Mérité

@arise77
"among" veut dire "parmi" et pas "seulement" (mais ça tu le sais déjà). Donc quand @celine écrit "parmi les plus récentes" cela ne signifie pas "seulement parmi les plus récentes". La nuance est bien là, on peut recevoir des cartes récentes (sorties il y a 30 jours ou plus), mais pas que.
Bonne journée quand même 😎

@stefnev1
Thanks for your reply, I also assume cards are from the entire collection.
Then why say "among the most recent ones"?

Congrats Paola, very well deserved 😎😍👍

quelle déception !

So far, Paola's outfits are on point. I think both Paola and the staff have a good sense of eye-catching outfits.

@arise77
For me, the cards are selected from 30 days ago and earlier in the entire series you haven't, not only "the most recent". This rule applies (sometimes 45 days ago and earlier) for long time in my knowledge of the games.

I haven't played since last year so I don't know if anything has changed since. I probably tried about 30 spins altogether and never landed on the -70% nor the "free" section of the wheel.

Also in the cards that were drawn, none of them were actually recent; so I still don't understand Celine's post when she says cards are selected "among the most recent cards".
For example, the 4 cards on the screenshot are from 2016 (2), 2013 & 2014.

@Celine @Manue Could you please clarify from which point/date/year cards are considered "the most recent"? And therefore which ones are not recent? Thanks.

❤️❤️❤️💋💋💋💋💋💋🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Not Sonya, Freya or Tatiana ?

Well deserved for the beautiful Paola Hard 💋💋

Definitely worth it and I can't wait for her incoming shows with themed-outfits :0

Paola Hard is a 20-year-old spanish beauty, she started her career in adult modeling in 2020 and hasn't stopped touring since.

One of the things that most marked the team is her ability to adapt to all situations and all requests ...

Pornstar for other productions, she is at iStripper a goddess of seduction and sensuality ... She poses wonderfully and her youth probalby contributes to her freshness and enthusiasm.

She can just as easily embody an exuberant school girl as a femme fatale, a dominant SM, a fierce bride or a daring pastry chef ... and you are not at the end of your surprises with the 5 shows not released yet...:)

If we had to blame her for something, it would be her impatience :) She can't keep still and is always eager to put on a show :)

We are extremely happy to name Paola Hard our iStripper of the Month of August 2021.

Here is an overview of her shows, just for our eyes' pleasure :



And don't forget her absolutely STUNNING VR180 performances:

https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/ddce85087c8b8e61
https://www.istripper.com/vr180/detail/f992e87fa1ea9dec

Congratulations, Paola !! Looking forward to seeing you again 😍

Right @duras, thanks a bunch!

Here you are - it's Morgane from years ago - she made 9 shows in 2008/9
For while I thought looked like Chiara - she also made six shows back in 2008
Both just 19/20 years old back then - Chiara still active it seems, Morgane retired in 2012.
---
Well done @duras 👍 - my thought about Chiara held me up - they could almost be sisters 😄

Yes, it's Morgane, one of the best models ever.

Anyone know who is this? Saw her in another post on this forum but have no idea if she is on iStripper.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/29408/65?post=719909
Update added FG117A
re-download required..
https://scenes.virtuastripper.net/ET_FractalGarden117.zip
zip size 14.0 Kb
@WA @EricTotem et al
@TheEmu following your comments about animations above, & in
a quest to restore a better frame rate for the model, we made
experiments further with FG117 calling it FG117A

• eliminated animations of the clipsprite and camera,
• made common the resolutions of camera, quad & clipsprite, .. then
• reverted the Sandbox735004Mod01 shader to its 'original' GLSLSandbox e#73500.4 speed via

#define time u_Elapsed*(-1.0)

This looks to have corrected the stilted movements of the model, seen in the first shader mod version.

