@goodwolf agreed

@TheEmu

Or rename it by adding a X (or something) to the end of its extension (file type)

Yes, that works. I should have thought of that..
Silly Me...
😧

Find and Rename that image, by adding an X to the beginning of it's name.

Or rename it by adding a X (or something) to the end of its extension (file type) so that it is no longer recognised as an image file. That works even when the scene is picking images at random from a folder.

That's near a million dollars and the average user 862000/1445= 600 dollars. Who said anything abt. recession ? I am here for silent observation where this goes. Good luck for the investors !

There is an Exception to this:

How to hide any image in a Scene File without editing the scene code..

1.) You might have to Examine the Scene code,
so you know what folder and what the name of the image is you want to hide.
2.) Find and Rename that image, by adding an X to the beginning of it's name.

Done.

If the Image is part of a folder, where the image is selected by the scene at random.
Then even renaming an Image, will not hide it from being used.

In this case / exception
you will have to Move the Image to a different folder:
1.) Create a new folder in the Scene Folder, maybe call it Backup.
2.) Move the Image from where it is originally, to this New Backup Folder.

You can Move it back then if you again want to see it.

There has been a bit of discussion ongoing about attribution
and the removal of Images and or removal of attribution comments from within a Scene File.

Once you have a scene downloaded to your own PC
you are free to make any changes to that scene you want.
As longs as you Don't upload or reshare it WITHOUT proper Permission.
It is only on your OWN PC, so you can make any change you want to it.

Once you have a scene downloaded to your own PC
If you want to hide an Image so it's not displayed
you can try the following.

How to hide any image in a Scene File without editing the scene code..

1.) You might have to Examine the Scene code,
so you know what folder and what the name of the image is you want to hide.
2.) Find and Rename that image, by adding an X to the beginning of it's name.

Done.

To Unhide an image you hid

1). Rename the Image back to it's original name by removing the X from it.

Done.

The Scene Code does not have to be Edited.
All you are doing is hiding the Image from the scene.
Since the Image isn't found by the Scene, it is not displayed by the scene.

You can also rename shader files, to hide the use of that shader.

This can be used to help troubleshoot a Scene
or just change the scene for your own Personal Enjoyment on your Own PC.
again
Once you have a scene downloaded to your own PC
you are free to make any changes to that scene you want
for your own personal enjoyment.

For this Dolz project is that $862k raised in USD?

USD, yes

The 10% bonus credits offer will have the same behaviour as the 20% reload bonus on iStripper, it is not supposed to be permanent. We put it online to celebrate the listing of the Dolz token, but it will regularly come and go.
When concomitant with another promo, it will be cumulative :)

If I add images then they get scaled or stretched

If you check the Existing Image used by the scene
you can Discover it's size in Height and Width,
But more importantly, it's size Ratio
is the ratio 4:3 or 16:9 or 16:10

examples of Ratio and Size
https://www.parts-people.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ScreenSizes.png

Now that you know the Ratio of the existing image
you can edit your own images so they are the same Ratio
or even edit them so they have the same Height and Width as the existing images.

Some of your custom images might only have to be Cropped to result in the correct Ratio
or Some might need to have a boarder added to make it the correct Ratio

And if you want to dive deeper into the scene itself.
Each time an Image is used in the Scene
there is a Size and or a Scale command
that changes how the image is displayed on Screen.

But the easiest way to change the background image is:
Use a custom image that is the same Size and same Ratio as the existing image.
Then you will not have any Scaling or Stretching issues.

Hope this helps.

Dive in and explore what you can do..

Visit this thread to ask more questions about scenes
https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/27449/1

Is the ten percent discounf on top of existing member and time based discounts and bonus promotions discounts when purchasing credits? If not can one simply use dolz tokens to purchase cards directly and not go through that extra step which sems suprtfluous.

For this Dolz project is that $862k raised in USD?

Maybe Totem should consider setting up user created tags, I think Steam does this?

Basically create a bunch of potential tags and let users pick them for each card, the most popular picks appear at the top of the list/in bold.

They should also be seperated from tags selected by Totem/QA.

You could add a symbol like premium members get for frequent taggers or some other small benefit.

