No, the second person was more than likely save them for somw thing else & made out 3.777repeating on his /her investment. so, the first person lost his/her investment of 500 credits which cost him 49.99 or 99.98 with bonus, althou again what you do with your credits is for you to descide

I was indeed talking just about company's economical point of view, not about what we can do with our wins and losses on Istripper gamble. My point was that such wins and losses make difference for us, but not for the company's revenues.

A few years ago, Disneyland began offering disney dollars. The money could be used in the park to buys toys, food, etc. . Why does this matter? Somve tourists spent all every dollar. some tourists left the park with dollars. It might be a mistake, it might be a souvener. Either way it is a the benefit to the company.

Totem has some members spend every credit. Some members quit before they use all the credits. Either way it is a benefit to the company.

Another example.
If...

• First user spent 500 credits in gamble and he won nothing.
• Second user spent 4500 credits in gamble and he won 17000 credits of the Mega Jackpot.

Which is the user who created more revenues for the company?
Second one.
The first one - indeed - did spend only 50 $ on software, the second one as much as 900 $. And this is ONLY thing that matters for the company. As credits have NO monetary value, Totem can create them out of nothing; and so, giving prizes whatsoever (both as cards or as credits) has NO cost for them.

Card acquisitions, gamble prizes/losses, etc. are fictional, and mean nothing about company's economical benefit.

If you think about it, all "Istripper world", with its cards acquisitions and its gambling games, is sort of a big videogame whose goal is just getting us make as many credits purchases as possible (which are only real money transactions here, and which pay for all Totem's employees, photographers and models).
And on this aspect, they win easily - since, as @TheEmu pointed some days ago, we are all *****: to beautiful women &/or to gamble...

@TheEmu,
I agree with that. thanks for the rely.
Have a great day and stay safe.

@BushViper357

Yes, that is what I meant by what you or I feel about the matter. But @HansSachs 's point, that you were responding to, and that I was elaborating on, was that no matter what we feel we have agreed that there is no monetary value involved.

Now I regard this as a rather dubious argument in the "real world", but I would not be at all surprised if it makes a huge difference legally if it changes a gambling game from playing for money to the legal equivalent of playing for matchsticks.

@TheEmu,
I understand the credits have no value. You wood agree I think if you did not
win the 1,500 credits to get the 136 cards, then to get the 136 I would have
had to spend $150.00 to get the same cards ?

barney remembering the u.s. constitution!

awesome

😫

@BushViper357

I think the point is that iStripper credits have no monetary value. This is made explicit in the licence that we all agreed to which says (in one of a few sections that are in uppercase)

YOU FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THE CREDIT SYSTEM HAVE NO MONETARY VALUE AND CANNOT BE REDEEMED FOR CASH. NO REFUNDS WILL BE MADE FOR THE PURCHASE OF CREDITS.

In this credits are unlike casino chips. So when you gamble for credits any wins or losses you make also have no monetary value - despite what you or I may feel that they are worth.

By the way the post on the 1,500 credits was a what if it happend. I get it
some people don't like to gamble and some do. As you can see I have all
the cards and I still gamble for credits as alot on here do.

jesaye de recuperer mon autre compte de istripers j'ai mon no je sai pas comment faire sur mon autre compte j'ai deja plein de fille aider moi merci

Ok, so it looks like that Totem gave me 136 cards because they like me for
I did not pay $150.00 for 1,500 credits, I paid $49.99 for the 500 credits I
started with and still have after using the 1,500 credits. Their is always a
winner and a losser when you gamble.

If I buy 500 credits at $49.99 and gamble it a way, Totem just made $49.99 for I
have no credits to buy cards.
But if I use the 500 credits to gamble and win 1,500 credits above the 500 I
started with and use the 1,500 to buy 136 cards at 11 credits each who wins
and who loses ?

In short: Totem has earned $ 49.99 in both cases (and this is, of course, only thing that matters from their point of view).

Wins and losses are only on our side, on our capacity to get cards.

Let's say it again, a card is not really "sold", it's exchanged for totally fictional entities called "credits" which Totem Team create to their liking (and they even have different prices depending on how many of them you buy).
They are a pure fiction, since they don't have any real economical value (you can not give them to anyone apart using them here, and of course no store on Earth would ever accept Istripper credits as payment); and since they are not convertible in any way back into money, also.

That means, only things really making difference for Totem are your credit purchases. What you do then with your credits doesn't really change anything economically on their side.

When on Istripper you acquire a card, or you gamble, you are really not giving anything to company - you did make your only real transaction with them earlier, when you did purchase credits.

@HansSachs
If I buy 500 credits at $49.99 and gamble it a way, Totem just made $49.99 for I
have no credits to buy cards.
But if I use the 500 credits to gamble and win 1,500 credits above the 500 I
started with and use the 1,500 to buy 136 cards at 11 credits each who wins
and who loses ?

The maid of the month : Anastasiia

The lovely Sarka popped up today, I popped up too... :)

@Xanthropus

Wow great work everyone!

Yes, we are getting them all 😀

Anna Polina / French Maid
Anissa Kate / Dust Buster
Gloria / Devious Maid
Mila Azul / Dust your Britches

👍👍👍

gambling that today bypass legal requirements...
there are tons of requirements regarding gambling...

