There are many that agree, but the ones that don't speak louder. we all have our opinions on the subject. Let's just leave things at what was said before. The clip in question was an obscured side shot that was not 100 conclusive that there was insertion, but, despite that, there is the arguement that it still qualifies as use of a toy. My feeling toward it is the level of explicitness should not be hampered (what would be the purpose of the very explicit option then), but if Totem didn't want toys used in this product, then they should be left out. I can agree with protests against something that wasn't supposed to happen. I just don't think the following shows should have to pay the price.
It almost reminds me of the superbowl fiasco. One incident on live tv, and all media gets edgy on content.