I agree with both sentiments expressed here.

Famous girls are a must have to keep the marketing going.

In all honest, apart from Eva Elfie and Jia Lissa, maybe Liya Silver, when was it the last time we saw a true pornstar in the studios?

Oh, and Skye Blue, too, she's great.

I agree more effort should be put into getting famous girls into the studio. I don't believe famous pornstars ask for a magnitude more money than the no-name Ukrainians and Russians that we nowadays get.

I don't think it's possible anymore to write reviews of cards you do not own.And hope it will never be possible, also!

Indeed, that was a rather pointless exercise.

I do have reviews on cards that I do not own, but since they were removed from the store and my collection they're not accessible by the majority of users anymore.

sorry for the first post being unrelated to the packs but with 7 shows this week does that mean the studio is back in full swing and you don't need to ration shows anymore?

If so congrats. glad to have something in the world back to normal.

we're here to help :)

Thank God it's Friday and we thought you'd be happy to get some free packs :)

New Releases

But first let me remind you the seven shows we have released this week ! Stacy Cruz, fresh and natural, totally subjugating in a spring red dress!
You're gonna also fall in love with Tina and her lace black lingerie, especially this irresistible brazilian panties!
And don't forget Sasha Meow and Tanya Bahtina, our two spicy tatooed of the week :-P
Carolina Abril comes back in her favorite role of domination, sweet Jill claims for all your tenderness in her innocent pink lingerie and Agatha Vega shows you her most beautiful curve in a hot black dress...
A very hot week if you ask me 😍




Free Packs

And you gonna get even hotter with this new edition of our Free Packs offer!

Very simple: each pack contains 3 cards.
Discount starts at 10% and goes up to 20%!
The more you buy, the cheaper you pay and the faster you earn FREE packs.

The Free packs offer will be available until Friday, May 14th, 2020 - 9.00 am, Paris time!

How to access the Free packs?

Go to the "Featured" tab of iStripper software.
Click on "Free Packs" category.

Enjoy !

in shader it gives a higher result that the propper "=" version.

Thankfully atom ***** if i put "if( a = 0 ) do somthing();" so i catch those mistakes. It was just weird that it didn't catch it in the dist = . Thanks for explaining why.

I don't think it's possible anymore to write reviews of cards you do not own.

And hope it will never be possible, also!

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.

I don't think it's possible anymore to write reviews of cards you do not own.

@gkar45

Just click on picture 1 and use the left symbol under the picture to download it, and there you go. That´s all it is. Just a picture. It does not give you any advantages, nobody can even see this except yourself. All you can do with the badges is print them and make some scrambled eggs on it. On Steam, the Gaming Platform, you can see how many kids are chasing for the same kind of Badges and Achievements. They spend lots of money to get them. I always thought this are only kids who spend their pocket money, to impress their friends or making stands. But to see the same bullshit is working on an adult platform as well, makes me laugh a little bit. I really cannot believe it.

This reminds me on a quote of Friedrich Nietzsche:

“Even now man is more of an ***** than any of the apes.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

Paint 3D didn´t save the dog, that result you see in 1st uploaded pic. That´s why I made another post with picture 2.

@gkar45

If somebody here is pulling your chain it is Totem. The 4.20 Badge making more money than any SEC does. Everybody is trying around the clock to get it. And as long as there are still people trying to get it, they will leave it be how it is. Money, Money, Money

I actually usually like the scratchers but after 185 cards, and not getting a single SEC, kinda thinking it's not worth doing it in the future.

I have just uploaded version 3.03d of the Playlist Generator. I've fixed 3 programming error all relating to clip filters and tags. I've also added a new tag "Tran all types" which should make it easier to exclude transition clips. I also changed the clip hotness count logic. Transition clips are no longer counted.

It can be found at: https://virtuastripper.net/files/Playlist_Generator.zip

If you have customized your current version, be sure to export your tags and filters before moving to the new version. See the User Notes for details, or ask me here.

Important note: The clip tags "tran ctl ..." are descriptors of regular clips not transition clips. They describe which transition clips may follow a regular clip. If you exclude these tags you will likely exclude many regular clips from your search. These tags have limited value.

One week of customer screwing. My fingers would rot off before I gave it another shot. They can stick that thing anywhere.

Finally I Got it! LOL!

OK so I gave it one last go, 4:20 PDT and 4:20 PST an hour later, No luck, will wait for the team to update accounts now.

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.I would not support this. People would then tend to write totally casual and unuseful reviews only reason and purpose of which would be helping them to get the badge...

I agree @HansSachs - while I am qt home self-isolating I have been working my way through my unwatched cards and I have been posting what I hope are useful reviews.In doing so, I am seeing more and more so called reviews that are simply one word - and as reviews they are neither use nor ornament. If people can do this simply to win a badge it cheapens the achievement and makes it harder for people to be able to assess if a card has what they want before they buy.

As for reviewing a card you do not own - what on earth would be the point of that?

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.I would not support this. People would then tend to write totally casual and unuseful reviews only reason and purpose of which would be helping them to get the badge...

