Tess get my vote

gracy 6
Tess 2

a close one indeed but i think Gracy-***** gets my vote

Gracy-*****: 5
Tess Lyndon: 1

Mine synchronizes, but gives an Error 403... Forbidden.

Wait... it's downloading now... let's see after an hour, how things are.

Edit: Whatever it was, seems it's gone. Download works again!

Very close for me here, but i'll have to vote for the South African Gracy

Gracy - 4
Tess - 1

Gracy 3
Tess 1

Getting Red Line "Error" when I try to "synchronize with server" by clicking on that on "Advanced" screen.

Gracy ***** 2 - Tess Lyndon 1

Giving the nod to Gracy.

Gracy *****-2
Tess Lyndon-0



1. Gracy-*****
2. Tess Lyndon
3. Viki
4. Silver
5. Maya Mai
6. Jennifer Galbina

Tess gets my vote over Viki.

Tess Lyndon - 10
viki - 5

Now Tess goes against Gracy-*****.

Gracy-***** 1

Tess - 0

I can't access the VG site. I'm on DB now.

Looks like the silly season's starting early this year so I might as well throw some oil on the fire.

The ratings are a marketing tool, pure and simple. High absolute ratings are a persuasive way of getting punters to look at your product.

Every time this debate rolls around people talk about the influence that higher ratings have on their buying decisions especially when they have just joined the site and this time around is no different.

Also, people talk about how they would like cards to be rated, what criteria are important to them and how these things 'should' be measured.

The fact is that once you've bought a card or had it sent to you via a subscription you're allowed to rate the card using any criteria you like. And your rating is just as valid as all the others. You can change the rating whenever you want and you don't have to rate the cards unless you want to. The people who rate every card a 10 or the ones who only rate cards they like have all paid for the privilege.

Objectivity? Pull the other one! It's not even April 1st yet!

I can't download a card I just purchased either. Its kicking out a server 403 error.

I can´t download three Tarra White´s cards: 542, 545 and 547. Is there any problem with the servers?

This is a tough one for me, but Tess gets my vote.

Tess Lyndon 9

Viki 5

I agree 100% with CyberVixen.
Statistically the whole rating system is flawed because it is User / Member based.
It is not based on any specific criteria, other then, Does the member like this model.

Is she pretty? does she have great legs?, a great Ass? are her Boobs big?
A Member looks at the model and the Outfit, and Rates it.

So increasing the decimal accuracy will do Nothing.
The ratings IMHO mean nothing..



Once there are Several Ratings accumulated, Anything less then a 1 above the current rating, pulls the rating lower and lower.

So if a card has a 7.4 rating, a new member giving a 0 to 7 pulls it down.
if a Card has a 9.2, anything less than 10 pulls it down.

Without knowing the Number of Votes per given rating, it's useless info.

Example: Great Dancer, Blonde, blue eyes, Muscular build, good on the Pole.
here are the voting results:
3 votes of 10
12 votes of 9
20 votes of 8
9 votes of 4 - Didn't like her Muscular build.
Using the current Average System, the cards rating would be

7.6 - not very good...

but the 42 votes of 8 or higher,
speaks more then the 9 votes of 4

So without voting statistics, the Number doesn't mean very much..

Pfffft......Monetary systems, Precision....Whatever. As if we're building Swiss watches.

Just don't see how a 9 rating could possibly be way too low when a 10 can be considered way too high. Sounds just a little anal retentive to me. Well, more than a little....actually.

Seems you can't stand it sometimes when someone disagrees with your point of view. Nothing you say will convince me. Just consider me as disagreeing with you on this and drop it. I'm dropping it with this comment.

@91hebasu,

I'll tell you exactly why I think decimal ratings (just between 9.0 and 10.0) would be helpful. More than half of the cards fall in between the range of 9.01 to 9.99. If I want to give a rating to one of these very common cards, I presently have only two choices: to give a 9 (which may be less than I think it deserves) and pull the average down, or to give a 10 (which may be a lot more than I think it is worth).

This is why our monetary systems have decimals and cents. The precision is useful.

Tess again!

Tess 8
Viki 5

Tess 7
Viki 5

Here is another girl that I love those legs of hers.

Satin WOW just like that ass.

very nice @pikawell

Very nice photos thanks keep them coming.