It has to be pointed - again - that on Istripper we don't gamble with real money, so there is no real gamble and also nothing out of any rule.
ONLY real transaction here on Istripper takes place when we purchase credits. Anything we do then with our credits is - from the company's economical point of view - purely fictional. Credits are a fiction: they are not money, and can never be converted back into money.
If you play a gambling game here, your credit win (or loss) has not any economical effect of any sort towards Totem, since credits are a pure fiction created by company. They may have a value for us - since we make use them in order to acquire cards - but for the company they economically mean absolutely nothing.
If I lose 500 credits while gambling here, I am not giving to the company any real economic advantage whatsoever. It gets probable, though, that I will purchase some more credits sooner or later, and that will be the only time in which I'll give a real economical benefit to Totem.

It is only allowed if you Are
1) Promoting iStripper with your video
2) Watermarking your videos with the iStripper Logo in constant view.
3) providing a link to the Main Page istripper.com

Honestly just wanted some eye candy for my viewers to watch without getting flagged (Youtube)

You should probably check with Totem on this. I know some people have been allowed to post material on other media, but the terms of the user license have some restrictions. I'm not an expert on the legal issues involved in this.

I appreciate the help. I will give this a try.

well if you are recording you could merely record the scene in full screen mode...and then just cut out the nude parts. Every card has three long scenes that are a full strip tease...and the first minute or so of these are going to be non-nude. Most topless scenes are also non-nude for a portion. I think you could easily get 5 minutes of non-nude footage from every show. I would be careful about sharing any footage that is non-demo though because istripper may not take kindly to its content being freely distributed, even non-nude.

I tried option 3 and this worked for me.

Honestly just wanted some eye candy for my viewers to watch without getting flagged (Youtube) This works well and I thank you for your help!

Baby Nichola
Kalisy
Zazie Skymm

Some ***** differences, but close enough

Emilya Argan
Guilia G
Paulina
Sophie Sparks

Foxy
Katya Klower
Randy Ayn

Kristina
Lovenia Lux
Luna Corazon

Wow great work everyone!

Foxy
Lucy Li
Tracey Smile

My dear @Stanston, it seems you have a problem. But I will not go into it any further and I will certainly not pick out all posts from me in the last months especially for you. That would be really too stupid for me.

I appreciate the help. I will give this a try.

There are basically three ways to do this.

1. Use safe-for-work
a. In the Safe For Work section turn on Dont' show any nudity unless I click to see it. (I've never used this so I don't know how well it works.)

2. Use the built-in settings of iStripper.
a. On the settings tab turn on the Advanced Settings checkbox on the upper left.
b. In the Desktop section be sure progressive hotness is not checked.
c. From the Levels of eroticism drop-down select what you want, in this case No Nudity, but multiple selections are allowed.

3. Make a playlist of just the clips you want to see.
a. On the settings tab turn on the Advanced Settings checkbox on the upper left.
b. In the Display section be sure Display Clips List is checked.
c. In the My Collection tab double-click a card.
d. On the card details disply click on the clips icon (second from the right) on the same line as the card name
e. Click on the Playlist tab on the far right, middle of the display
f. ***** the clips you want to the playlist.
g. You can repeat c-f for multiple cards, if you wish
h. Save the playlist
i. To play the playlist, click on the Now Playing tab just above the Playlist tab
j. Use Insert playlist to load a playlist (you can load more than one playlist, if you wish)
k. The Random and Repeat checkboxes control the order in which clips will be played

Option 1 is simplest, and option 3 gives you the most control control

Many cards have only a few non-nude clips, but you may find some topless clips acceptable as well.

Sorry If this Is the wrong place to post, I'm new to Istripper.
I checked the settings but I'm not really sure what to do.
Any help would be much appreciated thanks.

Girls Store tab
Only one of these categories can be selected in the Category tab.
A combination is not possible here.

###

My Collection tab
Several categories can be selected in the Category tab.

"big boobs" and "lingerie" selected. All other categories deactivated.

This example only shows cards that are contained in "big boobs" and also in "lingerie".

###

Search box

In the search box you can search for the cardID, the name of the model and the name of the show.

The ideal way to search is by cardID.
The cardID consists of a letter (a .. f) and a four-digit string (0001 .. 9999).
Examples: e1363, e0011, a1535, c0017

The following search string can also be used to search for the cards in the example:

e1363|e0011|a1535|c0017

It is also possible to search for several hundred cardIDs in this way. The length of the search string can also be optimized here.

If a search string was created for all shows of the "big boobs" category and another search string for the "lingerie" category, these can also be combined.
As a result, these shows can then be shown in the display.


These special search strings are regular expressions (RegEx).
The regex strings can be very complex. It is not easy, but it is possible.

Someone know when we have the show of Agatha vega with school clothes?

I wish that the gambling aspect of iStripper would decrease but I think that is very unlikely to occur unless there are changes in the applicable laws.

That is fine but I will call a spade a spade. There is a huge push to end ***** practices by companies regarding gambling that today bypass legal requirements that typically are enforced on gambling.