@Calgon, even the logo you are using isnt even yours.

https://www.pngitem.com/middle/hmmbowm_letra-x-png-efeito-fogo-transparent-png/

"Image License: Personal Use Only"


Edit:- I have found other copies of this image on other sites so i realise you might not have obtained it from the linked site, however if i restrict the google search to images with a creative commons licence they all dissapear.

@Vereena Hi, If you want to add your own images, please check this thread :

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/27410/6

wonderful ❤️

@Calgon, The issue is that you edited someone elses code(moved the atribution, the default program i use is just a small window so it looked like it had been removed because the fragment code starts right after your atrib, but as you have explained you dont know protocol, now you do.) and ***** when your scene was edited. That is hypocritical at the least. If they had reuploaded your scene and removed your logo or used your scene in an affiliate video without credit those would be an issue, but they didnt, its for use on their computer. Get over yourself.

Merci 👍 Et bien on dirait que tout cela commence a se mettre en place. 👌

oui pardon : https://opensea.io/collection/dolz-istripper

Merci pour les infos celine 👍
La page Opensea est-elle déjà accessible et dans ce cas pourriez vous fournir un lien? Merci 😊

We're all ears about https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/52225/1

Thanks @titiii and @TheEmu - I'm using paint.net. I'll look for an equivalent.

If I add images then they get scaled or stretched and look weird and there is no setting to prevent that.

is there some technique you used to get the edges so crisp ?

For the mask edges, when my selection is done, i always apply a Selection/Modify/Smooth Selection before delete unwanted parts

I do the same, except that as I am using Gimp the names are different (the term "feathering" is used). Strictly speaking it actually makes the edges less crisp but at the same time makes them much less jagged. In a few cases I manually apply blurring to a small region at the edges of the mask.

For the mask edges, when my selection is done, i always apply a Selection/Modify/Smooth Selection before delete unwanted parts (the minimum = 0.5 pixels).
I'm glad you like those scenes 😄

@titiii

some futurist scenes...

Thanks for sharing these. Some great work there 👍Love the foreground perspective on cyb77_trash01, the background yacht on beach2020_sand1 .... the reversed swing to solve the problems of where swings end. On beach2020_fruits the edges of the foreground fruit are perfect - is there some technique you used to get the edges so crisp ? All very polished scenes 👍

@titiii
Merci pour la mise à jour 👌 Et oui, 2 ans c'est long! Donc si tu as quelques trucs à ajouter, n'hésites surtout pas 👍😄

Ah oui, c'est pas faux, j'ai updaté le fichier avec les préfixes titiii_, il y a trop longtemps que je n'avais pas partagé de scènes...
Pas de mises à jour depuis 2 ans, mais je n'exclu pas d'ajouter des scènes que je n'avais pas partagé jusqu'alors.
Content que ça vous plaise.

You're right > files updated with the correct prefix, thanks for the feedback.

Thanks a lot @titiii

There were already several scenes that I had in your pack, which I don't think there were any updates. If I am wrong please correct me.

However, I didn't have cyberpunk. It's a pity that the cyberpunk scenes don't start with titiii like the others, because it makes it easier to identify the authors and to group the scenes in the same place.

Thanks for your beautiful work. 😊


Merci beaucoup @titiii

Il y avait déjà plusieurs scènes que j'avais dans votre pack, dont je ne crois pas qu'il y avait de mises à jour. Si je me trompe corrigez-moi.

Par contre, je n'avais pas cyberpunk. Dommage que les scène de cyberpunk ne commencent pas par titiii comme les autres, car cela facilte l'identification des auteurs et regroupe les scènes au même endroit.

Merci pour votre beau travail. 😊

some futurist scenes...

https://mega.nz/folder/8doXEBza#Q9mC0oU0r6Net2ZTjIm1Jg

A well dereved win for this super hottie! 🔥💖😍

@Z22

I have already been through the attributions that you were ***** about in relation to Coastal scene. Now you seem to be having a poke at the Feathers scene again.

I'm not going to get drawn into an endless cicular debate. You have ***** that I did not provide attributions when actually I did, now you are ***** that the attributions are not where you want them to be.

