Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Derniers messages - Page 795

  Forum

zzmaskers
Inscrit en Mar 2011
2197 message(s)

Not a Scar

Tout sur iStripper
8 May 2020, 42 réponses
My comment on her show a few minutes ago:

My advise at any commenter: look careful, there are NO scars; the red inkt is a tattoo. The breasts of Agatha are total natural. Agatha makes a very good debut!!!

Total 18 clips divided in Standing 6, Pole 6 and On TB 6. Some touching/rubbing in TB clips. No Bare feet. Starting Nude (just heels) one Standing, one Pole and one TB clip.

I knew Agatha from partnersite W4B, were she made her debut three years ago without any tattoo. A year later she had her first tattoo (our solar system on her back) and
the nipple piercings. Again a year later the breast tattoos were put on in red ink with the words “montirosa” and “manipuladora”. Superficially seen one can think it are scars,
but they are not. Her breasts are natural!!! The socalled sleeve on her underarm is the most recent one. Agatha has a soft, friendly face and her shapes are curvaceous, what
declares the title of this show. Her figure has the right proportions. No skinnyness here. The dress was beautiful, just as the high heels and the lace panties. At certain moments
a breast peeped out above the dress.

Agatha does a show mostly in the slower striptease style. So you have all the time to watch her curved body with her wide pelvis and her well developped butt. Her contact with
the camera is good and she smiles more then enough. At times her movements are squiggly. In the TB clips Agatha laughs slyly and is not shy. Perfect views on that ass/butt/bum.

The rating: Standing 4,5 (slower striptease style, squiggly), Pole 4,5 (learning fase, does her very best), Taskbar 5 (laughs slyly, not shy), Beauty 5 (friendly face, curved body) and
Outfit 5 (very nice dress and heels). Total 24/5 = 4,8-->5 stars. A good debut show of Agatha, but underrated by commenters/raters, who took a tattoo for a *****. NATURAL BREASTS!
------------------
As Music of the Show not a specific song, but all the music of the famous Venezuelan musician Oscar D’Leon. Before my retirement as teacher I once asked my female students
from the Dutch Antilles: “What is good Latin music?” One of the musicians they advised me, was Oscar D’Leon and so I learned from my students! “Mulate Coquete” is a good one.
Alkasyn
Inscrit en Apr 2008
1809 message(s)

American Models in Europe

Tout sur iStripper
8 May 2020, 38 réponses
Are the famous pornstars better? If it is, than it's in the f-cards since they have more experience with being filmed in masturbation shows, g/g and b/g. They are not better dancers: the best dancers in the last month's were for me Isabelle, Jessika, Angelika Grays, Elis (Czech), Ellie Leen (in the cards, where she's really dancing), Anastasia Brokelyn (a beginning pornstar) and Tina. My impression is that Totem selects the last year more on dance and pole dance skills. That's more important then their nationality.
I'm not convinced that pornstars are likely to be better on iStripper than unknowns, or that they will necessarily be more expensive.

Pornstars certainly seem to be more reliably good than unkowns at xxx, but only a few of them will have developed dance skills. There are many internet unknowns working the clubs and cams in Eastern Europe and they are equally likely to have the skills and beauty to put on a good show here. Of course, most unknowns won't want to strip on the net, but a proportion will and that number depends on economics and their alternative sources of income.

I think Totem finds it difficult to determine in advance who will do a good job. We know they ask for vids from unknowns and we know they've passed on some pornstars doing European tours - because surely the girls' agents will have contacted them. Maybe they were asking for too much money. But equally, we don't know how difficult it is to recruit unknowns, or how selective Totem is.

From the performers' point of view, maybe they sometimes need the money, but also they need the exposure, whether they are unknown or established pornstars. Whether they supplement their modelling with clubs, cams or escorting, a good iStripper performance must be useful.

So I suspect that Totem offers a pretty fixed fee for Take-1s and adjusts their profile in the market so that they get a regular flow of decent applicants (in their view). They'll modify their approach, if the proportion of pornstars/unknowns changes, for example if they fail to book any pornstars for a few months. They'll do the same if quality and hence sales drop off. Maybe they'll stretch a bit for a performer at the top of her career like Jia Lissa, but not enough to attract the likes of Kendra Sutherland.

So show quality will vary over time, depending on many things. Totem will almost certainly ignore the rumblings of the tiny minority of customers who participate in the Forum.

Fair analysis. I do think, though, that our rumblings do not go completely unheard and can be taken as some kind of an auxiliary tool when creating their policies, though.
stefnev1
MODÉRATEUR
Inscrit en Jul 2008
17231 message(s)
pantalone
Inscrit en Nov 2010
2303 message(s)

American Models in Europe

Tout sur iStripper
8 May 2020, 38 réponses
Are the famous pornstars better? If it is, than it's in the f-cards since they have more experience with being filmed in masturbation shows, g/g and b/g. They are not better dancers: the best dancers in the last month's were for me Isabelle, Jessika, Angelika Grays, Elis (Czech), Ellie Leen (in the cards, where she's really dancing), Anastasia Brokelyn (a beginning pornstar) and Tina. My impression is that Totem selects the last year more on dance and pole dance skills. That's more important then their nationality.

I'm not convinced that pornstars are likely to be better on iStripper than unknowns, or that they will necessarily be more expensive.

Pornstars certainly seem to be more reliably good than unkowns at xxx, but only a few of them will have developed dance skills. There are many internet unknowns working the clubs and cams in Eastern Europe and they are equally likely to have the skills and beauty to put on a good show here. Of course, most unknowns won't want to strip on the net, but a proportion will and that number depends on economics and their alternative sources of income.

I think Totem finds it difficult to determine in advance who will do a good job. We know they ask for vids from unknowns and we know they've passed on some pornstars doing European tours - because surely the girls' agents will have contacted them. Maybe they were asking for too much money. But equally, we don't know how difficult it is to recruit unknowns, or how selective Totem is.

From the performers' point of view, maybe they sometimes need the money, but also they need the exposure, whether they are unknown or established pornstars. Whether they supplement their modelling with clubs, cams or escorting, a good iStripper performance must be useful.

So I suspect that Totem offers a pretty fixed fee for Take-1s and adjusts their profile in the market so that they get a regular flow of decent applicants (in their view). They'll modify their approach, if the proportion of pornstars/unknowns changes, for example if they fail to book any pornstars for a few months. They'll do the same if quality and hence sales drop off. Maybe they'll stretch a bit for a performer at the top of her career like Jia Lissa, but not enough to attract the likes of Kendra Sutherland.

So show quality will vary over time, depending on many things. Totem will almost certainly ignore the rumblings of the tiny minority of customers who participate in the Forum.