Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Últimos mensajes - Página 723

  Foro

TheEmu
Desde en Jul 2012
7424 posts

piercings

Todo sobre iStripper
August 20, 2020, 25 respuestas
@Philours

Yes, it would be better if the trhreads titles better reflected their content. But, unfortunately, natural conversations (which these forum discussions resemble) do not behave that way and wander all over the place. If the participants in a thread are happy to see it wander then that is fine by me, if particpants object and ask for off topic discussions be moved elsewhere that is also fine.

As I said previously the problem is that the forum software does not, in my opinion, provide a good match to the ways in which the participants want to use the forums. There are much better ways of handling this sort of thing, for example the software used by a site that I read every day

https://www.realworldtech.com/forum/?roomid=1

This organises posts in a tree rather than a set of simple lnear threads. Rather than a posts just being appended to the end of a thread they are replys to some particular post. You can then view them sorted by time, or subject, or as a tree structure. In each of these cases you can limit the display to show you only posts from a range of dates and to highlight those that are most recent and those that you have already read. Because it allows you to give a new title to a post you can see when the subject is changed but still have visibility of what the post was replying to. This allows you to easily follow individual sub-threads whether they be on or off topic. I find this to be much more useful way of organising a discussion forum.