As an example in the US there is no warnings or such regarding nudity other than being 18+. On the flipside there are tons of requirements regarding gambling it just happens right now gamibling for digital goods does not fall under legal requirements (not yet but likely will in the future).

Totem had a scratch game...I believe it was last Thanksgiving...where one would be guaranteed a Joker or SEC card if one played a certain number of games (I think the Joker came in at 100 scratches) That feature would be good for Totem and the membership as well.

See I think this would balance out things with a fixed odds.

I think in order the best case to worst case would be:
Fixed results after so many scratches
Low luck modifier that slowly increases your chance at certain outcomes
Transparent odds

Maybe they are there but right now in theory Totem can choose to completely change odds by the minute in order to have early winners get others to also participate when odds are lower. Not saying this is happening just saying with the current system nothing is stopping them from doing this.

I do think though the previous scratch game I had played was good when first starting as it gave you lots of random cards prior to getting the bonus discounts that I now have access to.

28 scratch cards, 75 net credits spent.. "won" five cards none of which were interesting (all but one 720P).

Totem had a scratch game...I believe it was last Thanksgiving...where one would be guaranteed a Joker or SEC card if one played a certain number of games (I think the Joker came in at 100 scratches) That feature would be good for Totem and the membership as well.

@Dfner
First things First, the Team is aware of this Topic, and they reacted already on March the 20th.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44343/1#post655383
@SetFuego

And that will not stop me and others from keeping it up to date here

And that's why I hope that the people in charge get a bad feeling every time they read this.

At this Point, this is the first Time, where you are ***** about this situation here,
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44343/7?post=667042
and i dont see any other Post in a similar Form in the whole Topic so far, Hmmm ... Strange.
And you said by yourself,

And that will not stop me,

in your first Post here, where you are really Complainig in the whole Topic .... ?
But i didn't see another similar Post in the whole Topic before.
And further,

First and foremost I condemn the decision to increase the number of SEC's in this way, but these cards can only be obtained by direct gambling or by using jokers (also gambling). 😠

but on the other side, you took by yourself Advantage of one of these Gambling Games to Win an SEC Card?
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44343/6#post662374
The only thing i can really see here, are Accusations from your side.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44343/3#post655798

But that's only my own perception, maybe i'm wrong ... who knows.

@TheEmu I see what you mean, but come on... we're all here for the girls, no doubt about that. Did we sign up for gambling? Not really 😜

A long time ago, my nephew asked me why I would go to Las Vegas. I replied "hookers and booze!" we all laughed.

Then my brother started mentioning other things to do in vegas... and as he listed other things I added "and it's even better with .... Hookers and booze!"

gambling...

sitting pool side....

golf...

fancy dinner...



"we are all here for the girls" (and I do love my beer!)

... after all the complaints for last months or even years, they more than likely won't react to all that later either... :(

@Dfner - And that's why I hope that the people in charge get a bad feeling every time they read this. First and foremost I condemn the decision to increase the number of SEC's in this way, but these cards can only be obtained by direct gambling or by using jokers (also gambling). 😠

@SetFuego

And that's perfectly fine! I applaud you all for that. I just think that if they have not reacted by now, after all the complaints for last months or even years, they more than likely won't react to all that later either... :(

Totem is perfectly aware of the controversy, so anyone's posts about "informing" them that they're "alienating loyal customers" is no news to them. They know, they have discussed that, they have made their decisions. They either react upon the complaints or they don't.

And that will not stop me and others from keeping it up to date here, so that they are and remain aware of this home-made splitting of customers.

@arise77

It is because "we are all here for the girls" that I felt it necessary to point out the similarity of the two forms of exploitation of weaknesses. We are a self selecting group that are almost certainly very biased towards accepting one form. If you looked at a population of users of betting shops, attendees at horse races or those that frequent casinos you would probably encounter the opposite bias.

@arise77 If you didn't sign up for gambling, then don't gamble, simple as that :)

I, also, don't like the concept of Special Edition Cards, but if Totem decides to get part of their earnings by draining the pockets of customers who like to gamble and try their luck in the promotional games, then so be it.

You, and many others have voiced their opinion that you don't like it, but that's just about everything you can do. You can stop gambling and accept that some of the special edition cards might elude you because of that, but that's about it.

Totem is perfectly aware of the controversy, so anyone's posts about "informing" them that they're "alienating loyal customers" is no news to them. They know, they have discussed that, they have made their decisions. They either react upon the complaints or they don't. What TheEmu or me or you or anyone else writes here, has really no effect.

@TheEmu I see what you mean, but come on... we're all here for the girls, no doubt about that. Did we sign up for gambling? Not really 😜

Ahhh ... yes now it makes totally sense 😆

This is because of the Magic Boobs of Agatha ... 😜

Hmmm .... Strange things are Happening, na anyway the Question should be answered.

😛

@SetFuego

in the same thread to which @Stanston links.

And you were a little bit faster, as i mentioned that my precised Link worked in Firefox
but not in the Client :)

Very precise info and insight in the same thread to which @Stanston links. 😵

https://www.istripper.com/de/forum/thread/44707/1?post=662867