Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
I am 18+ or older - Enter
I am under 18 - Exit
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.

Últimos mensajes - Página 1835

  Foro

Loquacious
Desde en Aug 2014
3 posts

Should we refer to models rather than girls?

Todo sobre iStripper
November 7, 2014, 61 respuestas
The3LeggedMan: "Women like to be reminded of their youth and beauty and femininity, and "girl" captures all that."

Apasas: "To suggest that conventional use the word girl can in some way suggest anything inappropriate is ridiculous."

I believe that there are contexts where calling someone a girl can, indeed, be inappropriate and have other meanings than youth and beauty. Moreover, calling someone a girl might draw attention to their youth and beauty when it is not appropriate. Again, any office context can be highly applicable for this scenario: an employer calls an employee a girl, seeing no problem with her/his use of the word. The employee gets offended, because she does not want to be thought of as a girl (feeling that it belittles her or her achievements, for example).

I believe feowertig makes a similar point, indicating that any word (e.g. model) can be problematic. That is, 'girl' is not automatically problematic and 'model' is not automatically unproblematic. Respectful and professional language use often goes beyond single words, though even a single word can alter how a message is perceived. Of course, there are multiple interpretations about what respectful and professional language use actually is.

Considering the client's desktop settings specifically:

"Maximum girls"
"Girls' name" (Girl's name or girls' names?)

"Maximum models"
"Model's name"

In this very limited context, I do not feel that using 'girl' is in any manner demeaning, although I am not sure if it is flirty or inviting either. In the larger context of language use throughout the software and the home page, I think using 'model' might still be more respectful. I would correlate a model with a consenting adult who has professional knowledge, as opposed to a young thing that just happened in front of the camera. Having watched a fair share of shows, I can tell that these models seem know what they are doing. Naturally, a lot depends on what sort of message you want to convey and there may be listeners/viewers who will receive the message in a way you did not intend.
feowertig
Desde en Jun 2013
26 posts

Should we refer to models rather than girls?

Todo sobre iStripper
November 7, 2014, 61 respuestas
If one wants to avoid language issues as much as possible and with different language issues internationally, than substitute girls and possible other terms by their product name, as already mostly is in the forum.

The history of language teaches that many things can be done with words, to 'raise' or 'lower' relative in social interaction, although one could question if such really is as 'perceived to be'.
Treat another as you yourself would want to be treated mindthought, although socially in the activity of tease other social standards for us to see here are often used and outside of such they are referred to as models in casting here, although, as is in general, marketing and business are implied. But if one would want people to be teased, why would one use the term model in such activity?

In 'there is no I in we' for example, this goes both ways as well, as we can be socially engaged and we can be led by social socalled standards and it can also be used to personify and depersonify, as in are you only your gender, job or status? Within such one finds meaning and demeaning, although one step from the person, the core. To know oneself and to define oneself, but a model can just as well be an object or a puppet and an actor can imply acting and what a show or performance should enfold can be debatable, similar to what art is and who can be called an artist is, although widely accepted socially or economically.

As for 'enforced' socalled standards, cosmetic surgery was originally intended for dire need and media screwed many things up with cosmetics in my opinion as people are trying to live up to images which most of them aren't even real to begin with, although I have now diverted to personal rambling, people must do what pleases them, just hopefully not loose themselves in such process.

Terms used to define oneself aren't as important as the people being defined by them, not to forget that the term girls has also been used as empowerment as well. In the activity of teasing and intimacy even boy can be used in a positive sense and history has also known quite a few feminine uprisals and I do understand why one would desire alternative terms for demeaning interpretations of such through time, but by whom or by what would one rather be teased comes to mind.

As for terminology in settings and sites, the term model could also be used, might explain the small price increase ;) Oddly enough is that the term model actually sounds more demeaning as a person to me, media screwed that image up for me.

As for VirtuaGirl, any more options on shows a la Burlesque or GoGo Dancers, max is ten, I see possibilities for a Moulin Rouge show or some good feather dances :)
Loquacious
Desde en Aug 2014
3 posts

Should we refer to models rather than girls?

Todo sobre iStripper
November 6, 2014, 61 respuestas
(2/2)

In the first examples, why is the person - either Matthew or Selma - not fit to handle your finances? Does calling the person a man or a boy, a woman or a girl alter your perception of their experience? Personally, I think that calling someone a girl or a boy in a sentence where they are not able to do something well calls attention to their relative inexperience/lack of knowledge. Feel free to think of other examples, too. Consider the two examples about respect as well. Do you perceive a difference? What if it was you? How would you feel if your boss said this to you after you finished a particularly demanding task:

"You are a talented girl."
"You are a talented woman."