I did also try a few spins and made a comment on another thread, but at only 1 credit per spin it will take a very, very long time to fill the bar, unless you do also buy some of the selections. I'm waiting for the scratch card game next week to start my progress.
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/48230/1?post=720589

I don’t know how the chances are this time, but from 10 draws I never really got any seriously better discount than 20 percent (most of them were 10%), and all of them mostly ugly cards I didn’t like (maybe would have taken them with MUCH better discounts, or maybe I should have bought some of them to get better discounts). Kind of honestly de-motivates me. Last times (someone might remember that I praised this promotion some time ago) were definitely better :( I mean, even the Slot Machine recently at least showed me 25% every 3rd try or so, or I even got my credits back. Guess I’ll stick to buying new numbers I’m interested in or waiting for the rare cashback offers, obviously the only true interesting promotions meanwhile.

Maya Grand in July 2015 was apparently the Iron Lady - looking lovely in her strapless dress.

I'm at 4636. Getting there...

@cxsn , @HansSachs , me and others just want to know the reason why no previews for SECs on the app - that's all. Not interested at all in the chat about testing - should start a new thread for that if there is more to say.

Dans mon premier post, j'ai juste relater que sur la fin 2018, les SECs arrivaient sur le carroussel et que l'on pouvait uniquement y télécharger les démos. Et que dans la foulée (quelques jours peut-être) il y avait à faire une mise à jour du logiciel recommandée par iStripper. Et qu'à la suite de cette mise à niveau de l'application PLUS DE PREVIEW DE SEC!!! Le spectacle était terminé.

Entre nous:
On se fiche totalement des phases de développement du logiciel, ils ont juste adapté leur code pour que ce dernier bloque les SECs au niveau du carroussel et des previews, pointbarre. Et la génèse de tout ceci est purement commerciale.

P.S.
Perso, je repecte le business privé d'iStripper avec ses règles de fonctionnement, mais ici bloquer des previews, je trouve cela "PAS BIEN DU TOUT".😆

In my first post, I just related that on the end of 2018, the SECs were arriving on the carousel and that you could only download the demos there. And that in the wake (a few days maybe) there was to be a software update recommended by iStripper. And that following this upgrade of the application NO MORE SEC PREVIEW!!! The show was over.

Just between us:
Who cares about the development phases of the software, they just adapted their code to make it block SECs at the carousel and preview level, full stop. And the genesis of all this is purely commercial.

P.S.
Personally, I respect iStripper's private business with its rules of operation, but here blocking previews, I find it "NOT GOOD AT ALL".😆

"Hello, I have over 4979 cards what to do to receive Special Event cards, all the games like the wheel of Bargain I can't enter."

@1BlackKnight

Maybe ask here for help if the game is not working.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/48221/1?post=720500

I have 4973 cards but my name isn't there. Is the ranking for premium members only?

No, Premium does not come into play.

What does count towards the total are currently available cards - so in your total you must have some cards no longer available because I can see in your account that there are still 24 current cards that are not in your collection.

I have 4973 cards but my name isn't there. Is the ranking for premium members only?

@stefnev1

As far as I am concerned "the topic" is whatever the users are discussing irrespective of what the original title of the thread may be. It should not be up to any individual to decide to shut down a thread becaise they think it has wandered.

We're way off the original topic

I've written that two posts above.
Please, come back on topic, or I will close it.
Thank you.

@TheEmu

It is less clear that there should always be a separate test phase - testing should be part of all the phases - though it is clear that it should be done and often there will be two or more phases dedicated to testing.

I also have spent about 40 years struggling to get the importance of testing properly acknowledged - mostly to get that importance recognised as part of the requirements phases rather than as an "add-on" extra phase at the end. Ironically, considering Sexy3DBoy's NASA comment, this was mostly in respect to ESA and NASA projects and they were both quite poor at it compared with what I had been used to previously.

We're way off the original topic, but I can't help chiming in. This has been a hot issue for me for about the same length of time. I'd phrase it a bit differently. Instead of testing, I prefer to talk about Quality Assurance. Testing is a form of Quality Control and Quality Control is part of Quality Assurance. The Six Sigma community believes that with enough quality assurance at the front end you can eliminate testing at the back. Although I don't buy that completely they have a point.