Tess Lyndon for me.


Tess Lyndon-7
Viki-4

I don't see how it will make any difference with using decimals. So you give a girl a 9.8 instead of a 10......for what ?? She has a flaw somewhere ?? Going to be like gymnastic tournament scores ??

Still going to have members giving very high ratings for the ones they find hot and really low ratings for the ones they find less attractive. Still not very objective....for the most part.

Detailed reviews are an entirely different thing though. Extremely useful.

@BigSteve, sounds as a good idea!

When I started, Spacephantom was an active reviewer then. I found his reviews much more objective and useful to read, as just to look at the rating numbers. It helped me to get acquainted with the Girls, gave me advice on what to pay attention to, which are one or another's strengths and weaknesses. It was really educating!
And I'm not talking about the English language, which was really hard to understand at the beginning... His reviews are so detailed, so eloquently stated... man, this was tough.
I was truly grateful for what he did, and still am now. This kind of advice should newbies search for, I guess... ];-)

nice to see Carla Cox also on VG :-)

When I first became a VirtuaGirl customer, I placed a lot of reliance on the ratings, and I may not have had the courage to make my first purchase without that guidance. I immediately decided that the ratings I was seeing were accurate and valuable to beginners -- a good thing to have.

I don't know how many others agree, but I'm not at all interested in seeing separate ratings for appearance and performance, and since there are already thousands of cards out there without this breakdown, I think it unlikely that Totem would want to introduce a multi-ratings system now. (If they did, would it only be for new cards, or would they have to go back and develop these separate ratings for all currently existing cards?) One thing they could do more simply at this point would be to introduce some numbers with decimals into the drop-down ratings boxes. The numerical results could be integrated seamlessly into the existing system.

Dandelion

;-)

axelle parker is tight

Diana Doll

here's laura ,aleska diamond and Karina

Updated ladder:

1. Gracy-*****
2. Viki
3. Tess Lyndon
4. Silver
5. Maya Mai
6. Jennifer Galbina

Current voting:

Tess - 6
Viki - 4

My vote goes to Czech Tess Lyndon again- ///
Tess - 6
Viki - 4

Tess!!! :)

Tess - 5
Viki - 4

Viki Viki Viki!

Tess 4
Viki 4

Everybody knew I was pickin' Viki...

Tess Lyndon-4
Viki-3

Tess gets my vote

Tess Lyndon: 4
Viki: 2

btw @pikawell, Tess will keep on challenge the one above herself untill she either loose or gets to the top. If the challenger loose then a new girl will be picked to challenge Jennifer

Today, 14 march 2013, Carla Cox is in our studio for virtuagirl.
Here is a picture after her make-up.

Oh, I got it.
I just re-installed the entire software. The Modelcards are now downloading normally.
FML :D

OMG OMG OMG....finaly we will see Little Caprice.....and THANKY YOU for more cards with DENY :)
**buying more credits soon**

@alerte, when they're in trouble - you're a God for them, my friend, but when they get fixed - you don't exist.
Maybe @trishsman got his cards and is so happy now that just forgot to give any feedback ];-)

:s sorry ^^
i choose Viki

tess 3
Viki 2

Tess Lyndon 3 - Viki 1

Do we need ratings as such?
May be this is the point for beginners to start from... to get some kind of picture perhaps... as gray1959 asked for.
But,... as has already been said here many times, this numeric system doesn't give any objective information about the girl as a person and a dancing model in amount.
Personally I've been found that many, many Girls are very sexy and "hot" and a good performers as well, although their ratings were at this moment not the best at all.
So I feel now about these numbers a great caution.
Not every member rates the girls. There are some certain members of the community, who does. These members are not biased decision makers - these numbers reflect their personal preferences mostly.
So my message to newcomers will be - don't trust the numbers! Just watch the shows and enjoy. Get to know as many girls as possible - your own ratings about will come by the time!
And if you've become a serious collector one day - you have your favorites, then you will not give a coin for these numbers anyway ];-)

But as I said - it's my personal opinion only, not "official statement" ];-)

Tess Lyndon 2
Viki 1

here's monica scott

here's satin bloom

@pikawell, Tess will have to take on Viki first.

Tess Lyndon vs Viki

My vote goes to Tess

Tess Lyndon 1
Viki 0