What is surprising is that more review systems don't put more criteria to what you see.

Example anyone could write a review but as a purchaser I should be able to filter to only see reviews of owners, people who watched for 10hrs, ect.

I could also rate the reviewer and the ones I agree with show up and the ones I disagree don't show up in my rating.

This doesn't exist anywhere so not saying it's a shortcoming here.

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.

I would not support this. People would then tend to write totally casual and unuseful reviews only reason and purpose of which would be helping them to get the badge...

I have one suggestion for future achievements, an expansion of the critic award. You could do several more like "serious critic" - write a review for 10 cards you own, "honorary Critic" - write a review for 30 cards you own. Maybe even "Psychic Critic" - write a review for a card you do NOT own. I think you get some fun out these kinds of achievements.

Thank You for the enlightenment !!!
I'm one of those people who have adverse reactions to substances others find recreational.
*****gives me a sickening dizzy headache.
***** makes every muscle cell feel ill to the point of wanting to throw up.
Thankfully, ***** does relax muscles but the cheap stuff can give me a bad hangover so I'm not in danger of being an alcoholic because my body punishes me if I overdo it.
I prefer good bourbon or a nice single malt scotch.

Thanks

For those who have not received their badge yet drink 3 shots of JD old #7,
3 cans Coors light and smoke 3 joints twice a day until you receive it. Works
great for me.😇

I think we're all still waiting for the team to run the scans that will identify the winnersI don't know about others, but personally I am waiting them to do things as fixing Search function on forum, or the defective cards.

I think we have to be patient and let Celine and the team sort it out. They are working in difficult circumstances with working from home and they have a buggy beta version 1.2.248 to fix plus the faults as mentioned by @HansSachs.

So - we don't know their internal priorities but I'm willing to cut them some slack if they can at least keep us informed.

my xoxo achievemnt is also missing i won the fan sign of carly rae -.-

"4:20 Louis"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture)
😎

Oh @TimDenchanter - where have you been? 😄

The 4:20 references are all about cannabis. I will quote from Wikipedia....

"4/20 (pronounced four-twenty) is *****culture slang for ***** consumption, especially smoking around the time 4:20 pm, and also refers to cannabis-oriented celebrations that take place annually on April 20 (which is 4/20 in U.S. form)."

Hence the background in the badge is a *****leaf and Carolina Abril is used as "Abril" is Spanish for April.

I knew none of this until this badge appeared.

originally, 4 20 was the time of day.
school ended at 3:00
detention ended at 4:00
twenty minutes to get to the meeting place to.... get started...

I followed Celines instructions about contacting her concerning winning a fan sign and have still not received that badge

I think we're all still waiting for the team to run the scans that will identify the winners

I don't know about others, but personally I am waiting them to do things as fixing Search function on forum, or the defective cards.

I followed Celine's instructions and have not recieved the 4:20 badge. What's up?

I think we're all still waiting for the team to run the scans that will identify the winners and award us accordingly.

It is taking time.

Oh @TimDenchanter - where have you been? 😄

The 4:20 references are all about cannabis. I will quote from Wikipedia....

"4/20 (pronounced four-twenty) is *****culture slang for ***** consumption, especially smoking around the time 4:20 pm, and also refers to cannabis-oriented celebrations that take place annually on April 20 (which is 4/20 in U.S. form)."

Hence the background in the badge is a *****leaf and Carolina Abril is used as "Abril" is Spanish for April.

I knew none of this until this badge appeared.

They likely stopped to promote urgency when they do release a pack.

I will say I think like someone else said the only reason to get scratch cards is if you are new like I am or if you want the SEC.

Its not a great deal but its okay for people with zero discounts on their profile. That deal is outweighted by getting random cards.

I think possibly a better option would be a hidden booster pack with a theme in which a SEC could be randomly won. Possibly it could be that if you get a duplicate card it refunds you that portion of the booster as well.

You could just "scratch" to reveal each of the cards instead? Or possibly have it where you purchsae between 1-10 cards and there are 12 of them on the page and you the cards are numbered 1-12 you getting from 1 up to the number you purchased?

Lots of ways to possibly remove some of the complete randomness, keep some of the profit that they want, and get more out of it in the end for normal people.

I followed Celine's instructions and have not recieved the 4:20 badge. What's up?

Understand the "May the 4th" Star Wars reference but not the 4:20 thing ... please enlighten me THX

7 hours ago (edited)Little Caprice, Sybil, Cherry Kiss, Alyssa Reese have all become major starlets in@orclover - I was reading my way through your post when my eyes spotted two words - Belka and webcam!Please tell me more.....She goes by Faneti Reni.

Thanks @orclover - found it - including a nearly 2 hour cam video - wowser 😊😆

Hahahaha, they should have made buy 500 credits at 4.20 Badge, that would be a nice thing as well.

I think they could even give the 4:20 badge as a prize in Scratch Cards or in Slot Machine... it looks like people would be ready to bet tons of credits just in order to get it. 😲

7 hours ago (edited)
Little Caprice, Sybil, Cherry Kiss, Alyssa Reese have all become major starlets in
@orclover - I was reading my way through your post when my eyes spotted two words - Belka and webcam!

