Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Derniers messages - Page 2226

  Forum

Apasas
Inscrit en Aug 2009
1975 message(s)

Trios !!

Tout sur iStripper
30 December 2012, 35 réponses
I disagree that trios wouldn't cost more. In fact, I believe they would cost significantly more. (Although I could be wrong).

If we assume that each model is paid the same for every card ( whether solo, duo or trio), then a trio costs three times more than the a solo and 1.5 times more than a duo.

This means that for a trio to be worthwhile you need to generate at least 1.5 times the sales (whether that is from higher prices or more volume of sales) of a duo for the card to be worthwhile. Otherwise, Totem would be better off just producing another duo.

I also don't think the results of the poll indicate that Totem will receive massive sales from members as a whole. All it demonstrates is that there is an interest in the idea. But many voting yes may not buy consistently.

But I think there is one key reason why there will be no trios: it is because DB is in decline. Since DB started, totem have had a 1 credit sale for all cards, permanently dropped the price of duos from 3 to 2 credits and reduced the volume of cards produced.

On the other hand, Totem has increased the number of VGHD cards from 4 to 5. That suggests to me that Totem are more concentrated on VGHD than DB. This could be because VGHD profitability per card is better than DB. If this is the case, why would Totem take a risk on a trio card which costs more and is simply more risky based on an unrepresentative poll in a forum?I certainly wouldn't take such a risk.
Apasas
Inscrit en Aug 2009
1975 message(s)

Trios !!

Tout sur iStripper
30 December 2012, 35 réponses
I voted no. However, if they did it well I may changed my mind.

My principle reasons against trios are technical.

1) I am not convinced that a trio would work well on DB. Trios in porn depend heavily on close-ups and changing angles so you can get an overview of the scene as a whole. This is not possible in DB. I see the inability to shift angles a real problem. This means that even if you can see well what one girl is doing, you may not be able to see clearly what the other is doing. Sometimes the angles are poor with duos. So this problem will be even worse for trios.

2) I am of the view that the more people you have, the more planning and choreography you need. For a trio to work well it would have to very well choreographed and that may make it look less natural. While if it is not choreographed, it could turn into an amateurish mess.

3) Trios would cost more, but there is no guarantee that they will be more popular and generate sufficient revenue to cover the additional cost of production. There will be some who will buy eagerly. But whether that will translate into significant extra sales is another matter.

However, despite me voting no, I don't object in principle to the idea of trios. The idea of one model being worked on by two others is possible. But how I see it really working is two together while the third effectively does a solo show. So in reality, most of the time you will probably end up with one duo and one solo in the same show rather than a trio.