This weeks game I initially played only enough games to fill the progress bar to the SEC. At that point I was down by 115 credits having had 3 x 150 credit wins during the playing
Again this is weak evidence (i.e. is consistent with) the hypothesis that the games are not biased. Note that the uncertainty in a count of random occurrences is approximately the square root of the count - so a crude estimate of the uncertainty in the number of 150 credit wins is plus/minus 1.7 and even one more such win would have put
@Number6 into profit - however with such low numbers the uncertainty in the uncertainty is itself very high - i.e. you should not place much reliance on the numbers. Strictly speaking the square root rule for the uncertainty only applies when the count is large so that the uncertainty is much smaller than the count itself, but you can use it to get a feel of what the satisistics are telling you.
Again I feel that I must emphasise that my point here is
not that the games are unbiased only that we have not seen enough evidence to know one way or the other.