"You are a talented boy."
"You are a talented man."

Ultimately, context is also important. I think you would be perceived poorly if you were to call your secretary a boy or a girl. In an office setting, you would be expected to respect your employees and co-workers and that respect should be apparent in the language you use. Obviously, we are not in an office setting here. Indeed, I am confident that you could easily continue calling your performers girls as well, though personally I would advise against it. It is, ultimately, a political decision - outlining a policy, so to speak. I am afraid that this issue is closely tied to a very powerful debate about how men and women should be perceived in various settings. That being the case, this may be a problem that you cannot solve by appeasing everyone - whatever you do, someone is going to have a political agenda or follow an ideology that is opposed to your decision.


EDIT:

It might be helpful to consider the words in a relevant context. Compare the original with a revised version, taken from VG Q&A:

Q: Where are the girls from?
A: Most of our models are coming from eastern Europe. As you'll see browsing our website, young girls are beautiful over there.
We also produce American girls from time to time in order to bring you the best of both worlds. Famous models as Sunny Leone, Aria Giovanni… also contributed to make our software unique (If you never experienced Crissy Moran half naked waking you in the morning, you don't know half of what computers have been made for...)

***

Q: Where are the models from?
A: Most of our models come from eastern Europe. As you'll see browsing our website, young women are beautiful over there.
We also produce American models from time to time in order to bring you the best of both worlds. Famous models like Sunny Leone, Aria Giovanni and more have also contributed to make our software unique. If you have never experienced Crissy Moran - half-naked - waking you up in the morning, you don't even know the half of what computers were made for.

Could also say "We also feature some models from across the globe to bring you the best the world has to offer." Of course, you have to consider whether the wording is true in that case. Certainly the focus on women from eastern Europe is apparent. Note slight revisions in grammar and wording in addition to the girl/model issue.
Loquacious
Desde en Aug 2014
3 posts

Should we refer to models rather than girls?

Todo sobre iStripper
November 6, 2014, 61 respuestas
(1/2)

As you can probably summarize from the responses so far, 'models' seems to convey more respect and professionalism than 'girls'. Of course, like all the opinions above, mine is simply a personal view on the matter. Speaking as a linguist, I can state fairly confidently that language is what we make it be - but also what it has been in the past. For instance, when I think of 'a girl', I associate the concept with: 1) children 2) women who are not afforded respect as fellow adults. I base this knowledge on how I have seen the word being used in my personal past, within the social situations that I have observed from my point of view. This is not universally true, though. Some responses here do not see any problem with calling a grown woman a girl and may not even associate the word with a lesser status or any sort of unequal power relationship. Thus, there is no absolute true answer to this question: both 'model' and 'girl' mean different things to different people and the best you can do is to gather as much data as possible and make your call based on the knowledge you have.

I understand that there is some resistance to changing language 'artificially'. Calling a woman a model does not, indeed, change how you think of that woman now if you have thought about her as a girl for years or more. Change is, in most cases, more gradual and elusive. If you indeed need to refer to performers of various sexes and genders with one term, though, 'models' would likely convey what you need with very few problems, thus affording equal status to your performers.

Oh, and there is one thing in 91hebasu's post that I agree with: you could actually ask your performers. My personal hypothesis is that some of them might find girl more flirty, but I am sure you would get as many answers as you have models. English may not be their first language, but that does not mean that they do not have valuable opinions. The same goes for you, obviously.

TL;DR bonus, about language and neutrality:

There are a few posts here, like the post by The3LeggedMan, which do not see any real difference between the two words. I agree in the sense that if you call your performers girls, very few people would truly associate them with small children first. That being said, I do think that there is a subtle difference, related to language and power (I recommend reading critical discourse analysis theory if you want to study this further). Fortunately, it is possible to inspect this difference via linguistic intervention: we can substitute one word with another and see what effect it has on the meaning of a sentence. Consider substituting 'a man' with 'a boy' when talking about a grown adult. Let's look at a few examples. Why would you not let Matthew handle your finances in the sentences below:

"Matthew is a sweet man, but I would not trust him to handle my finances."
"Matthew is a sweet boy, but I would not trust him to handle my finances."

Similarly:
"Selma is a sweet woman, but I would not trust her to handle my finances."
"Selma is a sweet girl, but I would not trust her to handle my finances."

For respect:
"Anna is my secretary. She's a talented girl."
"Anna is my secretary. She's a talented woman."

"Matthew is my secretary. He's a talented boy."
"Matthew is my secretary. He's a talented man."