It is not my problem if you do not read something properly before you start *****. I referred you to the cc license that shadertoy uses by default.

We already covered this:

You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

It also states this:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

"In any reasonable manner" being the key point.

I have placed a link at the top of the shader to the URL on shadertoy where the original code was and in doing so anyone can see for themselves that there are no specific restrictions on the original shader. By extension the new code is on the same cc license as shadertoys default here:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.en_US

Placing further attributiuons next to the code to which they relate is a perfectly reasonable way to display it especially when the final product has different functionality than the original. Where code comes from multiple authors this is a simple and effective way to make clear exactly who developed what and it also doubles as a record of changes. There are many many other shaders on shadertoy that place their attributions like this, scattered throughout the code so if you still have an issue with this practise please could you take it up with the shadertoy community rather than just me. Nowhere in the cc license does it state that the original header must not be altered or moved, that is something that the author would need to have specified when they released their code.

The original shader had just one "plane" of output on a black background, my version allows for the shader to be called from the scene file to create as many planes as the user wants on a transparent background and thereby allowing for the creation of a foreground and a background around the model. I also adjusted the coordinate system to allow for the positioning of each plane so that I could reduce the number of feathers crossing in front of the models face and also allowed for changes to the number of feathers painted on each plane. That is all to say.... it is not the same shader as that from which it was derived.

You will even find on line 148 of feathers the following:

// Remove alpha wherever the background is black @TheEmu and @Z22
col.a = smoothstep(0.0, 0.01, col.r);

...an attribution to yours and @TheEmu providing a more elegant piece of code than the "functional but ugly" one that I had written.

You have written quite a lot on this forum about my scenes but as far as I am concerned, this is incorrect:

if there is already an atributiuon you are not supposed to edit it at all. You did, that was the problem

and nor is this:

Previously i have told calgon not to remove the original attribution on shaders

My code might be messy and not follow what others regard as best practise but I have made no attempt to remove fair and reasonable attribution of other peoples work and have complied with the cc license.

I sincerely hope that this is now finally the end of this matter.

👍

Sonya Blaze - Are You Bad Enough ? - f1225 - iStripper XXX
Mia Nix - Black Widow’s Web - f1202 - iStripper XXX
Lana Lane - Splash Zone - e1805 - iStripper
Felice - Beddy Byes Time - f1208 - iStripper XXX
Kelly Collins - Party Pink - f1236 - iStripper XXX
Christal - Midnight Moves - e1820 - iStripper
Any Moloko - The Queen Of Denial - f1224 - iStripper XXX

In older past versions of the App,
One could make an Edit to the Cards XML file in that Cards Data folder,
to make a custom Tag for that Card.

While these edits can still be made to the XML files.
They are No Longer Used by the App.

Tags have their own database,
as well as All of the cards Data used by the App is included in Two or Three of the .CDS files.
So the Data in the Individual XML files for each Card, are no longer used by the app.
Instead all of the Data for all of the cards are collectively stored in one Database created from a collection of CDS files.

If one were to include the Other Clothed Pantyless options where Pants, Slacks , Shorts, or Body Suits are worn without panties underneath,
then there should be add the UpSkirt tag as well.
UpSkirt would be used along with Pantyless on Skirts and Dresses, where one catches a view of the Pantyless Privates.

If we talk about models wanting to get their stuff out of iStripper, I do understand this mentality IF you have done your career very young and for a short time. Crissy Moran doesn't seem to fit into this category.

As an example, ***** O'Fee. It seems to me that she was in the business for a very short time when she was 18-19 years of age. I can understand her desire to "take it all back". She was young, did arguably a bad decision for herself and later wanted to forget all about it. Totem did the right thing to grant her her wish to take all the shows off the air - and e.g. at indexxx.com her entries have been removed.

But for Crissy Moran... she was in the business for years and years and years, it's different. Of course she could request her contributions to be taken off everywhere, but I believe she herself knows full well that it's a fool's errand. Too late for her and too much exposure. She had many years to think about whether she should be doing what she was doing. For ***** O'Fee, and many other models like her, it's one or a couple bad (in retrospect) decisions in very short time.