I have been convinced for a long time that testing is an inefficiently use of quality resources. I think peer reviews of requirements and designs are much more effective for finding significant problems. These days I do mostly enterprise level requirements work. From personal experience, the quality of my work products is directly proportional to the amount of peer reviews I can get from my collegues. I also know that the most significant problems I've detected in other people's work has been from review of their designs.

Here is a favorite quote of mine from Componsit/Structure Design by Glenford Myers, 1978, page 2:

"Programmers spend the majority of their time correcting their mistakes.

"Moreover they never finish. Examinations of typical programming projects will show that, over the dduration of the project, programmers spend over 50% of their working hours looking for and correcting their mistakes. The usual "solution" to this is remarkable. We try to solve the problem by rushing through the design process so that enough time is left at the end of the project to uncover the errors the were made because we rushed through the design process."

40+ years later and we still work this way.

This Hall of Fame there were 4970 cards in the Store
August has 31 days, so the next Hall of Fame should be 5002 cards
31 regular cards and one SEC, if the one SEC per month is followed.

So the Team has the entire month of August to finalize any plans they have for the 5000 Achievement badge.

Many Members have already reached 5000 cards in their collection, but this includes cards no longer for sale that are not in the store.
So as far as the Hall of Fame goes, it is as of yet, not an Official 5000 cards from the store.

Oui, vous voyez cette info sur la page de rechargement, comme le signale @wrightsayswow.
Je viens également de le remarquer car cette info n'apparait que si vous utiliser la méthode de recharge sur la page web.
Malheureusement l'info n'apparait pas si vous utiliser l'application !!😲

Yes, you see this info on the reload page, as @wrightsayswow reports.
I also just noticed it because this info only appears if you use the reload method on the web page.
Unfortunately the info does not appear if you use the application !! 😲

Oh well 30 cards to go to 5000.

5000 cards is a great course on iStripper. Unfortunately this step does not give any benefits or rewards. Not even an additional success (achievement) Sad 😭

To be honest for me it was just a bit of fun getting there.😎

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46546/1?post=719741

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/46546/2?post=720392

Eh bien 30 cartes pour passer à 5000.

[citation] 5000 cartes est un excellent cours sur iStripper. Malheureusement, cette étape ne donne aucun avantage ou récompense. Même pas un succès supplémentaire (réalisation) Triste 😭[/quote]

Pour être honnête pour moi, c'était juste un peu amusant d'y arriver.😎

On the page where you buy the credits it gives the time in Paris (11am / UTC +2) - you'll have to adjust for your time zone and note @Philours advice.

And why we cannot see the previews of the SEC, only Totem has the answer. So, I propose to wait and see if the team will write a response to that point.

It's not the first time I asked such question... I am still waiting...

Unfortunately this step does not give any benefits or rewards.

With now more members getting to this level, perhaps that will soon change?

That's a relief 👍 we don't want the lovely ladies ***** themselves 😊

@WSW no worries..., there is a safety net ~ we rendered it invisible 😉

Interesting analysis gentlemen, but we are now far from the original topic. And why we cannot see the previews of the SEC, only Totem has the answer. So, I propose to wait and see if the team will write a response to that point.
Have a nice day 😎

@EverthangForever I like the FractalGarden117 and 118 - thanks for those 👍
117 for the pole dances and 118 for swings. Hope those girls on the swing don't mind heights 😄

@pickle1

No I did not forget it, I just didn't mention it. I said that there are always at least the three phases I mentioned - this being almost obvious to almost everyone, when pointed out, even for trivial cases such as

print "Hello world!"

It is less clear that there should always be a separate test phase - testing should be part of all the phases - though it is clear that it should be done and often there will be two or more phases dedicated to testing.

I also have spent about 40 years struggling to get the importance of testing properly acknowledged - mostly to get that importance recognised as part of the requirements phases rather than as an "add-on" extra phase at the end. Ironically, considering Sexy3DBoy's NASA comment, this was mostly in respect to ESA and NASA projects and they were both quite poor at it compared with what I had been used to previously.

