have to be the validator - random sampling the output of the few dozen people to make sure they have followed the definition - and what does that person do if any of the few dozen went rogue?

It really is not that simple if it is to be done properly and accurately.

You use the linkset code.
Here it is:
[linkset][/linkset]And for the card of Kelly and Alissa it is:

And for two of Alissa's cards:

The card number (and the card letter) must be between the beginning and ending codes, exactly as shown in my above examples.
Only one card per linkset. The number of linksets is not limited except by total text size. Myself and others have posted dozens at once.

If you do not know the card letter:
new cards are always 'e' such as with Lana Lane or 'f' such as these links to Alissa Foxy.
The 'f' cards have the 'xxx' under the BIG letter S on the card image. This is not true of the 'e' cards.

guess it worked

@Wyldanimal

Despite what you say it is quite possible, and not very diificult, to create a playlist in which a card does play in a series of progressions each approximating a full striptease. Furthermore when the "play all clips" option was introduced that was how many (most?) cards did in fact play. They don't do so now and it is a feature that I sorely miss.

All that is needed is a few dozen volunteers.

Has there been any sign that there would be a few dozen volunteers ?

@TheEmu

A colossal task for a small team.

Yes, but this is something that can be group sourced. If a lot of people each review a few cards and report their results to a facilitator, that person could submit the result to Totem and totem's workload would be minimal. All that is needed is a few dozen volunteers. 😉

@Nebal

When the Team records a Video, it may well be one long session
that goes from Clothed, to Partially Clothed, to fully naked, to climax.

This type of session can be split up into a sequence of clips that could, later be put together in a chronological progression like you ask.

But Many times there are Multiple Shorter Sessions
They Might have 4 or 5 sessions that start fully clothed or Partially clothed, Where at the end of the short Session
the Model gets dressed again for the Start of the Next Session.

or once naked, there will be multiple short session that Start Naked.

These Sessions are then cut up to produce a random group of clips, that have no sequence from one to the next.

The 'C' series of shows ( DeskBabes ) had clips with a Scene Designation like _SC1_
All clips with the same _SCn_ were cut from the same Session and had a progression.
This is also true of some of the 'F' Series of cards (iStripperXXX)

The 'F' series of cards are often recorded in Longer sessions, and the clips can be put together in a progression.
This I think is why some of the 'F' series, have clips with duration of 5 minutes or longer.
They are cut from longer recorded sessions.

The Cards are Not meant to be a string of a Progression of clips cut from one Long Video.
They are Just a Bunch of Clips, some of various Levels of Eroticism.
Not meant to be Strung together to make a comprehensive chronological video.

Some cards do have clips that can form a Progression.

To add to @Pickle1 's reply, that 5,000+ shows he refers to comprise over 100,000 clips which need to be examined for this sort of tag. A colossal task for a small team.

😋😋😋😋

Time ago I proposed a new "pantyless" tag, but the proposal was ***** panned by TheEmu, so...only a manual search may help us :)

@Anjin62 - the problem with any new tag proposal is the effort required to go through 5,000+ shows to fiid the examples so that the tag is accurate and useful.

Some are easier than others to do. If you can set a tag by just looking at the card image, it is time consuming but possible.

But for any tag that could occur in any clip at random in a show, it is one hell of a task. If you want to know any show where the girl at some stage is pantyless, that falls into that latter category.

If you want to know shows where the girl just never wears panties, Starryk has helped you above.

You use the linkset code.
Here it is:

[linkset][/linkset]

And for the card of Kelly and Alissa it is:

[linkset]f1241[/linkset]

And for two of Alissa's cards:

[linkset]f1052[/linkset] [linkset]f0913[/linkset]

The card number (and the card letter) must be between the beginning and ending codes, exactly as shown in my above examples.
Only one card per linkset. The number of linksets is not limited except by total text size. Myself and others have posted dozens at once.

If you do not know the card letter:
new cards are always 'e' such as with Lana Lane or 'f' such as these links to Alissa Foxy.
The 'f' cards have the 'xxx' under the BIG letter S on the card image. This is not true of the 'e' cards.

My favorite cards of Alissa (based entirely on the outfits) are:
2022 Full show 2021 Full show
However, I like ALL of her cards, and am very happy to have this one
(a duo with Kelly Collins): Full show

how do u post card images/links in your msg

I typically don't like the order in which the clips are played, I think that in the past the ordering was (to my mind) usually more logical.

This @TheEmu , this is what I meant. I understand the Play All Clips feature. What I meant was a show that plays out in chronolical order- Fully clothed to naked to dildo action as in XXX cards. Not clothed, then next clip naked then next clip clothed again. Hope I'm making sense

Lana has a bunch of shows on my personal "fav shows of all time"-list.
Just an amazing woman to look at, and one of the sexiest I've ever seen.

Agreed that she's a great example of why non-xxx shows can be just as good as the xxx version.
Great body movement and facial expression is the biggest turn-on there is (along with the outfits of course)!

Very well deserved, and keep up the fantastic work! 😍🔥😍🔥

That's significant win, however the very low numbers show that it was a mistake again to limit this for DC users only. Happy to know miss Foxy did not needed my vote anyways.

Bravo Alissa !😘😍

My favorite cards of Alissa (based entirely on the outfits) are:
2022 2021
However, I like ALL of her cards, and am very happy to have this one
(a duo with Kelly Collins):

Agreed, congrats to the winner !

@Nebal - there is already the possibility to set the "show duration" slider on the options page to "all clips".

And, if you right click on an individual card's "play" button you are offered the option to "play all clips".

What is it that you want over and above these ?