For me this tag would only apply if it were dresses or skirts. All the other variations I would not consider as the perhaps traditional pantyless view.

That is one of the reasons why if a tag covering this were to be introduced I would much prefer the positive form "panties" rather than the negative "pantiless". It is clearer as to what is meant by the tag and can be used in conjunction with other tags to focus in on more specific predelictions.

Moi aussi je vais faire retirer du net toutes les photos et vidéos de ma personne où je pourrais être dans une situation "non voulue" et que la morale réprouve.😎

Easter bunny:

https://www.miccostumes.com/KDA-Seraphine-Cosplay-Costume-with-Bunny-Ear-Hairband-Bunny-Girl-Bodysuit-with-Tail-Necklace-162131p.html
Seraphine cosplay costume with bunny ears headband 😀

...how can they think that all of this will disappear permanently.

Yeah crazy idea. 😆
Once on the internet its not going away ever. 😆

I mostly look for girls wearing dresses or skirts ...

For me this tag would only apply if it were dresses or skirts. All the other variations I would not consider as the perhaps traditional pantyless view. Just shows how different we all view all these ever increasing number of tags.

Or Gamora from Guardians of the Galaxy

I note that some VR porn sites do a lot of cosplay, naming the characters and/or fandom, referring to them as parodies. Some of these videos are a few years old, suggesting they have not had significant copyright issues.

I also have a theory that most of these mainstream movie producers don't really want to get involved in a public fight with porn companies, as it would then associate them with porn (even if unintentional). It also publicises the porn company even more.

Also one can use 'code' to show the linkset as plain text.
Such as this:

[linkset]f1215[/linkset]

My approach to find out if a show might be pantyless is to look at the photoset. If she is wearing panties in photos she probably also does that in the clips.
btw to get the card pic to show here like in my previous post i wrote
[linkset] f1215 [/linkset]
Blanks added to make the tags visible.

I see the "Clemence is a beauty" comment too.

You can try this which allows the use and sharing of custom tags. (I never learned how to do that bit.😕)

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44539/2?post=662733

You may need this to run it, it's a sort of install and forget kind of thing. (I know I did. 😄)

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44539/2?post=682708

For problems, solutions, or questions you can ask him here.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/44543/5?post=744841

Hm looks like i missed out on that discussion.
Well i also think that this could be a group effort to collect the shows that deserve a certain tag.
Then we just need someone who has the software to add a tag to a show.



@sjaakie: Thanks for your additions... well some of them i wouldn't have considered to be pantyless because if you add shows that have some clips where panties are not worn or removed first then this list will become pretty big. I mostly look for girls wearing dresses or skirts but yeah no panties under body suits or shorts can also be found and should also count as pantyless in my opinion.

@ComteDracula, thank you!
So comments on cards stay (at least if owned).
But comments on VR shows do not.

I find it curious that people think they can leave no trace once they are on the internet.

There will always be someone who will have photos and videos, and who might put them back online somewhere.

When an adult person has voluntarily made about 50 adult films, how can they think that all of this will disappear permanently.

I've never been on the Dark Web, but there must be a lot of forbidden material on the regular net.

There is naivety in that.


Je trouve curieux que des gens puissent penser qu'il peuvent ne plus laisser aucune trace une fois sur internet.

Il va toujours y avoir quelqu'un qui va avoir des photos et vidéos, et qui risque de les mettre à nouveau en ligne quelquepart.

Quand une personne adiulte a fait de son plein gré une cinquantaine de films pour adulte, comment peut-elle s'imaginer que tout cela va disparaître de façon définitive.

Je n'ai jamais été sur le Dark Web, mais il doit y avoir pas mal de matériel interdit sur le net régulier.

Il y a de la naïveté dans cela.

I see this.

JonC001 1 hour ago
Clemence is a beauty.

Looking in the search for VR shows on the mobile version, I notice that the names do not match the images.

https://mobile.istripper.com/vr180


Je vois ceci.

JonC001 1 hour ago
Clemence is a beauty.

En regardant dans la recherche des shows VR sur la version mobile, je remarque que les noms ne corrrespondent pas aux images.

https://mobile.istripper.com/vr180