During that time I have also struggled to get the importance of putting extra effort into the very early phases - those that precede the software requirements phase - in order to determine what the real user requirements are rather than what they say they are (unfortunately that requires extra work from the users which is hard to get). All too often the user requirements we got were rather vague.

Oh well 30 cards to go to 5000.

5000 cartes est un sacré beau parcours sur iStripper. Malheureusement cette étape ne donne aucun avantage ni récompense. Même pas un succès supplémentaire (réalisation) Triste 😭

[quote] Oh well 30 cards to go to 5000. [/ quote]

5000 cards is a great course on iStripper. Unfortunately this step does not give any benefits or rewards. Not even an additional success (achievement) Sad 😭

.Even the most informal software development (which the iStripper development is not) has at least the three stages of requirements, design and implementation - even if it is only a single person writing a very small program for their own use he or she will ask themselves "what do I want the program to do" (requirements), "how should it do it" (design) and "what code do I need to write for it to do that" (implementation).

Typical - you forgot the fourth stage - testing to ensure that the code met the requirements.

I spent damned near 40 years in IT fighting that battle!

Climbing so far so good, up to #8, which suprised me. Jokers seem to be very hard to collect. Gift cards are easier but still expensive. Oh well 30 cards to go to 5000.

Vendredi 6 aoûtJusqu'au prochain TGIF Until the next TGIF

Soyez prudent, n'attendez pas le dernier moment!
Be careful, don't wait until the last moment!

Vendredi 6 août

Jusqu'au prochain TGIF Until the next TGIF

J'essaie d'en arriver au point où je peux avoir une *****ée entière d'iStripper "gratuitement" pour ainsi dire (c'est-à-dire sans dépenser de crédits).

Cela n'arrivera jamais. Totem trouvera toujours un moyen de me faire dépenser😊

Ha O.K. @Number6, c'est une idée 😊 Vous pourriez y arriver ! Si les spectacles VR vous intéressent, ils sont toujours payants. Une idée serait qu'ils soient échangeables avec des cartes cadeaux (Pourquoi pas?). Quand aux ventes aux enchères...Peu de solutions existent pour vous 😢.
Bonne chance alors 😎😊

[quote] I'm trying to get to the point where I can have an entire year of iStripper "for free" so to speak (ie without spending credits).

That will never happen. Totem will always find a way to make me spend😊 [/ quote]

Ha O.K. @Number6, that's an idea 😊 You could do it! If VR shows interest you, they always pay off. One idea would be for them to be redeemable with gift cards (Why not?). When at auctions ... Few solutions exist for you 😢.
Good luck then 😎😊

I am not 100% sure if I want to buy some credits at the moment... When will the extra credit deal stop?

As I wrote in another post (maybe not on the right place),

I use iStripper on my mobile
It's a good player for strip shows
Thanks to Totem for this good product

I think it could be interesting to introduce augmented reality in it by being possible to use the camera of the mobile to associate the show with our real environment. With this the camera of the mobile could take the picture of our room in real time and associate it to the show as a background picture. WIth this we could imagine that the show is in our home.

What do you think about that?

I could have used a wildcard,

Amazing to see the members collecting jokers. I see a few

I collect giftcards as well!😎

I am trying to get to the point where I can have a whole year of iStripper for "free" so to speak (i.e. not spend any credits).

It will never happen. Totem will always find a way to make me spend😊

J'aurais pu utiliser un caractère générique,

Incroyable de voir les membres collectionner des jokers. j'en vois quelques

Je collectionne aussi les cartes-cadeaux !😎

J'essaie d'en arriver au point où je peux avoir une *****ée entière d'iStripper "gratuitement" pour ainsi dire (c'est-à-dire sans dépenser de crédits).

Cela n'arrivera jamais. Totem trouvera toujours un moyen de me faire dépenser😊