Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Last posts - Page 307

  Forum

Bitwrangler
Joined in Apr 2021
361 post(s)

iStripper mobile | Official version - Q&A

Everything about iStripper
November 22, 2022, 221 answers
I am a bit ***** on the problem for "mobile-only" subscribers, as many of you say you are. YOU DON'T HAVE TO BUY ANY MORE CARDS TO SEE THEM. Period. You pay the fee, which is certainly much less than **I** spend here a month, and you get all the mobile cards there are- not just the ones you already own- and all the new ones Totem puts out.

So this is likely both cheaper and better for you going forward. And if the mobile service starts generating revenue, instead of just costs, I would not be surprised if Totem would speed up mobile release of the existing cards. You wouldn't mind that, yes? Because the beta mobile service NEVER gave you access to all the cards you bought. It only gave you access to the cards you bought- and ONLY the cards you bought- IF they had been converted for mobile. And that really hasn't been all that many, and the conversion process doesn't even keep up with the rate of new releases. If you want that to change, it has to generate revenue for Totem. And as the mobile library increases in size it should become a more compelling product on its own.

I mean, I am a gamer. I am not shocked when I both buy a game, and have to pay a monthly fee to play it. For a game I "own". Because I really do want to play, I pay. So maybe I am less sensitive to the issue. It wouldn't be my first sensitivity fail. But I think Totem truly did not expect all this furor over something that for most people is likely a net benefit. And very much in line with how the other major sites work- where you can either buy just a show, or buy a monthly or yearly membership and get access to all the existing and new content.

And it's how beta software works. You do a beta release for testing, to troubleshoot any issues, to see if your original design made sense, to see if there are missing features, to spin up your processes to support it, and see if there is enough interest to make it a real paying product. And if there wasn't, no matter that some people really liked it, it GOES AWAY. In this case, the original design did not make much sense- the mobile site only gave you access to the portion of the converted collection that you already had bought. Which was different for each user, and had to be customized for each user. It could not be used to introduce new users to the product. In the production version each paying user gets exactly the same access, and for almost everyone it is MORE access- much simpler to manage and better.

So everyone has a choice. You can see all the mobile releases for a monthly fee, or you can access ALL the cards, mobile-released or not, by buying each of them and viewing them in the app. Which is ***** expensive. Yes, if you want to do both, it will now cost even more. I think options are good, and I think being able to access the mobile content for a pretty low monthly fee gives quite a good introduction to the product for a new user without requiring the large investment that any significant number of cards for the app requires.
orclover
Joined in Jun 2012
1403 post(s)

A Quality Product

Everything about iStripper
November 21, 2022, 21 answers
I just wanted to comment on something I am noticing- the Totem production team is really, really good. It's not just that most of the girls here look happier than they do anywhere else. It's not just that the lighting and camera work is great. Or that you have picked some great outfits. Or even that you are shooting and have shot some fabulously attractive girls. But I am struck by the fact that someone there is doing a spectacular job with makeup these days. The girls not only look happier on iStripper but they look BETTER than they do elsewhere. Please keep it up with that natural look. Because you are making these girls look like GODDESSES.

Now if I could convince you guys to show off these lovely girls with a more balanced proportion of regular cards instead of 80% XXX, (come on, would it be so hard to do TWO normal cards out of a five card set instead of just one?) I would be even happier. Because iStripper ROCKS.

One reason the girls may be happier is they don't have to dance for 5-6 hours in a two day period. The xxx allows a table routine, with some orgasms, and keeps girls off their feet and doing routines that may be exhausting, difficult, and may produce insecurity. Totem seems to like a costume card that provides a role play opportunity, a xxx table routine, a card that only has pole with xxx, a mixed card and a non-xxx card that contains a focus on dance moves such as twerking or real dance. This menu allows cards to be varied and keeps girls from getting bored or appearing stale, which was a problem when most cards were non-xxx.