I typically don't like the order in which the clips are played, I think that in the past the ordering was (to my mind) usually more logical.

Well deserved and a shining example shows don't need to be XXX to be amazing.

Glad 😘
***** Job was truly a captivating show/card 😍👍

Can Totem figure out a way to just click on Play all clips so we can watch the show from start to finish?
Start to finish, Dinner to dessert? Soup to Nut
Instead of using playlists?
For a computer dummy like myself?
Like streaming a video

That would be very cool

I wish the cards would 'pile' in my collection to keep it neat and tiddy.

I second that,
Add a 3rd type of card View Option to the My Collection Screen.
Piles or Stacked - Each Model would have Her own Pile / Stack of cards.
Then if you Hover for a second or Click on a Pile,
The Pile Fans out or expands to let you select a card.
When the Mouse leaves the Expanded cards, they go back to being a pile.

The top card of the Pile or Stack would be Controlled by the Sort Order.
Of Course, the Pile Name would be that of the Model.

Small change:

I would like to see the "Next Outfit" button changed to a clothes hanger icon instead of a skip icon. Makes more sense to me that way.

Medium change?

I wish the cards would 'pile' in my collection to keep it neat and tiddy. Already hundreds of models in the store and impressive to scoll through the 5,000+ shows there. But for my collection not so much.

Happy New Year! 2022 has been incredibly entertaining on iStripper. I am counting on you to create further magic in 2023. 💚

I was sure of that, Alissa is over the top. Congratulations my beautiful brunette and a very happy New Year 2023 to you and your family and friends. Good health, good work and all you want become reality 💋

👍 😎

Bravo Lana, well deserved 😘

I was sure of that, Alissa is over the top. Congratulations my beautiful brunette and a very happy New Year 2023 to you and your family and friends. Good health, good work and all you want become reality 💋

@Mark49
Send an e-mail to [email protected] with all the details on your demand and the customer service will answer you.

Very old thread, I close it.

Well deserved!
Very talented, very young and very beautiful!

👍

HI

how can i delete my account please

Well deserved!
Very talented, very young and very beautiful!

Congratulations Alissa! Well deserved!

Alissa is one of my favorite girls in my card collection. Looking forward to new shows from this exceptionally beautiful and charming girl.

Alissa certainly deserves this award.
So far, I own all of her cards, including the SEC.
She is an absolutely beautiful woman.
I rather like the first pic where she is having some fun with soap on her naked body. I hope that is a card.

I'm glad to officially announce that you have chosen Alissa Foxy as our iStripper Talent of the Year 2022!
Votes are unanimous, and Alissa came in first with nearly the double votes granted to the second place!

And it's perfectly well deserved! Alissa Foxy has been a charm to work with! Her eyes, her perfect body, her superb smile, the way she moves, her skills to embody any character, especially Mercredi Addams and her famous dance that Alissa has perfectly interpreted and that already went all around the web, everything in this young woman is STUNNING!

Lana is not my number one iStripper model, but she's strikingly beautiful and sexy nonetheless! I think she looks even better now...

Beautiful woman; beautiful outfit.
I wish I could enjoy at least some VR shows, but my equipment does not work well with it.
(no VR device)

Here is Svetlana in VR 180!!!
This white dress fits her incredibly and I must admit I fell in love with her super beautiful knees and legs....

Svetlana U is super natural and sweet and she delivers a great intimate show !

https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/6663952a6b2dbee0

Enjoy 😍

My talent of the year!

I totally agree. I love her eyes and her beautiful eye contact.

Wow! Up close, in the first picture, it looks even more beautiful! Her eyes are superb!

3. Eliminate the feature in small size, whereby the show is cancelled if the girl walks off the screen

There are two separate occassion when this happens.

1) The girl walks into a region not covered by a screen.

2) The girl walks off one screen onto another and drops through the floor.

The first of these requires a redesign to handle the case where the edge of the displayable area is reached. There are several possibilities. E.g. have a "barrier" that stops the girl moving off screen (that barrier itself may be offscreen so the girl could move partly offscreen) or have her "wrap round" to the opposite side of the screen. (Incidently, I would like to be able to set up such barriers for myself within a screen in order keep certain areas clear of the dancers.)

The second, however, does not seem to be due to a design feature but to an implementation bug. The following describes what I think is happening.

If you have two screens with their bottom edges aligned and a task bar on one then walking off that task bar onto the other screen will result in the performer dropping to the lower edge of the second screen. If she then walks back to the first screen you would expect her to continue to dance on the first screen. However, at least on my system, if the first screen has a lower resolution than the second screen the position of the bottom of the clip seems to be calculated as being a fraction of a pixel below the bottom of the screen so she drops off screen.

I think that this is due to miscalculating the pixel positions. In my case the larger screen has a vertical size of 1080 pixels and the smaller one only 900 pixels. I suspect that a rescaling factor of 900/1080 is being used whereas the correct factor should I think be 899/1079 (the tops of each pixel being at 0,1,2,3... not 1,2,3...)

the Next Outfit is to play a different card from the same Model, but in a different outfit.

That is what I thought the poster meant. I can see no way of interpreting "next clip" as "next scene" or vice versa.

I would very much like a "next clip" option (and "previous clip", and "previous card" options). Indeed I have suggested them myself on more than one occassion

Isn't that the same as the currently existing "next outfit" ?

No, the Next Outfit is to play a different card from the same Model, but in a different outfit.
If you only have one card from that Model, or only one of her cards enabled
then the Next Outfit selection is Not enabled.

Suggestion 1
When you rightclick on the model, have a command "next scene"

I believe you mean Next Clip from the currently playing card.