Please tell me more.....

She goes by Faneti Reni.

I pulled "play time min".

Play Time min is a card attribute and should be pretty accurate. The staticProperties file contains the total number of frames in all the .vghd clips of a card. That number does not inlcude .demo clips or transition clips. I assume 25 frames per second and use that to calculate the play time. I understand that some cards are recorded at 24 frames per second, so there is the potential for a 4% error. At one time I thought some cards were recorded at 20 frames per second, but that doesn't seem to be true.

The uncertainty is about the Play Time sec in the Clip table. That is an approximation. The staticProperties file contains the size of the card for all available resolutions. From what I can see this is the total number of bytes for the same set of .vghd clips that are used for counting the number of frames. Using the correct resolution for your collection, I calculate average bytes per second for the card. Then I use the actual size of each clip to calculate the play time of that clip. This results in a set of numbers that add up correctly but will be off by the amount that the average bits/second of a clip differs from the overall average for the card. I'm not an expert on video encoded, but I would think that a card with a lot of motion would require more bits/sec than one with less. I do know that when I compare the result of my estimates with the published play time of clips there are significant differences. One advantage of my approach is that it lets me estimate the play time of transition clips.

If I knew a way to capture Totem's numbers, I'd use them, but I don't.

May be it would be great to have more permanent booster packs (even if you cannot choose the cards in the packs) with various thematics to define.

Back when the program was called VirtuaGirlHD Totem permanently offered quite an extensive range of themed booster packs. I do not know why they stopped, but presumably it was for good business reasons.

@gkar45,
Thank you. (no 4:20 achievement yet).

@arise77 I agree and many people are in your case since the poll for the May 22nd promo is clearly in favour of the Cashback offer.

May be it would be great to have more permanent booster packs (even if you cannot choose the cards in the packs) with various thematics to define.

Scratched 300+ cards and only 1 SEC out of 7 in the store. I mainly played because the SECs cannot be bought. While I still came out as a winner (gained some credits), I see no point inHmm, vO continuing with gambling games like these as the chance of winning SECs is extremely low and scratching cards is time consuming.

I alsno noticed the fact that today I did not win a single blank (or 20 credits), playing 200 cards. Saturday I won several of those, playing a 100 cards, It appears the rules and odds have been changed, which I also consider an incentive to skip the games at all and forget about SECs.

7 hours ago (edited)
Little Caprice, Sybil, Cherry Kiss, Alyssa Reese have all become major starlets in

@orclover - I was reading my way through your post when my eyes spotted two words - Belka and webcam!

Please tell me more.....

@Dfner I'm glad members who have a full collection can get SECs quite easily, after all you guys buy all the cards and should be rewarded in a sense for that.

@Gorfa91 I agree sometimes I got cards I wouldn't have bought and they ended up being surprisingly nice. But that only happened a few times.
I am already less picky than in the past, I started getting a larger variety of models when Totem added weekend discounts and -12% push previews a few years back. At that point I was willing to spend more to get more cards; I still had the choice of cards I was getting though.
These days, you have Booster packs one week, then Mystery envelopes the next, then gambling, then Lucky boxes, etc. All pre-selected cards.

I already ***** so many credits on the Scratch game and the Slot machine that I don't see the point anymore.

Gamblers already have their games twice a month, offer Booster packs or Mystery boxes to whover likes pre-selection. Why not give the opportunity to members like us to get Joker cards or SECs without all the stuff we don't want?

@Jenkers @thoooth let's talk with our wallets! 😉💰

As other members have suggested before, all members who are between new and maxed-out members are the ones paying for this promotion. If we stop taking part in this, Totem will have to improve this game to make it worth it for us.

4:20 with me also not what is wrong with it (1:20)

Wouldn't it be easier having the 4:20 achievement work like this?

Buy a card between 4:20 and 4:20:59 pm CEST -> you get it
Buy a card between 4:20 and 4:20:59 pm PDT -> You get it

Add options, that helps. The achievements themselves are a fun feature but need some tuning in terms of requirements.

Just wanting the "Well Done" achievement :)

les ***** angels contre le COVID 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

@Z22

The == operator is a comparison for equality that evalutes to 0 for not equal or to 1 for equal. It is not an assignment.

The statement dist == (distance(G, H)); is valid because the shader language's syntax is based on that of C which allows expressions anywhere that you would expect statements. In the example the function distance will be called, its return value compared with dist and the result discarded, in particular dist will not be updated by this statement and if distance has no side effects the whole statement can be optimised away because it has no visible effect.

In any sensible language such statements would be errors, but they are valid in C or GLSL.

The following is a valid, if rather pointless, function

void func(void)
{ 42;
}

It is also easy to make the opposite error and use = where you intend to ==, e.g.

if ( a == 0 ) do_something();

will compare a with 0 and only call do_something if a is equal to zero

but

if ( a = 0 ) do_something();

will set a to the value 0 and will never call do_something() whereas

if ( a = 1 ) do_something();

will set a to 1 and will always call do_something()